Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Braodway Tower 2012.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Broadway Tower 2012.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2012 at 12:51:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by Saffron Blaze - uploaded by Saffron Blaze - nominated by Saffron Blaze -- Saffron Blaze (talk) 12:51, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support -- Saffron Blaze (talk) 12:51, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- Comment lots of dust spots in the sky and the south side of tower is a bit too shady to me. Nice composition and better than the successful present FP IMHO though. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:10, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- Done Spots gone. Thanks. Saffron Blaze (talk) 13:23, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- (weak) Support. No problem! --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:42, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
- Done Spots gone. Thanks. Saffron Blaze (talk) 13:23, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support Tomer T (talk) 14:10, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support Great composition. - A.Savin 16:24, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- Neutral I prefer the minimalism (distracting trees and background) and saturation of the current FP. This one is still very nice though (and far bigger). Vignetting should be fixed. Filename too :) - Benh (talk) 21:44, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- I took a tall step ladder with me just so I could get high enough to demonstrate why the Tower was placed where it is... the view. BTW, sorry about the file name, name is now correct. Saffron Blaze (talk) 23:58, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- "I prefer the saturation of the current FP" o.O Really? That one is very obviously oversaturated (unrealistic)... --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:42, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
- Sure but I can't help but preferring it... hope I have the right to ;), like the many people who promoted it POTY. We aren't on wikipedia FPC after all, are we ? - Benh (talk) 18:21, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
- "I prefer the saturation of the current FP" o.O Really? That one is very obviously oversaturated (unrealistic)... --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:42, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
- I took a tall step ladder with me just so I could get high enough to demonstrate why the Tower was placed where it is... the view. BTW, sorry about the file name, name is now correct. Saffron Blaze (talk) 23:58, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Katarighe (Talk) 13:57, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support Óðinn (talk) 16:46, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support Cathy Richards (talk) 19:44, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Böhringer (talk) 20:27, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:53, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Moonik (talk) 14:12, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support Great picture. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:22, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support Jkadavoor (talk) 07:59, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Pudelek (talk) 10:08, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support Big wow, the place itself is WOW. --Paolo Costa (talk) 16:33, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:57, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture