Commons:Deletion requests/File:Teresa Cheung.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Teresa Cheung.jpg

Copyright violation. I have read OTRS-ticket and it seems to be ridiculous for me. Fist of all because it is cropped version of the original on the official site. The sacond because of it:

Dear XXX,

Thank you for your response. 

I took the picture myself. I am an amateur photographer and I am used to doing self portraits with my own camera.

Please expedite my case.

Best,
Teresa Cheung

An amateur photographer doing self portraits with NIKON D70? The email has been sent from (removed mail info) so I have no doubts it was not Teresa, bur someone else. I really surprised that OTRS-staff have unscrupulous users like Natuur12 --Алый Король (talk) 06:12, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

The D70s is a mid range camera so it is not strange that a famous actress has such a camera. The pose is likely enough for a selfie. This whole DR is based on a assumption that the subject lied. Not mistaken like often happens, but lied. The crop looks like an improvement so that's not strange and the a-mail validates that we are not dealing with an imposter. Now a more serious note. It is a no go to be this impatience since you send me an email not to long ago and you didn't bothered to wait for answer. But given the fact that you published an OTRS-email, the email of a client who's privacy you violated by posting her email and you posted the first name of my alias. I wanted to respond your email today but I am glad that I didn't. Given the email you send to me you where under the impression that this is my real name. Luckily this isn't my real name since you could have easily out me if it was. I suggest we  Keep this image since accusing a client of lying requires a bit more than the camera being a D70s and her cropping the image. Natuur12 (talk) 12:58, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Natuur12, the angle is impossible for a selfie, the perspective indicate a long portrait lens that cannot possibly be held at arms length, and the is a very obvious lightning (probably a reflector from slight underneath), and make-up on the subject. The probability of this image being a selfie is above zero, but below that of hell freezing over. Rama (talk) 13:34, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

I mentioned NIKON just because it's not iphone or cellfone or something like that, have you ever met people who make selfie holding it? How it looks like? And Rama is right: the angle is impossible foe selfie. The second. I mentioned email just to let administrators know that email has been sent not from official site but some other site that dosn't have any connection to actress. The site is down, so I don't see any porblem with it. --Алый Король (talk) 14:38, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

I use a nikon D5100 to take selfies (doesn't happen often). When it comes to the email, still a privacy violation. You simply never give away the contact details of the donors, ever. There in fact is a connetction. But please give me some time to contact the donor again. This donation is from a long time ago (even from before I became an admin) so let's hope for the best. Natuur12 (talk) 15:06, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Donator mailed. Natuur12 (talk) 17:46, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

 Delete I also think that this is not a selfie. This said, publishing details of OTRS tickets here is really not OK. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:38, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Just an update. No responce yet. Natuur12 (talk) 17:15, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

I don't believe that there will be any responce so this one can be closed. Natuur12 (talk) 12:28, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

---

Deleted: Per discussion -- Geagea (talk) 12:32, 9 March 2015 (UTC)