Commons:Deletion requests/File:NikhilJassawalla.jpg
No copyright on flickr Grantkemp (talk) 03:56, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Keep passed Flickr review last year, though it's not available now. --Simonxag (talk) 21:32, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
- Kept, passed Flickr review. Thuresson (talk) 23:22, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
I took this photo and never authorized its distribution, exhibition, or any other form of release. Also, it has clearly been photoshopped (as you can see in the history). This is also something I did not authorize. I request that this photo immediately be removed. Please respect my wishes. 32.177.55.118 08:38, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
I took this photo. It was originally watermarked. It has since been photoshopped by someone and placed onto this site without my permission. It was falsely licensed, again without my permission. This violates copyright law. This is the last time I will request deletion. If you do not comply, I will take legal action and contact the press regarding wikimedia commons' failure to respect copyright law. 202.88.167.124 13:07, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
For admins, see here. --Túrelio (talk) 15:52, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Delete: We shouldn't accept every DR for reasons that copyright has changed on Flickr, but this deletion seems fine for me. From the Flickr user name ("nikhiljassawalla"), the description and the article it was once in, I assume it's a self-portrait that the person no longer wants in the Internet. This is also indicated by the fact that it's no longer on Flickr (see Simonxag's comment above) and that the subject requested deletion of the en.wikipedia article (I have no verification, but I assume it's made by the same user as the uploader). It seems to me these actions are motivated by privacy, which I believe we can accept here, in this case. --The Evil IP address (talk) 17:54, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Speedy-Deleted as per consense of Bidgee, The Evil IP address and me. Image unused, no recognizable usability, likely privacy-motivated request by uploader/original creator and to avoid unnecessary drama. --Túrelio (talk) 19:11, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
