Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo FC Paradiso.png
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Above COM:TOO Switzerland. Jonteemil (talk) 15:55, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Keep. No, because File:CHE_Paradiso_COA.svg (the flag of the municipality of this club) is PD. The logo of the club is obviously a derivative of the flag. PaterMcFly (talk) 18:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- See {{Coa blazon}}: This coat of arms was drawn based on its blazon which – being a written description – is free from copyright. Any illustration conforming with the blazon of the arms is considered to be heraldically correct. Thus several different artistic interpretations of the same coat of arms can exist. Sometimes, the design officially used by the armiger is likely protected by copyright, in which case it cannot be used here. I don't know how the law is in Switzerland but I know that in Sweden the design used officially is copyrighted eventhough the version uploaded to Commons is very much like it. Jonteemil (talk) 19:10, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- I wonder however if the lion might be covered by {{PD-CoA-Switzerland}} and thus PD. Jonteemil (talk) 19:12, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- It sure is, that's why I linked to File:CHE_Paradiso_COA.svg, which shows the same lion and is obviously covered by {{PD-CoA-Switzerland}}, because it's the CoA of an existing municipality. PaterMcFly (talk) 15:40, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
- I wonder however if the lion might be covered by {{PD-CoA-Switzerland}} and thus PD. Jonteemil (talk) 19:12, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- See {{Coa blazon}}: This coat of arms was drawn based on its blazon which – being a written description – is free from copyright. Any illustration conforming with the blazon of the arms is considered to be heraldically correct. Thus several different artistic interpretations of the same coat of arms can exist. Sometimes, the design officially used by the armiger is likely protected by copyright, in which case it cannot be used here. I don't know how the law is in Switzerland but I know that in Sweden the design used officially is copyrighted eventhough the version uploaded to Commons is very much like it. Jonteemil (talk) 19:10, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: See above. --Yann (talk) 19:34, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Eric Duff as Logo (Invalid license, not a simple image or text only.) Yann (talk) 10:18, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- This is obviously too complex to avoid a copyright, but if it is based on an earlier public domain version, then it may be OK. The source must be provided. Yann (talk) 10:20, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- See arguments provided by PaterMcFly and Jonteemil above. --Leyo 13:07, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: see above. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 00:06, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
