Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/03/31
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
c'est le miens et je veux qu'il soit supprimé Alou lafrite (talk) 04:04, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 05:24, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mélencron as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G3 Yann (talk) 05:26, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 05:26, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Sock of Thepoliticsexpert. Another image of Karia added. Related information at en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thepoliticsexpert. -- Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 13:49, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Nick (talk) 14:09, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gomes 2018 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:53, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
not being used. OOS. Eaglezero (talk) 15:11, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Themightyquill (talk) 17:35, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
not being used. OOS. Eaglezero (talk) 15:11, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Themightyquill (talk) 17:35, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
not being used. OOS. Eaglezero (talk) 15:18, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Themightyquill (talk) 17:32, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
it is OOS. Eaglezero (talk) 15:20, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Themightyquill (talk) 17:28, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:36, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, actually. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:09, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
not being used. OOS. Eaglezero (talk) 15:11, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Themightyquill (talk) 18:11, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
not being used Eaglezero (talk) 15:12, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Themightyquill (talk) 18:10, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
not being used. OOS. Eaglezero (talk) 15:18, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Themightyquill (talk) 18:11, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 02:47, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and copyvio of https://www.mikhailgrand.com/bio. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 20:17, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 21:46, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Сомнения в лицензии. Автор неизвестен, дата создания и обнародования фото ненизвестна Dogad75 (talk) 20:37, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:58, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BearSatterstrom (talk · contribs)
[edit]While we allow a limited number of personal images for the user pages of active contributors, "active" and "contributor" must come first. Commons is not Facebook. See COM:SCOPE. This user has made a grand total of six edits on all WMF projects. They include a now-deleted main space personal gallery.
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:39, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: spam. --Jcb (talk) 21:13, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ankur Malga (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not a social network here. Out of Project scope. A few user pages are allowed. I excluded those 3 images used on en and hi.wikipedia from this deletion request.
- File:Ankur Malga (New 2018).png
- File:Ankur malga Dost 2.jpg
- File:Ankur Malga Dost.jpg
- File:Swag Ankur.png
- File:BCA Asmie Student(2017-18).jpg
- File:Ankur.png
- File:Ankur Signature 2.jpg
- File:Ankur badnor.jpg
Zaccarias (talk) 13:21, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:09, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ankur Malga (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal, unused images, out of scope.
- File:Ankita Tailor.jpg
- File:Ramesh Chandra Malga.jpg
- File:Mrs. Snehlata Malga.jpg
- File:AKM.jpg
- File:Malga Ankur.jpg
- File:Ankur Signature.jpg
- File:Ankur Malga.png
Ronhjones (Talk) 15:04, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ankur Malga (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader).
- File:Hai Koi.jpg
- File:1 or 1.jpg
- File:BCA Teacher , student and all Staff.jpg
- File:Asmie Teacher 2.jpg
- File:Asmie Teacher.jpg
hiàn 19:59, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ankur Malga (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - personal photo album
- File:Mr ANKUR MALGA.jpg
- File:Hai Koi.jpg
- File:1 or 1.jpg
- File:BCA Teacher , student and all Staff.jpg
- File:Asmie Teacher 2.jpg
- File:Asmie Teacher.jpg
- File:Ankita Tailor.jpg
- File:Ramesh Chandra Malga.jpg
- File:Mrs. Snehlata Malga.jpg
- File:AKM.jpg
- File:Malga Ankur.jpg
- File:Ankur Signature.jpg
- File:Ankur Malga.png
Cabayi (talk) 08:55, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete all. Just used for personal vanity spamming on en.wiki that we have to keep deleting. —SpacemanSpiff 10:18, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:09, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:54, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete OOS, COM:ADVERT, probably copyrighted by Kay Duncan or her ad people. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:16, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, covers need OTRS-permission for restoring. Taivo (talk) 10:03, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Kay Duncan, out of COM:SCOPE. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:55, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete OOS, COM:ADVERT, probably copyrighted by Kay Duncan or her ad people. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:15, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, covers need OTRS-permission for restoring. Taivo (talk) 10:05, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Kay Duncan, out of COM:SCOPE. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:56, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete OOS, COM:ADVERT, probably copyrighted by Kay Duncan or her ad people. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:15, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, covers need OTRS-permission for restoring. Taivo (talk) 10:01, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Kay Duncan, out of COM:SCOPE. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:56, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete OOS, COM:ADVERT, probably copyrighted by Kay Duncan or her ad people. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:14, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, covers need OTRS-permission for restoring. Taivo (talk) 10:02, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Kay Duncan, out of COM:SCOPE. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:56, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete OOS, COM:ADVERT, probably copyrighted by Kay Duncan or her ad people. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:14, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, covers need OTRS-permission for restoring. Taivo (talk) 10:00, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Kay Duncan, out of COM:SCOPE. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:57, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete OOS, COM:ADVERT, probably copyrighted by Kay Duncan or her ad people. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:13, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, covers need OTRS-permission for restoring. Taivo (talk) 09:59, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
File:Journal Tiger cover personal everyday lined 200 page journal by Kay Duncan Amazon $14.00.jpg
[edit]Copyrighted work by Kay Duncan, out of COM:SCOPE. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:57, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete OOS, COM:ADVERT, probably copyrighted by Kay Duncan or her ad people. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:13, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, covers need OTRS-permission for restoring. Taivo (talk) 09:58, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Kay Duncan, out of COM:SCOPE. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:57, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete OOS, COM:ADVERT, probably copyrighted by Kay Duncan or her ad people. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:09, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, covers need OTRS-permission for restoring. Taivo (talk) 09:56, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
it is OOS. Eaglezero (talk) 15:18, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Themightyquill (talk) 10:21, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
not being used. OOS. Eaglezero (talk) 15:23, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Themightyquill (talk) 10:19, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Already deleted. Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Bentriumph — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 21:39, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 18:45, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Already deleted. Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Bentriumph — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 21:41, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 18:45, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 02:44, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:54, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 02:47, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:54, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: Unused personal photo. Mys_721tx (talk) 03:35, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:55, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: a file with questionable educational value. Mys_721tx (talk) 03:39, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:55, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: a file with questionable educational value. Mys_721tx (talk) 03:39, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:55, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: a file with questionable educational value. Mys_721tx (talk) 03:39, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:56, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: a file with questionable educational value. Mys_721tx (talk) 03:39, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:56, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: a file with questionable educational value. Mys_721tx (talk) 03:40, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:56, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: a file with questionable educational value. Mys_721tx (talk) 03:40, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:56, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: a file with questionable educational value. Mys_721tx (talk) 03:40, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:56, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: a file with questionable educational value. Mys_721tx (talk) 03:40, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:56, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: a file with questionable educational value. Mys_721tx (talk) 03:40, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:56, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: a file with questionable educational value. Mys_721tx (talk) 03:41, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:57, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: a file with questionable educational value. Mys_721tx (talk) 03:41, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:57, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: a file with questionable educational value. Mys_721tx (talk) 03:41, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:57, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}} Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:13, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:57, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photo and out of project scope. Pescov (talk) 04:22, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:57, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: Unused personal photo. Mys_721tx (talk) 05:36, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:58, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: a file with questionable educational value. Mys_721tx (talk) 05:37, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:58, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: a file with questionable educational value. Mys_721tx (talk) 05:37, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:58, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: Unused personal photo. Mys_721tx (talk) 05:37, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:58, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: a file with questionable educational value. Mys_721tx (talk) 05:41, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:58, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: a file with questionable educational value. Mys_721tx (talk) 05:41, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:59, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: a file with questionable educational value. Mys_721tx (talk) 05:41, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:59, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: a file with questionable educational value. Mys_721tx (talk) 05:45, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:59, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: a file with questionable educational value. Mys_721tx (talk) 05:52, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:00, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Unused photo, blurred and out of project scope. Pescov (talk) 06:17, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:59, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Spam; Out of project scope.
- File:Rejuvanation therapy at parijatak.jpg
- File:Unwind Your Soul Towards a Healthy Beginning- parijatak.jpg
Lacrymocéphale (talk) 08:35, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:00, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 09:20, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:01, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:02, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshots of questionable notability.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:01, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:02, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Test picture Misaochan (talk) 14:58, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:00, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Test picture Misaochan (talk) 15:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:01, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Test picture Misaochan (talk) 15:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:01, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Test picture Misaochan (talk) 15:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:01, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Test picture Misaochan (talk) 15:07, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:01, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
There is no indication of permission anywhere including here Leoboudv (talk) 01:16, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and COM:VPC#File:Miodrag Lekić Demos.jpg & File:Miodrag Živković.jpg. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:08, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:01, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
There is no indication of permission anywhere including here. Leoboudv (talk) 01:17, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and COM:VPC#File:Miodrag Lekić Demos.jpg & File:Miodrag Živković.jpg. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:09, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:01, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photo and out of project scope. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. ← 01:36, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:01, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Daniel Awigra (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader).
hiàn 02:43, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:01, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
PDF of File:SCHMALZ Logo.png. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:51, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:01, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope selfie, uploaded for draft on en wikipedia. 1997kB (talk) 04:49, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:02, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Very unlikely to be own work, no permission. Yann (talk) 06:02, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:02, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Unused. Spam for a PR company. No educational value. BethNaught (talk) 10:13, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:03, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Apparent derivative work of image previously published on the subject's Instagram account.[1] Resolution and composition suggest a cropped screencap. Neither the ownership nor the permission/licensing of the original image has been verified. Dancter (talk) 22:32, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Done by Túrelio. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:03, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
The CC-BY license is attributed to the upload [File:Sorbs.dna.jpg] in Commons, while no such license is granted by the original publisher nature.com. The image is derived from this publication [2] of nature.com. It is evident that the publication of nature.com is not free of charge which means it is not under Open Access (OA) [3][4]. Only publications of nature.com which provide the option for Open Access (OA) are licensed under Creative commons licenses[5][6]. The Open Access journals of nature.com are listed here [7] [8] and the source in question “Genes mirror geography within Europe” is not published in any of the listed Open Access journals but in the International Journal of Science.
In other words in any publications of nature.com under the license CC-BY, the CC-BY tag is ALWAYS indicated in the articles under the Rights and Permission section along with a tag reading that the article is under Open Access, for example in publications of the Journal of Scientific Data [9], Nature Communications [10], Scientific Reports [11] and Primary Care Respiratory Medicine [12]. In the source of the nominated image “Genes mirror geography within Europe”[13] there is no any indicated CC-BY tag or Open Access tag which means the image [File:Sorbs.dna.jpg] was uploaded without known license. This is a confirmation of a copyright violation along with the fact that the International Journal of Science of nature.com is not in the list[14] of Open Source journals and none of the journal’s articles contain the CC-BY tag and license. Χυγο (talk) 03:15, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete as copyright violation. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 19:44, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 13:53, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Questionable sourcing Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:08, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Ymblanter (talk) 13:54, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zaoualiahmed (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small images without EXIF data, some copied from Facebook, some quite old, obviously not own works.
- File:Marzoug1957.jpg
- File:Marzouggarde.jpg
- File:Marzougprison.jpg
- File:Marzougfares.jpg
- File:Hassenmarzoug.jpg
- File:Derouiche .jpg
- File:Mohamedachab.jpg
- File:Anouarhaded.jpg
- File:Drhamedibensalem.jpg
Yann (talk) 06:53, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:08, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zaoualiahmed (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small images without EXIF data, one from Facebook, user blocked twice for copyvios, very unlikely to be own works.
- File:Achabmohamed.jpg
- File:Mohamedanouar.jpg
- File:Presidentnaiferhedi.jpg
- File:Benaissajalelst.jpg
- File:Jalelbenaissastt.jpg
- File:Mohamedbensalemst.jpg
- File:Naiferhedi.png
- File:Bureau ST.jpg
Yann (talk) 20:00, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:16, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SudhanshuKumar1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploader is part of a ToU violating sockfarm, these uploads have exif stripped or are webgrabs, including one movie poster, all falsely claimed as own work.
- File:KARAN OBEROI FITNESS MODEL.jpg
- File:Sanjay Bhutiani.jpg
- File:Abhishek Sharrma.jpg
- File:Gurav Sharma.jpg
- File:Sanil Gosavi.jpg
- File:Pradeep K Sharma.jpg
- File:Damru Poster.jpg
- File:Karan goddwani.jpg
- File:My Mother's Wedding.jpg
- File:Rituraj Kishor Sinha.png
- File:ShubhashishBhutiani- Pic 2.jpg
—SpacemanSpiff 06:55, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:08, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vlad191798S (talk · contribs)
[edit]Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Ссылка на разные файлохранилища, автора установить невозможно, проверить лицензию невозможно
- File:Пионер сердобск.jpg
- File:Вид города.jpg
- File:Собор Михаила.jpg
- File:Аллея героев2.jpg
- File:Аксютин.jpg
Dogad75 (talk) 09:43, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:48, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vlad191798S (talk · contribs)
[edit]No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks
- File:Памятник Ильичу.Наш.jpg
- File:Памятник Лермонтову Сердобск.jpg
- File:Памятник Яблочкову.jpg
- File:Сердобск111.jpg
- File:Тюрин fE.jpg
- File:Лобановo.jpg
- File:Макаров0.jpg
- File:Лашинs.jpg
- File:Гусев.jpg
- File:Аллея героев2.jpg
- File:Каляпинrs.jpg
- File:Силаев Герой СССР.jpg
- File:Гущин Герой СССР.jpg
- File:Быков.jpg
- File:Герой Шабашов.jpg
- File:Шабашов.jpg
Dogad75 (talk) 15:04, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:50, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vlad191798S (talk · contribs)
[edit]Files without EXIF data, including 2 old images, user blocked for copyvios, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Буденый.jpg
- File:Будёный в молодости.jpg
- File:Лысая гора..Сердобск.jpg
- File:Камень обелискcE.jpg
- File:Сердобск.jpg
- File:Вечерняя школа.jpg
- File:Герой СССР Горшков.jpg
Yann (talk) 07:13, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:09, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wagner Oliveira Rodrigues (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small images without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
- File:GENEROSA.jpg
- File:FELIPA(Uma das Fundadoras da Banda).jpg
- File:Edimar.jpg
- File:TIÃO CACHOEIRA.jpg
- File:Regente.png
- File:VEREDINHA 12.JPG
Yann (talk) 07:32, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:09, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 10:34, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:10, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 20170259 JVG (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete them all. The uploadeer has uploaded images without any evidence of permission. --Leoboudv (talk) 18:52, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:09, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:41, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:30, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:59, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:30, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:59, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:32, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:59, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
I'm not convinced this is below COM:TOO#United States. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:40, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:57, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Publicity still similar to http://www.siteducyclisme.net/coureurfiche.php?coureurid=3573 : unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:42, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:59, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Although published on flickr, this is not a selfie. The image is found on other locations on the internet, for instance on this forum: http://www.kanyetothe.com/forum/index.php?topic=5496290.8946 . So not correctly licenced on Flickr by the uploader there. Elly (talk) 15:42, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:58, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Farhankhan48242 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader).
hiàn 15:44, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:56, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims. Looks like a screenshot of Google Maps. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:36, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:31, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
There is no Freedom of Panorama in Russia for monuments.
Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:36, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:34, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims. Looks like a screenshot of Google Maps. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:37, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:36, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims. Looks like a screenshot of Google Maps. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:42, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:37, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Leonid Utesov
[edit]No FoP in Russia for sculptures.
Sealle (talk) 20:08, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:43, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zoyeb Ahmed (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal selfies and photos. Unlikely to be used in a project. Commons is not a personal webhost.
- File:Zoyeb 2.jpg
- File:Ahmed zoyeb.jpg
- File:Zoyeb ahmed 2.jpg
- File:Zoyeb ahmad khan.jpg
- File:Zoyeb ahmed.jpg
- File:Zoyeb ahmad.jpg
- File:Zoyeb ahmed.png
- File:Zoyeb.jpg
- File:Zoyeb Ahmed 2.jpg
- File:Zoyeb Ahmed.jpg
- File:Zoyeb Ahmed Sign.jpg
Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:03, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:22, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zoyeb Ahmed (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images, unused, out of project scope. No educational value.
- File:Zoyeb ahmad crishtmas.jpg
- File:Zoyeb ah med picasso.jpg
- File:Zoyeb collegues mr sandeep.jpg
- File:Mnx zoyeb ahmad.jpg
- File:Zoyeb ahmed college.jpg
- File:Zoyeb ahmed 3.jpg
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 21:57, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope: unused personal selfies and photos. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:15, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Vandal at work. Broichmore (talk) 17:15, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:47, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
it is OOS. Eaglezero (talk) 15:19, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Really? Have we got too many images of Turkish Cypriot cuisine? Closing admin, please see other DRs by this user. I do not wish to repeat everything everywhere. --E4024 (talk) 14:11, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:16, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
not being used. OOS. Eaglezero (talk) 15:19, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Yeah, it's not being used. People in TR:WP are too busy writing articles of their favourite actresses or singers -most of whose names I happen to hear there for the first time- and have got no time to write a series of good articles on different olive sorts in Turkey. Now, if you make a small effort and look at the description at the File:Olives of Artvin.jpg, you will see that these olives are singular ("unique" if you so wish) in Turkey as probably the only olives grown out of the traditional oil-producing regions of the country. If you were a real user, and not a sleeper, I could even join you in supporting deletion because we have a similar image here; but as you are foul-playing I will not collaborate with a user who is now reading this DR from their regular account. Am I right, man? --E4024 (talk) 08:25, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:15, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
not being used. OOS. Eaglezero (talk) 15:20, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- How is this possibly out of scope? It's a great picture that fits well in many cateories. I can't help but notice your edits on commons over two years have been moslty if not entirely deletion nominations, which is highly suspect, in my opinion. - Themightyquill (talk)
- Indeed as uploader I could join the DR, as we have a similar image in File:Veal stew with mashed potatos (cubic food).jpg. But the issue is: (i) I was very enthusiast to give the puree its cubic form and take a pic to upload here. Instead of being appreciated by the user (I mean the one behind the sleeper's name :) I am being DR'ed. (ii) If this DR has been made by a "sleeper" (something worse than sock puppetry, IMHO) and the sleeper has only woke up -after two years of inactivity- only to attack my files -and in the meantime to a banned user's files, as they would not be able to say anything- I see it as quite legitimate that the closing admin must take some measures against this user name. Please note: I have a principle of not complaining about people in order not to get them blocked (x); but blocking this user name will not harm the real user behind it, maybe even help "him" to rethink the attitude. Of course as long as they do not repeat the "not-so-elegant", sort of saying it, "practice". Got it? Ich kann nicht express it better. --E4024 (talk) 08:51, 2 April 2018 (UTC) (x) (The most I asked about a user once was to "warn" someone who insulted me, but what I got in return was being scolded myself by the admin I went to and also being unjustly warned at the first opportunity. What can I do other than ignoring them... C'ést la vie! :)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:15, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
not being used. OOS. Eaglezero (talk) 15:21, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:15, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
not being used. OOS. Eaglezero (talk) 15:21, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:14, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
not being used. OOS. Eaglezero (talk) 15:22, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Like your user name that was opened two years ago and not used until -for some reason- you woke it up recently. I think that is a more interesting issue to investigate. --E4024 (talk) 15:45, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:14, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
not being used. OOS. Eaglezero (talk) 15:22, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:12, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Boldburner (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader).
- File:Boldburner, kelvin christian chengula at flerimo hospital iringa.jpg
- File:Boldburner ,Kelvin chridtian chengula at iringa referral hospital 2015.jpg
- File:Kelvin in business.png
- File:Boldburner, kelvin christian chengula.jpg
- File:Kelvin christian chengula, Boldburner.jpg
- File:Boldburner, kelvin christian chengula at Ruaha catholic university Iringa.jpg
- File:Boldburner, Kelvin christian chengula at lugalo stadium Iringa.jpg
- File:Boldburner at work.jpg
hiàn 15:25, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:06, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 15:32, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - the image is used, but the user not an active participant. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:08, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Advertisemet, I think Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:28, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:50, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Qmasterart (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images, not notable person : out of scope
- File:Jerry with the website polo shirt.jpg
- File:Jerry, San Jose Police Chief Chris Moore and Ret Judge Cordell.jpg
- File:Jerry Volunteering.jpg
- File:JerryInterview.jpg
- File:JerryCamera.jpg
- File:2nd Annual Family Day.jpg
- File:JerryUniformPic.jpg
Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:27, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:50, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 21:06, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:49, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 21:06, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:48, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 21:07, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:47, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 21:08, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:46, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope, with no possibly of use. Bidgee (talk) 23:32, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:44, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
unused personal photo, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 18:46, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:52, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
out of scope, doubtful own work Pibwl (talk) 18:48, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:51, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
es:UltraUdo was deleted due to non-notability. Probably its logo is out of project scope. In addition, complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:31, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:00, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Widely published promotional photo of a musical artist, no evidence of own work. BethNaught (talk) 09:51, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:59, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by VoidWanderer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Derivatives of works with an unclear copyright status.
- File:Roketsan display in Kyiv 06.jpg
- File:AHS Krab in Kyiv 08.jpg
- File:UAV Atlon-Avia 05.jpg
- File:Kvitnyk-E 04.jpg
- File:Karasuk 03.jpg
- File:BTR-4MV 06.jpg
- File:BM-27 Uragan diesel 02.jpg
- File:KrAZ Hulk 04.jpg
- File:Uragan KrAZ-63221 05.jpg
- File:Uragan KrAZ-63221 04.jpg
- File:Stilet combat module 11.jpg
- File:BRDM-NIK 02.jpg
- File:T-72AMT 02.jpg
- File:Kastet combat module 02.jpg
- File:BMPT Strazh 04.jpg
- File:BlokpostPamyati Kyiv2017 09.jpg
- File:BlokpostPamyati Kyiv2017 07.jpg
- File:BlokpostPamyati Kyiv2017 08.jpg
- File:BlokpostPamyati Kyiv2017 05.jpg
- File:BlokpostPamyati Kyiv2017 03.jpg
- File:BlokpostPamyati Kyiv2017 02.jpg
- File:Taipan 6.jpg
- File:Kozak-4 4.jpg
- File:Otaman 6x6 8.jpg
- File:Kozak-5 4.jpg
- File:Kozak-2M2 Jab.jpg
- File:Kozak-2M2 4.jpg
- File:Kozak-2M1 4.jpg
- File:Warmate UAV 04.jpg
- File:TIMP-71 desc.jpg
- File:BAU 23x2 desc.jpg
- File:BMP-1T desc.jpg
- File:"Duplet" fighting module 02.jpg
- File:Stilet fighting module 04.jpg
Sealle (talk) 10:03, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Sealle, the files you've nominated may be grouped in two large groups:
- exhibition plates;
- the BlokpostPamyati exposition (File:BlokpostPamyati Kyiv2017 09.jpg, etc).
- The first group, exhibition plates, are falling under {{PD-text}}, let me quote it:
The depicted text is ineligible for copyright and therefore in the public domain, because it is not a “literary work” or other protected type in sense of the local copyright law. Facts, data, and unoriginal information which is common property without sufficiently creative authorship in a general typeface or basic handwriting, and simple geometric shapes are not protected by copyright.
- simple geometrical shapes, logos and tiny pictures may not be considered as copyright violation.
- The BlokpostPamyati exposition is demonstrated freely in Ukraine. You don't even need to buy a ticket. Please explain your concerns in a slightly more detailed fashion. Thanks. --VoidWanderer (talk) 16:15, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Free access to the exposition does not mean that the exhibited artworks are not protected by copyright. See also COM:FOP#Ukraine. Sealle (talk) 16:41, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Still not a problem, since I know the author of the exhibition, Pavel Netesov, and can ask for proper OTRS. --VoidWanderer (talk) 16:57, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Permission of Pavel Netesov: {{PermissionOTRS|2018040410013134}}.--Anatoliy (talk) 21:47, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:58, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Egtrader11 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in vanity article.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:40, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Random doodles, out of scope Wcam (talk) 15:00, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:41, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
not being used. OOS. Eaglezero (talk) 15:07, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for attracting my attention to this file. Now that I looked at it again, I see that at the "Description" part I had opened a parenthesis but forgotten to close it. Now I'm going to correct that. OTOH, my opinions on this and the other related DRs you may read at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tuzda balık being served.jpg. Note: When I say "you" I'm referring to the real you, not the sleeper you created two years ago and woke only a few days ago to Wikihound me. Regards. --E4024 (talk) 07:37, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:43, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
not being used. OOS. Eaglezero (talk) 15:07, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Hello everyone. I created Category:Salt-cooked fish with one picture that we had at hand, a pic that shows the preparation of the fish for cooking it in salt. After that, I took several pics on the later stages of this cooking method, over a special Turkish cuisine cat on the Turkish-style salt-cooked fish: Salt-cooked fish coming out of the oven, its salt cover being cracked, opened, and finally the food served. I made a serial illustration of a food-cooking procedure of which we had almost nothing in hand before. Did I receive thanks for the effort? No. Did anyone pay me the bill of one of the most expensive restaurants in Ankara? No. What did I receive? A series of DRs for a series of pics. Ah, only one bead of the chain or series, the previous pic (not taken by me) was not DR'ed. Certainly the deletion request spree (by a "previously never used" two-year old account) is on persons not on files. What a pity... --E4024 (talk) 07:32, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:44, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
not being used. OOS. Eaglezero (talk) 15:09, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- The food looks delicious. The DR opener looks suspicious. (Please scan their edits.) --E4024 (talk) 14:58, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:45, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
not being used. OOS. Eaglezero (talk) 15:10, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:46, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
not being used. OOS. Eaglezero (talk) 15:11, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:46, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
not being used. Eaglezero (talk) 15:14, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Please see the information I provided at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tuzda balık being served.jpg. As these are "my" files, I'm not voting. (IMHO we should delete some DRs like this. :) --E4024 (talk) 08:34, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:47, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
not being used. OOS. Eaglezero (talk) 15:14, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Please see the information I provided at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tuzda balık being served.jpg. As these are "my" files, I'm not voting. (IMHO we should delete some DRs like this. :) --E4024 (talk) 08:35, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:47, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
not being used. OOS. Eaglezero (talk) 15:17, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Not my best türlü picture. My views at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Veal stew with a block of potato puree.jpg are valid for all DRs of this... person. (The user normally uses another name.) --E4024 (talk) 15:03, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:47, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Model with questionable notability, no articles on the subject. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:04, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Waz8 (talk) 22:45, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:07, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Uploader with a history of copyvios; questionable license. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:09, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:07, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Uploader with a history of copyvios; unlikely license. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:10, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:08, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
The weapon is old, but it is close to impossible that this is an old image. No real source given. Avron (talk) 16:36, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:09, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ChristianBethel (talk · contribs)
[edit]I don't believe that the uploader is the author. It is the fist upload of this user, one file can be found here: [15]. Looks like small size of a professional image.
Avron (talk) 16:41, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:11, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tissues345 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata, and the nature of the images. Looks like screenshots from Google Maps or similar.
—LX (talk, contribs) 16:49, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:11, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims. Looks like a screenshot of Google Maps or similar. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:03, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:11, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims. Looks like a screenshot of Google Maps or similar. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:03, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:12, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
unused personal file 37.5.6.178 06:20, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 17:11, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unlikely to be own work anyway. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:12, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Kamaljeet Singh Bawari. He uploaded again. Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 06:28, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:42, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
copyvio (poster is not on free licence) Ciacho5 (talk) 18:05, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:13, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Can't find proof on the source website that this file is actually CC BY-SA. Spinster (talk) 18:21, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:14, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
along with File:Alejandro Gallae.jpg and File:Alejandro Gallae 1.jpg, unused personal photos, sole uploads Pibwl (talk) 18:32, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:15, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Definitely not CC-BY-SA 3.0 1233 (talk) 05:19, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no license at all. --JuTa 12:50, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 07:23, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: still no license. --JuTa 12:49, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
merlyn graterol 190.79.159.145 06:05, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: speedily: Inappropriate use of talk pages. Request by author. --Achim (talk) 15:28, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
MERLYN GRATOL Merlyn graterol (talk) 05:33, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Inappropriate use of talk pages. --Achim (talk) 17:54, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Not needed, it exists already a better PNG veriant. --Ras67 (talk) 14:46, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:32, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:32, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:32, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:33, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope, very blurry. Taivo (talk) 14:32, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:32, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:33, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:34, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tara.marocchi01 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical paintings and photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Elizabeh Halleck . 1860's.png
- File:A possible portrait of Angelica Church c.1780s?.png
- File:Catherine Van Rensselaer poses for portait in 1750 --.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:33, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope Mitte27 (talk) 00:20, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: falls in category "Gray letter S". Ruthven (msg) 13:16, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:33, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
No source Onlyraffael (talk) 15:50, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 15:13, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
No permission Onlyraffael (talk) 03:46, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: permission not needed if ineligible for copyright. --Jcb (talk) 08:09, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
No permission Onlyraffael (talk) 15:51, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - don't nominate it again!. --Jcb (talk) 20:35, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Muhammad Azam Ansari (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused {{Userpage image}}
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:59, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:35, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 21:01, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:39, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Source: https://www.clarin.com/politica/gustavo-valdes-triunfo-abre-puerta-futuro-cierra-definitivamente-kirchnerismo_0_B1fow7K2-.html Gastón Cuello (talk) 23:01, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:36, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status of all images contained within this infographic seb26 (talk) 23:17, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:36, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
No clear educational reuse seb26 (talk) 23:22, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:36, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Copied from Imgur (Feb 5, 19 views) Dispenser (talk) 23:29, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:36, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Copied from Imgur (July 2016, 146 views) Dispenser (talk) 23:31, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:36, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jakson2018 (talk · contribs)
[edit]These images are unlikely to be the work of the uploader because they are from different cameras and dates (latest 2017, earliest 2014) and all depict the same person, Jorge Escalante. This means it is more likely that the images have been obtained via an online search or sent from various sources, making their copyright status unclear.
- File:Intervenciòn de Entrega de Sillas de ruedas en la Jagua de Ibirico 2016 - 2.jpg
- File:Entrega de premio Alcalde Solidario e Incluyente de Latinoamérica 2017.jpg
- File:Entrega de Sillas de ruedas en la Jagua de Ibirico 2016.jpg
- File:Jorge Escalante.jpg
seb26 (talk) 23:33, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:36, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
possible copyvio 201.241.87.35 23:54, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Oppose Fake. Vandal IP --Gastón Cuello (talk) 00:30, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- how could it be vandalism? Chile copyright law isn't clear enough as to pseudo-coat of arms are not copyrighted? afaik all works post 1965 are. --201.241.87.35 05:19, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - I don't see what would be wrong with the nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:38, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 06:46, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 06:33, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 06:46, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 06:33, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted outdoor advertisement. 220.137.7.244 13:41, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 06:33, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
This is FYROM. There is not republic of macedonia yet. So macedonia as a country is not legal yet. Also Macedonians were talking the Greek language. These people are not. Unless you want to spread fake history. 86.22.198.10 12:14, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- WTF?! Grtek (talk) 12:51, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Please, read Commons:Deletion policy first... Thanks! Grtek (talk) 12:55, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:04, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Карты в РФ и СССР защищены авторским правом. Dogad75 (talk) 20:34, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:08, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии, фото сокрее производная работа фотографии 1979 года неизвестного фотографа Dogad75 (talk) 20:41, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: the historical photograph by an unkown authoruploaded as a modern own work by the uploader. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:09, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии, фото скорее всего- производная работа послевоенной фотографии неизвестного фотографа, дата обнародования неизвестна Dogad75 (talk) 20:42, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: the historical photograph by an unkown authoruploaded as a modern own work by the uploader. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:10, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 20:50, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:18, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
В СССР и РФ карты защищены авторским правом Dogad75 (talk) 20:54, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: the historical photograph by an unkown authoruploaded as a modern own work by the uploader. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:20, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Any metadata, unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:21, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:22, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
False date, unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:25, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:23, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Not own work, false date, http://notrehistoire.ch.s3.amazonaws.com/photos/2011/11/f3ddf4bfae979bd5.jpg, anyway perhaps PD in Switzerland. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:38, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:40, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Not own work, false date, https://lavozdelmuro.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/las-fotografias-historicas-retocadas-cuando-no-existia-el-photoshop-26.jpg, perhaps PD in the USA. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:40, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:41, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
This is published on Flickr by the subject himself, but photographer is Ana Paula Hirama. On the photostream of this person, I do not find this image, see https://www.flickr.com/search/?user_id=33704098%40N00&view_all=1&text=Covas. So I assume this image is copyrighted and it cannot be transferred to Commons with the CC-BY-SA lisence. The un-cropped original at Flickr lists the name of Hirama, see https://www.flickr.com/photos/brunocovas/5324827962/in/photostream/. Elly (talk) 15:38, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- The image is from a person and nothing more, so, as I remember, this person owns the rights of its own image, and can define its copyrights. For example, if Hirama sold the image to someone without Covas approval, it can apply to justice for compensation. Paladinum2 (talk) 12:24, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Paladinum2 is mistaken, the copyright holder is in principle the photographer, not the depicted person. --Jcb (talk) 15:09, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Blurry image with replacements in Category:Prince Edward Station platforms. Xeror (talk) 01:30, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:44, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Blurry image with replacements in Category:Prince Edward Station platforms. Xeror (talk) 01:33, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:44, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Reproduction of [16]. No terms of secondary use has not been shown at the original page. Please also visit ja:Wikipedia:削除依頼/枢軸主義 if you understand Japanese. The only page which uses this file in JAWP is now under discussion for deletion and some users comment that article is for advertisement. 郊外生活 (talk) 05:15, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Comment After starting this deletion request, the original author of that file announced that that is uploaded by itself ([17] - written in Japanese) and we need not worry about copyright problem. However, this file is still for advertisement and not shown enough notability, so it should be deleted and I will not withdraw this request. --郊外生活Kogaiseikatsu (talk,contribs) 06:16, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no educational value. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:46, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ابزارآلات الکترودسازه (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unidentified logo uploaded by an account used only for self-promotion. No indication of any relevance given. Out of Commons:Project scope.
-
Zaccarias (talk) 06:55, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:48, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
High quality alleged self-portrait by allegedly-famous Maldivian singer is dubious. BethNaught (talk) 07:56, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Out of project scope. --Randykitty (talk) 09:15, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:49, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
- also file:La Romero y Marilyn Manson.jpg
Collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 08:02, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:49, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
- also file:Logo carta maior.png
pt:Carta Maior was deleted thrice. Probably its logo and screenshot are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:08, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:50, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 08:19, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:50, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
It was a test picture for direct uploads Misaochan (talk) 09:14, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:50, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
es:Legálitas was thrice deleted due to promotionality. Probably the logo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:21, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:51, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
too dark.. Qurren (talk) 12:05, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: adequate quality. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:55, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
out of project scope, useless photo for wiki Bestalex (talk) 12:10, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose could have some educational value, espetially when it is geolocated...Grtek (talk) 12:09, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: not great quality but in scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:56, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Unused low-quality personal photo of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. —LX (talk, contribs) 12:38, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:57, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
wrong and incomplete modification of the image Oceanbreezeblog (talk) 18:31, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:31, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
wrong and incomplete modification of the image Oceanbreezeblog (talk) 18:31, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:31, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
This is not the Hebrew Pronunciation of the word Shavtay (talk) 13:54, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Indeed! My mistake; this is apparently a file recorded by accident while I was demonstrating the tool. As the author, I support deletion. Ijon (talk) 15:37, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and support by author. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:05, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Source is missing. Jcb (talk) 14:34, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: source has been added. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:07, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Appears to have been uploaded solely for promoting a band, by user that does not seem to be versed in Wikipedia/Commons policies The Anome (talk) 14:36, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:07, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:09, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Appears to have been uploaded solely for promoting a band, by user that does not seem to be versed in Wikipedia/Commons policies The Anome (talk) 14:37, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:09, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
not being used. OOS. Eaglezero (talk) 15:07, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Please read the information I have added to other DRs by this "user". If you have got time, please also read the Description of the File:Another little friend.jpg. Thanks for your time. --E4024 (talk) 14:19, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- This is an urban snail, something we don't have too many. --E4024 (talk) 07:48, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for deletion. - Alexis Jazz 20:46, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: in scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:10, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
not being used Eaglezero (talk) 15:10, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - wonderful painting. Closing admin, please better use your time in examining the edits of this -sort of to say- user or better "sleeper". Please also see my comments for additional information in their other DRs and in User talk:Krd also. Thanks for your time. --E4024 (talk) 08:58, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Will not dignify this DR with a response - Alexis Jazz 21:02, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per consensus above. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:27, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 15:38, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:10, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
doesn't seem to be in a scope Pibwl (talk) 18:47, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:14, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
doesn't seem to be in a scope, unused, no cat Pibwl (talk) 18:49, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: disagree, facepainting. --Achim (talk) 17:21, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Achim55. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:24, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Apparently a copyright violation and flickrwashing by flickr user Andrew Scheer. See the full exif on the flickr page and the link to the actual license terms by the copyright owner: "© Crown copyright 2018, Usage Terms - Licensed for use under the terms and conditions of the MOD News License". Not CC0. -- Asclepias (talk) 18:53, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Good catch. This photo is from Scheer's trip to London and it looks like he re-posted this MOD photo to his Flickr account. Most photos on the Flickr account are by his official photographer, Andre Forget. // sikander { talk } 20:48, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:15, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Empty image MarioFinale (talk) 18:59, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:15, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Unidentified low quality sign Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:25, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:15, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Duplicate to File:Berlinbrennt final.pdf, but for crop Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:32, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:16, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Unclear ownership. The upload metadata claims "Own work", but this is a portrait of Cooper, uploaded by a user named User:Nigel Cooper. Unless it's a selfie, that means it wasn't taken *by* Cooper, and thus "Own work" doesn't apply. It's likely this was a portrait commissioned by Cooper, who owns the rights, but that's still not the same as Own Work. RoySmith (talk) 19:42, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:24, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted according to metadata. Own work? Geralt Riv (*talk) 20:22, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: not found elsewhere on the internet using Google Images. Image seems to be part of a series: same style and place as other uploads by this user. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:22, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan, This sculpture was erected in 1979. [18] Y.haruo (talk) 21:15, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- It looked old. I failed to check. My bad. Delete. ~Mable (chat) 07:22, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:17, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Randykitty as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copied from https://www.arc.org.np/ — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 21:47, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- SPeedy delete, obvious copyvio. --Randykitty (talk) 06:37, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:17, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
non existed flag ΝικόλαςΜπ. (talk) 22:28, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:17, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Suspected Copyvio from here Anna (talk) 10:36, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- An apparently identical one has now been uploaded by the same user. The pictures seem to be a detail from this one which is being used as a background image on the company website. --Anna (talk) 10:35, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Please check other uploads by the same user also. I cannot find the other images on the company website, but they are photographed in very much the same style as this one, presumably by a professional product photographer. They are definitely not "own work". Uploader has promised to check with the photographer about the license, but I haven't heard from him since. --Anna (talk) 07:01, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:53, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Copyvio: as stated in the source URL, “Copyright ©2015-2016(8) www.gov.cn ... All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to www.gov.cn. Without written authorization from www.gov.cn, such content shall not be republished or used in any form.” Photos taken by the Chinese government are usually not in public domain under Chinese copyright laws. --Spring Roll Conan ( Talk · Contributions ) 09:10, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
According to Copyright Law of the PRC, the Article 5 says 'This Law shall not be applicable to ... (2) news on current affairs; ...' I consider this event conveyed in the picture should be a kind of 'news on current affairs'. 凝紫明 (talk) 14:47, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- My understanding is: "news on current affairs" in Article 5 of the Chinese copyright law means mere report of facts through various media sources (as mandated in the implementation regulations of that law). Without stating the background of this image, the image itself is not "news on current affairs", just an enrichment to the news. --Spring Roll Conan ( Talk · Contributions ) 15:22, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- According to the Implementation Regulations of the law, the Article 5.2 only applies to the "[s]imple news about the fact". Pictures are not eligible. --WQL (talk) 14:58, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: In the source page, it has labelled "Xinhua", which stands for Xinhua News Agency. Pictures from XNA are no public domain. --WQL (talk) 15:02, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Xinhua News Agency is not the private news agency, but public news agency - Founded 1931; 87 years ago, Owner: People's Republic of China (100% Chinese Government-owned institution) , ref: It's from the User:AyodeleA1's original contribution Goodtiming8871 (talk) 01:27, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- The history of the source doesn't determine whether the file concerned is under public domain. The Chinese government (or Xinhua News Agency, whatever) has explicitly claim copyrights for photos and text they publish - that's why I voted to delete Zhao Leji's portrait a few months ago.
- Please read the Article 5 of the Chinese copyright law again. For government works, only government edicts (or in Chinese, 法律、法规,国家机关的决议、决定、命令和其他具有立法、行政、司法性质的文件,及其官方正式译文) are exempted from copyright protection.
- I beg to differ with your explanation - If the uploader him/herself took that photo, s/he should contact with Commons:OTRS to give evidence that s/he is the owner of this photo. The OTRS volunteer team will then review the statement and determine whether to accept it. If accepted they will tag the work. This is the only acceptable way for Commons to handle copyright-released media files; unilateral claims just doesn't work. --Spring Roll Conan ( Talk · Contributions ) 11:51, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Speedydelete: non-free image. --Garam talk 11:43, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note - Regarding Copyright Law of the People's Republic of China (2010) [1] and Commons:Copyright rules by People's Republic of China. [2]
It's my understanding that the photo is applicable to the Article 5: The law does not apply to those specified in Template:PD-PRC-exempt.
- As "The key point" might be whether the photo of the news it the part of news on current affairs.
- The summary definition of News on Wikipedia "News is information about current events. News is provided through many different media" (examples: printing, broadcasting; public Television or Public Radio, or electronic communication )
- Article 5 This Law shall not be applicable to:
The Copyright Law of China: Article 5 This Law shall not be applicable to:
(1) laws, regulations, resolutions, decisions and orders of state organs; other documents of legislative, administrative or judicial nature; and their official translations;
(2) news on current affairs;
(3) calendars, numerical tables, forms of general use and formulas. Goodtiming8871 (talk) 10:29, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
- I have elaborated on my stance based on the implementation regulations of the Chinese copyright law - photos are not considered "news on current affairs". Wikipedia is blocked in Mainland China, and it has no effect on how to interpret the Chinese copyright law. Chinese judiciary's viewpoint on this matter is inconclusive, yet some legal opinions (by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress - which have the right to interpret laws they [or plenums of the NPC] drafted and passed - and judiciary) support my point (see here and here).--Spring Roll Conan ( Talk · Contributions ) 14:57, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
- Dear Spring Roll Conan, Thank you for your valuable contribution. I love to see the actual court cases: especially the second link: "On the Meaning of "Current Affairs News" in "The Copyright Law".here)
- From my understanding, we should abide by the result of the current judicial practice in Chinese court as it would be the future reference of the other similar cases in China.
- In summary,
- 1) If the photo is the actual fact of the News or enhancing the effectiveness of news, it is not protected by copyright law; no one has the right Claim copyright.
- Examples of cases) a photo of the "36th World Journal Conference", The photos of “Fan Bingbing Wedding Photographs News"
- 2) IF photos do not convey current events or the relevant facts are necessary, the photo is protected by copyright law,
- The photos of "Chen Guanxi arrived in Beijing Photographs News".
- Regarding the cases above, I believe that the photos of "conference, meeting, congress, assembly, gathering, summit, or wedding News" is not protected by copyright law, as per the judicial practice in the Chinese court. Goodtiming8871 (talk) 23:51, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
- It seems that you only pick court cases preferential to your own claim. In the cases of photos depicting the 36th FIPP World Magazine Congress and Fan Bingbing in bridal dress, the court thought that the photos are reflective of current affairs and essential to convey the news on current affairs, which are directly contradictory to the case below. Author of both opinion essays I cited do not agree with this point of view.
- Also it seems that the case on the photo depicting Edison Chen arrived in Beijing is misinterpreted above. The court said that the photo reached the threshold of originality and unessential to convey mere reports of facts even if it is reflective of current affairs. (PS. don't use Pinyin to transliterate every Chinese personal names. For some people this is a type of insult.)
- If courts produced contradictory ruling on copyrights, we should rather exclude photos in question to prevent possible copyright complaints by the reporter who took the photo or his employer.
- Photos on assemblies (in China) are copyrighted. Such provisions are non-existent in the Chinese copyright laws, and Wikimedia Commons administrators are unlikely to agree with this type of claim - see there.
- Take into account that the copyright laws in the U.S. are applicable there even if the Chinese copyright law is not applicable there or the original creator of the work relinquish his copyright claims on the photo concerned in China only, since servers for Wikimedia Commons are U.S.-based. According to this press photos are generally unacceptable in Wikimedia Commons.--Spring Roll Conan ( Talk · Contributions ) 09:46, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
- I have elaborated on my stance based on the implementation regulations of the Chinese copyright law - photos are not considered "news on current affairs". Wikipedia is blocked in Mainland China, and it has no effect on how to interpret the Chinese copyright law. Chinese judiciary's viewpoint on this matter is inconclusive, yet some legal opinions (by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress - which have the right to interpret laws they [or plenums of the NPC] drafted and passed - and judiciary) support my point (see here and here).--Spring Roll Conan ( Talk · Contributions ) 14:57, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
References
[edit]Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 15:47, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
No FOP in Iceland. Architect was Guðjón Samúelsson (died 1950) Wdwd (talk) 14:23, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:18, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Undeleted in 2021, when Guðjón Samúelsson copyright expired. Platonides (talk) 15:00, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:18, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Publicity still similar to http://www.siteducyclisme.net/coureurfiche.php?coureurid=3573 : unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:12, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 13:43, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/jlandy-jl-byer/images/a/aa/JlandyJlByer0102489.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20180321030009 Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:08, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Y.haruo at 17:14, 28 April 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: http://jlandy-jl-byer.wikia.com/wiki/Jlandy_Jl_Byer --Krdbot 18:18, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
Per {{FoP-Turkey}}, only permanently installed art can be freely photographed. This photo violates artist's copyright. Taivo (talk) 07:54, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- This is a pic from Sinjar, Iraq and AFAIK there is no FoP in Iraq. --E4024 (talk) 07:05, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: anyway a DW. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 08:42, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- I will provide OTRS by today. Devopam (talk) 12:46, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- OTRS sent. Devopam (talk) 17:57, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - if a valid permission is received, then the image will be restored. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:10, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:16, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
CONFUSION EN EL ENUNCIADO ESUTEBANSU (talk) 10:25, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work : very small without EXIFs. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
There is no evidence that Time magazine released the image under a CC license. Hakken (talk) 11:13, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
No evidence to support the claim that this logo was published or commissioned prior to 1983. —LX (talk, contribs) 12:12, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
Facebook photo according to metadata. ~Cybularny Speak? 12:34, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
копия файла https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:LADA_SAGONA_21099.jpg Barbarian (talk) 12:56, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
Aus Gründen der Einheitlichkeit ist es meiner Meinung nach besser, die hier enthaltenen Kategorien in der Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Leutzsch aufzulisten. Ebenso die einzeln stehenden Datein. Falls ich mich irren sollte, mach ich es gern wieder rückgängig. Canon55D (talk) 13:08, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Support --Achim (talk) 18:32, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: empty category anyway. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:03, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
Aus Gründen der Einheitlichkeit ist es meiner Meinung nach besser, die hier enthaltenen Kategorien in der Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Leutzsch aufzulisten. Ebenso die einzeln stehenden Datein. Falls ich mich irren sollte, mach ich es gern wieder rückgängig. Canon55D (talk) 13:11, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: empty category anyway. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:03, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
Photo from Facebook [19] with Copyright. Gastón Cuello (talk) 13:21, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
not being used Eaglezero (talk) 15:04, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- This file should be kept even if only for DENYing the pleasure of trolling to the "sleeper". Please read the comments in their other DRs, like: Commons:Deletion requests/File:"Antik Kentte Sabah Alışverişi" by Gülsün Karamustafa (33450418355).jpg. --E4024 (talk) 06:49, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission from the artist. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:58, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
No evidence that the supplied licence is valid. Ghirlandajo (talk) 15:56, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear author/date therefore unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:55, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photos, Out of scope
- File:Yuandris de González.jpg
- File:Luis Rafael González y su esposa Yuandris de González.jpg
- File:Luis Rafael González y su esposa.jpg
- File:Familia González Gordones (De Luis Rafael González).jpg
- File:Matilde de Hernández y Yuandris de González.jpg
- File:Familia Gonzalez Gordones.jpg
Ronhjones (Talk) 18:41, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Estos archivos pertenecen a Luis Rafael González, son originales de ellos. Lo puedo certificar, que no son plagio. --Mayerlin77 (talk) 23:56, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
@Ronhjones: note that the former “Bot-sp” is now Newsp (talk • contribs • block log • filter log). Should the account be unblocked? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:31, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Incnis Mrsi: Reason for block now not valid, so unblocked.Ronhjones (Talk) 17:44, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
NO SE DEBEN BORRAR --Heartlove2 (talk) 00:35, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Todas las Imágenes mencionadas son originales de la fuente. NO DEBERÍAN SER BORRADAS
- File:Yuandris de González.jpg
- File:Luis Rafael González y su esposa Yuandris de González.jpg
- File:Luis Rafael González y su esposa.jpg
- File:Familia González Gordones (De Luis Rafael González).jpg
- File:Matilde de Hernández y Yuandris de González.jpg
- File:Familia Gonzalez Gordones.jpg
--Heartlove2 (talk) 00:35, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
- Question @Ronhjones: in support of your no-scope claim, do you mantain that these are miscategorized in Category:Salmistas & Profetas? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 15:11, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Ronhjones: repinging. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 15:37, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Ya se acepto el Undeletion requests En Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests y fueron aceptados todos los términos para no eliminar estos archivos. Para estas
- File:Yuandris de González.jpg
- File:Luis Rafael González y su esposa Yuandris de González.jpg
- File:Luis Rafael González y su esposa.jpg
- File:Familia González Gordones (De Luis Rafael González).jpg
- File:Matilde de Hernández y Yuandris de González.jpg
- File:Familia Gonzalez Gordones.jpg
--Truelovecool (talk) 17:41, 6 April 2018 (UTC) --Truelovecool (talk) 17:41, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
- ¿Ya se aceptó? No digas tonterías. (Y no las hagas, tampoco: P.f. quita de abusar de los entretítulos solo para énfasis.) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 19:06, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
- Tuválkin Do not insult. Only, explain to them if they do not understand. That's what you're for. --Mayerlin77 (talk) 22:02, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
- I didn’t insult anyone. This person can blame “Wikipedia” for being hard to understand, but it doesn’t take a genious to figure at least these two things, relevant for the matter at hand:
- Creating three different sock accounts to engage in this DR discussion instead of keeping to the same single nick only adds confusion and distrust.
- Repeating the same “argument” over and over is not a way to hold a constructive discussion.
- He’s trying to have his way by means of drama and trolling, but that backfires fast around here. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 08:00, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- Has tenido un mal dia, Tuválkin como para que vengas con insultos.? Bajale dos, me haces el favor. Si ves que estoy diciendo algo mal, lo mas probable es porque no maneje toda la informacion de Wikipedia a la perfeccion. Explicame y ya. Si no Anda con tu amargura para otra parte. . Pero tranquilo que que ya sere una diestra en eso. --Truelovecool (talk) 21:47, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
- A mim ninguém me explicou, vê lá. Orienta-te: COM:SCOPE + COM:COPYRIGHT. Mas dou-te uma de borla: O que te disseram no Undeletion requests não foi que estas fotos são para manter, foi que a discussão acerca de as apagar ou não deve ser mantida aqui nesta página. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 08:00, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- Ronhjones necesitare otra cosa para validar esto? aun estoy aprendiendo --Mayerlin77 (talk) 22:02, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Per COM:SCOPE. This isn't Facebook or Instagram, all are familiar photos w/o encyclopedic use. --Taichi (talk) 07:23, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- Comment After a local checkuser request in Spanish Wikipedia, all these accounts are belonged to Bot-SP or Newsp. --Taichi (talk) 20:14, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+grabbed from facebook "FBMD". --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:45, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
Probably copyvio. Uploader does not seem to have right to publish picture. — ThomasO. 18:57, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Ich habe das Bild von der Künstlerin zum Upload erhalten und es stellvertretend hochgeladen. Die Besitzerin des Bildes hat ebenfalls eingewillgt. Was braucht es noch? --NB-Edit (talk) 19:26, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- Es ist eine Freigabe vom Rechteinhaber erforderlich, die im OTRS zu archivieren ist. Siehe Commons:Licensing/de, dort insbesondere die E-Mail-Vorlagen. Gruß — ThomasO. 20:15, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no permission - see OTRS. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:46, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
Looks like a copyright violation or advertisement from Jesse Garant & Associates. Regardless of copyright status, this is a branded advertisement. Mets501 (talk) 19:06, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:50, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
This image is unlikely to be the uploader's own work as stated. The subject died on 1997, so there's no way a photo could have been taken in January 2007. I was unable to find this photo online, other than here. Diannaa (talk) 21:37, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:39, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
Likely copyright violation. There's no evidence that the person who uploaded the logo to Flickr is actually the creator, the copyright holder or otherwise in a position to release the image under CC-0. For example, YouTube had it first. Checking Tabletop123's other uploads, which largely are based on other images by the same Flickr user, may be worthwhile. Huon (talk) 01:49, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
How do I contest this. Thanks. --Tabletop123 (talk)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:31, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Is Liam Davis identitcal with the person behind the user account Speech500? If not this is a CopyVio! Martin K. (talk) 06:41, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- I presume that the original map was drawn by Ursula K. Le Guin. It's the same with maps of Middle-earth and other fictional countries which are deleted again and again. There should be a clear note in the header of each category of this kind which says that they are all copyrighted. NNW 17:45, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:32, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Permission from Angela Raffa needed. See COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 06:57, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:32, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Probably not own work. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:52, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- If it is own work, there's no other source than the author. Antonello Zito at Italian Wikipedia is the given author. An internet search found http://www.scinexx.de/dossier-detail-767-7.html where the picture is referenced to wikimedia license CC 3.0. -AdAstraPerScientiam (talk) 07:51, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- According to the search query I did yesterday, the probable source is Harvard University, at this page (now dead link) the image was present at higher resolution. Jcb (talk) 11:35, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:33, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
This logo has been discussed a number of times before such as at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vodafone Logo klein.svg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vodafone.svg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vodafone.png, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vodafone Greece logo2017.png and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vodafone Albania.svg, with the consensus has been that it is too complex to be PD per COM:TOO#United Kingdom or to be kept per COM:PCP. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:12, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy delete
I could understand if the earlier logos with the O's in the Vodafone logotype representing opening and closing quotation marks and suggesting conversation are above the UK TOO. But the current logo? A quotation mark (text) cut out of a circle with "vodafone" written under it?- Alexis Jazz 04:09, 31 March 2018 (UTC) - Comment I've posted notes on the user talk pages of the admins who closed the DRs mentioned above (I didn't post on the one admin who was subsequently banned) to ask for clarification of which file they deleted and whether it is the same as this. The "quotation mark" has been previously referred to as a "teardrop", but that might have been for an older version. However, this is resolved is fine with me, but it probably needs to be resolved for good one way or the other. Simply uploading the same file again and again is a waste if it's only going to continued to be deleted. At the same time, if someone feels the other deletions need to be reconsidered, then that should probably be done per COM:REFUND and not by reuploading the file again and again. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:08, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete same logo as the one deleted in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vodafone.svg, more creative than the EDGE magazine logo that is copyrightable in UK Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:47, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Christian Ferrer: I beg to differ. The E in the EDGE logo is customized to make it appear as if EDGE is sort of
strike through. Which is sort of creative and probably a custom font. - For the Vodafone logo, we are talking about the speechmark. It's a quotation mark. Cut out of a circle. A red circle. - Alexis Jazz 16:27, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Christian Ferrer: I beg to differ. The E in the EDGE logo is customized to make it appear as if EDGE is sort of
- Comment For reference, the logo deleted in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vodafone Albania.svg was a 3D version of the logo (similar to this one, only in SVG and with text). Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:22, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- I see little to no value in having the 3D version here and don't really mind if that, along with the old logo version that uses quotation marks in the O's is deleted just to be on the safe side. But this version should imho be kept. - Alexis Jazz 16:27, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Is this fine in the United States? Absolutely. Is this fine in the UK? Highly debatable. And therein lies the problem. The "sweat of the brow" type threshold of originality upheld by the UK courts is really difficult to get around. From my point of view, cutting a quotation mark out of a red circle could very well meet that threshold.
The UK court's threshold for originality is the expenditure of more than negligible or trivial effort or relevant skill in the creation of the work. Going back to the EDGE decision (where that quote came from), it was determined that the simple stretching of the font and the addition of a bar is non-negligible. The quotation mark indicates "talking" which shows a deliberate attempt to match the logo to the product being offered. I could definitely see the EDGE decision being applied to this logo as well since the creation of the logo requires additional skill in design to ensure the logo looks proper. That certainly seems like something that would meet a sweat of the brow type TOO. --Majora (talk) 17:06, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Majora: So why are we keeping the BBC logo again? - Alexis Jazz 19:10, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Letters in normal, everyday, typefaces are below the UK's TOO. That much is clear. The quotation mark in this logo is not in a normal typeface. Also, you uploading a derivative work of something that is DR'ed (File:Nadafone.png) is disrupting Commons to prove a point. Something you should really try to avoid. --Majora (talk) 19:50, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Quotation mark cut out of a circle.
- Letters cut out of squares.
- So why are we keeping the BBC logo again? The not-everyday font thing? When we are talking about a quotation mark?
- Please remove the link to Nadafone in this discussion here. I don't know how your tools work, but I have seen before this can result in accidental deletion. Nadafone does not disrupt Commons. - Alexis Jazz 21:49, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Continuing to compare this to the BBC logo indicates a misunderstanding of how the UK looks at these things. And you were the one that brought it up originally anyways. I'm not removing anything and when this file gets deleted I'll have to DR your derivative anyways. And saying that your derivative work of a potentially copyrighted logo is not disruption indicates a misunderstanding of those things as well. --Majora (talk) 00:06, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- You won't have to DR it. You win. I don't have time for this. If anyone would now ask me, I can't explain why a quotation mark in a circle is not OK but letters in boxes are. If anything shows misunderstanding, it's how the deletion request results for the 3D logo are getting applied to a 2D logo. - Alexis Jazz 21:33, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- Continuing to compare this to the BBC logo indicates a misunderstanding of how the UK looks at these things. And you were the one that brought it up originally anyways. I'm not removing anything and when this file gets deleted I'll have to DR your derivative anyways. And saying that your derivative work of a potentially copyrighted logo is not disruption indicates a misunderstanding of those things as well. --Majora (talk) 00:06, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- Letters in normal, everyday, typefaces are below the UK's TOO. That much is clear. The quotation mark in this logo is not in a normal typeface. Also, you uploading a derivative work of something that is DR'ed (File:Nadafone.png) is disrupting Commons to prove a point. Something you should really try to avoid. --Majora (talk) 19:50, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Majora: So why are we keeping the BBC logo again? - Alexis Jazz 19:10, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Comment This 2D Vodafone logo was unveiled in October 2017. I took a closer look at the deletion requests linked here. In the order they are linked:
- The first DR was from December 2016, so not this logo.
- The second nomination is from August 2016, so again, not this logo.
- The third nomination (December 2017) is from Majora saying "See previous nomination". I don't know if this file was the old or the new logo, but the previous nomination that was being referred to was certainly not the current logo. File was deleted per nomination.
- The fourth nomination (December 2017) is again from Majora saying "Similar to previous Vodafone logos. All deleted.". Deleted without discussion.
- The fifth nomination is identical. (exact same time and text, Majora) Deleted per nomination.
- The sixth nomination was a 3D version of this logo, so.. not this logo. - Alexis Jazz 22:26, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Most of those were actually speedable under COM:CSD General 4. They were recreations of the same deleted logo. And just because they were deleted without discussion doesn't mean the DR didn't have merit. It really does seems like you don't understand how the UK does TOO or how Commons deals with file maintenance issues such as this. --Majora (talk) 00:06, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Per this request, the logo deleted in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vodafone Greece logo2017.png was not the same as the logo being discussed here. If it is felt necessary for the discussion, I am happy to temporarily restore it. Green Giant (talk) 14:51, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per Majora. (also, again per M, we can really do without the pointy uploads in discussions like this...) -- Begoon 17:22, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Seems I forgot to link Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Vodafone logos here.
- Comment I don't even really care if Commons decides this is copyrightable in the UK and needs to be deleted. And for the earlier Vodafone logos that were deleted previously that is certainly a very defendable position. What I don't understand is why this logo needs to be deleted, but similar logos must be kept. The Nike swoosh (yes, that's a US logo, that's not the point) is a strong trademark just like the Vodafone speechmark, but even in the UK I don't believe the speechmark is copyrightable. We are extrapolating from the EDGE case and I think we are taking it too far. If we delete this, there is no way we are going to keep the speechmark. If we want to "play it safe", we should outright ban all UK logos. - Alexis Jazz 15:22, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, by Christian Ferrer per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Vodafone logos. Taivo (talk) 08:43, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Metadata say this is from Facebook. The uploader should clarify their ‘own work’ claim. 2A02:2168:1237:FF00:3951:BF57:60BC:DCCC 22:23, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Hello. I know Inara personally and with her corresponded on Facebook. Originally, I planned to put a photo File:Picture of Ināra Petrusēviča.jpg [20]. I was the copyright owner, but the photographer himself was in America and I also needed permission to take pictures of the pictures on the background. And I decided to download another photo from the Facebook archive. I apologize for English-google translate)) --Changall (talk) 23:53, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The permission from the copyright holder is needed (see OTRS) --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:13, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
This logo, of Israel National Road Safety Authority, made of its name plus a road-V sign, cannot be considered too simple not to be copyrighted. As such, it has no place in the Commons without a specific OTRS release note from the owner. Ldorfman (talk) 23:58, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:11, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
copie de https://reporter-de-l-au-dela.blogspot.fr/2017/05/interview-de-manu-delpech.html Habertix (talk) 00:34, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Bonjour,
Est-ce que c'est ce lien qui a fait que avez supprimé mon article ?
Merci de me le faire savoir, afin que j'y remédie.
Cordialement
L.R.Béranger
Deleted: per nomination - copyright violation. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:24, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Susceptible of Copy-vio. Brgesto (talk) 05:55, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:22, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Susceptible of Copy-vio. Brgesto (talk) 05:56, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:21, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by SpiderMum as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: non-free logo Yann (talk) 06:09, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:23, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
I am the author of this image. According to this discussion in Wikipedia, this portrait is not of Georges de Bande. It is a modern interpretation without any authenticity. For this reason, I request its deletion. Corso (talk) 09:28, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+unclear copyright status of the plate. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:19, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
bad copy (?) from File:Legislative bans on "propaganda" of LGBT in Russian regions.svg Charmbook (talk) 19:53, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - image is used. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:17, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
This does not appear to actually be used by BH. If it is or was used, then it is a copyvio -- " Copyright © 2018 Hungama Digital Media Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. All Rights Reserved." If it is not used, then it is out of scope because there is no educational purpose to a logo that is not authentic. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:33, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-textlogo and in use. --Yann (talk) 06:37, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by SpiderMum as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: non-free logo, Pinkfloyd3 is not the author PD-textlogo? Uploader not informed. Yann (talk) 06:08, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: not so simple. Ruthven (msg) 22:17, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by SpiderMum as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: non-free logo, Pinkfloyd3 is not the author Yann (talk) 06:09, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:17, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
The fact that the group is Italian is not sufficiant to say that a Italian copyright protection is applicable, we need infos about the first publication Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:11, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- It seems to be published in a magazin called Figurina Panini Cantanti '72 see http://www.anniversarybooks.it/figurine-cantanti-72-sanremo-e-psichedelia/cantanti-panini-72/ .--Sanandros (talk) 11:12, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: can be considered PD-Italy (but it's borderline). Ruthven (msg) 22:19, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Frodar as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Quality and size shows that it's taken from an aerial video Yann (talk) 06:55, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Ronhjones at 18:54, 9 Juni 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: Standard YouTube license, see 0:41 --Krdbot 00:15, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Frodar as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Quality and size shows that it's taken from an aerial video Uploader not informed. Yann (talk) 06:56, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Ronhjones at 18:53, 9 Juni 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: Standard YouTube license, see 0:50 --Krdbot 00:15, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Liegt eine Einverständniserklärung der Erziehungsberechtigten vor? Bei Kindern ist das erforderlich. QWL2016 (talk) 16:00, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Hallo QWL2016, da ich in der Nähe wohne, könnte ich die Eltern ausfindig machen und anfragen. Allerdings bräuchte ich eine passende "Kochbuch-Vorlage". Hier finde ich bisher nichts Anwendbares. Ich würde mich über deine Mithilfe freuen. Gruss, --Pakeha (talk) 17:40, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Ich habe leider nichts Entsprechendes. Ich hatte dienstlich mal damit zu tun und würde empfehlen die Datei löschen zu lassen. --QWL2016 (talk) 18:06, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Hier eine Vorlage, die sich problemlos anpassen und übernehmen lässt: http://vogtland-rebels.de/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Zustimmung-zur-Ver%C3%B6ffentlichung-von-Fotos-Kinder-und-Jugendliche.pdf. --Dietrich Krieger (talk)
- Gut, ich versuche etwas daraus zu machen. Löschen käme für mich erst infrage, falls ein besseres Foto vorhanden wäre. Wenn man diesen Brauch in der Fastenzeit dokumentiert, sind immer Minderjährige auf Fotos abgebildet. Zur Fairness gehört allerdings auch die Zustimmung der Kinder und Eltern. --Pakeha (talk) 17:13, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- Hier eine Vorlage, die sich problemlos anpassen und übernehmen lässt: http://vogtland-rebels.de/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Zustimmung-zur-Ver%C3%B6ffentlichung-von-Fotos-Kinder-und-Jugendliche.pdf. --Dietrich Krieger (talk)
- Ich habe leider nichts Entsprechendes. Ich hatte dienstlich mal damit zu tun und würde empfehlen die Datei löschen zu lassen. --QWL2016 (talk) 18:06, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: explicit consent required per Commons:Photographs of identifiable people (Switzerland). --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:26, 17 June 2018 (UTC)