Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2012/03/27
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
I was unable to find this image at the provided source and, at best, it is a derivative work from the Star Wars movies. Eeekster (talk) 03:00, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Not public domain. Martin H. (talk) 04:06, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Blurred image not useful. Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 08:01, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: The quality is too bad to be of any use. Hence speedied. Sreejith K (talk) 08:33, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/File:Francis Edgar Stanley c1882.jpg
obviously non-free and not owned by uploader to be able to release as such...claimed as image from movie and "found it on the internet" (see also visible watermarking). DMacks (talk) 02:28, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom; obviously not a freely licensed image. 28bytes (talk) 02:32, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Common Good (talk) 19:24, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Useless for lack of description. Ices2Csharp (talk) 15:09, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
I was hoping one picture is worth a thousand words! However, without explanation the point is not always clear. I will add some clarifications to the picture tomorrow. Boute (talk) 20:35, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
The clarifications have now been added. Quick feedback would be appreciated. Boute (talk) 05:33, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you, this is fine. I cancel the nomination. Could you have a look at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Plot of decibel.pdf as well? Ices2Csharp (talk) 07:08, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
unidentified person, doubt own work. no educational use possible Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 00:48, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry for intervening again :D - but I look through the same old uncategorized days like you. The person on the photograph was fast identified as the spanish writer and professor Jesús Cotta Lobato. I can't find the image in the same oder better resolution in the internet, so (you already know) I tend to keep it. for no evidence of copvio.--Funfood ␌ 21:02, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Comment You're more than welcome to intervene! ;)) See, couldn't find that guy 'cause I didn't know his last name. He teaches at IES in Sevilla. So, at least he exists. Couldn't find his pic anywhere, so I'd like to withdraw my RFD. Added another category to the image, btw.
I withdraw my nomination --Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 22:38, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Nomination withdrawn Morning Sunshine (talk) 01:43, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Problème de droits (plaque) JLPC (talk) 19:02, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Done Speedy Delete. --M0tty (talk) 21:28, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: by M0tty Morning Sunshine (talk) 01:43, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Low quality, many better alternatives in Category:Adenosine triphosphate. Leyo 15:34, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete as replaceable and numerous chemical mistakes: the O with one bond each need to be OH or O– not "just" a dangling O atom. DMacks (talk) 21:49, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Ed (Edgar181) 15:02, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
www.erich-fromm.de states at bottom "Alle Rechte vorbehalten! © 1999 by Erich Fromm Estate" (all rights reserved) GeorgHH • talk 06:18, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission Polarlys (talk) 15:28, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 00:10, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Agree Personal pic; low quality. Whaledad (talk) 16:05, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:28, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
unused, no educational value, sketch. I consider this file a test upload. Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 00:19, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Agree File page confirms: this is a sketch logo for a future company. Whaledad (talk) 16:07, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:28, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
logo / facebook / band spam. pick one :) Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 00:36, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Personal unusable artwork, out of scope. --P199 (talk) 16:14, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
- Agree - No Wikimedia value. Whaledad (talk) 16:29, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:29, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
advertising, logo spam Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 00:41, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Agree User name says it all. (Probably also Undesireable User Name.) Whaledad (talk) 16:31, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
- Spam extends to: File:JANE_CARR_LA_MER.jpg and File:JANE CARR BIJOUX SCARF.jpg. Whaledad (talk) 16:34, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:30, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. -mattbuck (Talk) 01:03, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:30, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
promo pic. probably (c) anyway Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:30, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:31, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:38, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:31, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:39, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:31, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
image for article on enwiki (deleted); out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:45, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:33, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
spam, out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:47, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:34, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
out of scope, promo Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:59, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:34, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 04:04, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:35, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Private image. unused. GeorgHH • talk 07:14, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:36, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:24, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:40, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:25, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:41, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:27, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:41, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope: use TeX. Leyo 15:37, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete unused and easily recreated in high quality graphics (which this file isn't) or markup-text (TeX as proposed) for improved reusability. DMacks (talk) 21:48, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:43, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Low quality photo of domesticated cat. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:44, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
out of project scope. -- Common Good (talk) 18:40, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope, a cafe promo George Chernilevsky talk 19:44, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Most likely copyvio. See also Terra Alta Guatemala. Trijnsteltalk 20:14, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:45, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Most likely copyvio. See also Terra Alta Guatemala. Trijnsteltalk 20:14, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:45, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 20:45, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:27, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - seems unlikely to be of general utility Tabercil (talk) 21:31, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:27, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
unused personal picture Ileana n (talk) 21:46, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:26, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
no not really funny jokes on Commons, please Antemister (talk) 21:52, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- We have hundreds of "Special or fictional flag" images on Commons, and usually flag images are not deleted just for being special or fictional. However, this one is rather stupid and low-quality... AnonMoos (talk) 06:32, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep What a proposterous nomination. Fry1989 eh? 22:44, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope, without EV George Chernilevsky talk 19:47, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Unreadable small screenshot, out of COM:PS Funfood ␌ 21:53, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:46, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
- File:TheElderScrolls Oblivion.jpg
- File:Daggerfall screenshot.jpg
- File:Captura morrowind.jpg
- File:With horse in Oblivion.jpg
- File:Theelderscrollsarena.png
Copyrighted screenshot from The Elder Scrolls video game. Ytoyoda (talk) 12:58, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:40, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
Useless for lack of description. Ices2Csharp (talk) 15:10, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Comments have now also been added to this picture. Feedback for further improvements are appreciated. Boute (talk) 11:36, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you, I cancel this nomination. Ices2Csharp (talk) 15:03, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
replaced by Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Kastl (Upper Bavaria). 89.244.170.171 15:22, 27 March 2012 (UTC) 89.214.66.128 19:51, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep: Category:Kastl and Category:Kastl (Upper Bavaria) refer to different municipalities. -- 89.214.66.128 19:53, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Ok, request closed. 79.192.96.93 10:47, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: by Foroa Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:40, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Rd232 (talk) 09:20, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
I think this is a copy of Plantilla:Ficha_de_iglesia in es.wikipedia which is not needed here in Commons. Sreejith K (talk) 02:06, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Motopark (talk) 05:58, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Sreejith K (talk) 11:19, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
no permission Yaya7812 (talk) 15:38, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: This is a USA image, taken around 1882 and clearly published. Therefore PD-1923 applies. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:28, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
- Renomination #1
the user does not have permission to use 130.111.96.115 17:25, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
this photo was first published in 1980's, therefore it is under owner copyright 130.111.96.115 17:26, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept Nonsense. The image is in the form of a card, so it was clearly published before 1923 and therefore PD. However, even if it were not published until recently, it is still PD because all USA images created before 1892 are PD, even if never published.
I also note that you now nominated this for deletion three times, using two different names. That is a serious violation of our rules. If you take similar action again, you will blocked from editing on Commons. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:55, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Renomination #2
no permission 130.111.96.115 12:36, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
not in public domain, it was first published in the 1980's 130.111.96.115 12:38, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Speedy keep -- user blocked for three days What part of the explanation and warning above didn't you understand? Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:26, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
不要なファイル Gp0017 (talk) 12:02, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Gallery created by mistake. Gp0017 (talk) 07:29, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per Uploader's request George Chernilevsky talk 19:36, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
watermarks give a strong suggestion of copyright violations
- File:Oscar Perez 1.jpg
- File:Cesar osvaldo villaluz.jpg
- File:Yosgart Gutierrez 25.jpg
- File:Aarón Galindo 6.PNG
- File:Julio Cesar Dominguez 4.jpg
- File:Rogelio Chavez 16.jpg
- File:Carlos Bonet 8.jpg
- File:Martin Galvan 29.jpg
- File:Edgar Andrade 10.jpg
- File:Pablo Zeballos 10.jpg
- File:Chelito Delgado 19.jpg
- File:Cesar Villaluz 18.jpg
- File:Pablo Zeballos 9.jpg
- File:Javier Orozco 27.jpg
- File:Cesar el chelito Delgado 19.jpg
- File:Cesar chelito Delgado.jpg
- File:Cesar Delgado 19.jpg
Vera (talk) 19:29, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
I've just found a further five confirmed copyvios among this user's uploads. User is obviously just grabbing files from the internet.
- File:René Higuita.jpg
- File:Omar Palma.PNG
- File:Niver Arboleda.jpg
- File:Luis Pirata de la Fuente.jpg
- File:Jorge Comas.jpg
- File:Jesús chucho Ramírez.PNG
- File:Gustavo el grillo Biscayzacu.jpg
- File:Eduardo Rergis.PNG
- File:Eduardo Moses.PNG
- File:Luis Garcia 9.jpg
- File:Luis el matador Hernandez 15.jpg
- File:Isaac Terrazas 14.jpg
- File:German Villa 20.jpg
- File:Benjamin Galindo 21.jpg
- File:Joel el tiburon Sanchez 3.jpg
- File:Francisco Palencia 17.jpg
- File:Claudio Suarez 2.jpg
- File:Carlos Hermosillo 27.jpg
- File:Braulio Luna 19.jpg
- File:Alberto García Aspe 8.jpg
- File:Jorge Campos 1.jpg
- File:Michael Arroyo 10.PNG
- File:Aarón Galindo 6.PNG
- File:Cesar Villaluz 18.jpg
- File:Cesar chelito Delgado.jpg
- File:Cesar Delgado 19.jpg
January (talk) 13:28, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: all gone Denniss (talk) 22:56, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
No confidence any of these small, low quality images were created by uploader. If there is metadata, it's from 2 cameras, the rest of the images have nothing. At least one image has overprinting showing true source. This looks like another fan-gallery of footballers, not own work.
- File:Julio César Furch 11.jpg
- File:Daniel Villalva 9.jpg
- File:Inri Manzo 235.jpg
- File:Gerardo Lugo Jr. 32.jpg
- File:Diego Chávez 293.JPG
- File:Luis Sánchez 1.jpg
- File:Gabriel Peñalba 8.jpg
- File:Alan Zamora 17.jpg
- File:Alan Zamora 7.jpg
- File:Emmanuel García 13.JPG
Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:24, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, obvious copyright violations by persistent serial copyright violator. Time to block this vandal indefinitely. Enough is enough. —LX (talk, contribs) 09:11, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and user blocked. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 01:13, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Uploaded content contains a lot of photographs that can't possibly all be the authors own work. copyright infringement. No FOP in Italy
- Delete, homepage materialMotopark (talk) 16:55, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- File:27 high tech e ecologia fonvi.pdf
- File:26 archistars e high-tec 1970-2000 Fonvi.pdf
- File:19 arechitettura contemporanea fonvi.pdf
- File:18 dopo lo international style 1950-70 Fonvi.pdf
- File:17architettura contemporanea la ricostruzione 1943-2009 Fonvi.pdf
- File:17architettura contemporanea 1960-80 Fonvi.pdf
- File:Architettura e paesaggio in Italia 1946- 90.pdf
- File:16 Italia fra vecchio e nuovo 1950-1970 Fonvi.pdf
- File:15 Italia fra vecchio e nuovo 1930-40 Fonvi.pdf
- File:14 Italia fra vecchio e nuovo 1915-30.pdf
- File:13 Taut, Asplund e Aalto un'altra modernità 1927-50 Fonvi.pdf
- File:12 Le Corbusier 1927-50 Fonvi.pdf
- File:11 il mito del moderno 1900-27 Europa. Fonvi.pdf
- File:11 il mito del moderno 1900-27 USA Fonvi.pdf
- File:10 werkbund e folklore 1893-1914 Fonvi.pdf
- File:10 werkbund, modernismo e folklore 1893-1914 Fonvi.pdf
- File:10 art nouveau secessione 1893-1914 Fonvi.pdf
- File:9 metropoli e industrie il secondo ottocento Fonvi.pdf
- File:8.1800-1850 Germania, Russia, America.pdf
- File:L'arch a roma 1860.pdf
- File:8 1800-1850 Francia, Inghilterra, Italia.pdf
- File:7 architettura 1750-1800 classicismo e pittoresco fonvi.pdf
- File:7 Francia 1750-1800 Fonvi.pdf
- File:7 architettura 1750-1800 classicismo e pittoresco Fonvi.pdf
- File:6 il barocco in Europa e in America Fonvi.pdf
- File:6 la francia barocca fonvi.pdf
- File:3 manierismo in europa fonvi.pdf
- File:3 Manierismo st arch it VF.pdf
- File:5 fra 600 e 700 a Roma e in Italia Fonvi.pdf
- File:4 la nascita del barocco a Roma Fonvi.pdf
- File:3 Manierismo st arch it Fonvi.pdf
- File:2 da Bramante a Michelangelo Fonvi.pdf
- File:1 brunelleschi e alberti Fonvi.pdf
- File:Architettura romana sepolcri e vie sepolcrali Fonvi.pdf
- File:Arch. romana tecniche, decorazione, materiali, strade, ponti, acquedotti, porti. Fonvi.pdf
- File:Arch. rom. Mura e porte urbiche. Fonvi.pdf
- File:Fra Giocondo idraulico a Venezia 1506-12 Vincenzo Fontana.pdf
- File:Architettura e rappresentazione Vincenzo Fontana pdf.pdf
- File:2 dopo il liberty architettura italiana 1906-1920.pdf
- File:1 architettura e storicismo e liberty architettura italiana fra 800 e 900.pdf
- File:Architettura italiana 1906-1918. Dopo il liberty.pdf
- File:Architettura italiana fra 800 e 900 storicismo e liberty.pdf
- File:V. fontana origini arch veneziana.pdf
Vera (talk) 16:24, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
add one new file--Motopark (talk) 16:56, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Not all are in Italy. For example, File:26 archistars e high-tec 1970-2000 Fonvi.pdf is in Paris. No FOP in France either. Delete all for multiple reasons: no evidence of permission from the photographers and writers of the texts, texts out of scope and no evidence of permission from the architects of recent buildings in various countries. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:07, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted three, the rest had been previously deleted on other DRs Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:28, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Milena Oliveira Santos (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal pictures.
- File:Paloma Ferreiraaa.jpg
- File:Paloma ferreira.jpg
- File:Paloma Ferreira no jornal extra.jpg
- File:Paloma Ferreira.jpg
- File:Paloma Ferreira - Show Room.jpg
- File:Paloma Ferreira na Quinta da Boa Vista.jpg
Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:23, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:40, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
source / author / uploader don't match. no source, no permission. strongly doubt own work, btw
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 00:45, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete File:Jaypicton2.jpg: has been used here and here before being uploaded to Wikimedia.
- Delete File:Jaypicton1.jpg saeems to have been taken from a publicity picture that has been used for several festivals, posters, etc, like here and here, here.
- Delete File:JAY5.jpg was copied from here
- Delete File:JAY4.jpg was copied from here.
- Whaledad (talk) 17:06, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:41, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
vulgur photos P. Sridhar Babu (talk) 11:28, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason for deletion. See COM:CENSOR. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:39, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
This member is no longer active on Flickr. P. Sridhar Babu (talk) 05:49, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept - I really doubt this is anything but another "vulgar photos" in sheep's clothing. We have flickrreview, we don't need the user to still be active. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:46, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
User has uploaded mostly copyvio photos and screenshots. Unlikely that this is any different without more meaningful source info. Ytoyoda (talk) 12:59, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 19:00, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
No source information. Probably stolen and cropped from copyrighted material Matthew hk (talk) 13:35, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Withdrew My fault. I did not check the page history which do had right source information and the license was verified. Matthew hk (talk) 15:16, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn Denniss (talk) 18:59, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Wrong Name, other with better quality Cressonhist (talk) 14:30, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 18:58, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Wrong Name, other with better quality Cressonhist (talk) 14:31, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 18:58, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Wrong name, other with better quality Cressonhist (talk) 14:32, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 18:58, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Wrong name, other with better quality Cressonhist (talk) 14:32, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 18:58, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Low-resolution photo with no clear subject taken in an unidentified location. Nobody has been willing or able to describe, categorise or otherwise identify the purpose of the photo for years, and it's not used anywhere. As such, it is not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons:Project scope. —LX (talk, contribs) 14:32, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 18:58, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
source says "own work" but image is watermarked "getty images" – JBarta (talk) 17:38, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 18:57, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Most likely copyright violation. Kai von der Hude (talk) 14:13, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Hallo
Bild ist eingereich! [Ticket#2012032710009565] Eingangsbestätigung (Re: WG: Beispiel Arbeit [...])
Hello i have send mail for vallidation here the Ticket Number: [Ticket#2012032710009565] Eingangsbestätigung (Re: WG: Beispiel Arbeit [...])
Info OTRS-Permission recived and inserted. Greets --AleXXw 18:46, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Kept, as permission has been sent to OTRS and a ticket issued. Túrelio (talk) 22:11, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Could someone explain to me why this can be in Commons. Aren't such mascots copyrighted ? Hektor (talk) 07:27, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, the mascots are copyrighted, but the stamps of Russia are not copyrighted. If you use a stamp as a whole, you can publish the stamp in Commons. But derivatives are, as a rule, forbidden. For example, you cannot cut a mascot out of the stamp. Dmitry Ivanov (talk) 08:18, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- This sounds like a loophole to me. Hektor (talk) 06:52, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
- You can find explanation here. Laws are different in various jurisdictions, and there is nothing wrong about it. --Leonid Dzhepko (talk) 18:24, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: As per Dmitry Ivanov and Leonid Dzhepko russavia (talk) 07:06, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Even though stamps are technically public domain in Russia, they still contain depictions of the Sochi mascots, which are a separate, trademarked and copyrighted work owned by Sochi's organizing committee. Thus, they are not fully free. ViperSnake151 (talk) 15:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Yes, in this case we have the restriction on the making of derivative works based upon this stamp: simply speaking, you cannot cut a mascot out of the stamp. From this point of view the stamp with the mascots of the Sochi Olympics is not fully free.
- At the same time the case of the stamps is not unique. There are the restrictions on the making of derivatives and/or on the fields of use applied to such things like state symbols (coats of arms, flags etc.), bank notes etc. The things like these are not fully free: for example, the commercial use of current national coats of arms is very restricted or forbidden.
- And the community of Commons has the consensus about these things: they can be uploaded.
- The same principle can be (and must be) applied to the stamps, including this souvenir sheet with the Sochi mascots.
- Yours respectfully, Dmitry Ivanov (talk) 19:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, per previous DR and this comment by Dmitry. Although the characters are (C) and (R), Sochi 2014 Olympic and Paralympic Organizing Committee, owner of the rights of the characters, allowed the organisation that create such stamps to be released. As such, is was responsability of the SOPOC to know the laws of Russia for stamps. Tbhotch™ 23:30, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- Commons requires content to be free in both the US and its source country. I think this would not apply to the former. ViperSnake151 (talk) 03:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- I think ViperSnake151 is wrong here: the image of the Russian stamp will also be PD in the US, according to the general principle of the Convention. Please do not mix up different things: a stamp image and Olympic mascots themselves. Here we speak about deletion of a stamp image. --Leonid Dzhepko (talk) 07:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- Commons requires content to be free in both the US and its source country. I think this would not apply to the former. ViperSnake151 (talk) 03:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, per previous Dmitry Ivanov and ViperSnake151. This file is used in a way that is appropriate template {{PD-RU-exempt}}. --►Cekli829 08:30, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Неважно, какое произведение воспроизводит почтовый блок. Весь блок является знаком почтовой оплаты. --Vizu (talk) 18:25, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 12:23, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Mascots are a seperately copyrighted work that cannot be covered by the PD claim, per Commons:Deletion_requests/Azerbaijan_World_Chess_Championship_set, making the entire image non-free. ViperSnake151 (talk) 05:16, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Per aforesaid, and per a similar case: Commons:Deletion requests/File:1C PSE Russia 2008.jpg. To say the truth, the precedent of the Azerbaijan World Chess Championship cited by ViperSnake151, doesn’t look as an especially conclusive proof, this deletion has to be disputed. Dmitry Ivanov (talk) 18:53, 27 May 2015 (UTC).
- Comment The artwork depicted was pre-existing and is fully copyrighted; being published on a "public domain" stamp does not change the fact that there is a copyright on the character and its depictions. ViperSnake151 (talk) 04:08, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- In this case: an exception to the copyrights {{PD-RU-exempt}} applies to stamps only (and other marks of postal payment). Any other mascots images would violate copyright. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 07:24, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. The decision to delete Azerbaijan_World_Chess_Championship_set was absolutely wrong from legal standpoint, and should be reversed BTW. Wikimedia Foundation runs no legal risks in this instance, because Azerbaijani law is definite here: stamp images are not copyright protected, and so are not protected in the US as well. Mascots are mascots, and postage stamps are postage stamps; legal status of the two is different, and the protection they enjoy is different. Do not mix the two. Images of postage stamps as long as they are identifiable as such, i.e. in their entirety, are free. As soon as you separate a mascot image from the postage stamp image, it would forfeit its uncopyrightable status, therefore no derivative works are allowed with respect to postage stamp images. --Leonid Dzhepko (talk) 08:45, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Comment There is no denying that the stamp itself is PD. But the artwork contained within it is copyright Sochi Organizing Committee, and there are two distinct copyrights that have to be acknowledged; one has been waived per law, but the other is not. It is like a photo taken in a region where there is no Freedom of Panorama; the photographer still has rights to the rest of the photo, but it is still subject to the copyrights of the subject depicted. ViperSnake151 (talk) 00:13, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
- Disagree A) If the stamps in Russia are in PD under a normative act, therefore exceptions to the PD-status of the stamps have to be established by means of a normative act. But there are no exceptions to the PD-status of the stamps of Russia in normative acts. B) The rights of a copyright holder (the rights of the Olympic Committee in our case) are not trespassed, they are regulated by agreement between a copyright holder and the postal authorities: a copyright holder can prohibit the publication of a copyrighted work as a part of a PD-work or can permit to publish a copyrighted work as a part of a PD-work (for a compensation or without it). B) The similar situation is in “no-FoP-countries”: the sense of a “no-FoP-law” isn't in the prohibition on the publication of photos featuring architectural works, “no-FoP” means the necessity to come to an agreement between the author (publisher) of a photo featuring an copyrighted architectural work and the holder of the copyright. Dmitry Ivanov (talk) 08:36, 30 May 2015 (UTC).
- Keep, per Leonid Dzhepko and Dmitry Ivanov. --Michael Romanov (talk) 08:13, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
______ Kept. As above and prior keeps. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:45, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Description: photo by Ricardo Flores Source: own work, Author:buddybrobeck - That doesn't make any sense whatsoever. Not own work or no permission Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:33, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:48, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
strongly doubt own work Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:49, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:48, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
source doesn't match author. probably copy vio Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:02, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:50, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
own work, author and uploader odn't match up. out of scope anyway Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:03, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:51, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
The file is missing evidence that the copyright holder of the cover work licensed the file under the given license. Asclepias (talk) 02:54, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:04, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
No FOP in Iran. Americophile 04:38, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 10:05, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
No FOP in Iran. Americophile 04:38, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 10:06, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
No FOP in Iran. Americophile 04:39, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:47, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
No FOP in Iran. Americophile 04:39, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 10:06, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
No FOP in Iran. The statue has been sculpted about 10 years ago and therefore still protected by the Iranian copyright law. Americophile 04:47, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:25, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Sculpture by Corneille (1922-2010). There is no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 06:12, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Note: the artist is actually Frans Corneillie from Westrozebeke. BrightRaven (talk) 07:19, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:40, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
COM:DW 77.184.160.214 06:49, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:16, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Photograph in a PDF, should be provided in an image fileformat Funfood ␌ 08:14, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:48, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Possibly a copyright violation. This depicts a person who is said to have lived in the 50s (if he existed at all, see en:Jules Jammal), so the claim of "own work" by a person with no other contributions appears dubious. Sandstein (talk) 08:34, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:49, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
File:Ursula Sax, Raummesser UX35, skulpturale Intervention im Lichthof des Albertinums Dresden 2012.jpg
[edit]
Art work by an living artist (de:Ursula Sax) inside a museum (en:Albertinum) GeorgHH • talk 08:49, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:52, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Self-promotion/advertisement. Out of scope. Jafeluv (talk) 09:19, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:45, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:05, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:37, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:07, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:20, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:11, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:21, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:11, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:23, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
No permission. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:26, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:18, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
No permission. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:26, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:23, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Unclear source, maybe TV. No indication that music is available under a free license. Pristurus (talk) 12:29, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:29, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
The image is already present in a much higher quality as File:Ming Yejong.jpg. Additionally the title is wrong, as it does not show emperor Jiangtai. Mps2 (talk) 13:12, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:48, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Is really "Snobbiz" the author of this painting? Stigfinnare (talk) 13:34, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:23, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Appears to use a photo of Mr. Bean in it's construction and the copyright status of the Bean photo is unknown. – JBarta (talk) 13:47, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:50, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Appears to use a photo of Mr. Bean in it's construction and the copyright status of the Bean photo is unknown. – JBarta (talk) 13:47, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:49, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Wrong file uploaded. This one is taken by my father. My picture is uploaded now ! sri :-) Richardkw (talk) 13:53, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:47, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
and other uploads by Homaiho (talk · contribs). Unlikely to be own work: inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF/different cameras. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:46, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:39, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
No permission, file description page states: 'Prohibida su reproducción total o parcial por cualquier medio sin permiso escrito de las autoridades universitarias.' Ices2Csharp (talk) 15:42, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:37, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
No permission, permission field states: 'ninguno' (no at all). Ices2Csharp (talk) 15:49, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:32, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
No permission, permission field states: 'sin permisos de uso' (without permission for usage). Ices2Csharp (talk) 15:50, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:32, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
No permission, file description page states: 'Prohibido su uso sin permiso del autor.' Out of scope anyway. Ices2Csharp (talk) 15:57, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:56, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
False own work claim: this is a scan of a printed map in circulation. The copyright belongs to the publisher or author of the map. —Andrei S. Talk 16:06, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:43, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Unclear whether the copyright of this photographed piece of art belongs to the uploader as well. Mathonius (talk) 19:22, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 10:01, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Sculpture by Corneille (1922-2010). There is no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 06:13, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Artist is Frans Corneillie from Westrozebeke who was still alive in 2010. Thanks to User:Zeisterre for this correction. --Foroa (talk) 18:40, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:36, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Image used for BS on TALK page. No educational value. Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 00:31, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Agree - Personal picture; no Wikimedia value. Whaledad (talk) 16:28, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. JuTa 11:03, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Source: own work / author: Jay Picton. Uploader different. So, no permission or no source. Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 00:43, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Picture originates from Jay's MySpace page. I don't think posting photos on MySpace make them public domain. It definitely doesn't make them "own work". Whaledad (talk) 16:46, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
- CommentPosting on myspace doesn't change the license. No automatic pd or cc. --Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:16, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. JuTa 11:04, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
no real source, no real author. Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:21, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Comment Weak source, I have to admit, but this says, he is an author ;) --Funfood ␌ 21:43, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. JuTa 11:07, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Looks like homework to me. out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:41, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - "Este ensayo tiene como objetivo verificar ..." - definitely homework. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:22, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. JuTa 11:09, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Strongly doubt own work Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:53, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Like with a lot of your deletion requests I'll tend to keep the picture. Even it is small and of low quality: the enwp article about Glen Ashman could use it and there is no evidence of a copvio. We could put half commons to deletion request if we doubt every own work. Regards --Funfood ␌ 14:37, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Comment It is not my fault, the image is NOT OWN WORK. According to our rules -> RFD You have to look at it from a different angle, somebody might use a (c)-image and gets into a lot of trouble because we (Commons) ignore the laws. Usage on any wiki doesn't proof anything besides that the image is used for educational purposes. Enwiki will get away with fair use, we don't. Commons is global. I actually try to establish the origin of every single image I tag. Don't want to be the bad guy, who tags files without thinking about it. And sure, I do make mistakes. And as you know, I withdraw RFD's gladly. Any ideas how to save the image? --Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 20:12, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Comment What makes you sure that the image is NOT OWN WORK? Maybe I am a bit shortsighted, but I tend to keep pictures like this one. But I know, other people's views are different - that's what Commons is all about ;) --Funfood ␌ 20:19, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Comment transferred discussion onto your talk page. we might get a loving smack in the face from our loving admins when we misuse the RFD discussion :-)) --Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 20:36, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Picture was copied from the judge's blog: "The contents of this page Copyright 2006-2011 by Glen Ashman. All Rights Reserved.". Whaledad (talk) 17:19, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: cpvio. JuTa 11:10, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Can't find this image at given source. Can't find any general (c) information either. Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 04:10, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete It is here [[1]].--Funfood ␌ 20:42, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: cpvio JuTa 11:16, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- +File:Historic drawing of a Short Tailed Hopping Mouse.jpg (downscaled duplicate)
Same problem as in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Long-Tailed Hopping Mouse drawing.jpg, not a historic drawing, rather a modern drawing grabbed from recent books or recent websites. Source is http://www.australianwildlife.org/Wildlife-and-Ecosystems/Australias-Biodiversity-Crisis.aspx. Martin H. (talk) 04:15, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete, source gives no support to uploader's claim that this is an old artwork out of copyright, and instead has a clear copyright notice. -- Infrogmation (talk) 15:46, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: cpvio JuTa 11:18, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
No FOP in Iran. Americophile 04:38, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 10:00, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
I suspect uploader is not the copyright holder. Original appears as Flash animation BTola-FlashAnimation-CarvingDezine.swf from at http://www.btola.com/ifgt-technology.html . Other files from same uploader also look suspect. 84user (talk) 08:58, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Agree that there's no specific evidence of permission/licensing (best we have is circumstantial: the editor appears to be en:WP:SPA whose sole role is promoting this company, and therefore might be PR employee). Image itself is too small/low-res to be of much use either...it's apparently illustrating a complex heat- and mass-flow process but cannot decipher the parts in order for it to have educational worth. DMacks (talk) 05:27, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
- Delete The contract for the uploader was to add one diagram to the article from the client's website, and it appears that this was the diagram chosen by the uploader. It therefore is extremely unlikely that this is the uploader's own work, and there is no evidence that the client intended to release the image under a compatible license, as they may not have been aware of those conditions. - Bilby (talk) 12:49, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. JuTa 19:43, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by InverseHypercube as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Only Canadian photographs before 1949 are acceptable, and 50 pma for other works. Since this was created in 1943, the author probably didn't die before 1946, which is the cutoff for URAA. Sreejith K (talk) 10:02, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - the few copyrightable elements on the cover are old. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:44, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
- Do you know that the logo is old enough? Otherwise I suppose it could be below the threshold of originality, but it's arguable. InverseHypercube 03:27, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Collage containing deleted images: File:Samsun2.png, File:Samsun1.png. Takabeg (talk) 11:36, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep: Done. (Don't forget to hide the old version) --McZusatz (talk) 07:11, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- There's still an attribution problem as not a single original author is named. That's a license violation. The original uploader can only be credited for pasting these images together, not for the images used. --Denniss (talk) 17:14, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Kept: I fixed the author attribution now, but nxt time pls. do this yourself. JuTa 19:59, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio? Also here ([2]) with an earlier date. Stefan4 (talk) 12:09, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
![[2]](http://www.dicv.csic.es/arxius/AvelinoCorma.jpeg.jpg){kind=link}
- The uploader created a talk page for me at Spanish Wikipedia. It is lucky that e-mail notification was enabled since I would otherwise not have noticed this. He wrote that he has taken the photo himself and that the other web site might have copied his image.
- The Commons image was uploaded on 10 March 2011 while the other web site has a modification date of 3 February 2011 which is slightly earlier. The Commons image looks like a crop of the much bigger image on the external site, so I would say that this needs OTRS. There is an even earlier version here. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:46, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. JuTa 20:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
The image is already present in a much higher quality as File:Ming Yejong.jpg. Additionally the title is wrong, as it does not show emperor Tianqi. Mps2 (talk) 13:11, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Even so the resolution of File:Ming Yejong.jpg is much higher, it has a badly modified background (see the linked original source: pattering is missing, at the right shoulder it is cut too less, at the left shoulder too much). Should not be deleted, just renamed. --Hareinhardt (talk) 20:58, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: its in use. Use {{Rename}} if desired. JuTa 20:04, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
My own uploaded picture, duplicate of File:Galaxies' El Dorado.jpg, much less resolution. Dipankan001 (talk) 14:13, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- However, this one from NASA.gov seems to be color-corrected. Platonides (talk) 14:44, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. JuTa 20:07, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
insufficient licensing Agora 15:54, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: quote from description page: This picture is only for the use of his biography on wikipedia JuTa 20:12, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Useless for lack of description. Ices2Csharp (talk) 16:06, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
No, it's not. Please check more carefully before suggesting deletions. This image is used and described fully here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FASTQ_format sealox (talk) 08:15, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Please note following guidelines on deletion request:
"Additionally, you may want to check for Wikimedia projects that use this item and then remove or, if possible, replace with a superior item."
- I did check carefully. The pdf version is not in use in the article. Instead, the article uses File:Probability metrics.svg. Your answer seems to show confusion between the pdf and the svg version. Svg is far better than pdf for figures like this. Ices2Csharp (talk) 20:47, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion JuTa 20:14, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
low resolution makes it unlikeley to be own work Vera (talk) 16:35, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:05, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Japan (or almost anywhere else, for that matter) for nonfree cabinet artwork. Thus, this is an unauthorized derivative work of the cabinet art. RJaguar3 (talk) 18:01, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep This has nothing to do with FOP or derivative work, this is an original photo. I think this is de minimis. The main artwork at the right side is shown in a very small portion and from an angle. The other artwork is not too complex (color portions with also very small circles with the characters and also de minimis. We have lots of other cabinets. Also kept File:Donkey Kong arcade.jpg --Kungfuman (talk) 11:48, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- I find it hard to believe that de minimis would apply here when the cabinet itself is the focus of the photograph (as opposed to a generic photograph of an arcade that happens to also include nonfree cabinets, which would likely fall under de minimis). See the deletion log for File:Pacman-puckman.jpg, in which a comparison of Pac-Man and Puck Man cabinets was deleted for copyright reasons. RJaguar3 (talk) 21:24, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
- The cabinet is not de minimis. But the artwork of it thereon. I don't know how the Pacman image looked (obviously comparing 2 cabinets, maybe the same copyrighted Flickr image as on the english Wiki) but the artwork here is not in the center and not for comparison reason. You also see more than just the cabinets here (background). We have other (Pac-Man) cabinets like this File:Super Pac-Man - Bally Midway Namco arcade cabinet.jpg which shows some characters frontally and is more questionable than the very dark and very sharp angled artwork on the lower right side which someone can't really see properly. Or File:Mspacmancabinet.png or File:Space Invaders Arkad.jpg. Again, almost all arcade cabinets (and many other products) have artwork, characters, or portions of the screen or else. I think if it's not shown too close and the artwork fewer than half of the image, like it is here, it should be kept. And the Gauntlet cabinet image would be useful without any artwork because of it's unique cabinet style. So another reason that the artwork is de minimis. --Kungfuman (talk) 15:22, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
- I find it hard to believe that de minimis would apply here when the cabinet itself is the focus of the photograph (as opposed to a generic photograph of an arcade that happens to also include nonfree cabinets, which would likely fall under de minimis). See the deletion log for File:Pacman-puckman.jpg, in which a comparison of Pac-Man and Puck Man cabinets was deleted for copyright reasons. RJaguar3 (talk) 21:24, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
it shows a poster made in 1996, may be coprighted Ezarateesteban 22:16, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Do not delete. The poster is only a portion of the image, not its main subject (a projector), and not the whole poster can be seen. So there is no copyrignt violation. If you still have doubts, you can always cut away the most part of the poster, without deleting the image. --Leonid Dzhepko (talk) 07:15, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Kept: cut out copyrighted poster and fotos and hidden initial version. JuTa 20:27, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
All images claim own work, strong doubt about that. Maybe the pdf is own work, meta data is not conclusive IMHO
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 00:23, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
I have changed the Wi-LAN Timeline chart and the Hopper Plus image to indicate they were taken from Wi-LAN Presentation material. The MF EoY photo was given to me by Dr. Michel Fattouche. I have indicated that on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zhatim (talk • contribs) 03:32, 27. Mär. 2012 (UTC)
- Comment What exactly is it you want to establish with changing from own work to template:.....? Why can you upload parts of a presentation which is property of the Wi-Lan Company and tag them under CC-SA license? Not trying to be mean! :) --Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 03:48, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete The two pictures are clearly from Wi-Lan copyright material and unless submitter shows that he legally represents Wi-Lan in donating these into the public domain, he has no right do do so. The award picture (scan, more likely) may have been given to submitter by the gentleman himself, but that doesn't convey copyright unto submitter, nor does it make it public domain. Whaledad (talk) 16:25, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Foot in mouth: User:Zhatim is likely w:en:Hatim Zaghloul, so likely he IS authorized to donate File:Wi-LAN Timeline chart 92-04.jpg and File:Hopper Plus.gif to the community. (Do we need an OTRS for that?) I'm still less convinced re. the Award. Do we need an OTRS from Fattouche? And/or from Ernst & Young? Whaledad (talk) 22:20, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
- Keep as per above. --McZusatz (talk) 18:49, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
'Kept: for now. But tagged with {{No permission}}. Should be confirmed through COM:OTRS. --JuTa 11:00, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
strongly doubt own work
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 00:47, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete File:Jaysus (3).jpg has been copied from here. Whaledad (talk) 17:13, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. JuTa 11:06, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
IMHO unusable on commons, unknown people, unknown locations.
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 04:07, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Comment User:TFCforever, who now edits as User:Michael Barera, seems to think this is a "Women's association football player from the Czech Republic". I've invited him to comment here. - dcljr (talk) 23:16, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Comment I'm not 100% sure, but based on the fact the description is in Czech and the categories that CommonSense gave to the image in question, I thought it was safe to assume the category I added was the correct one. Again, I'm not positive, but I do think it is correct. Michael Barera (talk) 20:20, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- That seems to pan out. File:Futsalmisa.jpg can be found here, in higher resolution than uploaded, so likely the original. The site marks: "Copyrights © 2005 - 2012 ČFSF - Futsal". Whaledad (talk) 17:49, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
- Comment I'm not 100% sure, but based on the fact the description is in Czech and the categories that CommonSense gave to the image in question, I thought it was safe to assume the category I added was the correct one. Again, I'm not positive, but I do think it is correct. Michael Barera (talk) 20:20, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Note that pics were uploaded in 2010 and not used. Whaledad (talk) 17:49, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. JuTa 11:14, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by IPN-Adriana-A (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, no permission.
- File:Prac7com.pdf
- File:TIPOS DE CONEXIONES.pdf
- File:PUERTOS.pdf
- File:Puerto usb.pdf
- File:Practica1.pdf
- File:Bluetooth.pdf
- File:Sistema GPS.pdf
- File:Registros.pdf
- File:RANGOS EN VOLTS DEL SISTEMA BINARIO.pdf
- File:Que es CPU.pdf
- File:Frecuencias.pdf
- File:El cinescopio.pdf
- File:Bluetooth e infrarrojo.pdf
- File:ROBOTs.pdf
- File:LEYES DE LA ROBOTICA.pdf
- File:CLASIFICACION DE LOS ROBOTS.pdf
- File:Tarea 5 Precauciones y articulos para la limpieza de una computadora.pdf
- File:Tarea 4 mantenimiento preventivo, predictivo y correctivo.pdf
- File:Tarea 3 historia de las computadoras.pdf
- File:Tarea 2 wiki.pdf
- File:Tarea 1 diagrama bloques.pdf
Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:09, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. JuTa 19:52, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
No permission, file description pages state: 'No usar sin permiso' (do not use without permission).
- File:Eldoradoim.jpg
- File:Fuentedelajuventud.jpg
- File:Lafragata.jpg
- File:Eljaguar.jpg
- File:Quetzalim.jpg
- File:Eldesafio.jpg
- File:Entradaim.jpg
Ices2Csharp (talk) 15:44, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. JuTa 20:10, 23 July 2012 (UTC)