User talk:Pilgab
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
--SieBot 19:06, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Stitched and a little bit brightened. Have a lot of fun. --Marku1988 18:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you again! Pilgab 19:08, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Please stop reverting my edits - the horse is in the breed gallery Nonius and it is no problem to find it there. I think this is really enough. If you don't think so you may make up a Category for the breed. In this case don't forget to put the category in the breed gallery also. There are hundrets of horse photos in Commons - we can't put them all in the main category. --Kersti 09:43, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:30, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
File:Balatoni_naplemente2.JPG
Your image File:Balatoni_naplemente2.JPG is used on two pages on Wikinfo. http://www.wikinfo.org/index.php/File:Balatoni_naplemente2.JPG Fred Bauder (talk) 01:30, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for informing me! :) --Pilgab (talk) 09:19, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Szia! Szeretném ezt a képet a neved megjelölésével felhasználni a Balaton Regatta ingyenes vitorlás hírújságban, amely 10e pl-ban jelenik meg minden balatoni kikötőben. Üdv, Rakmányi Ernő, felelős szerkesztő 3:10 June 22.
Hello! Köszönöm szépen, hogy szóltál, nagyon örülnék neki. Pilise Gábor
Hi Pilgab, I used your beautiful Big Ben photo at http://www.boldlygosolo.com/boldly_go_solo/2010/09/is-london-safe-for-solo-travelers.html on Sept 22, 2010.
Thank you :) Cheers! Pilgab (talk) 18:52, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello Pilgab, we used your Lake Balaton photo for a story on Hungary. (http://travel.asiaone.com/article/destinations/hidden-treasures-of-hungary)
Thank you for the gorgeous photo. -AsiaOne Travel
Tip: Categorizing images
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 23:06, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Kapor3.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Kapor.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Foxi Kethevoama 2.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Kapor4.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Foxi Kethevoama 3.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Kapor2.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Foxi Kethevoama.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Nagy Ferenc.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Balogh Tamás.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Hi, I used your image Aranycsapat.jpg to illustrate my article on football formations on Suite 101and have put in your credit as requested. I tried to link to it here but Wiki wouldn't let me. However, if you go to Suite 101 and search on my name (Steve Rogerson) you will find the article entitled "How Don Revie Changed The Face of Football" in which your picture is used.
Thank you very much! :) I've found the article, good job! :) Pilgab (talk) 16:13, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Michaeldsuarez (talk) 20:20, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Tóth László.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Tóth László.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Denniss (talk) 16:34, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Regasterios (talk) 05:37, 8 May 2021 (UTC)