User talk:Jula2812
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 7 days. For the archive overview, see Archive/. The latest archive is located at Archive/2024. | |
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 07:36, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:August Grahl - Prinzess von Sachsen.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:August Grahl - Prinzess von Sachsen.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:37, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
added
This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 100 years or fewer. You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States. | |
This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights. |
Yours sincerely, --Jula2812 (talk) 17:30, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Walther Benser, "A Colour Charmer Visits India", Januar 1965.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
-- Ies (talk) 14:46, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
File:Walther Benser, Buchtitel "Mein Leben mit der Leica" 1990.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
-- Ies (talk) 14:47, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Prospekt "en Leica-afton med Walther Benser", Schweden Februar 1958.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
-- Ies (talk) 14:50, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Walther Benser, Cover Prospekt "Original Benser" Kamera-Zubehör.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
-- Ies (talk) 14:51, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Walther Benser, Lichtbildvortrag, Augsburg 1979.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
-- Ies (talk) 14:53, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Walther Benser, Poster 42x59cm, 1965.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
-- Ies (talk) 14:54, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Werner Heuser 1956 100x100cm Landstreicher.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
And also:
- File:Werner Heuser 1956 100x80cm Masken.jpg
- File:Werner Heuser 1953 100x80cm Carneval.jpg
- File:Werner Heuser 1955 80x60cm Trio Ritter Tod und Teufel.jpg
- File:Werner Heuser 1952 53 80x60cm Heimkehrer.jpg
- File:Werner Heuser 1928 80x60cm In den Anlagen.jpg
- File:Werner Heuser 1929 84x64cm Jesus fällt das erste Mal.jpg
Yours sincerely, Ies (talk) 15:04, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
copyright belongs to the heiers of Werner Heuser, the picture is on our property, copyright violation is not in mind
This work is in the public domain in the United States and the source country. In most cases, this means that its copyright expired under the law of the source country and it was either published prior to January 1, 1929 or its copyright also expired under the law of the United States. Its copyright has also expired in those countries with a copyright term of life of the author plus 50 years or less. To the uploader: please provide relevant publication and authorship details.
For non-US works, consider attaching a country-specific tag if available. | |
|
would be soon right
The heirs of this work's copyright holder (usually the creator) have released it into the public domain. This applies worldwide.
In some countries this may not be legally possible; if so: |
Yours sincerely, --Jula2812 (talk) 17:25, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Otto Sohn-Rethel.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Martin Sg. (talk) 22:23, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:2 Pintores Alemanes Exposicion Noviembre de 1960.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 22:49, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
File tagging File:Werner Heuser 1928 80x60cm In den Anlagen.jpg
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Werner Heuser 1928 80x60cm In den Anlagen.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 22:50, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Werner Heuser 1929 84x64cm Jesus fällt das erste Mal.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 22:50, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
File tagging File:Werner Heuser 1953 100x80cm Carneval.jpg
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Werner Heuser 1953 100x80cm Carneval.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 22:50, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
File tagging File:Werner Heuser 1956 100x80cm Masken.jpg
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Werner Heuser 1956 100x80cm Masken.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 22:51, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
File tagging File:Werner Heuser 1956 100x100cm Landstreicher.jpg
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Werner Heuser 1956 100x100cm Landstreicher.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 22:51, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Werner Heuser 1955 80x60cm Trio Ritter Tod und Teufel.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 22:52, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
File tagging File:Ursula Benser 95x75cm.jpg
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Ursula Benser 95x75cm.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 23:03, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Walther Benser, Cover Prospekt "Original Benser" Kamera-Zubehör.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:31, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Walther Benser, Poster 42x59cm, 1965.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:33, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Von der Raupe zum Falter, Otto Sohn-Rethel ca. 1910 01.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Von der Raupe zum Falter, Otto Sohn-Rethel ca. 1910 01.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 03:16, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
license added: cc-by-sa-4.0 waiting for permission - see Ticket#2015011110005999
File:Kindergruppe - Geschwister, Bronze, Käthe Kollwitz 1937-38.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
KDS4444 (talk) 08:03, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
This is a faithful photographic reproduction of a two-dimensional, public domain work of art. The work of art itself is in the public domain for the following reason:
The official position taken by the Wikimedia Foundation is that "faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works of art are public domain".
This photographic reproduction is therefore also considered to be in the public domain in the United States. In other jurisdictions, re-use of this content may be restricted; see Reuse of PD-Art photographs for details. |
will this do? --Jula2812 (talk) 08:13, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
File:Kindergruppe - Geschwister, Bronze, Käthe Kollwitz 1937-38.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
KDS4444 (talk) 18:01, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!
You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.
Dear Jula2812,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.
Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:43, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:K20 Agnes Martin 7. Nov 2015 bis 6. März 2016.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:K20 Agnes Martin 7. Nov 2015 bis 6. März 2016.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Emha (talk) 13:05, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
Lizenzbausteine
Hallo Jula2812,
{{cc-zero}} kannst du nur nehmen, wenn das Werk von dir ist. Bei alten Bildern solltest du daher besser {{PD-old-auto-1923}} nehmen. Wenn der Fotograf bekannt ist, kommt auch {{PD-old-70}} in Frage.--Theo Bümmelmann (talk) 16:22, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- kapiert und erledigt - danke sehr für den Hinweis -- Jula2812 (talk) 05:53, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!
You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.
Dear Jula2812,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.
In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.
Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Hallo Jula, weißt du, ob das Relief beim Neubau wieder angebracht wurde? Sonst sollten wir den Text entsprechend ändern. -- Kürschner (talk) 13:32, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
- Ich bin am Sonntag bei „Troner art“, Altestadt und werde das Gebäude umschleichen. Liebe Grüße --Jula2812 (talk) 13:58, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
- das Relief mit den zwei Äffchen des von Weichs (welcher residierte dort wohl um 1823 ?) ist an dem Neubau wieder angebracht worden. Es grüßt die Julia --Jula2812 (talk) 18:56, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
- habe ich nicht zu hoffen gewagt. Es grüßt zurück der Kürschner (talk) 21:26, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry, ich habe geträumt, diese Doublette war keine Absicht: File:Düsseldorf, Liefergasse Ecke Ratinger Straße, Affenrelief, 2018.jpg. :-( -- Kürschner (talk) 18:07, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- habe ich nicht zu hoffen gewagt. Es grüßt zurück der Kürschner (talk) 21:26, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
- das Relief mit den zwei Äffchen des von Weichs (welcher residierte dort wohl um 1823 ?) ist an dem Neubau wieder angebracht worden. Es grüßt die Julia --Jula2812 (talk) 18:56, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
- Hinweis: Sonne. Griechenfest vorm Rathaus. -- Kürschner (talk) 09:14, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
- Aftó eínai ypérocho. Katalavaíno. Ísos sto iliovasílema. --Jula2812 (talk) 09:35, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
- Fies - der Google-Übersetzer streikt. Und mein Versuch, vor der Fahrt nach Kastoria griechisch zu lernen, scheiterte bereits im Ansatz kläglich. Aber wir werden uns gegen 13 Uhr eine Mezze gönnen. -- Kürschner (talk) 09:51, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
- (Lecker, empfehlenswert (bis Sonntag)!) -- Kürschner (talk) 14:42, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
- Aftó eínai ypérocho. Katalavaíno. Ísos sto iliovasílema. --Jula2812 (talk) 09:35, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Ubcule (talk) 14:29, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Fotograf August Exter mit Fotogeschäft Oststraße 71 in Düsseldorf tätig für den N.S. Bilderdienst noch zu finden in Adressbuch Düsseldorf 1940 S. 149, d. h. bis 1939 noch lebend. Herausgeber war der Kunstverlag J. Kalinowski Düsseldorf laut meiner Recherche von gleicher Postkarte auf Portalen für alte Ansichtskarten von 1937. Now decide yourself ... --Jula2812 (talk) 21:21, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Hallo
Ich freue mich, dass ein Benutzer bzw. eine Benutzerin so tief in die Geschichte eindringt. Ich habe über den Staatlichen Bahnhof Obercassel einen Artikel angelegt. -- Gruß Tischgenosse (talk) 19:59, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
- auch ein Hallo an den Tischgenossen und danke für den Artikel Alter Bahnhof Oberkassel – habe dein Bild in Commons unter Category:Alter Bahnhof Oberkassel (Düsseldorf) einsortiert. Ganz lieben Gruß von Benutzerin --Jula2812 (talk) 11:16, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
File:Stadtplan Düsseldorf 1909.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
mritz (talk) 12:46, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
File:Stadtplan Düsseldorf 1920.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
mritz (talk) 12:46, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
File:Stadtplan Düsseldorf Altstadt und Karlstadt 1909.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
mritz (talk) 12:46, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Stadtplan Düsseldorf Altstadt und Karlstadt 1909.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Stadtplan Düsseldorf Altstadt und Karlstadt 1909.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 16:35, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
Autopatrolled rights given
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you.. - FitIndia Talk Mail 10:20, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- merci danke thank you Fitindia --Jula2812 (talk) 09:39, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
File:Das Malefiz Spiel 1974 (01).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
h-stt !? 13:15, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Fotos von der Brend'amourstr. in D'dorf-Oberkassel
Hallo Jula2812, meine Hochachtung vor Deinem Projekt, Häuser aus Düsseldorf-Oberkassel für Wikimedia Commons zu fotografieren. Ich bin dort aufgewachsen, wohne aber schon seit langer Zeit nicht mehr im Rheinland und freue mich jetzt sehr über Deine hochwertigen Bilder. Da werden viele alte Erinnerungen wach. Dazu zwei Fragen: Wie triffst Du Deine Auswahl: alle Häuser oder nur schöne / alte / denkmalgeschützte? Was mich konkreter interessiert: von der Brend'amourstr gibt es (bis jetzt) Bilder von den geraden Hausnr.n 2 bis 30 (plus die einzelnen Nr.n 65 und 74); hast Du evtl. vor, auch noch andere Häuser aus dieser Straße zu fotografieren? Ich denke vor allem an die Häsuer im unteren Abschnitt mit Hausnr.n größer 30. Gruß --Acky69 (talk) 11:20, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
- Huhu @Acky69 – das freu mich, dass es Dich freut. Die Auswahl bezieht sich auf die Häuser unter Denkmalschutz: “Liste der Baudenkmäler in Oberkassel (Düsseldorf)”, deswegen diese Lücken und Sprünge. Aber so manches Mal bin ich von den Häusern in der Nachbarschaft so begeistert, dass ich diese (äh mit nem blöden Händy) auch fotografiere. Auch die Architekten sollten gewürdigt werden, wenn ich ein Haus diesem zuordnen kann. In der Liste fehlen in der Brend’amourstraße ab Nr. 32 noch so einige wunderschöne Gebäude ... die werden Stück für Stück folgen. Lieben Gruß Jula2812 (talk) 11:51, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Stadtplan Düsseldorf 1909.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
mritz (talk) 08:39, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
File:Stadtplan Düsseldorf Altstadt und Karlstadt 1909.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
mritz (talk) 08:39, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
File:Stadtplan Düsseldorf 1920.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
mritz (talk) 08:39, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
File:Feuerwehrturm mit Pavillon auf der Gesolei 1926.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ralf Roletschek 19:10, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
?
Sorry, die Kürschnerin musste mir erst nachträglich auf die Sprünge helfen. Bis zum nächsten Mal, hoffentlich weniger vernagelt... -- Kürschner (talk) 14:36, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- so vernagelt fand ich Dich nicht. Bis zum nächsten Mal ... --Jula2812 (talk) 17:59, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
File:Haus Schwalmstraße 15 und 17, Düsseldorf-Oberkassel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
194.8.218.245 20:57, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Mühlensignet am Haus Ratinger Straße 42 "Zur Windmühle", Düsseldorf, 1909.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Carl Ha (talk) 14:13, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Düsseldorf, Haustür Liefergasse 30, Erwin Quedenfeldt, 1909.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Carl Ha (talk) 14:14, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Düsseldorf, Wirtschaftszeichen am Hause Ratingerstr. 14–16, "Zur Uel", Erwin Quedenfeldt, 1909.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Carl Ha (talk) 21:22, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Fritz Josef Haubner, Kunstpreisträger 2020, DIE GROSSE 20-21 (02).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 14:59, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- stimme dem Löschantrag bzgl. copyvio; works by living artist, no fop. zu. War 2021 von der Installation begeistert. Dann bitte auch dieses Bild löschen File:Fritz Josef Haubner, Kunstpreisträger 2020, DIE GROSSE 20-21 (01).jpg Jula2812 (talk) 15:19, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Düsseldorf, Giebel am Marstall alter Zustand an Alt Pempelfort, Erwin Quedenfeld, 1915.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Carl Ha (talk) 20:39, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Düsseldorf, Giebel am Marstall, neuer Zustand, nördl. Seite, an der Straße Alt-Pempelfort (heute Couvenstraße), Erwin Quedenfeldt, 1909.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Carl Ha (talk) 20:44, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Düsseldorf, Giebel am Marstall, neuer Zustand, südl. Seite, Jacobistraße, Erwin Quedenfeldt, 1909.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Carl Ha (talk) 20:54, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Katholische Bürgergesellschaft Constantia, Bilker Straße 21, Düsseldorf, Foto Erwin Quedenfeldt, 1915.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Carl Ha (talk) 22:34, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Düsseldorf altes Carmelitessenkloster-Krankenhaus, Quedenfeldt, 1915.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Carl Ha (talk) 07:49, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Düsseldorf, unterer Teil der Mühlenstrasse, Erwin Quedenfeldt, 1915.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Carl Ha (talk) 07:55, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Düsseldorf, Ratingerstr. 15, Erwin Quedenfeldt, 1909.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Carl Ha (talk) 08:15, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Pardon
Die Kopie eines Fotos unter dem Datum der Kopie "Düsseldorf photographs taken on" einsortieren, finde ich auch ziemlich blöd! Unkonzentriert, tschuldigung!
In der Regel geschieht das über den Umweg der Kategorie "Wikipediatreffen Düsseldorf, 18. Mai 2024", oder so ähnlich.-- Kürschner (talk) 17:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- oh, das versteh ich jetzt nicht ;) Jula2812 (talk) 12:20, 20 May 2024 (UTC)