Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Nominations

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures will only work on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 20:12, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC)
  • Please insert a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries
  • Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first; many are still unassessed
  • If you see terms with which you are unfamiliar, please see explanations at Photography terms
Please nominate no more than 5 images per day and try to review on average as many images as you nominate (check here to see how you are doing).

March 27, 2014

March 26, 2014

March 25, 2014

March 24, 2014

March 23, 2014

March 22, 2014

March 21, 2014

March 20, 2014

March 19, 2014

March 18, 2014

March 17, 2014

March 16, 2014

March 14, 2014

March 13, 2014

March 12, 2014

Consensual review

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

  • To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
  • You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
  • The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.
Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
  • In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
  • Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add  Oppose and  Support if necessary.
  • Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
  • Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".


Consensual Review

File:Pelophylax ridibundus DSC 7786w.jpg

  • Nomination Two marsh frogs (Pelophylax ridibundus) in reproduction, Lower Austria --P e z i 23:07, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Not sharp. --Blurred Lines 14:28, 26 March 2014 (UTC) Comment I'd like to have another opinion. --P e z i 00:13, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support : OK for me. --JLPC 08:54, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Hue_Vietnam_Doors-in-Càn-Thành-Palace-01.jpg

  • Nomination Freshly refurbished doors in Càn Thành Palace within the Citadel of Huế, Vietnam --Cccefalon 16:59, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Parts of image not in focus. --Blurred Lines 14:28, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
     Info It should be obvious, that the DoF is on the middle of the three groups of doors. The first and third group are intentionally blurred. --Cccefalon 19:35, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
 Comment DOF is part of the composition and ok, though the bokeh of that lens is not the finest. The image seems to be somewhat tilted and should be rotated CCW. But as I don't know if the walls are really vertical, I'll wait for a correction or a comment before giving a pro. -- Smial 09:48, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

File:2013-08-23_Chiemsee_Reggae_Summer_-_Junior_Kelly_3686.JPG

  • Nomination Junior Kelly at Chiemsee Reggae Summer Festival 2013. By User:Church of emacs --Achim Raschka 09:38, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Low detail caused by high ISO. --Mattbuck 23:30, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
    Perhaps somewhat too strong noise reduction, but given the lighting situation absolutely ok for QI. --Smial 10:40, 26 March 2014 (UTC)- Support in this situation of light is it QI to me. --Ralf Roletschek 10:55, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

File:2013-08-24_Chiemsee_Reggae_Summer_-_Beginner_5133.JPG

  • Nomination Beginner at Chiemsee Reggae Summer Festival 2013 By User:Church of emacs --Achim Raschka 09:38, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Unsharp. --Mattbuck 23:30, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
    Where is the insharpness? You can count every hair of the beard and even recognize the earring holes. Near perfect given the lighting situation. --Smial 10:40, 26 March 2014 (UTC)- Support in this situation of light is it QI to me. --Ralf Roletschek 10:55, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

File:2013-08-24_Chiemsee_Reggae_Summer_-_Ska-P_4903.JPG

  • Nomination Ska-P at Chiemsee Reggae Summer Festival 2013. By User:Church of emacs --Achim Raschka 09:38, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Low detail caused by high ISO. --Mattbuck 23:30, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
    Perhaps somewhat too strong noise reduction, but given the lighting situation absolutely ok for QI. --Smial 10:40, 26 March 2014 (UTC)- Support in this situation of light is it QI to me. --Ralf Roletschek 10:55, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Xanthogaleruca luteola MHNT Dos.jpg

  • Nomination Xanthogaleruca luteola --Archaeodontosaurus 10:04, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion *  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:32, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
  •  Neutral I put it into question. Too many over-exposed parts and not very sharp IMO. --Hockei 16:34, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment The insect measuring 1.2 mm. To do better with this resolution, we must go into the studio. The model did not come. --Archaeodontosaurus 06:45, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me. --JLPC 08:52, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Hauskatze an einem Scheunenfenster in Grossarl.JPG

  • Nomination tired cat --Usien 18:53, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:09, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
     Oppose Too much contrast, overexposed and blurred areas close to the mouth and neck IMO, Sorry. --Hockei 16:55, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Ciampinoi_in_Val_Gardena.jpg

  • Nomination Skiing on "Ciampinoi" in Val Gardena in South Tyrol. --Moroder 23:47, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  SupportGood quality. --Cccefalon 07:14, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose not sharp. --Coyau 05:50, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
  •  Info At full size the background might be a bit unsharp but I don't think I need to resize the image as someone would suggest, since Wikimedia does it automatically. You don't need to look at full size and everyone can sharpen the image to his demand. If you look carefully at the image you see a lot of detail.Imo most of QI images hardly have this amount of detail --Moroder 21:23, 23 March 2014 (UTC

File:Gherdëina_da_Secëda_ju.jpg

  • Nomination Skiing on "Ciampinoi" in Val Gardena in South Tyrol. --Moroder 23:47, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion * SupportNice! --Nino Verde 07:20, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose not sharp. --Coyau 05:50, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
  •  Info At full size the background might be a bit unsharp but I don't think I need to resize the image as someone would suggest, since Wikimedia does it automatically. You don't need to look at full size and everyone can sharpen the image to his demand. If you look carefully at the image you see a lot of detail. Imo most of QI images hardly have this amount of detail --Moroder 21:23, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support ql! --Steinsplitter 09:50, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 15:55, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Ponts couverts au coucher du soleil.jpg

  • Nomination Covered bridges at sunset, Strasbourg, France. --Aloïs Peiffer 16:54, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Great light and colors. I love the cathedral in background. --Esilerey 17:38, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
    I disagree, the perspective correction is yet not properly done. --Cccefalon 19:07, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Porsche_-_Boxster_-_Mondial_de_l'Automobile_de_Paris_2012_-_202.jpg

  • Nomination une Porsche Boxster présentée lors du Mondial de l'automobile de Paris 2012. --Thesupermat 10:54, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Bad crop (on top, at the right). CA/WB-issues. Perspective not properly done. --Cccefalon 12:05, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
    pour le "bad crop" ça serait bien que ceux qui rédigent ces commentaires aient en tête que ces photos ont été prises à un salon ou il y a des milliers de personnes qui déambulent autour des voitures exposées elles-mêmes les unes contre les autres, merci. --Thesupermat 21:52, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Porsche_-_Cayenne_S_Diesel_-_Mondial_de_l'Automobile_de_Paris_2012_-_202.jpg

  • Nomination une Porsche Cayenne présentée lors du Mondial de l'automobile de Paris 2012. --Thesupermat 10:54, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Perspective not done. Bad cop on top. Wrong WB. --Cccefalon 11:56, 21 March 2014 (UTC) pour le "bad crop" ça serait bien que ceux qui rédigent ces commentaires aient en tête que ces photos ont été prises à un salon ou il y a des milliers de personnes qui déambulent autour des voitures exposées elles-mêmes les unes contre les autres, merci. --Thesupermat 21:52, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Porsche_-_Panamera_Sport_Turismo_e-hybrid_-_Mondial_de_l'Automobile_de_Paris_2012_-_204.jpg

  • Nomination une Porsche Panamera Sport Turismo e-hybrid présentée lors du Mondial de l'automobile de Paris 2012. --Thesupermat 10:54, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Hard reflections with CA. Moiré with chroma noise in the background. --Cccefalon 11:59, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
    J'ai retravaillé la photo. --Thesupermat 21:45, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Porsche_-_Panamera_Sport_Turismo_e-hybrid_-_Mondial_de_l'Automobile_de_Paris_2012_-_206.jpg

  • Nomination une Porsche Panamera Sport Turismo e-hybrid présentée lors du Mondial de l'automobile de Paris 2012. --Thesupermat 10:54, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Background moiré with chroma noise. Perspective not done. --Cccefalon 12:03, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
    J'ai retravaillé la photo et quand on photographie avec un écran en arrière plan, c'est un peu normal. --Thesupermat 22:14, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Durasov_palace_wide.jpg

  • Nomination Nikolay Durasov’s Palace in Lyublino, Moscow, Russia --Nino Verde 07:16, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Support Good quality. --Coyau 07:34, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree, strong CA that should be removed. I will move back to "Promotion" afterwards. --Cccefalon 10:09, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
  •  CommentIf you mean branches of trees - i've did the best. Wide angle lens is not very good at corners, Photoshop and Camera raw failed to remove all CA. So, you may decline this image. --Nino Verde 12:39, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
  • As it was already promoted, there are only two ways left: Asking third opinion in Consensual review (it will automatically sent there by the QICbot tomorrow morning) or changing Discuss to Withdraw which can be done only by the nominator. Cheers, --Cccefalon 15:08, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Framing isnt best, but I did not see any terrible CAs. --Florstein 08:17, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Nino Verde, new version uploaded without CAs and a bit more sharp, revert if you don't like --Christian Ferrer 20:13, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
 Comment Even after emptying cache, there is still a lot of CA fringe around the branches of the trees. I even would say, it is worse than before. --Cccefalon 22:07, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Cccefalon, by opening both versions in two windows, I agree not at all, I see a clear decrease and even a disappearance of CAs, please open the both at the same time and compare. --Christian Ferrer 06:05, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Florstein 08:23, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Sèvres_-_petit_coulage_-_démoulage_08.jpg

  • Nomination Small-scale casting (slipcasting) workshop of the manufacture nationale de Sèvres. Turning out of the mold of a piece. --Coyau 04:04, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion  Support --Cccefalon 06:25, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
     Comment - Isn;t it a bit overexposed? --Mattbuck 07:50, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
     Support I don't think so. --Martin Kraft (talk) 13:05, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

File:PGO_-_Hemera_-_Mondial_de_l'Automobile_de_Paris_2012_-_003.jpg

  • Nomination Une PGO Hemera présentée lors du Mondial de l'Automobile de Paris 2012. --Thesupermat 08:33, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:36, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
    I disagree, it's tilted. --Cccefalon 12:15, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ Done--Thesupermat 22:17, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Porsche_-_911_Carrera_4_-_Mondial_de_l'Automobile_de_Paris_2012_-_205.jpg

  • Nomination une Porsche 911 Carrera 4 présentée lors du Mondial de l'automobile de Paris 2012. --Thesupermat 08:33, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion  Comment All the picture is too dark and noisy IMO, but not bad IMO. Also not QI IMO  Oppose--Lmbuga 18:06, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
    j'ai retravaillé la photo --Thesupermat 21:31, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

File:2014.03.09.-18-Kaefertaler Wald-Mannheim-Braune Krabbenspinne-Weibchen.jpg

  • Nomination Braune Krabbenspinne - Xysticus cristatus, Weibchen (female) --Hockei 17:17, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Overprocessed. Please zoom in to confirm. --Arctic Kangaroo 17:58, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
    I don't think so. More opinions? --Hockei 18:22, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 Info I uploaded a new version with some changes. Please take a look but I still don't agree with Arctic Kangaroo. --Hockei 09:51, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
  •  Neutral Too many are blurred. It is advisable to close the diaphragm more. --Archaeodontosaurus 06:52, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

File:2014.03.09.-17-Kaefertaler Wald-Mannheim-Braune Krabbenspinne-Weibchen.jpg

  • Nomination Braune Krabbenspinne - Xysticus cristatus, Weibchen (female) --Hockei 17:17, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Overprocessed. Please zoom in to confirm. --Arctic Kangaroo 17:58, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
    I don't think so. More opinions? --Hockei 18:22, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 Info I uploaded a new version with some changes. Please take a look but I still don't agree with Arctic Kangaroo. --Hockei 09:52, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
  •  Neutral Too many are blurred. It is advisable to close the diaphragm more.--Archaeodontosaurus 06:53, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Bristol Balloon Fiesta 2009 MMB 29.jpg

  • Nomination Bristol Balloon Fiesta. Mattbuck 08:03, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion  Oppose soft (with sharpening haloes on the edge), missing contrast too --A.Savin 14:34, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
    I think it's marginal, I'd like another opinion please. --Mattbuck 23:12, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
     Oppose Per Alexander. @Mattbuck: I find that your photos are usually quite soft? --Arctic Kangaroo 03:06, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Well I do sharpen them all, and I do find that my photos are sharper than the average here. --Mattbuck (too lazy to log in) 12:37, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

File:London MMB E4 Great Western Main Line 43091.jpg

  • Nomination Great Western Main Line in London. Mattbuck 08:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion  Oppose Dark areas are too dark. The left area of the front of the train is blurry. --Lmbuga 17:04, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
    The photo is accurate to the conditions. --Mattbuck 23:10, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

File:London MMB I9 Gordon Square.jpg

  • Nomination Gordon Square, London. Mattbuck 08:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:47, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
    Underexposed and underexposed background (see people) --Lmbuga 17:07, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
    Sunny day and thick foliage. I think the curves bring out the subject well. There's no overexposure beyond a tiny bit at the bottom on the metal. Mattbuck 23:10, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Lake Windermere MMB 44.jpg

  • Nomination Lake Windermere. Mattbuck 08:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion  Support Good quality. --Arctic Kangaroo 05:10, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
     Comment Clear not QI for me: Rule of thirds. But...
    Español: paso de todo y considero que las reglas no son iguales para todos o me opongo?
    --Lmbuga 17:20, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
    Rule of thirds is hardly a requirement. Mattbuck 23:10, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
    Note: Rule-of-thirds is a subjective requirement, depending on personal preferences. It falls under the part about composition in the guidelines. --Arctic Kangaroo 08:48, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Sony 18-55 E.JPG

  • Nomination Sony 18-55mm E-mount lens. --Bourgeois.A 16:34, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
    Mild tilt clockwise. Mattbuck 21:02, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Good quality. --Arctic Kangaroo 00:28, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 15:53, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Hauinger_Buurefastnacht_2014_04.jpg

{{/Discuss|Carnival in Hauingen (Lörrach), Germany --Taxiarchos228 05:34, 12 March 2014 (UTC)|[reply]

not IMO --Taxiarchos228 07:05, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Cayambe 12:18, 27 March 2014 (UTC) [reply]

File:Close-up of Cynopterus brachyotis (Lesser short-nosed fruit bat).JPG

  • Nomination Close-up of Cynopterus brachyotis. --AntanO 09:40, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Not too bad. Don’t like the bright flash(?) reflections though. Seems a bit overprocessed too (oversharp hairs around eye) --Kreuzschnabel 17:44, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too harsh flash IMHO, also too overprocessed Poco a poco 19:55, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Poco, could be nice a long exposition shoot with low light. (Use tripod) --Wilfredor 14:11, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Oversharpened, see hairs. --Cayambe 12:09, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Cayambe 12:09, 27 March 2014 (UTC)