Commons:Deletion requests/2024/09/08: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
A1Cafel (talk | contribs)
Line 40: Line 40:
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:"UMNO Sudah Tidak Ada Lagi" - Kata Tun Mahathir Di Bicara Minda Sinar Harian Low.webm}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:"UMNO Sudah Tidak Ada Lagi" - Kata Tun Mahathir Di Bicara Minda Sinar Harian Low.webm}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sidang Parlimen 2019 - Jawapan Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad Terhadap Isu Pengecil.webm}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sidang Parlimen 2019 - Jawapan Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad Terhadap Isu Pengecil.webm}}
{{Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vijayaranjini 1984 vaadiraj movieset reshoot.jpg}}

Revision as of 04:36, 8 September 2024

September 8

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 00:23, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete While I disagree that the topic is out of scope, this specific image doesn't really bring much to the table.--Leptictidium (talk) 06:07, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:52, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope / copyvio: plain text, vague source. Omphalographer (talk) 00:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:52, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Blankenfeld (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: plain text. These images are clearly screenshots of text, not original documents.

Omphalographer (talk) 00:37, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:52, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-resolution image with doubtful own work claim, especially considering the upload history of Special:Log/Ashrefavira. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vosler12 (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: fictitious flags and parliament diagram.

Omphalographer (talk) 01:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:25, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: strangely formatted printout of a user sandbox containing personal messages. Omphalographer (talk) 01:22, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: not sure what this is a photo of, but it sure isn't a flag. Omphalographer (talk) 01:27, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's obviously not own work- it was taken from https://www.olympedia.org/athletes/82247. Even Olympedia doesn't know when or where the photo was taken, or who took it. (But do we trust them to do due dilligence?) If it was taken in Hungary or Switzerland (her home country and the country of the Olympics were held in 1948), this could easily be protected. We have no evidence that this is an anonymous publication, only that Olympedia doesn't know the author. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 01:33, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep It meets PD-EU and PD-Swiss, Tineye search over 50 billion images and found no one claiming an active copyright, and no information to contradict the circa 1948 date. --RAN (talk) 03:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    A lack of Tineye results for an image means nothing. We know that the image has been published on Olympedia; the fact that Tineye doesn't show that just demonstrates how unreliable it can be. Omphalographer (talk) 03:54, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi, @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ). I noticed you put the template on the image, claiming each of the following statements:
    1)The photograph was published over 70 years ago.
    2)The author's identity was not published alongside the photograph
    3)The photo was
    i)published in Switzerland AND
    ii)over ago fifty years ago AND
    ii)Switzerland courts would consider this non-creative enough to be copyrightable.
    4)The photo was published circa 1948
    Please prove them. Thank you! GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 04:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The license only requires that there was "reasonable evidence". We generally rely on Occam's Razor, we accept the simplest explanation, doubt could be used to denigrate any image. For instance: Who took the picture? It must be the named photographer, right? What if the photographer was in the bathroom, and an assistant pressed the shutter release. What if the photographer's spouse pressed the shutter release while the photographer adjusted a light. What if a monkey entered the photo studio while the photographer, their spouse, and the photographer's assistant, were inattentive and the monkey pressed the shutter release. What if the camera was on a random timer, and no one was responsible for pressing the shutter release. --RAN (talk) 05:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) Okay. Please provide reasonable evidence that any of the above of true Thank you! GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 06:23, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Without any information where the photo was taken and first published, we cannot determine the copyright status of this photo in either the US or a possible country of origin, and since the person shown was born in 1928, it obviously cannot be old enough for {{PD-old-assumed}}. --Rosenzweig τ 10:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Merelokl (talk · contribs)

Fake license review by uploader. There is no indication of CC licensing.

0x0a (talk) 02:22, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file seems to be taken from a CBS News video, but the file information summary says "Source: Own work". LightNightLights (talk) 16:35, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [edited LightNightLights (talk) 16:42, 15 March 2024 (UTC)][reply]

(This is my first Commons deletion request, and I might not know info that other, more experienced, editors know about Commons, copyright, or deletion requests.) LightNightLights (talk) 16:38, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - I don't think a US map with some states colored is above the ToO. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:17, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Randomstaplers as Copyvio (db-copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.cbsnews.com/video/super-tuesday-2024-presidential-election/%7Chelp=off ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:32, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see copyrightable content in the image. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:32, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@ToBeFree Yeah, but the design and drop-shadow... too risky. It would have been safer if it had been uploaded to Wikipedia for fair use instead.⸺Randomstaplers (en talk) 02:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I suspect there's an attribution violation somewhere. "Own work"?⸺Randomstaplers (en talk) 02:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I just fixed the attribution, but I don't think shadow and placement are copyrightable in this image either. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@ToBeFree And then there's the filename. "Z5227494646617 05395d24887d2f92f2feb466507b8c87.jpg".⸺Randomstaplers (en talk) 02:36, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. We shouldn't need to pilfer these sorts of images from news web sites; we have our own map templates for marking up groups of states, like File:Blank US Map (states only).svg, and we can and should use one of those instead. Omphalographer (talk) 04:26, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak  Delete, not in use and can be easily recreated using SVG/higher resolution, in terms of copyright however, this is way below the TOO. ~TheImaCow (talk) 15:47, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per User:Omphalographer and User:ThelmaCow. --P 1 9 9   21:08, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I violated the rules in making this Randomuser795 (talk) 02:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work, jpg of small resolution without metadata, all other images (of similar content) by uploader were copyvios: User talk:Phichet9707 Nutshinou Talk! 03:01, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Büşra ÖZCOŞKUN (talk · contribs)

Unlikely own works, jpgs of small resolution, all other uploads by uploader were clearly pulled from several places on the web: User talk:Büşra ÖZCOŞKUN

Nutshinou Talk! 03:01, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i would think this is beyond TOO for Sweden? TheLoyalOrder (talk) 03:16, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Ikan Kekek, and I suppose that crosses that look more or less exactly like this one have been known in Sweden for a long, long time. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:18, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Uploader has mirrored the image-frame from the actual music video of the movie: Song Thandana Thandana on Youtube (Mentioned is the exact timestamp, from which the mirrored screenshot is uploaded) --106.51.110.101 03:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy delete as copyvio. --P 1 9 9   12:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. 100% a screenshot of a media being played on a device. Cannot be the work of an external party other than that of film crew. -- 106.51.110.101 03:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy delete as copyvio. --P 1 9 9   12:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gustavo the Image Flag (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: fictitious flags.

Omphalographer (talk) 03:28, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kashishyoga1 (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: personal certificates.

Omphalographer (talk) 03:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:56, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saeedniko (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: unused images of plain text.

Omphalographer (talk) 03:30, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:56, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused, unidentified video game screenshot. Omphalographer (talk) 03:32, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:56, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Youtube screenshot of Kannada film:Mata (2006 film). Youtube video link with timestamp:[1] -- 106.51.110.101 03:33, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy delete as copyvio. --P 1 9 9   12:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Youtube video screeshot of an interview: [2]    -- 106.51.110.101 03:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy delete as copyvio. --P 1 9 9   12:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PENIS Эlcobbola talk 23:25, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: literally just vandalism. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:55, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:40, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Disagree with deletion. Vector shape of map of Romania I don't see as eligible for deletion." - ThecentreCZ Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, a complex shape regardless. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:44, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No, it is not complex shape. This is few stars, 20 points-curved simple line of map of Romania and text font. You should not start requests anymore please. Some of these you've nominated and deleted have been already restored and you just added unecessary troubles. Thank you.--ThecentreCZ (talk) 04:04, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Because of the simple font, the simple stars and the shape of Romania. Welkend (talk) 07:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Note: Romania has no data on TOO, delete per COM:PCP. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Disagree with deletion of this file uploaded in 2012." -ThecentreCZ Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:46, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, still think the arrangement of shapes is original enough to put it above COM:TOO Czech Republic. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:47, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep You are wrong. These are not unique. You've would question entire thousands of files with simple shape consensus. As I stated before, these are simple geometric shapes of and 5 times with one two pointed object. Cannot be seen as such. Thank you. ThecentreCZ (talk) 04:09, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The arrangement of the simple shapes may be "a unique outcome of the creative activity of the author" per my previous linked page. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 04:32, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
These shapes can be arranged in multiple ways in a creative manner. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 04:33, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes they can, according to previous assements, in this case this is simple case adequate to be on Commons is accordance with thousands of other logos. Not uniquely designed, on which treshold of originality can apply. ThecentreCZ (talk) 04:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But the other logos were kept because the TOO of the country of origin was high. I'm not sure if Czech has a high TOO, as a strict interpretation of the law can mean that this logo can be copyrighted. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:06, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I'm sorry, @Grandmaster Huon, but your perception of when something should be deleted does not match the TOO. Furthermore, a normal request for deletion of a file will also do. The fact that you are requesting quick deletions everywhere is not exactly useful. Welkend (talk) 17:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What TOO in question? Grandmaster Huon (talk) 20:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that non-obvious speedy deletion requests are wrong. But why do you think this file is below COM:TOO Czech Republic? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The arrangement of geometric shapes in a unique manner can be a creative effort as per COM:TOO Czech Republic. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 23:05, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That might be a fair argument, but it's not so obvious as to warrant speedy deletion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But is it enough to merit deletion regardless? Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:47, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It might be. And that's why I asked User:Welkend why they think the file is below COM:TOO Czech Republic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:48, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I Want to upload new one DJ Ash Army (talk) 03:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F10. No need to upload another photo, en:Draft:Ash Army has been deleted 3 times. --Achim55 (talk) 16:19, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 03:54, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:18, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 04:04, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:18, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 04:05, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:18, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 04:06, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:18, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 04:08, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 04:08, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 04:10, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 04:10, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 04:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 04:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 04:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 04:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own work" seems extremely unlikely; looks like a bad reproduction of a frame from a film, with the aspect ratio wrong. Jmabel ! talk 00:23, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Sir,
I took this snap
Gangaasoonu (talk) 18:41, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Gangaasoonu: Are you saying you actually took this picture in 1984, or just that you photographed a movie screen? Or something else? - Jmabel ! talk 20:22, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
shot this in my yashica camera in 1984 during shooting of Ade_Kannu kannada movie. This was in an old hard copy photo album.
In 2023, used mobile phone to take photo of that and uploaded into my personal google photos & then uploaded here
Gangaasoonu (talk) 20:33, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

shot this in my yashica camera in 1984 during shooting of Ade_Kannu kannada movie. This was in an old hard copy photo album. In 2023, used mobile phone to take photo of that and uploaded into my personal google photos & then uploaded here Gangaasoonu (talk) 20:33, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Gangaasoonu: OK. Please see my remarks on the related Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vijayaranjini 1984 vaadiraj movieset.jpg. We might as well continue discussion in one place, if these are exactly parallel. - Jmabel ! talk 22:04, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per uploader's assertion of own work, AGF. --P 1 9 9   15:15, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Screenshot of Youtube video; video-link with timestamp: Song:‘Ide Nota Ide Aata’, Film:‘Ade Kannu’ (1985).  Uploader even convinced many, by lying in a previous deletion-nomination (above) and has uploaded many similar screenshots. Requesting strict action against the uploader. --106.51.110.101 04:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy ping @Jmabel: , @P199: --2406:7400:107:682:0:0:0:1 05:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Traveling now, and I don't have time to look at this closely but, yes, if uploader was outright lying this calls for an indef block. If the video is reusing a still photo that they took, that could be another matter. - Jmabel ! talk 11:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Impossible.. Its just a simple screenshot of a copyrighted Youtube video.. --106.51.110.101 06:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: speedy delete as copyvio. User will be blocked for these actions. --P 1 9 9   12:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]