Wikimedia Commons

User talk:JuTa/Archive 55

< User talk:JuTa
Latest comment: 3 years ago by JuTa in topic Spiegazioni

French permission, package #4

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Dear JuTa, please restore:

The lag in the french permission queue is about 100 tickets and 100 days; I guess about 2/3 of them will lead to restauration of images. I hope I am not getting too much on your nerves with this. Can we work through this together, chunk by chunk?

Regards, --Mussklprozz (talk) 17:19, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi, you are very wellcome. Its done. Perhaps you should go regularly through the subcats of Category:OTRS received and Category:OTRS pending to prevent such "early" deletions. regards --JuTa 00:38, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Don't have time to build a fence, must catch chicken. ;-) To be serious: I shall have a look onto those, thanks. Have done the permission tags again. Cheers, --Mussklprozz (talk) 09:15, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Flag of the Bashkir ASSR (1925-1937).svg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Good day! Bashkir ASSR is not Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic. The redirect is wrong. Sorry for my English, I use a google translator. --Jim Hokins (talk) 13:12, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

The file was binary identical to File:Flag of the Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic (1927-1937).svg. --JuTa 17:09, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles/Mohammad.Mohammadzadeh

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, dear admin

All above pictures were taken from Interent ant non of them are own work. please delete all

thanks [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 16:12, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

I marked them as having no source now. --JuTa 17:12, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

French permission, package #5

Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Dear JuTa, please restore

Can you please have a look at? -

Cheers, --Mussklprozz (talk) 10:33, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

  Done. For the last one: I linked to the source page, but didnt checked in deatil if the licenses are compatible. --JuTa 10:50, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Thanks. I finalized the seven above. For the last one, the creator of the collage wants to license it under Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, yet the individual components are licensed under cc-by-sa in different versions, e.g. 2.5 and 4.0. Is that feasable?
Cheers, --Mussklprozz (talk) 21:02, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
No --JuTa 22:56, 19 November 2020 (UTC)--JuTa 22:56, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Thanks. I wrote back to the client. --Mussklprozz (talk) 08:15, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

French permission, package #6

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hi JuTa,

can you please restore

Some of the files were deleted by other admins and not by you. Is that acceptable for you?

Cheers, --Mussklprozz (talk) 10:01, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

  Done. The 2nd one has been rennamed, but you will see... --JuTa 10:18, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
  Done. OTRS tags added. In some of the cases I still had questions to the clients, but I am confident that they will readily be answered.
Übrigens scheint es so, als ob wir es weitgehend geschafft haben. Jetzt nur noch dreißig Tage Rückstand, und bei den Tickets, die ich zuletzt bearbeitet habe, waren die Bilder noch da. Herzlichen Dank noch mal für Deine Hilfe! :-)
--Mussklprozz (talk) 10:42, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
Na fein :) --JuTa 10:48, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Undeletion request

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, you deleleted these files on 2020-11-09. If I undestood correctly these were deleted because there was no information of the original files in Wikimedia Commons description file. Content of the photo and videos were selected so that they were freely licenced or under public domain by age OR they were created by uploader User:Aprom (ie photographing, photo editing and recording video etc.) as part of the m:Helsinki rephotography project. Anyway, after undeleting I or Aprom will update the missing information and fill the OTRS-permit if you think OTRS is required too.

--Zache (talk) 09:30, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi, they are back. For the fiest 2 an OTRS confirmation is IMHO required. --JuTa 18:49, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

I want to make NoFoP-Saudi Arabia Template.

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

After seeing NoFoP-South Korea, NoFoP-France, NoFoP-Italy and NoFoP-UAE, I wanted to make NoFoP-Saudi Arabia.

However, this structure of template is very complex, and it is difficult for me to make.

Please make an NoFoP-Saudi Arabia Template. Once created, I will do the translation.

(According to COM:FOP Saudi Arabia, Saudi Arabia has no freedom of panorama.)

--Ox1997cow (talk) 15:22, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, its years ago I was woling with FoP-templates. Please ask on i.e COM:Village pump for help. --JuTa 18:40, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Boy l0 2.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 
File:Boy l0 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Mjrmtg (talk) 12:05, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

  Done --JuTa 14:48, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Presidente_Eurico_Gaspar_Dutra_inaugura_nova_sede_do_PSD.pdf

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello,

I was already talking with another Wikimedia editor about these files before you intervened.

he oriented me about how I was supposed to quote the licensing.

All these images are public domain, since they come from the Brazilian National Archive (arquivo nacional).

I have rectified the licensing and hope everything is ok now.

Thank you very much.

Archduke Trentinator (talk) 18:11, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

I removed the problem tags now. --JuTa 22:47, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Chicandier.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Moin JuTa,

für die Datei liegt eine Freigabe bei OTRS vor. Der Einsender schreibt, es handele sich um ein Selfie. Falls das nicht völlig unplausibel ercheint: Kannst Du die Datei dann bitte wiederherstellen?

Gruß & Dank, --Mussklprozz (talk) 15:35, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Die Datei ist wieder da, guck selbst :)--JuTa 16:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Hab Dank! – Unwahrscheinlich, dass das ein Selfie ist. Metadaten fehlen. Seisdrum, wir können nicht den Notar spielen. Ich trag die Freigabe ein. --Mussklprozz (talk) 16:37, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

DPLA duplicates

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hi JuTa, I'm hoping we can work together on the issue you are having with the duplicates from the DPLA bot. Let's start a fresh thread!

I will just note first that it is very difficult for me to investigate this, especially as I don't have admin privileges on Commons. Your process involves deleting the edit histories without alerting the uploader, and I also don't see any notifications or have a log to check for when you delete a file from my bot, so I don't have much visibility into what has been going on currently. The reason I need to investigate further is I don't believe any of these are bot "errors", per se. That is, the bot is uploading the correct file with the correct metadata according to the source institution. So the problem lies not in the bot code, but either the source institution has some error in its data, or possibly the duplication is caused by a Wikimedian uploading from their catalog before we did, or maybe there is some valid reason for a duplicate.

I am also noticing some concerns in the approach you are taking to resolve the perceived problem. For example, for this file, I uploaded the authoritative version from the institution that digitized and cataloged this image, and you deleted the version with the official metadata to redirect it to one uploaded by another editor which lacked some of the basic information. I believe the DPLA upload should not be deleted in this case, but the merge can be done in the other direction. In other cases, such as this one, it appears you may have found a data error in the US National Archives catalog, where a same image was uploaded to the wrong catalog record. But by simply deleting them without allowing us to notify the institution and get the data corrected on the provider's end, the bot might simply upload this again some day, seeing it as a missing item. And it doesn't appear you've made any determination as to which image was actually the correct match for the metadata, and so now wee still left with what appears to be data error as the remaining non-deleted instance of this file, since the description does not match the text on the page.

The bot has completed its current batch, but in the future can you alert me to issues you are seeing so we can try to figure out what has happened? DPLA is currently engaged in the larges content donation to Wikimedia Commons ever. We uploaded over half a million files in the last 2 weeks, so I acknowledge you saw some increase in duplicates reported, but I actually gratified to see we were able to pull off such a large upload with such a small error rate, relative to the total batch size. Thanks! Dominic (talk) 19:09, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi Dominic, well there are 2 different types of cases:
1) someone else auploaded an identical images often years or more ago mostly from differnet sources like other USGov sites or flickr. In this case I kept the older copy.
2) you uploaded the same image with different names from DPLA. This is likely caused by DPLA itself, they have the same image mutiple times in their database under different titles.
What I could offer. When I work on duplicates in future I can copy over the complete Bot-up-load-text to the older file description page. Then you get a chance to investigate the cases further. Up to now I didnt saw any information in it worth to keep, the EXIF are mostly identical to what was noted in the {{DPLA}} template. The dpla_id you can see in the filenames of the left redirects.
You can also check reguarly Special:ListDuplicatedFiles during your batch uploads, it gets uploaded every 3 days in the morning hours UTC. You can include the code of User:JuTa/monobook.css to your personel css file and when you then check the Bots uploads you should see any redirects in yellow or what ever color you like.
regards --JuTa 19:32, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
I now did the 1st one with copying over the bot-description. File:Close-up view of JPM port CBM.jpg. Nr. 351 within Special:ListDuplicatedFiles. Up to Nr. 506 they are not proccessed yet, but will get soon by me. PS: Note the special page will get updated tomorrow morning. --JuTa 19:46, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
I now finished the current duplicates on the special page. PS: You even can go through my logs and look out for DLPA files, this might be the most efficiant way to find the files for you. --JuTa 21:29, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Template:FoP-Vietnam

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Template:FoP-Vietnam has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Buiquangtu (talk) 22:58, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Dumfriesshire Hounds.jpeg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello JuTa, I left a message for you and Didym at File talk:Dumfriesshire Hounds.jpeg, I am unsure if you got the ping. As I described there, as far as I am aware I had the permission of the photograph’s creator to publish it, before requesting undeletion do you have any evidence that what I was wrong in my assumptions? Cavalryman (talk) 12:21, 1 December 2020 (UTC).

Hi, the photographer has to confirm the release of a free license of his choice by sending a mail to the commons support team. See Commons:OTRS. --JuTa 14:23, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Category:Th.

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi. All other changes in WD are already made. If you can kindly revive the cat, everything will be OK. IN WD there are many people who could also help, but I did it myself. Auf wiedersehen. --E4024 (talk) 13:05, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

I tried to do something by myself; please check it. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 13:36, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
We discusion it on your talk page, please move it back. --JuTa 15:13, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Categorization

Latest comment: 3 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Hi. You make Category:Van Aalst (surname) a subcat ot of Category:Aalst (surname). This is incomprehensible (at least to me, whom a sockpuppeteer recently impersonated as User:Stupid E4024 :). Trying to correct the categorization, probably I made another mistake in moving. Maybe as an admin you can correct things here; but please do not make "a surname subcat of another surname". That is simply wrong. Danke. --E4024 (talk) 13:32, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Fixed by just moving it back. --JuTa 15:12, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
You did not fix it. You repeated the previous categorization mistake. Remember, we have a rule: Cat-subcat etc. Both cats cannot be a subcat of Category:Surnames, while one of them is a subcat of the other. --E4024 (talk) 15:45, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Thats the case for every subcat in any subcat of Category:Surname particles. They are in different areas of Category:Names. Otherwise an image could not be in i.e. Category:Buildings in Berlin and Category:Events in Berlin because they both are in Category:Berlin. Its correct now. --JuTa 16:47, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Category:Names? I thought we were talking about Category:Surnames. --E4024 (talk) 16:49, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
and Category:Surnames is a subcat of Category:Names - (nerly) everything finally ends up as subcat of Category:Topics Category:CommonsRoot. --JuTa 16:53, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Institution deleted

Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Juta,

I realized that you deleted the Institution: template page for Amaiur Arkeologia Zentroa at 00:45, 30 December 2020, but I was left guessing as to the reason, G1: Test page, accidental creation, or page containing nonsense or no valid content (???). What does that mean really? It is a museum institution. Nothing to do with G1 really, and no test, although there was a red link, which I guess meant that I had to create a page for that institution.

Thanks for clarifying this, perhaps I am missing something, but honestly I think there is a misunderstanding. Iñaki LL (talk) 15:01, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

You completly emptied it yourself. I now restored it and undid your last edit - see Institution:Amaiur Arkeologia Museoa. --JuTa 16:10, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
O my, really? Thank you for that then, JuTa! Iñaki LL (talk) 17:55, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Just another thing, JuTa. Could you please delete this page? (Duplicate, wrong wording) Thanks Iñaki LL (talk) 21:23, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Done, but that was the page I just restored. --JuTa 21:27, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Plase undelete

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Files by Raymond Lo

Latest comment: 3 years ago7 comments3 people in discussion

The original files have already been released per "CC BY-SA 4.0" on [:http://www.staceylonginfo.com/raymond.html]. The source of the two original files are: [:http://www.staceylonginfo.com/assets/stacey_long_in_west_kowloon_20191026_by_raymond_lo_01.jpg] and [:http://www.staceylonginfo.com/assets/stacey_long_in_west_kowloon_20191026_by_raymond_lo_02.jpg]. Regards! Joe FSF (talk) 13:01, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

JuTa: This concerns Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Raymond Lo and Commons:Deletion requests/File:20191026 West Kowloon.jpg.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:15, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Hmm, I'm not realy convinced that the source isnt license laundering. You may like to raise an Commons:Undeletion request, perhaps you can convince other admins. --JuTa 14:48, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
As far as I know, the OTRS procedure is ongoing. Raymond Lo has been communicating with OTRS via emails. Several days ago, he has provided some photos of his camera and lens showing the serial number and model number. It takes some time for the verification process. Regards! Joe FSF (talk) 08:41, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Whan OTRS process is running, they will arrange undeletion if everything checks out OK. --JuTa 10:04, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
The OTRS procedure is passed. The files 20191026_West_Kowloon02.jpg and Stacey_Long_by_Raymond_Lo2.jpg have been restored, but the files Stacey_Long_in_West_Kowloon_20191026_by_Raymond_Lo_01.jpg and Stacey_Long_in_West_Kowloon_20191026_by_Raymond_Lo_02.jpg have not yet been restored. Would you please restore these two files. Regards! Joe FSF (talk) 02:20, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
You are not a member of the OTRS team. I only restore such cases after request from that team. --JuTa 06:22, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Flag of The Kazakh Autonomous Socialist Soviet Republic.svg

Latest comment: 3 years ago10 comments2 people in discussion

source on the flag? Soviet Kazakhstan ВотанБатан (talk) 13:56, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Flounder en:Kyrgyzstan and en:Kazakhstan? ВотанБатан (talk) 14:03, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Just dont overwrite old files, upload "your" versions under a new name, but here you have allready another file. --JuTa 15:15, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Do you understand that ВотанБатан (talk) 16:22, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

No, I dont underatand what you want. --JuTa 21:13, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

1920-1936 - Kazakh Autonomous Socialist Soviet Republic 1936-1991 - Kazakh Soviet Socialist Republic ВотанБатан (talk) 02:00, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Kazakhstan

  •  
    Kazakh Autonomous Socialist Soviet Republic (1920-1936)
  •  
    Kazakh Soviet Socialist Republic (1937-1940)
  •  
    Kazakh Soviet Socialist Republic (1940-1953)
  •  
    Kazakh Soviet Socialist Republic (1953-1991)
  •  
    Kazakhstan

ВотанБатан (talk) 11:08, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

When you do the right thing ВотанБатан (talk) 10:58, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Never --JuTa 10:59, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

KAZAKHSTAN ВотанБатан (talk) 16:43, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Category:Military aircraft built in 2003

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo JuTa, diese Kat ist nun nicht mehr leer. Hättest Du was dagegen, wenn die Seite wieder hergestellt wird? De728631 (talk) 16:04, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Ist wieder da. Gruß --JuTa 19:29, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
Danke.   De728631 (talk) 19:59, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Undeletion request

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Can you undelete one more Helsinki rephoto video, ie same last ones, but I just missed this one in my last request. Thanks.

--Zache (talk) 19:53, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi, its back. Please arrange OTRS release. Thx. --JuTa 19:58, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Duplicated Photos

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Juta

last month you redirected photos from pikiwikisrael due for duplication

when a photo is redirected it dissapears from pikiwiki database because the pointer in the photo page still points to the old photo and it loses the photo.

Can I do this search for duplicated photos myself? or can you give me a notice when it happens?

thanks!! Pikiwiki - Israel free image collection project (talk) 15:26, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi, see Special:ListDuplicatedFiles. --JuTa 15:27, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi Juta

There is some activity in my watchlist that belongs to a different user for example 

 User talk:JuTa‎ 22:00  +162‎  ‎De728631 talk contribs‎ →‎Category:Military aircraft built in 2003: danke
 User talk:JuTa‎ 21:53  +378‎  ‎Zache talk contribs‎ →‎Undeletion request: new section
 User talk:JuTa‎ 18:04  +308‎  ‎De728631 talk contribs‎ →‎Category:Military aircraft built in 2003: new section

please check

thanks Pikiwiki - Israel free image collection project (talk) 07:46, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

What should I checck? Thats a part of the history of my talk page. --JuTa 10:20, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Copie de Henri Bergson au concours général de mathématiques – Archives nationales – AJ-16-799 page 2.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

This document is a scan of handwritten document by Henri Bergon (1859-1941). In french, "Copie" also means "school work written on loose sheets". Cordially. --H2O(talk) 18:08, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Könnten Sie bitte nicht mehr die Löschung dieser Fotografie beantragen, da sie der Gemeinfreiheit gehört? --Julien Demade (talk) 18:32, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
I removed the prblem tag now. --JuTa 22:17, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
Danke!--Julien Demade (talk) 22:41, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

c:Category:Coins_of_Louis_Rudolph_as_Prince_of_Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel etc.

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo JuTa, bitte reaktiviere folgende am 18. Sep. 2018 von Dir gelöschte, damals noch leere, Kategorien:

Sie sind jetzt jeweils mit zahlreichen Bilddateien gefüllt. Danke und Gruß, HReuter (talk) 18:24, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

  Done. Gruß --JuTa 19:55, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Danke für schnelle Erlediung! Gruß --HReuter (talk) 14:09, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

category deletion

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I don't remember creating the category Galveston's 61 Street Fishing Pier.jpg but you were right to delete it. I don't know how to delete categories. I created the Category:Walking the Cow at someone's request, then they decided not to use it. So, since you can delete categories please delete it. Thank you. -- Jim Evans (talk) 19:47, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi,   Done and you can not delete, only admins can. --JuTa 19:53, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Six months on the islands ... (cover of book).jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Dear JuTa! The fact that OTRS is slow, should be addressed to OTRS, not to me. Виктор Пинчук (talk) 06:08, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Fine, then ask please on Commons:OTRS noticeboard for it. I only deleted it after a month of not OTRS reaction and a bot notified you. --JuTa 06:12, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

This morning I sent a second request, registered under the number [Ticket#: 2020121310001333]. Виктор Пинчук (talk) 12:39, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Again: please ask on Commons:OTRS noticeboard for this case, as I cannot see th emails. The old ticket ID was 2020110410006722. regards --JuTa 16:51, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Deletion query

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Regarding the recent deletion of: File:1969 circa Rona Bailey Breaker Bay (MB).jpg

I believe the required release has now been received by Wikimedia Commons. Copied below for your reference. Is it possible to have the deletion reversed? Sorry if this is the wrong place to ask - I am new-ish to this process. Pakoire (talk) 20:03, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

From: Permissions - Wikimedia Commons <permissions-commons@wikimedia.org> Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 11:34 AM Subject: [Ticket#2020121010013166] Confirmation of receipt (Re: Photo of Rona Bailey [...]) To: Meg Bailey <meg.bailey1@gmail.com>


Dear Meg Bailey,

Thank you for your email. This is an automatically generated response to inform you that your message has been received. Because all emails are handled by volunteers, it may take some time for us to reply. We kindly ask for your patience and understanding as we try our best to reply as quickly as possible. If your article or file has been deleted in the mean time, please don't worry. Any administrator can restore these later.

If you want to send more emails about the same subject, please add the following to the subject bar of the email: [Ticket#: 2020121010013166].

Yours sincerely,

The Volunteer Response Team

Please ask on Commons:OTRS noticeboard for this case, as I cannot see th emails. --JuTa 23:37, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Undeletion request (explicit authorization)

Latest comment: 3 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Bonjour JuTa. L'image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Fapae#Copyright_status%3A_File%3AEG_Rouen_2017.jpg est une illustration unique extraite par moi-même à partir d'une vidéo, capture d'une conférence à Rouen. Je pense que cette image est acceptable comme Image fixe issue de film. La question du droit à l'image est réglée, le sujet m'ayant donné son autorisation explicite. Reste la question de la licence. Quel est votre avis ? Reste aussi la procédure pour remettre l'image en place. Merci ! Fapae (talk) 18:54, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi, you dont need the persmission from the depicted person, but from the photpographer. He/she has to confirm the publication under a free license through Commons:OTRS. regards --JuTa 21:58, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi, don't you agree with the Bern convention "fair use"? Cf. fr:Wikipédia:Autorisation d'utilisation d'image/image de film. Regards Fapae (talk) 08:57, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Commons does not accept fair use. Please see Commons:Fair use. --JuTa 09:13, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
OK, Now I have the authorization: «Aucun problème de notre côté pour l'utilisation de cette image avec l'accord de Madame Godart. Cordialement, J.M L'équipe du SUN Service aux Usagers du Numérique Université de Rouen Normandie» Please undelete Fapae (talk) 10:05, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Thats not enough, they the copyright holder has to agree to an explicit free license like {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} and send that confirmation to the commons support team - see Commons:OTRS. Once everything checks out OK they will arrange the undeletion. --JuTa 11:51, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Deletion request

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I'm trying to get File:Southeastern_Grocers_footprint_2020_November.png deleted. It was malformed, and has, since, been replaced (with File:Southeastern_Grocers_footprint_2020_December.png). I noticed that you removed the deletion-request categories from the image. May I ask why?        — BoringJim (talk) 20:51, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Because add such a category is not starting a deletion request. Please follow the instructions on Commons:Deletion requests and Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually. regards. --JuTa 21:55, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
I've been looking all over for that info. Thanks much!        — BoringJim (talk) 18:11, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Undeletion request

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Please undelete this photo. The correct, second OTRS statement has been sent now. Thank you in advance! --Micalek (talk) 01:58, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Please ask on Commons:OTRS noticeboard for this case, as I cannot see the emails. --JuTa 04:55, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Photo has been undeleted. Thank you. --Micalek (talk) 17:19, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2020/2021!

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
    * Happy Holidays 2020/2021, JuTa! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:45, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

 

File:Flag of Egypt (1958–1972).png

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Flag of Egypt (1958–1972).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 19:39, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Urbestro de Vieno .JPG

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo JuTa, und ein frohes neues Jahr! Du hattest vor ein paar Jahren diese Datei zur Wiederherstellung markiert. Allerdings ist ab heute nur der Text gemeinfrei. Das Foto ist aber wahrscheinlich immer noch geschützt, darum habe ich die Datei erstmal aus Category:Undelete in 2021 rausgenommen. De728631 (talk) 14:08, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Greenlandic audio

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi there, thanks for your message. I am very new to Commons procedure so I apologise if I did not correctly explain, or did not follow a rule in uploading those audio files. I am certain they are copyright free but it was rather overwhelming trying to figure out how to show it.

So these files, and any more that will possibly come, are from the website oqaasileriffik, which is an independent branch of the Greenlandic government. There is a function on there called Martha, to generate AI audio of any Greenlandic words. This software is free and available in other places other than oqaasileriffik.

I was unsure at first of whether it was copyrighted so I emailed the secretariat first before uploading, and they said it could be used however anyone wishes, and even suggested bulk processing using Docker. I will attach our email conversation via imgur here.

So in conclusion these files are not generated by a human, but are AI voices generated by opensource, free software. Every file comes as an .mp3 and I have been coverting them to .ogg. I hope this helps. Jakeybean (talk) 10:34, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

File:WaterCollage.png

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi JuTa! I noticed that you were curious about the copyright on my image "File:WaterCollage.png". Just so you know, I made this by using three public-domain images from Pexels, and putting them together with a free online collage tool. How do I mark this?

Sorry, as far as I can see on https://www.pexels.com/license/ the license is not free enough for commons, as commercial reuse of unaltered copies is not allowed. --JuTa 16:29, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Bitte löschen

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo JuTa, bitte lösche die Dateien

Gesundes Neues Jahr!, --Tommes 14:40, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Eclipse m1.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 
 File:Eclipse m1.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. A reason for the tagging has not been detected or none was placed.

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now ! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 116.48.196.194.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 05:11, 3 January 2021 (UTC) —————————————

Hello JuTa,

Unfortunately I couldn’t obtain licence (requested one but then asked to be charged 2000 pounds!!)and didn’t know how to delete it, I would be appreciated if you can?

Many Thanks

Z Al-Nabulsi — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A00:23C6:FE80:D100:7D61:3FAA:404A:31D2 (talk) 23:06, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Undeletion request

Latest comment: 3 years ago7 comments3 people in discussion

Hello, it seems that Category:Wilhelm Feldman 1905 was deleted some time ago as a result of a bad edit to {{PD-Feldman-1905}}. I plan to repopulate it, so could you please undelete it? Thanks. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 14:55, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

  Done. --JuTa 16:00, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Review

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello. Can you check license for this file is correct? I think it's true, but it felt weird that it wasn't uploaded before. Thanks. --ToprakM ✉ 19:49, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Looks OK to me. regards --JuTa 19:51, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

File:02 Viola-Schoepe-Kuenstlerin-im-Atelier Raskolnikov.tif

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Moin JuTa, gutes Neues (kann man wohl noch wünschen)

kannst Du bitte die o.g. Datei wiederherstellen? Wir haben eine Freigabe unter Ticket#2020122710004841.

Danke und Gruß, --Mussklprozz (talk) 20:24, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

  Done. --JuTa 20:39, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

suppression de documents des Archives nationales (France) sur Wikimédia Common

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Archives_nationales_(France)#Source_of_derivative_work_is_not_properly_indicated%3A_File%3APetit_Palais_des_Beaux-Arts._Plan_de_l%27%C3%A9tage_-_Archives_nationales-_CP-F-12-4445-L-A.jpg Bonjour, je ne comprends pas ces demandes de suppression. Les Archives nationales ont signé un partenariat avec Wikimédia France depuis 2013 et contribuent activement à la diffusion libre et gratuite des documents conservés par l'institution. La licence utilisée n'est peut-être pas la bonne, mais au lieu de tout supprimer, il faudrait discuter et proposer une solution. Tous les documents mis en ligne sur Wikimédia Commons depuis 2013 sont conservés par les Archives nationales et librement communicables (domaine public). Je vous demande donc de bien vouloir réintégrer tous les documents versés. Nous ferons le nécessaire pour indiquer la licence qui convient. Cordialement --Archives nationales (France) (talk) 14:45, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Archives nationales (France), you declared the documents as your own work, which is not the case. Yo might have scanned but not created them. Please name the real author(s) on the description page(s). The used {{Cc-zero}} is incorrect too, because that only can be done by to copyright holder, better would be i.e. {{PD-old}} or what ever is fitting for the documenmts. regards --JuTa 15:18, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Krystian Kamiński.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi,

I apologise, but it seems that I forgotten to finish the case regarding file File:Krystian Kamiński.jpg for which there is a proper agreement, but I just probably forgotten to change template. See: ticket:2020091610027763. Cheers, Polimerek (talk) 12:15, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

There was no indication of pending OTRS within the file description. The file is back. Please finish your OTRS task now. regards --JuTa 13:30, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you. That was my mistake, I just have forgotten to add OTRS template. Polimerek (talk) 19:44, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Delete version

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi JuTa. The second version of the this file needs to be deleted: Samuel Johnson... Because it contains a change made just for humorous purposes. Thanks in advance. Good works. abc, 17:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

  Done --JuTa 20:58, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Ossoff photos deletion

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. There are two files -- File:Senator Jon Ossoff.png and a higher-res copy File:Jon Ossoff Senate photo.jpg -- that keep getting put on the page for Jon Ossoff on Wikipedia. It is clearly the same photo as the one at this article. Could you please delete the two? Would save a lot of energy on reverting if you could do this quickly. Thanks, DemonDays64 (talk) 23:26, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

UnDelete Request

Latest comment: 3 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

I would like to reverse several deletions that you did on 13 Jan. The files were duplicates, but accidentally duplicate. I will replace the files that these were redirected toward, as these actually contain the wrong images.

CdnMCG (talk) 21:49, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi CdnMCG, I deleted the redirects. Now you should be able to upload new different versions to those filenames. regards. --JuTa 22:03, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you Ju. Unfortunately, it seems I still cannot upload the files because the system recognizes it is the same as what was deleted. I have made a request here Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#Military_Map_Symbols which may resolve the problem. CdnMCG (talk) 23:02, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
You should hit the box "ignore any warnings" near the bottom at i.e. this upload page. --JuTa 04:31, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
That looks like it will work. I did not see that "ignore warnings" option previously, but it is there now for most. Do you have an expedient way of fully deleting the remainder of these:

CdnMCG (talk) 03:16, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

  Done. --JuTa 08:07, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Spiegazioni

Latest comment: 3 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion

Spiegazioni per il File:Tuttoschermo.gif. Tutto ciò che si vede nel gif, tanto la cornice grigia con dati numerici, che la zona verde dove compaiono le immagini gialle in movimento sono state programmate in visual basic, dove è stato implementato il mio software sviluppato in tale ambiente. Ci si può sincerare del fatto visionando all'indirizzo: http://www.sonar-info.info/P31/31pagina.html tre routine di calcolo diverse, in file exe, redatte in modo analogo a quelle impiegate per la gif in questione che riportano la stessa cornice grigia e la zona verde con le immagini gialle in movimento. Questo lavoro, presente sul mio sito dal 2012, è parte di un mio studio sul sonar.

Posso quindi concludere che tutto ciò che appare nel gif è opera mia, ottenuta tramite Visul Basic, portata in tale forma tramite programma di cattura disponibile in rete.

Faccio inoltre presente che tutte le figure pubblicate da funzioni di correlazione sono state copiate dal mio sito http://www.sonar-info.info/ di mia esclusiva proprietà, il sito, come potrete vedere non ha fini di lucro. Per concedermi la possibilità di impiegare materiale del mio sito, su richiesta, mi è stato iviato il Ticket: [Ticket#2019052110002315]

--Funzioni di correlazione (talk) 13:41, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Funzioni di correlazione, you should either place a not on http://www.sonar-info.info/P31/31pagina.html a note that the content is published under CC1.0 or you have to confirm your authorship through Commons:OTRS. regards. --JuTa 14:25, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Caro amico ti ringrazio del suggerimento, puoi ora controllare su http://www.sonar-info.info/P31/31pagina.html se la nota è corretta.

Grazie --Funzioni di correlazione (talk) 15:23, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I cannot find it. Can you please a bit more presice what you mean. --JuTa 16:15, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
La dichiarazione di pubblicazione sotto CC1.0 è indicata in testa al file P31 all'indirizzo :

http://www.sonar-info.info/P31/31pagina.html Se in P31 non vedi l'indicazione CC1.0 devi cancellare la cache relativa a quell'indirizzo, che ti mostra come era p31 la prima volta che lo hai letto, lo devi poi richiamarlo ancora all'indirizzo http://www.sonar-info.info/P31/31pagina.html

Spero di essere stato d'aiuto

grazie --Funzioni di correlazione (talk) 08:41, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Ahh, that was a caching issue on my site. I removed the problem tag now. --JuTa 08:46, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
A questo punto, per cortesia, vorrei sapere se la dichiarazione di pubblicazione sotto CC1.0 è corretta e quindi posso stare tranquillo che il mio GIF non sarà cancellato.

ciao e grazie

--Funzioni di correlazione (talk) 09:18, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

I cant speak for other people, but from my site: yes. --JuTa 09:21, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JuTa/Archive_55&oldid=531090453"
Return to the user page of "JuTa/Archive 55".