Commons:Deletion requests/File:SPGB Conference, 1905.jpg
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 18:07, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep; OTRS pending. —Psychonaut (talk) 19:12, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
- What exactly would you expect from an OTRS ticket in this case? Jcb (talk) 19:29, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
- I expect the photograph's former copyright holder to confirm that the copyright has expired. By the way, could you please merge your Commons:Deletion requests/File:SPGB-1905-conference.jpg nomination into this one? One image is a derivative of the other. It's pointless to hash out the exact same arguments on both pages. —Psychonaut (talk) 22:10, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
- Without authorship information, any statement about whether the copyright would have expired would be made up and worthless. Jcb (talk) 15:08, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
- I expect the photograph's former copyright holder to confirm that the copyright has expired. By the way, could you please merge your Commons:Deletion requests/File:SPGB-1905-conference.jpg nomination into this one? One image is a derivative of the other. It's pointless to hash out the exact same arguments on both pages. —Psychonaut (talk) 22:10, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
- What exactly would you expect from an OTRS ticket in this case? Jcb (talk) 19:29, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Keep a 1905 photograph was subject to the 1862 Act, then the 1911 Act, and both those Acts were not about publishing nor set defined times on copyright post mortem. There is no requirement to show that the author died prior to 1947 as it would have been out of copyright by the time of implementation of the 1956 Copyright Act. See similar example at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sharpe Richard Browdler 1847-1909.jpg — billinghurst 07:34, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
- You have made such claims before about UK copyright, but when it came to provide evidence to support this claim, you went silent. Jcb (talk) 16:39, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep as per Billinghurst. Yann (talk) 13:28, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Per B. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:26, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
