Commons:Deletion requests/2024/11/25

24 November 2024

26 November 2024

Deletion requests on 25 November 2024

November 25

File:Pas-de-Calais 2021-12-24 (51852010625).jpg

Work by Pablo Picasso exhibited in Pas-de-Calais in 2021. There is no freedom of panorama in France. 81.41.185.128 02:10, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Info, Picasso’s painting depicted here would be eligible for undeletion after 2044 (70 years after his death), unless evidence related to its first publication is provided (if the work was first published in France, then 70 years p.m.a. would apply, but if it was first published in Spain, then it wouldn’t be PD until 2054, as Spain has a copyright term of 80 years p.m.a. for works first published and/or authors deceased before 1987). 81.41.185.128 16:44, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Snoopy's Racing Railway Sign.jpg

No FOP for 2d stuff in Canada JayCubby (talk) 02:40, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I'd be ok with considering this as a 3D work. It's a freestanding outdoor structure, not like a painting. Dmartin969 (talk) 07:14, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dmartin969 Interesting, I'd not thought of that. What about the fact that the cartoon characters depicted are not PD? JayCubby (talk) 23:44, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As the creator and photographer of the file I'm also familiar with the amusement park of which this is located at, the attraction it represents, and the licensing deals in play. We currently do have access to a PNG image that can be uploaded as an official logo in its place, yes, but theme park rides and logos do not abide to the same copyright standards as an actual work of art. The characters in the image are associated with the fully-PD Six Flags Entertainment Corporation. The image existing on the web has harmed no laws, parties, or individuals, there is no reason to take it down. Bigtime Boy (talk) 03:33, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kim Ju Ae at a New Year's Eve celebration on 31 December 2023.jpg

All of Korean Central News Agency works are protected by copyright.

https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/nation/2024/10/205_384533.html:

"According to the Ministry of Unification, South Korean media outlets legally use photos provided by KCNA by paying copyright fees through a Japanese intermediary."

Hashflu (talk) 03:36, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Protected by copyright in North Korea, likely protected in the United States as per U.S. Copyright Office circular 38a.(both countries are signatories to the Berne Convention) File:Kim Ju-ae.png appears to be problematic for the same reasons. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 21:55, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I don't see how this doesn't fall under Article 12 of the DPRK's copyright laws, which clearly states: "Documents for state management, current news or information data shall not be the object of copyright unless commercial purpose is pursued." KNCA is owned and operated by the North Korean government, and so, instead of this just being in the public domain under their laws, they have actively relinquished their own copyright by writing a law which places news material into the public domain. In a sense, it would be like if I owned a company which had a bylaw that all of our press releases are in the public domain. International law thus plays no part there; I, the entity which creates the work, have chosen to place it in the public domain. The creators of that photograph are KCNA which is a subset of the KCBC which is a subset of the Cabinet which is a subset of the Supreme People's Assembly which wrote the law. Thus, KCNA relinquished their own copyright of their own volition. That is, unless this is interpreted as "commercial purpose being pursued", but thus far I don't see explicit evidence that this specific image has been deliberately commercialized. TheTechnician27 (talk) 06:15, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They do use these images commercially- they apparently charge licensing fees. This one in particular seems to have been licensed to the Associated Press, as per the Guardian article and the Associated Press's post at Alamy. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 07:13, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen disagreements and past deletion requests about this exact article of the DPRK copyright law and its interpretation, how has past consensus been? Would using a screenshot from Rodong Sinmun/KCTV be suitable instead since they don't seem to collect copyright fees?

I'd also be interested further on how copyright fees would be collected due to international sanctions. Perhaps it could be used as fair use on English Wikipedia with the {{Non-free USGov-IEEPA sanctions}} template? NAADAAN (talk) 15:32, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It seems that the incongruity between the text of the law and the reports of requiring licensing for media corporations can be explained by the line "unless commercial purpose is pursued". This suggests that the issue with media corporations is that they are corporate, for-profit entities, meaning their use and publication of such material is inherently commercial in nature. Given that the Wikimedia Foundation is a non-profit organization, and the usage of any materials published by the DPRK therein are incapable of serving a commercial purpose, it is safe to assume that this and other such images fall well within the allowances of the law in question.

Jj1984o (talk) 20:58, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete See also: Commons:Deletion requests/File:KimJungUn-KCTV.png, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Destruction of Inter-Korean Liaison Office (4).jpg. Works by KCTV, KCNA (or whatever similar equivalent there may be) are not generally in Public Domain.--Namoroka (talk) 06:12, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:佐藤里帆.jpg

This file was initially tagged by 1.33.123.150 as no source (No source since) Krd 05:51, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The source is own work, it's a large image, and EXIF is provided. The IP user who requests deletion needs to provide evidence that this image is stolen; otherwise, it should be kept, as it's COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Babubhai.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 06:06, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chandrakant Handore.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 06:06, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dr. Ramesh Y. Prabhoo.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 06:06, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gadwal Vijayalakshmi (cropped).jpg

This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 06:06, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gadwal Vijayalakshmi.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 06:06, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kiritparmar.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 06:07, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Majid Hussain.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 06:07, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Meenakshi Patel (cropped).jpg

This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 06:07, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Meenakshi Patel.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 06:07, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mira Aggarwal, April 2007.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 06:07, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shailesh-parmar.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 06:07, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tallinn, teater Estonia - vaade turuplatsile, AM N05926.jpg

no Commons:Freedom of panorama in Estonia Wkentaur (talk) 08:14, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A building that was built in 1913 by architects Armas Eliel Lindgren (1874 – 1929) and Wivi Lönn (1872 – 1966). The question is whether this counts as "collective work" (copyright protection for 70 years after publication) or whether it falls under the "standard" copyright rule (life of the last surviving author + 70 years) per COM:ESTONIA. If it's the former, then it's already PD. If it's the latter, then undelete in 2037. Nakonana (talk) 23:24, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BlackStar1991 (talk · contribs)

photos from instagram and non free licensed websites.

modern_primat^ඞඞඞ^----TALK 08:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What are the problems? Some of these files are my own, and I have credited the source for others. They have an open license BlackStar1991 (talk) 09:04, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Non-stop.jpg is COM:DEMINIMIS , File:Josephine-Jackson.jpg is literally from instagram https://www.instagram.com/ta.sama.backup/ . and about other files either cannot reach the source or source itself is not free licensed. @BlackStar1991 modern_primat^ඞඞඞ^----TALK 10:09, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 09:24, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by BlackStar1991 (talk · contribs)

Files that contain nothing educational other than raw text, see Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content.

Komarof (talk) 11:40, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These files contain information about terrorist acts committed by Russians against the Ukrainian people. Allowing Russians to block this information is a mockery of the memory of the war that Russia unleashed against Ukraine. BlackStar1991 (talk) 13:46, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:51, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ikan Kekek, if you dare to read the policy carefully, your comments will be more useful. a. COM:INUSE: A media file that is in use... b. COM:SCOPE: The following are not considered media files, and may not be hosted here: ... Files which are representative merely of raw text, e.g. ASCII files, raw source code listings as mentioned above, etc. Komarof (talk) 13:03, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
COM:INUSE overrides that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:13, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User:Ikan Kekek, that is, you've got problems with perceiving coherent text. COM:INUSE is an integral part of COM:SCOPE. --Komarof (talk) 02:04, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't read Ukrainian at all, but I know what COM:INUSE says. We are not to override editorial decisions of sister sites. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:40, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It seems you don't read English at all. COM:INUSE is for media files. Komarof (talk) 08:37, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'll let others judge who reads that page better, and that's a rude, very silly remark. I'm done talking to you. Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:13, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To be fair, COM:INUSE is self-contradictory in regard to hosting text files, but that doesn't excuse your dumb ad hominem remark. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:26, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The contradictions are not in the policy, but they appeared in your statements when you finally decided to read its text. Your patience ran out faster than mine, although it was me who had to deal with an interlocutor who stubbornly repeats the same thing, not knowing that his words contradict the policy he refers to. Someone else will decide whose position looks dumb. Komarof (talk) 10:24, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, we can create charts on wikipedia. no need to store. modern_primat^ඞඞඞ^----TALK 10:52, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, the files are plain text and can be just written out (which would also make them more accessible). Nakonana (talk) 23:32, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kubek - Franciszek Jujka.jpg

the photo may be in the public domain, but without citing the source it is impossible to verify. so it should be removed out of caution. 87.205.173.60 13:21, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per COM:UTIL. Dmartin969 (talk) 18:16, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karol kot morderca mieszkaniec meiselsa.png

It can't be PD-US, because it was made in Poland, not USA. 87.205.173.60 13:30, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep license fixed. Dmartin969 (talk) 18:09, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zdjecie-wykonane-przez-milicje-po-zatrzymaniu-Joachima-Knychaly.jpg

No proof that this photo is CC. It can be found in the web https://www.tineye.com/search/298db84898df3a5e005b197d19e5bd5567fc9d05?sort=score&order=desc&page=1 Also not PD-Poland without proof. 87.205.173.60 13:37, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep PD-Poland reads: "all photographs by Polish photographers (or published for the first time in Poland or simultaneously in Poland and abroad) published without a clear copyright notice before the law was changed on May 23, 1994 are assumed to be in the public domain in Poland." I have never seen a police mug shot with a copyright notice in Poland. We house a dozen of these images. --RAN (talk) 02:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:1938 lata wgzrodzicamig-7.jpg

No publication date or publicator to be PD-Anon or PD-Poland. 87.205.173.60 13:37, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:1948 nowiskiwgrussojiwasz1948g-9.jpg

No publication date or publicator to be PD-Anon or PD-Poland. 87.205.173.60 13:38, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gombrowiczmlody1928.jpg

No publication date or publicator to be PD-Anon or PD-Poland. 87.205.173.60 13:38, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:WG-44-2.jpg

No publication date or publicator to be PD-Anon or PD-Poland. 87.205.173.60 13:38, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gombrowiczmlody.jpg

No publication date or publicator to be PD-Anon or PD-Poland. 87.205.173.60 13:39, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zentara.jpg

Unknown author cannot make photo CC. 87.205.173.60 13:39, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gombrowiczdzieckiempodszyty.jpg

No publication date or publicator to be PD-Anon or PD-Poland. 87.205.173.60 13:39, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gombrowiczdziecko.jpg

No publication date or publicator to be PD-Anon or PD-Poland. 87.205.173.60 13:40, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Witkacywtatrach.jpg

No publication date or publicator to be PD-Anon or PD-Poland. 87.205.173.60 13:41, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:IanCurtis.jpg

Photo can be CC, but original work in exhibition not. 87.205.173.60 13:41, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HANNY JOOST PAJOUW.jpg

Not like own work UltimoGrimm (talk) 13:50, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Is the "Author" field in the metadata a problem? I don't know how to understand a long set of numbers as an author. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nu Front Hong Kong.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Wcam as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No FOP for 2D works in Hong Kong per COM:FOP Hong Kong Yann (talk) 13:52, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded in 2005, in use. Regular DR is better. This would be OK in USA, not sure about HK. Yann (talk) 13:54, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: this is not "2D artistic craftsmanship" and should be deleted per COM:FOP Hong Kong. --Wcam (talk) 15:58, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ipenguin.jpg

Per COM:TOY and COM:PACKAGING JayCubby (talk) 14:05, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Orjinta Nnaemeka .O.jpg

Not like own work UltimoGrimm (talk) 14:13, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why? No matches on TinEye or Lens.Google. What's your evidence? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:01, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dayo1.ogg

Out of scope, no educational value cross-wiki. Astrinko (talk) 14:27, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by "cross-wiki"? The only thing that saps value from this file is that the language, place name or whatever is not further identified. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Inioluwa1.ogg

Out of scope, no educational value cross-wiki. Astrinko (talk) 14:28, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by "cross-wiki"? The only thing that saps value from this file is that the language, place name or whatever is not further identified. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oluseye1.ogg

Out of scope, no educational value cross-wiki. Astrinko (talk) 14:29, 25 November 2024 (UTC) Hello @Astrinko, i trust that you're doing fine, the file above is an audio pronunciation of the Nigerian name "Oluseye"[reply]

It's part of my contribution to the @Celebrating Nigeria names event. The project was approved and funded by the Wikimedia Foundation few months back and its aim is to create Wikipedia articles and Wikidata pages about indigenous Nigeria names, followed by uploading the correct pronunciation of these names to Wikicommons and subsequently linking them to the Wikipedia articles. This is an example of such article.

In case you're also concerned that some of these pronunciations(audio) are duplicated - it's because some (a rather small percentage) of the pronunciations are not correct and I had to upload a correct version.

In essence, the audio file will be linked to https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oluseye which currently contains an incorrect pronunciation of the name. Dr Marve (talk) 16:51, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dr Marve, thanks for explaining! Could you please add an instructive category to all of these files? Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:05, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Olaniyan1.ogg

Out of scope, no educational value cross-wiki. Astrinko (talk) 14:29, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Astrinko, the file above is an audio pronunciation of the Nigerian name "Olaniyan"

It's part of my contribution to the @Celebrating Nigeria names event. The project was approved and funded by the Wikimedia Foundation few months back and its aim is to create Wikipedia articles and Wikidata pages about indigenous Nigeria names, followed by uploading the correct pronunciation of these names to Wikicommons and subsequently linking them to the Wikipedia articles. This is an example of such article.

In case you're also concerned that some of these pronunciations(audio) are duplicated - it's because some (a rather small percentage) of the pronunciations are not correct and I had to upload a correct version.

In essence, the audio file will be linked to https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olaniyan which currently contains an incorrect pronunciation of the name. Dr Marve (talk) 16:45, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Olaonipekun1.ogg

Out of scope, no educational value cross-wiki. Astrinko (talk) 14:29, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Inxent Panneau émaillé.jpg

No FOP for 2d works in France JayCubby (talk) 15:02, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Il s'agit d'une plaque communale destinée à l'information du public installée sur une place publique. Jacques Rocquet (talk) 10:00, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Siti Nurhaliza - Inspirasi (Anugerah MeleTOP Era 2016 ).webm

The video might be free to distribute and use, but the whole song itself isn't. No proof yet that the song (in any form) is released under Creative Commons license. George Ho (talk) 15:02, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:WEP (Egypt, Jordan, Palestine) - WikiArabia 2019.pdf

Lots and lots & lots of non-free logos! JayCubby (talk) 15:23, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ruby Bridges visits Barack Obama White House.jpg

I feel like this is pushing the boundaries of de minimis JayCubby (talk) 15:26, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Main subject of the image is the individuals, not the painting. Dmartin969 (talk) 18:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I feel like the subject is the painting, specifically how Obama is looking at it. The camera isn't exactly pointed at him. JayCubby (talk) 20:47, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think the solution is to blur the painting so that we can still recognize what it depicts but it's blurry enough to be de minimis. That seems like a delicate balance, so I'd trust someone else's judgment on where to draw that line. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:08, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We've done that in the past, and that seems reasonable to me. JayCubby (talk) 23:18, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've uploaded an attempt at File:Ruby Bridges visits Barack Obama White House (blurred).jpg JayCubby (talk) 23:26, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That looks great to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:32, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for other reasons: Per the exif: "This photograph is provided by THE WHITE HOUSE as a courtesy and may be printed by the subject(s) in the photograph for personal"

so... yeah... there's that. JayCubby (talk) 23:39, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is in no way relevant. It's a work of the White House and therefore PD. I'm not sure what your conclusion is. Cutlass ^Ciera 01:13, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I get for a lazy google search... Souza at one point worked for the White House. My other point is moot. JayCubby (talk) 01:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Dmartin969, the main subject is not the painting. Cutlass ^Ciera 01:28, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Meghna Bank PLC Head Office Gulshan 1.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Bangladesh since 2023 Syrus257 (talk) 15:59, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per FOP-Bangladesh. Dmartin969 (talk) 18:43, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:"روشي قاسم" ايزيدية من مجمع حطين الذي يقع شمال قضاء سنجار في محافظة نينوى ، تعد اكبر معمرة في العراق من مواليد ( 1887 ).jpg

صورة لها حقوق Mohammed Qays 🗣 16:17, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dulce 1997.jpg

Unclear copyright status, very unlikely that uploader is the author (and their contributions were flagged many times for copyvio) Ђидо (talk) 16:35, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dulce 21 años 1993.jpg

Unclear copyright status, very unlikely that uploader is the author (and their contributions were flagged many times for copyvio) Ђидо (talk) 16:36, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dulce frente a su escritorio.jpg

Unclear copyright status, very unlikely that uploader is the author (and their contributions were flagged many times for copyvio) Ђидо (talk) 16:36, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dulce María Loynaz Portada.jpg

Unclear copyright status, very unlikely that uploader is the author (and their contributions were flagged many times for copyvio) Ђидо (talk) 16:37, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dulce Mascota Preferida.jpg

Unclear copyright status, very unlikely that uploader is the author (and their contributions were flagged many times for copyvio) Ђидо (talk) 16:37, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:All Saints concert live.jpg

From an unreliable Flickr account, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with 201240123@N05 Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:44, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dulce María Loynaz Muñoz.webp

Copyright violation Ђидо (talk) 16:47, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, could probably be kept as not renewed or no notice, but impossible to know without date of creation. Dmartin969 (talk) 18:34, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Revolutionary-communist-international-flag-english-flag.svg

Fails to present a source for what they claim to be an organisation's logo. Suspected copyvio as a result Rambling Rambler (talk) 18:38, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't this be PD-textlogo, considering the fact that the hammer and sickle is such an old symbol that it couldn't be copyrightable nowadays and the rest is just a red flag with white letters? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:15, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It could possibly be argued to be simple enough under that but the wider issue is they haven't submitted it as such (i.e. "this is RCI's flag but I don't believe it is protected by copyright"). Instead they have submitted it as their own work without sourcing it, which I would err from the level of knowledge I have in saying it is therefore a breach because they're claiming they created it in effect. Rambling Rambler (talk) 16:11, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That can be corrected and shouldn't require deletion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:16, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I’m the original designer of this flag for the Revolutionary Communist International (RCI). The design is part broader visual identity and goes beyond a simple arrangement of elements, so I don’t believe it falls under PD-textlogo. I have included some of the original Figma files and drafts here for reference: Figma link. Let me know if you have any questions! – Siha Haahr

File:Revolutionary-communist-international-black.png

Claiming an organisation's logo as their own work, suspected copyvio Rambling Rambler (talk) 18:39, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I’m the original designer of this flag for the Revolutionary Communist International (RCI). I have included some of the original Figma files and drafts here for reference: Figma link. Let me know if you need anything else for the upload to be kept up! – Siha Haahr Siha1917 (talk) 01:47, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Revolutionary-communist-internatoinal-english.svg

Claiming an organisation's logo as their own work, suspected copyvio Rambling Rambler (talk) 18:40, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't this be PD-textlogo, considering the fact that the hammer and sickle is such an old symbol that it couldn't be copyrightable nowadays and the rest is just black letters on a white background? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:16, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It could possibly be argued to be simple enough under that but the wider issue is they haven't submitted it as such (i.e. "this is RCI's flag but I don't believe it is protected by copyright"). Instead they have submitted it as their own work without sourcing it, which I would err from the level of knowledge I have in saying it is therefore a breach because they're claiming they created it in effect. Rambling Rambler (talk) 16:12, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That can be corrected and shouldn't require deletion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:15, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also reminding myself that a typo in the filename needs to be edited out when the file is likely kept. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:01, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I’m the original designer of this flag for the Revolutionary Communist International (RCI). The design is part broader visual identity and goes beyond a simple arrangement of elements, so I don’t believe it falls under PD-textlogo. I have included some of the original Figma files and drafts here for reference: Figma link. Let me know you need anything else to keep this up! – Siha Haahr

Claiming an organisation's logo as their own work, suspected copyvio Rambling Rambler (talk) 18:41, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not public domain? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:17, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tampa Bay Lighting logo (2011-2024).png

Logo uploaded by a blocked editor. It duplicates File:Tampa Bay Lightning 2011.svg. – Sbaio (talk) 19:32, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nursery after search 24 June 2014.JPG

Non-free elements, to the point of exceeding de minimis JayCubby (talk) 19:36, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:معهد إبراهيم ابو لغد للدراسات الدولية.png

Above TOO, would need VRT perm JayCubby (talk) 20:41, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Городок (Львівська обл.) Пам'ятник Тарасові Шевченку.jpg

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created 19719. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor Vasyl Odrekhivskyi. Микола Василечко (talk) 21:00, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Painting by Jose Campeche.png

Image too small, there is a better version in: File:Campeche, José - Virgin of Solitude, from the Mínimos de la Victoria Convent - Google Art Project.jpg Ecummenic (talk) 21:20, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tatra T6B5 (423).jpg

Автор выложивший это фото на Википедию взял фото без разрешения из моего Instagram. Yesyaaa (talk) 21:26, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.instagram.com/p/CUZeDMcIl7V/?igsh=bWw4cDkzbzlpZ2tp

я выложил фотографию 29 сентября 2021 года, сверху ссылку на мой аккаунт с этой фотографией, прошу удалить данную фотографию, потому что автор который её сюда выложил, автором фото не является. Yesyaaa (talk) 22:00, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete COPYVIO. Nakonana (talk) 00:05, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moneda 1 Bolívar 2021.png

Wrong license, not a self-work. Also, there are no exceptions contemplated for the Venezuelan currency in Commons:Currency Banfield - Amenazas aquí 21:29, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prince Charles after receiving his wings.jpg

Copyright notice at source: https://www.rct.uk/collection/exhibitions/hrh-the-prince-of-wales-an-exhibition-to-celebrate-his-sixtieth-birthday/prince-charles-after-receiving-his-wings. The Royal Collection's copyright policy makes no mention of Crown Copyright: https://www.rct.uk/about/policies/copyright, DrKay (talk) 22:21, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was published prior to 1974. Cliffmore (talk) 18:56, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can accept that it was published in 1971, but that still means that it is copyrighted until 2042 in the UK because copyright on works by unknown photographers lasts for 70 years from publication. In the US, it will be copyrighted for 95 years. There is no evidence, and indeed there is contrary evidence, that it is Crown copyright. The source page says that it is not. DrKay (talk) 22:11, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's not accurate. The Royal Collection, "acquired by HM Queen Elizabeth II" is the copyright holder. The individual photographer may be unknown but the copyright holder is not. And as such, the expiry date has already taken effect. Cliffmore (talk) 23:53, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The en:provenance has nothing to do with the copyright. There is a copyright notice at the source. There is no indication anywhere that it is Crown copyright. The Royal Collection Trust is not the Crown. It is a registered charity. DrKay (talk) 10:03, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wildcats logos

Links given by the uploader do not provide any information about the copyright status of the logos. Per precautionary principle, they should be removed so the symbols are far above the TOO.

Files affected:

Fma12 (talk) 23:28, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

At least as of 2016, Northwestern claimed to own all rights over their logos, but many of the logos (or, as they say, indicia) included on the page are obviously PD-textlogo under COM:TOO US, so I don't think we can consider their claims reliable. The relevant question is how old this logo is and whether it's old enough to be public domain. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:40, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to this source, the cat figure was introduced in 1981 so not even a "PD-US-no notice" license could apply there. Fma12 (talk) 23:14, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per {{PD-US-1978-89}}. I don't see any registration for the logo by Northwestern University within the required 5 year timeframe. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:48, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]