Commons:Deletion requests/2024/10/11

October 11

edit

pertenece a https://bogota.gov.co y todas las entidades de la alcaldia de Bogotá Dlg098 (talk) 03:37, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Abzeronow as no permission (No permission since) Krd 05:14, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quite surprising, that it was allowed to create such gravestone in 1924. But it is still likely copyrighted. If we do not know the sculptor, then we cannot be sure, that (s)he is 70 years dead (Russia demands often even 74 years). Taivo (talk) 09:48, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wouldn't it fall under 2.) for anonymous authorship of Template:PD-Russia-expired or Template:PD-Russia-1996 or Template:PD-Russia? Nakonana (talk) 14:01, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
PD-Russia-1996 applies, if the sculpture is anonymous. But is it anonymous? The fact that I and you do not know the author does not make it anonymous. Is there an expert or database, who confirms anonymous work? Taivo (talk) 13:31, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The database of the Ministry of Culture also doesn't know / list the author. Does that count? Nakonana (talk) 18:14, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Book cover and copyvio Doostdar (talk) 11:31, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a copy and it is a personal work. Farbod13789 (talk) 15:31, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G1. I do not see reason for speedy deletion and allow discussion for a week. Taivo (talk) 11:33, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This page is redirected to File:Alva Chiang standing and holding microphone on the stage 20230513 (cropped).jpg, but Solomon203 removed it and tagged with speedy delete. He has not provided an explanation for his action, so I suggest keeping this page.--125.230.85.27 12:45, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Keep: As the creator I suppose I should at least clarify that I didn't create the redirect accidentally or as a test: it was a routine (and indeed automatic) creation along with renaming the file. I renamed the file under criterion 3 (obvious error) because the "AGA male staff" does not appear in the cropped version, but I don't think the name is so inaccurate that there's significant harm in keeping it. I have unblanked the redirect because I don't think it's appropriate to blank a redirect while it's being discussed. --bjh21 (talk) 17:43, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Improved (cropped and straightened) version has been uploaded [Savage House (straightened)] Pbergerd (talk) 13:33, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The picture is not showing Tuc de Saumet, so the title is not correct. The showd peak has no name. 188.77.121.159 13:37, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The name of the peak is not right, so the name of the picture is wrong too. The picture should be deleted. Contraix (talk) 13:41, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why do you think COM:File renaming requires the deletion of the file? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:28, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The peak doesn't show Tuc de Saunet. The shoed peak has no name. Contraix (talk) 13:39, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Contraix (talk) 13:41, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just correct the filename and description! Why is that so hard? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:06, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Logo likely above the trheshold of originality AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 13:45, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Comment – While I perceive the text as fine, the paper crane makes me believe this is above the threshold, per Commons:TOO Japan. EdoAug (talk) 17:56, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Comment – the orizuru paper crane is a critical part of Nihon Hidankyō's logo: removing the orizuru would tarnish the file's meaning. The orizuru itself is not in copyright, and there are already free images of the orizuru, such as File:Origami - Crane.svg. However, I cannot make a decision until (1) we find out if Nihon Hidankyō consistently uses a particular angle of the orizuru, and (2) someone makes a version of "Origami - Crane.svg" at that particular angle. --Minoa (talk) 20:30, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

there's a better version of this video still published by the IDF at "File:Israeli attacks on Yemen, September 2024. XXIII.jpg" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sdo216 (talk • contribs) 10:29, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This may very well be out of copyright, but with no source or author I think makes it at least worthy of discussion. Bastique ☎ let's talk! 18:31, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate file at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Urolophus_aurantiacus_Izu_%C5%8Cshima.webm Coughdrop12 (talk) 18:44, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

normally the file is delete which has been uploaded more recently. Also use {{duplicate}} for duplicate files. cheers, Amada44  talk to me 07:42, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Diese Grafik hat Schöpfungshöhe, da vermutlich gezeichnet bzw. gemalt. "Eigenes Werk" würde bedeuten, dass Jula2812 diese Grafik eigenhändig erstellt hat (anstatt sie z. B. zu fotografieren oder zu scannen). Dies bezweifle ich. GerritR (talk) 20:20, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ohje, dass ist 10 Jahre her – und tatsächlich habe ich das gemalte Wappen aus der Nachlass-Sammlung abfotografiert. Es war im Besitz von Werner Heuser († 1964), wobei ich mit Sicherheit sagen kann, dass das Gemälde nicht von seiner Hand, sondern schon älteren Ursprungs ist. Er hatte selber Ahnenforschung betrieben und darüber mit seinem Onkel Peter Georg Heuser († während des 1. Weltkrieges) sich ausgetauscht. Somit müsste das Bild zumindest Urheber: unbekannt / Quelle: aus Nachlass und {{PD-old-70}}. Zu dem Heuser Wappen existiert noch ein Foto eines vermutlich im 2. Weltkrieg verschollenen Bildes, ein Stempelsiegel und ein Abdruck in Siegellack. Der beschreibende Text ist aus den Annalen der Heusers aus Gummersbach. Jula2812 (talk) 15:47, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image seems to be screencapped from one of several Love Lies Bleeding press junket videos from the same sitting, probably this one which was not released with a free license. If it's not pulled from this video, the exact source and timestamp from a freely licensed video should be produced as evidence. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 20:38, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]