July 23

Я автор изображения. Прошу удалить - так как повторяет очень похожее мое изображение Well-read MountainMan (talk) 16:04, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by nonnotable band; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:00, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 11:55, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:07, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Delete per nom. Taylor 49 (talk) 16:28, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 11:56, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JTan124 (talk · contribs)

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:08, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 11:58, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:09, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Delete per nom. Taylor 49 (talk) 16:28, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 11:58, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

broadcast screenshot, no reason why uploader would have authority to grant license Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:22, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:55, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

broadcast screenshot, no reason why uploader would have authority to grant license Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:22, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Delete per nom. Taylor 49 (talk) 16:29, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --CptViraj (talk) 08:59, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not creative commons Urang Kamang (talk) 00:59, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, not CC at source and the archive urls dont work. Can be undeleted with proof of license. --Gbawden (talk) 14:32, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio: http://gurkhan.blogspot.com/2018/10/95.html Nickel nitride (talk) 01:05, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Comment Both copies on "blogspot" have a text over the image whereas the copy at Commons does NOT. Taylor 49 (talk) 16:31, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Photo cropped and lettering removed in photoshop. This photo has one author - Gur Khan (Alexey Khlopotov). Nickel nitride (talk) 01:56, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Лучше уж эта фотка, чем то, что было ранее Kosthar4uk (talk) 17:58, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a suspicion of unauthorized reproduction. https://lavieenbleu.info/Ypsilon.html エノール (talk) 01:14, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:31, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo only used in deleted article on en-wiki. I don't see it as being used in future articles. Liz (talk) 01:38, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:29, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has Nadia taken her own photo during a ceremony? I don't believe this is an own work of Nadia Gerhard. 181.203.11.106 01:58, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright holder LEDERHOS would also be happy, I guess, if this copyvio is removed from Commons. 181.203.11.106 02:05, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:32, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete as soon as the copyvio source is deleted. Better speedily. 181.203.11.106 02:07, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:33, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because they are using morrocan tajin in serving the food لطيفة بومر (talk) 02:11, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think there is no need for Algeria vs Morocco tajin wars in Commons, therefore it should be kept. However, I have a suspicion that this and other food pictures uploaded by this user are not own works but probably from cook books. Therefore all of them risk being deleted. 181.203.11.106 02:35, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Delete. Source appears to be a Facebook post by an Algerian restaurant. Omphalographer (talk) 18:23, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:32, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alpsman (talk · contribs)

Fictional and out of scope --N Panama 84534 10:17, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:13, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alpsman (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: fictitious election maps and party logos.

Omphalographer (talk) 02:14, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 15:51, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused screenshot of an unidentified web site (possibly some sort of SEO management tool). Omphalographer (talk) 02:18, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:00, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RenzoLauSegovia2013 (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: unused images of text.

Omphalographer (talk) 02:19, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:32, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is Pinterest? 181.203.11.106 02:27, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Delete. Inadequate (practically nonexistent) source and author information. Omphalographer (talk) 18:12, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, needs proof of permission. --CptViraj (talk) 09:01, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 03:13, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 14:33, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

suspected copyright issue www.zakulisi.cz? 217.255.190.114 08:01, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To explain further: this is a pure copyright issue, not a nudity/sexuality issue.

The page says "own work" but there is a watermark (www.zakulisi.cz? not sure). If the copyright situation is OK, the request should be rejected. 217.255.158.254 08:09, 24 September 2014 (UTC) (nominator)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 21:59, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 16:59, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:55, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:17, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Delete useless Dronebogus (talk) 02:42, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Speedy delete Deleted and reuploaded too many times. Please speedily delete again and lock forever to the level "sysop only". Taylor 49 (talk) 16:36, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Recreation of content deleted per community consensus (G4). --Эlcobbola talk 19:58, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


  Delete Delete all files uploaded by Alexietwink (cock-only account): dupe, cock-spamming, not sure whether subject has consented, not educationally useful, and lock the title "File:Erected penis 1.jpg" forever to level "sysop only". Taylor 49 (talk) 16:45, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Recreation of content deleted per community consensus (G4). --Эlcobbola talk 19:58, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


  Delete Delete all files uploaded by Alexietwink (cock-only account): dupe, cock-spamming, not sure whether subject has consented, not educationally useful, and lock the title "File:Human Erected penis.jpg" forever to level "sysop only". Taylor 49 (talk) 16:46, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Recreation of content deleted per community consensus (G4). --Эlcobbola talk 19:58, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 03:16, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:33, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 03:17, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:33, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 03:18, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:33, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:55, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:55, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 03:28, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:55, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine, completed in 1997 thus unlikely to be in PD A1Cafel (talk) 03:30, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:55, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While uploader said that is Marbled swordtail (X. meyeri), this species actually does not show elongated tail fin, which makes this identification false.[1] This uploader has been editing for the sole purpose of spreading misinformation. Other uploaded image by this user shows false licence and copyright violation. (See this) See the article that this user edited[2] and what I rewritten only based on claims in papers,[3] this user continued to add false claim that is not discussed in papers at all in articles. This image is already spread too much as X. meyeri in other language of Wikipedia, best way is to delete that. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 03:31, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 03:31, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:55, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate file of File:V20230218LJ-0689 (52884655966).jpg A1Cafel (talk) 03:33, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:34, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 03:35, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:55, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the United States for non-architectural works

A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 17:05, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 03:50, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:56, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Russia, artist Veniamin Pinchuk died in 1987 A1Cafel (talk) 04:10, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:56, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused content fork of File:United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea parties.svg TDL (talk) 04:13, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please use this file in the entry rather than the current map, as the current map incorrectly distinguishes between "non-parties" and "signatories", whereas signatories are in fact non-parties in the context of multilateral treaties that require a step beyond signature (ratification, accession, etc.) for a State to become a party. Accordingly, the colouration of the current map is misleading. 141.39.213.233 09:37, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you think there's something wrong with the map, then it's much better to update it so that it gets used globally, rather than creating an unused content fork.
I've implemented the requested colour change to the currently in use map, so this file can be deleted as a duplicate. TDL (talk) 16:51, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused content fork of File:United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea parties.svg TDL (talk) 04:13, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please use this file in the entry rather than the current map, as the current map incorrectly distinguishes between "non-parties" and "signatories", whereas signatories are in fact non-parties in the context of multilateral treaties that require a step beyond signature (ratification, accession, etc.) for a State to become a party. Accordingly, the colouration of the current map is misleading. 141.39.213.233 09:36, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you think there's something wrong with the map, then it's much better to update it so that it gets used globally, rather than creating an unused content fork.
I've implemented the requested colour change to the currently in use map, so this file can be deleted as a duplicate. TDL (talk) 16:52, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 04:29, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:35, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Historical images, created in 1963, unlikely to be uploader's work. Additional source and license information should be provided A1Cafel (talk) 04:30, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted magazine cover A1Cafel (talk) 04:35, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:35, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:53, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:56, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from the source and author A1Cafel (talk) 04:53, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:35, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:54, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:56, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Barbados A1Cafel (talk) 04:55, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:56, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Barbados A1Cafel (talk) 04:56, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:56, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Barbados A1Cafel (talk) 04:56, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:56, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Barbados A1Cafel (talk) 04:58, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:56, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Bangladesh A1Cafel (talk) 05:00, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:56, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Jordan A1Cafel (talk) 05:03, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:56, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Created by a globally blocked user (Moina kissimani), sockpuppet of Asf Dine : long term abuse for self-promotion Supertoff (talk) 05:09, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Hehua as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: per Com:PACKAGE and the logo on it is not in Public domain per COM:TOO Singapore. Is this a US or Singapore work? King of ♥ 05:12, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. I don't know. And now Galderma's Headquarters is in Zug, Switzerland. I also don't know when the logo on it is used and published first in which country. Hehua (talk) 06:08, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Aurelio Sandoval as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Mexican currency is copyrighted and the reproduction of designs is only permitted by seeking authorisation from the Ministry of Finance (Secretaría de Hacienda y Crédito Público) King of ♥ 05:13, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Keep the coins are de minimis The New Foxy (talk) 00:39, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Not DM when viewed 1:1. --Gbawden (talk) 14:36, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by OhKayeSierra as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Blatant copyvio of logo at [4]. COM:TOO? King of ♥ 05:14, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Alachuckthebuck as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: No evidence of a free license at the claimed source. COM:TOO? King of ♥ 05:15, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the gears and the combined hammer and sickle, the levels are below TOO.   Keep. Ahri Boy (talk) 08:20, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wouldn't the "stripes" on the back of the sickle representing the american flag make it above TOO?   Delete All the best -- Chuck Talk 21:39, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nope. Too simple in my eyes. Ahri Boy (talk) 03:01, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by 185.172.241.184 as Logo. COM:TOO? King of ♥ 05:17, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No author given nor permission, copyvio from https://open.spotify.com/artist/6kTbW6MDF6yj2PHjz4kSoJ Hoyanova (talk) 05:23, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:36, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file should not be handled through the speedy deletion process, but should be a regular nominate for deletion. Typeface designs are mostly not protected by copyright law. It’s just the font softwares. Flamon (talk) 05:40, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Alachuckthebuck as Copyvio (copyvio). Further information on why converting set type to outlines or export them to pixels is a fair use can be found here e.g. https://helpx.adobe.com/fonts/using/font-licensing.html#act-img . The deletion request for this file should be removed. Flamon (talk) 05:48, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We need evidence of permission to allow this to be used by anyone for all commercial purposes. Based on the license terms, it appears that only the orignal purchaser of the adobe license (the uploader) has the ability to use the font in commercial work. We don't have that permission, and would need to obtain it from the foundry/adobe. The image itself is legal, but the terms allowing use of the font in rasterized images disallowed additional commercial reuse of the font or image without repurchasing of the license from adobe or the foundry.
All the best -- Chuck Talk 21:37, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Chuck,
Thank you for clarifying your doubts.
Indeed, only the Adobe CC subscriber is allowed to use Adobe CC fonts for commercial work. However, once the work is converted to pixels or outlines, it is no longer considered a font. Embedding a font in a PDF file still counts as a font, but this secure way is permitted by the license. The font file itself is not embedded in a PNG pixel file or SVG vector file.
Consider this scenario: if I take a photo of a storefront with a specific typeface, I can sell that photo or make it public domain. People using that photo don’t need to license the font used because they cannot extract and use the font to create new texts. If your interpretation were correct, 90% of Wikimedia images containing text would be illegal.
One more scenario: I can layout a PDF info sheet with a long text, possibly including the name of the font used, and make the exported PDF document public domain. People can print and sell this document or create new documents using parts of the PDF, either as in-frame or as rasterized.
And one more scenario: If I take a photo of a store front with a typeface, I can sell that photo or make it public domain. People who use that photo do not have to license the font that was used, because they can not use the font to set new texts.
If you were right, 90% of wikimedia images that contain text would be illegal.
But one relevant legal scenario could be that Adobe says “Did the user Flamon have the right to use the font when he produced the image?” I would refer to my real name and provide one invoice from before the date of upload, provided that the font was part of the Adobe CC library at that time. And if I did not comply, any user could register for Adobe CC, generate that image again, upload the same image as a new version or reupload a new one, quit the Adobe CC subscription within 14 days and would also get a complete refund.
Fonts are not typefaces.
If there are specific paragraphs in the license agreement that you believe prohibit this usage, please let me know, and we can discuss how it applies to this case. Flamon (talk) 22:24, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's an SVG version of this flag map, see File:Flag map of South West Africa (1928–1982).svg Adinar0012 (talk) 06:15, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Having an SVG doesn't mean that we just delete the PNG version. Please identify how the PNG is out of scope, and what is the advantage of a deletion?  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:47, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per en:Sweat_of_the_brow#Israel possibly eligible. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Amit offir logo final 2.png -- Geagea (talk) 06:33, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:57, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's an SVG version of this flag map, see File:Flag map of South Africa (1928–1982, with South West Africa).svg Adinar0012 (talk) 07:03, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The process is to label PNG with the template {{Vector version available}} not to think deletion. What is the issue with both file type versions existing? Why would we take away user choice?  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:40, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad license wrong source low resolution no Exif possibly copyvio Waqar💬 07:23, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedily deleted Taylor 49 (talk) 16:50, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong license definitely not own work copyvio Waqar💬 07:24, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Yann. --Gbawden (talk) 14:36, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by John Gregory Foss (talk · contribs)

Dubious claim of own work, one from FB. PCP

Gbawden (talk) 07:24, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:19, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect license no metadata copyvio unlikely own work Waqar💬 07:26, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 15:54, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jejemrgrtha (talk · contribs)

Professional photos, mix of cameras but mostly no exif, unlikely to be own work

Gbawden (talk) 07:29, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:19, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я автор изображения, прошу удалить Well-read MountainMan (talk) 07:37, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:55, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

subject's face is enhanced with ai but the image is overall blur no Exif data and it can be found on lots of news websites so definitely not own work and copyvio Waqar💬 07:42, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Delete, obviously not own work and no evidence that the original image was ever released into the public domain. enwiki was previously using the lower resolution en:File:Shafilea Ahmed.jpg, taken from the press coverage of the time and considered to be copyrighted. Belbury (talk) 16:46, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above. --CptViraj (talk) 09:03, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image license is CC BY NC SA 4.0 Leoboudv (talk) 07:52, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy - per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 09:12, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photograph of Elena Tsagrinou in Eurovision Song Contest 2021. unlikely own work. -- Geagea (talk) 07:59, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:57, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not origional signature : https://signature.freefire-name.com/s/hiba ~AntanO4task (talk) 08:04, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Túrelio. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:19, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, CC NC per exif Gbawden (talk) 08:18, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:57, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational use. 0x0a (talk) 08:24, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:57, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(C) at source - no evidence that this is free Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:57, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ahmes Syahda (talk · contribs)

per COM:CB#Payment_cards, the pattern/design of the card can be copyrighted.

0x0a (talk) 08:52, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:19, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaders request Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 09:26, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:37, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

original uploader's request, accidentally uploaded and not covered in FOP Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 09:28, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:CSD#G7. @Immanuelle: you tagged this for renaming after you tagged for deletion. I assume you still want it deleted, but please request undeletion if you changed your mind. Also, when COM:CSD#G7 applies, tagging as {{SD|G7}} will be processed faster than a full deletion request. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:57, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Carte fantaisiste non sourcée qui induit les gens en erreur 2A01:CB11:8038:4D07:1822:BE6A:FA5A:3C24 09:31, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:37, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Carte fantaisiste non sourcée qui induit les gens en erreur 2A01:CB11:8038:4D07:1822:BE6A:FA5A:3C24 09:32, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced fantasy map that misleads people 2A01:CB11:8038:4D07:1822:BE6A:FA5A:3C24 09:33, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Carte fantaisiste non sourcée qui induit les gens en erreur 2A01:CB11:8038:4D07:1822:BE6A:FA5A:3C24 09:34, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

誤って投稿したため ブラックチャック (talk) 09:56, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: courtesy deletion: uploader requested deletion on the day of upload. --Yasu (talk) 15:15, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no author given and copyvio from linkedin page of this person see https://www.linkedin.com/posts/nina-blom-44305b52_nina-blom-werd-in-jeugd-door-moeder-mishandeld-activity-7076973882275950592-qHDq?originalSubdomain=nl Hoyanova (talk) 10:25, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Wvdp as no source (No source since). Converting to regular DR as the source is provided and it appears to match EXIF. Presumably the concern is the that uploader, User:Judophotos, might not be the Judophotos mentioned in the EXIF and watermark. —RP88 (talk) 10:28, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]