 | The differential $D^0$ production cross section as a function of $P_T$ and $Y$ in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 5$ and $13$ TeV considering forward rapidity bins. The results with the GBW, MPM and APPROX. models are directly compared against the experimental measurements provided by the LHCb Collaboration \cite{LHCbpp5, LHCbpp13}. |
 | The differential $D^0$ production cross section as a function of $P_T$ and $Y$ in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 5$ and $13$ TeV considering forward rapidity bins. The results with the GBW, MPM and APPROX. models are directly compared against the experimental measurements provided by the LHCb Collaboration \cite{LHCbpp5, LHCbpp13}. |
 | The differential $D^0$ production cross section as a function of $P_T$ and $Y$ in $pPb$ collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 5$ TeV considering three forward and backward rapidity bins. The predictions given by the GS (GBW), GS (MPM), GS(APPROX.) and UGDnuc models are directly compared with the experimental data from the LHCb Collaboration \cite{LHCb5}. |
 | The differential $D^0$ production cross section as a function of $P_T$ and $Y$ in $pPb$ collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 5$ TeV considering three forward and backward rapidity bins. The predictions given by the GS (GBW), GS (MPM), GS(APPROX.) and UGDnuc models are directly compared with the experimental data from the LHCb Collaboration \cite{LHCb5}. |
 | The differential $D^0$ production cross section as a function of $P_T$ and $Y$ in $pPb$ collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 8.16$~TeV considering three forward and backward rapidity bins. The predictions given by the \emph{GS (GBW)}, \emph{GS (MPM)}, \emph{GS (APPROX.)}, and \emph{UGDnuc} models are directly compared with the preliminary experimental data from the LHCb Collaboration \cite{LHCb816}. |
 | The differential $D^0$ production cross section as a function of $P_T$ and $Y$ in $pPb$ collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 8.16$~TeV considering three forward and backward rapidity bins. The predictions given by the \emph{GS (GBW)}, \emph{GS (MPM)}, \emph{GS (APPROX.)}, and \emph{UGDnuc} models are directly compared with the preliminary experimental data from the LHCb Collaboration \cite{LHCb816}. |
 | The differential $D^0$, $D^+$, and $D^{*+}$ production cross sections as a function of $P_T$ and $Y$ in $pPb$ collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 5.02$~TeV considering $-0.96 < Y^{*} < 0.04$. The predictions given by the \emph{GS (GBW)}, \emph{GS (MPM)}, \emph{GS(APPROX.)}, and \emph{UGDnuc} models are directly compared to the experimental data from the ALICE Collaboration \cite{ALICE502}. |
 | The ratios as function of $P_T$ considering the $D^+/D^0$ (left panel) and $D^{*+}/D^0$ (right panel) differential production cross sections. The predictions given by the \emph{GS (GBW)}, \emph{GS (MPM)}, and \emph{UGDnuc} models are directly compared to the experimental data from the ALICE Collaboration \cite{ALICE502}. |
 | The ratios as function of $P_T$ considering the $D^+/D^0$ (left panel) and $D^{*+}/D^0$ (right panel) differential production cross sections. The predictions given by the \emph{GS (GBW)}, \emph{GS (MPM)}, and \emph{UGDnuc} models are directly compared to the experimental data from the ALICE Collaboration \cite{ALICE502}. |
 | The nuclear modification factor for $D^0$ (upper left panel), $D^+$ (upper right panel), and $D^{*+}$ (bottom panel) meson production in $pPb$ collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 5.02$~TeV considering $-0.96~<~Y^{*}~<~0.04$. The predictions given by the \emph{GS (GBW)}, \emph{GS (MPM)}, \emph{GS (APPROX.)}, and \emph{UGDnuc} models are directly compared to the experimental data from the ALICE Collaboration \cite{ALICE502}. |
 | The nuclear modification factor for $D^0$ (upper left panel), $D^+$ (upper right panel), and $D^{*+}$ (bottom panel) meson production in $pPb$ collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 5.02$~TeV considering $-0.96~<~Y^{*}~<~0.04$. The predictions given by the \emph{GS (GBW)}, \emph{GS (MPM)}, \emph{GS (APPROX.)}, and \emph{UGDnuc} models are directly compared to the experimental data from the ALICE Collaboration \cite{ALICE502}. |
 | The nuclear modification factor for $D^0$ (upper left panel), $D^+$ (upper right panel), and $D^{*+}$ (bottom panel) meson production in $pPb$ collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 5.02$~TeV considering $-0.96~<~Y^{*}~<~0.04$. The predictions given by the \emph{GS (GBW)}, \emph{GS (MPM)}, \emph{GS (APPROX.)}, and \emph{UGDnuc} models are directly compared to the experimental data from the ALICE Collaboration \cite{ALICE502}. |
 | The nuclear modification factor for $D^0$ meson production in $pPb$ collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 5$~TeV in the forward (left panel) and backward data (right panel) considering the common rapidity range, $2.5 < |Y^{*}| < 4$. In particular, the predictions given by the \emph{GS (GBW)}, \emph{GS (MPM)} and \emph{UGDnuc} models are directly compared to the CGC predictions \cite{Ducloue:2015gfa,Fujii:2017rqa} concerning the forward configuration. The experimental data are reported by the LHCb Collaboration \cite{LHCb5}. |
 | The nuclear modification factor for $D^0$ meson production in $pPb$ collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 5$~TeV in the forward (left panel) and backward data (right panel) considering the common rapidity range, $2.5 < |Y^{*}| < 4$. In particular, the predictions given by the \emph{GS (GBW)}, \emph{GS (MPM)} and \emph{UGDnuc} models are directly compared to the CGC predictions \cite{Ducloue:2015gfa,Fujii:2017rqa} concerning the forward configuration. The experimental data are reported by the LHCb Collaboration \cite{LHCb5}. |
 | The differential cross section (left panel) and the nuclear modification factor (right panel) for $D^0$ meson production in $pPb$ collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 5$~TeV as a function of $Y^{*}$ in the forward and backward configuration. A comparison between the predictions with the \emph{GS (GBW)}, \emph{GS (MPM)} and \emph{UGDnuc} models and the data reported by the LHCb Collaboration \cite{LHCb5} is performed. |
 | The differential cross section (left panel) and the nuclear modification factor (right panel) for $D^0$ meson production in $pPb$ collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 5$~TeV as a function of $Y^{*}$ in the forward and backward configuration. A comparison between the predictions with the \emph{GS (GBW)}, \emph{GS (MPM)} and \emph{UGDnuc} models and the data reported by the LHCb Collaboration \cite{LHCb5} is performed. |
 | The rapidity dependence of the UGD parameterizations evaluated at the transverse momentum values given by $k^{2}_T = 0.5\, Q^{2}_{s,A}$, $k^{2}_T = Q^{2}_{s,A}$, and $k^{2}_T = 5\, Q^{2}_{s,A}$. |
 | The rapidity dependence of the UGD parameterizations evaluated at the transverse momentum values given by $k^{2}_T = 0.5\, Q^{2}_{s,A}$, $k^{2}_T = Q^{2}_{s,A}$, and $k^{2}_T = 5\, Q^{2}_{s,A}$. |
 | The rapidity dependence of the UGD parameterizations evaluated at the transverse momentum values given by $k^{2}_T = 0.5\, Q^{2}_{s,A}$, $k^{2}_T = Q^{2}_{s,A}$, and $k^{2}_T = 5\, Q^{2}_{s,A}$. |