001702783 001__ 1702783
001702783 003__ SzGeCERN
001702783 005__ 20220810230924.0
001702783 0248_ $$aoai:cds.cern.ch:1702783$$pcerncds:CERN$$pcerncds:CERN:FULLTEXT$$pcerncds:FULLTEXT
001702783 0247_ $$2DOI$$a10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3120-z
001702783 035__ $$9arXiv$$aoai:arXiv.org:1405.4295
001702783 035__ $$9Inspire$$a1297050
001702783 037__ $$9arXiv$$aarXiv:1405.4295$$chep-ph
001702783 037__ $$aIPPP-14-35
001702783 037__ $$aDCPT-14-70
001702783 037__ $$aCERN-PH-TH-2014-083
001702783 037__ $$aDESY-14-069
001702783 037__ $$aKCL-PH-TH-2014-22
001702783 041__ $$aeng
001702783 088__ $$aIPPP-14-35
001702783 088__ $$aDCPT-14-70
001702783 088__ $$aCERN-PH-TH-2014-083
001702783 088__ $$aDESY-14-069
001702783 088__ $$aKCL-PH-TH-2014-22
001702783 084__ $$2CERN Library$$aTH-2014-083
001702783 100__ $$aSchlaffer, Matthias$$uDESY
001702783 245__ $$aBoosted Higgs Shapes
001702783 260__ $$c2014-10-29
001702783 269__ $$c16 May 2014
001702783 300__ $$a14 p
001702783 500__ $$aComments: 17 pages, 7 figures, 6 tables. Added references and minor clarifications. Matches published version
001702783 500__ $$9arXiv$$a17 pages, 7 figures, 6 tables. Added references and minor clarifications. Matches published version
001702783 520__ $$aThe inclusive Higgs production rate through gluon fusion has been measured to be in agreement with the Standard Model (SM). We show that even if the inclusive Higgs production rate is very SM-like, a precise determination of the boosted Higgs transverse momentum shape offers the opportunity to see effects of natural new physics. These measurements are generically motivated by effective field theory arguments and specifically in extensions of the SM with a natural weak scale, like composite Higgs models and natural supersymmetry. We show in detail how a measurement at high transverse momentum of $H\to 2\ell+\mathbf{p}\!\!/_T$ via $H\to \tau\tau$ and $H\to WW^*$ could be performed and demonstrate that it offers a compelling alternative to the $t\bar t H$ channel. We discuss the sensitivity to new physics in the most challenging scenario of an exactly SM-like inclusive Higgs cross-section.
001702783 520__ $$9Springer$$aThe inclusive Higgs production rate through gluon fusion has been measured to be in agreement with the Standard Model (SM). We show that even if the inclusive Higgs production rate is very SM-like, a precise determination of the boosted Higgs transverse momentum shape offers the opportunity to see effects of natural new physics. These measurements are generically motivated by effective field theory arguments and specifically in extensions of the SM with a natural weak scale, like composite Higgs models and natural supersymmetry. We show in detail how a measurement at high transverse momentum of $H\rightarrow 2\ell +\mathbf {p}\!\!/_\mathrm{T}$ via $H\rightarrow \tau \tau $ and $H\rightarrow WW^*$ could be performed and demonstrate that it offers a compelling alternative to the $t\bar{t} H$ channel. We discuss the sensitivity to new physics in the most challenging scenario of an exactly SM-like inclusive Higgs cross section.
001702783 520__ $$9arXiv$$aThe inclusive Higgs production rate through gluon fusion has been measured to be in agreement with the Standard Model (SM). We show that even if the inclusive Higgs production rate is very SM-like, a precise determination of the boosted Higgs transverse momentum shape offers the opportunity to see effects of natural new physics. These measurements are generically motivated by effective field theory arguments and specifically in extensions of the SM with a natural weak scale, like composite Higgs models and natural supersymmetry. We show in detail how a measurement at high transverse momentum of $H\to 2\ell+\mathbf{p}\!\!/_T$ via $H\to \tau\tau$ and $H\to WW^*$ could be performed and demonstrate that it offers a compelling alternative to the $t\bar t H$ channel. We discuss the sensitivity to new physics in the most challenging scenario of an exactly SM-like inclusive Higgs cross-section.
001702783 540__ $$3preprint$$aCC-BY-3.0
001702783 540__ $$3publication$$aCC-BY-4.0$$fSCOAP3
001702783 542__ $$3preprint$$dCERN$$g2014
001702783 542__ $$3publication$$dThe Author(s)$$g2014
001702783 595__ $$aOA
001702783 595__ $$aCERN-TH
001702783 595__ $$aLANL EDS
001702783 65017 $$2arXiv$$aParticle Physics - Phenomenology
001702783 65027 $$2arXiv$$aParticle Physics - Experiment
001702783 690C_ $$aARTICLE
001702783 690C_ $$aCERN
001702783 695__ $$9LANL EDS$$ahep-ph
001702783 695__ $$9LANL EDS$$ahep-ex
001702783 700__ $$aSpannowsky, Michael$$uDurham U., IPPP
001702783 700__ $$aTakeuchi, Michihisa$$uKing's Coll. London
001702783 700__ $$aWeiler, Andreas$$uCERN$$uDESY
001702783 700__ $$aWymant, Chris$$uAnnecy, LAPTH$$uDurham U., IPPP
001702783 710__ $$5PH-TH
001702783 773__ $$c3120$$oEur.Phys.J. C74 (2014) 3120$$pEur. Phys. J. C$$v74$$y2014
001702783 8564_ $$uhttp://arxiv.org/pdf/1405.4295.pdf$$yPreprint
001702783 8564_ $$8879795$$s40404$$uhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/1702783/files/CLplots.png$$y00020 CL$_s$ vs. the integrated luminosity using $\tau\tau$ mode for the model point of $\kappa_g=0.5$ (left) and $\kappa_g=-0.5$ (central). Right: CL$_s$ as a function of $\kappa_g$ for an integrated luminosity of 3000 fb$^{-1}$.
001702783 8564_ $$8879801$$s2420$$uhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/1702783/files/HtoTauTauBoost.png$$y00005 Caption not extracted
001702783 8564_ $$8879802$$s2197$$uhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/1702783/files/HtoTauTauPartonLevel.png$$y00003 Showing the difference in the relative positioning of the neutrinos/$\slashed{\mathbf{p}}_T$ and the dilepton system between $H\to W_\ell W_\ell^*$ and $H\to \tau_\ell\tau_\ell$ decays.
001702783 8564_ $$8879791$$s2815$$uhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/1702783/files/HtoWWboost.png$$y00004 Caption not extracted
001702783 8564_ $$8879785$$s1792$$uhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/1702783/files/HtoWWpartonLevel.png$$y00002 Cross-sections normalized by the SM value after applying several $p_{T,H}$ cuts in parton level for several model points $(c_t,\kappa_g)$.
001702783 8564_ $$8879786$$s41512$$uhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/1702783/files/NP_higgs.png$$y00001 Left panel: model points generated for this analysis in $(c_t, \kappa_g)$ plane. The shaded area shows parameter space which gives the inclusive cross-section consistent to the SM prediction within 20\%. Right panel: parton level $p_{T,H}$ distributions for the SM, and $(c_t,\kappa_g)=(1 -\kappa_g, \kappa_g)$ with $\kappa_g =\pm 0.1,\pm 0.3,\pm 0.5$.
001702783 8564_ $$8879788$$s39192$$uhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/1702783/files/NP_higgs_pt_aftercut_WW.png$$y00014 Signal distributions for the SM and six model points, normalized to the respective cross-sections. Left panel: the collinear mass $M_{\rm col}$ after cut 7. $p_{T,H}^{\rm rec}$ is shown for $H\to \tau\tau$ ($H \to W_\ell W_\ell$) in the central (right) panel after all optimized selection cuts.
001702783 8564_ $$8879787$$s38054$$uhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/1702783/files/NP_higgs_pt_aftercut_tautau.png$$y00013 Signal distributions for the SM and six model points, normalized to the respective cross-sections. Left panel: the collinear mass $M_{\rm col}$ after cut 7. $p_{T,H}^{\rm rec}$ is shown for $H\to \tau\tau$ ($H \to W_\ell W_\ell$) in the central (right) panel after all optimized selection cuts.
001702783 8564_ $$8879778$$s37082$$uhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/1702783/files/NP_mcol_aftercut.png$$y00012 Signal distributions for the SM and six model points, normalized to the respective cross-sections. Left panel: the collinear mass $M_{\rm col}$ after cut 7. $p_{T,H}^{\rm rec}$ is shown for $H\to \tau\tau$ ($H \to W_\ell W_\ell$) in the central (right) panel after all optimized selection cuts.
001702783 8564_ $$8879783$$s24921$$uhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/1702783/files/dR_ll_aftercut_log.png$$y00010 Distributions of the transverse mass $m_{T, \ell\ell}$ after all selection cuts up to $6'$ imposed (left panel) and the dilepton separation $\Delta R_{\ell\ell}$ after all selection cuts up to $7'$ imposed (central panel). Right: stacked distribution of the `Higgs' transverse momentum $p^{\rm rec}_{T,H}$ (defined in Eq.~\eqref{eq:ptH}) after {\it all} selection cuts for $H \to W_\ell W_\ell^*$ optimization, with a logarithmic scale.
001702783 8564_ $$8879784$$s22389$$uhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/1702783/files/higgs_pt_aftercut_forWW_log.png$$y00011 Distributions of the transverse mass $m_{T, \ell\ell}$ after all selection cuts up to $6'$ imposed (left panel) and the dilepton separation $\Delta R_{\ell\ell}$ after all selection cuts up to $7'$ imposed (central panel). Right: stacked distribution of the `Higgs' transverse momentum $p^{\rm rec}_{T,H}$ (defined in Eq.~\eqref{eq:ptH}) after {\it all} selection cuts for $H \to W_\ell W_\ell^*$ optimization, with a logarithmic scale.
001702783 8564_ $$8879789$$s24249$$uhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/1702783/files/higgs_pt_aftercut_fortautau_log.png$$y00008 Left panel: the invariant mass of the two leptons, $m_{\ell \ell}$, after cut 6. Central panel: The collinear mass $M_{\rm col}$ after cut 7, stacking the different processes. Histograms are normalized to the respective cross-sections. Right panel: stacked distributions of the `Higgs' transverse momentum $p_{T,H}$ (defined in Eq.~\eqref{eq:ptH}) after selection cut~8, with a logarithmic scale.
001702783 8564_ $$8879805$$s40006$$uhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/1702783/files/mcol_log.png$$y00007 Left panel: the invariant mass of the two leptons, $m_{\ell \ell}$, after cut 6. Central panel: The collinear mass $M_{\rm col}$ after cut 7, stacking the different processes. Histograms are normalized to the respective cross-sections. Right panel: stacked distributions of the `Higgs' transverse momentum $p_{T,H}$ (defined in Eq.~\eqref{eq:ptH}) after selection cut~8, with a logarithmic scale.The collinear mass $M_{\rm col}$ distributions after (upper) and before (lower) cut 7, stacking the different processes. Histograms are normalized to the respective cross-sections. The $p_T$ cut on the reconstructed Higgs are $p_{T,H}^{\rm rec}>200$~GeV, $p_{T,H}^{\rm rec}>300$~GeV, and $p_{T,H}^{\rm rec}>400$~GeV from left to right.
001702783 8564_ $$8879781$$s37600$$uhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/1702783/files/mcol_nocut_log.png$$y00023 The collinear mass $M_{\rm col}$ distributions after (upper) and before (lower) cut 7, stacking the different processes. Histograms are normalized to the respective cross-sections. The $p_T$ cut on the reconstructed Higgs are $p_{T,H}^{\rm rec}>200$~GeV, $p_{T,H}^{\rm rec}>300$~GeV, and $p_{T,H}^{\rm rec}>400$~GeV from left to right.
001702783 8564_ $$8879799$$s38305$$uhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/1702783/files/mcol_nocut_pt300_log.png$$y00024 The collinear mass $M_{\rm col}$ distributions after (upper) and before (lower) cut 7, stacking the different processes. Histograms are normalized to the respective cross-sections. The $p_T$ cut on the reconstructed Higgs are $p_{T,H}^{\rm rec}>200$~GeV, $p_{T,H}^{\rm rec}>300$~GeV, and $p_{T,H}^{\rm rec}>400$~GeV from left to right.
001702783 8564_ $$8879793$$s34211$$uhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/1702783/files/mcol_nocut_pt400_log.png$$y00025 The collinear mass $M_{\rm col}$ distributions after (upper) and before (lower) cut 7, stacking the different processes. Histograms are normalized to the respective cross-sections. The $p_T$ cut on the reconstructed Higgs are $p_{T,H}^{\rm rec}>200$~GeV, $p_{T,H}^{\rm rec}>300$~GeV, and $p_{T,H}^{\rm rec}>400$~GeV from left to right.
001702783 8564_ $$8879797$$s40424$$uhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/1702783/files/mcol_pt300_log.png$$y00021 The collinear mass $M_{\rm col}$ distributions after (upper) and before (lower) cut 7, stacking the different processes. Histograms are normalized to the respective cross-sections. The $p_T$ cut on the reconstructed Higgs are $p_{T,H}^{\rm rec}>200$~GeV, $p_{T,H}^{\rm rec}>300$~GeV, and $p_{T,H}^{\rm rec}>400$~GeV from left to right.
001702783 8564_ $$8879780$$s35377$$uhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/1702783/files/mcol_pt400_log.png$$y00022 The collinear mass $M_{\rm col}$ distributions after (upper) and before (lower) cut 7, stacking the different processes. Histograms are normalized to the respective cross-sections. The $p_T$ cut on the reconstructed Higgs are $p_{T,H}^{\rm rec}>200$~GeV, $p_{T,H}^{\rm rec}>300$~GeV, and $p_{T,H}^{\rm rec}>400$~GeV from left to right.
001702783 8564_ $$8879800$$s28499$$uhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/1702783/files/mll_log_nostack.png$$y00006 Left panel: the invariant mass of the two leptons, $m_{\ell \ell}$, after cut 6. Central panel: The collinear mass $M_{\rm col}$ after cut 7, stacking the different processes. Histograms are normalized to the respective cross-sections. Right panel: stacked distributions of the `Higgs' transverse momentum $p_{T,H}$ (defined in Eq.~\eqref{eq:ptH}) after selection cut~8, with a logarithmic scale.
001702783 8564_ $$8879790$$s9819$$uhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/1702783/files/model_points.png$$y00000 Left panel: model points generated for this analysis in $(c_t, \kappa_g)$ plane. The shaded area shows parameter space which gives the inclusive cross-section consistent to the SM prediction within 20\%. Right panel: parton level $p_{T,H}$ distributions for the SM, and $(c_t,\kappa_g)=(1 -\kappa_g, \kappa_g)$ with $\kappa_g =\pm 0.1,\pm 0.3,\pm 0.5$.
001702783 8564_ $$8879796$$s25736$$uhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/1702783/files/mt_log.png$$y00009 Distributions of the transverse mass $m_{T, \ell\ell}$ after all selection cuts up to $6'$ imposed (left panel) and the dilepton separation $\Delta R_{\ell\ell}$ after all selection cuts up to $7'$ imposed (central panel). Right: stacked distribution of the `Higgs' transverse momentum $p^{\rm rec}_{T,H}$ (defined in Eq.~\eqref{eq:ptH}) after {\it all} selection cuts for $H \to W_\ell W_\ell^*$ optimization, with a logarithmic scale.
001702783 8564_ $$8879777$$s13386$$uhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/1702783/files/pHT_tt_05_bkg_CLs.png$$y00016 CL$_s$ vs. the integrated luminosity for the model points $\kappa_g= 0$ (SM, left) and $\kappa_g=0.5$ (central) against a background-only hypothesis using the $\tau\tau$ mode. Right panel: CL$_s$ plot for the model point of $\kappa_g=0.5$ against a background-only hypothesis using the $WW$ mode.
001702783 8564_ $$8879798$$s13457$$uhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/1702783/files/pHT_tt_05_tt_10_CLs.png$$y00018 CL$_s$ vs. the integrated luminosity using $\tau\tau$ mode for the model point of $\kappa_g=0.5$ (left) and $\kappa_g=-0.5$ (central). Right: CL$_s$ as a function of $\kappa_g$ for an integrated luminosity of 3000 fb$^{-1}$.
001702783 8564_ $$8879779$$s13136$$uhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/1702783/files/pHT_tt_10_bkg_CLs.png$$y00015 CL$_s$ vs. the integrated luminosity for the model points $\kappa_g= 0$ (SM, left) and $\kappa_g=0.5$ (central) against a background-only hypothesis using the $\tau\tau$ mode. Right panel: CL$_s$ plot for the model point of $\kappa_g=0.5$ against a background-only hypothesis using the $WW$ mode.
001702783 8564_ $$8879776$$s12544$$uhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/1702783/files/pHT_tt_15_tt_10_CLs.png$$y00019 CL$_s$ vs. the integrated luminosity using $\tau\tau$ mode for the model point of $\kappa_g=0.5$ (left) and $\kappa_g=-0.5$ (central). Right: CL$_s$ as a function of $\kappa_g$ for an integrated luminosity of 3000 fb$^{-1}$.
001702783 8564_ $$8879792$$s13347$$uhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/1702783/files/pHT_ww_05_bkg_CLs.png$$y00017 CL$_s$ vs. the integrated luminosity for the model points $\kappa_g= 0$ (SM, left) and $\kappa_g=0.5$ (central) against a background-only hypothesis using the $\tau\tau$ mode. Right panel: CL$_s$ plot for the model point of $\kappa_g=0.5$ against a background-only hypothesis using the $WW$ mode.
001702783 8564_ $$8879794$$s1106422$$uhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/1702783/files/arXiv:1405.4295.pdf
001702783 8564_ $$81052231$$s652653$$uhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/1702783/files/10.1140-epjc-s10052-014-3120-z.pdf$$ySpringer Open Access article
001702783 8564_ $$81424024$$s652653$$uhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/1702783/files/scoap3-fulltext.pdf$$yArticle from SCOAP3
001702783 8564_ $$82334578$$s652653$$uhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/1702783/files/scoap.pdf$$yArticle from SCOAP3
001702783 916__ $$sn$$w201420
001702783 960__ $$a13
001702783 980__ $$aARTICLE
001702783 980__ $$aCERN
001702783 999C6 $$aInvenio/1.1.0.156-1d5a9 refextract/1.1.0.156-1d5a9-1400554117-0-26-110-164-0-0-117