CERN Accelerating science

Primary vertex distributions for the analysed events. The left panel shows the distributions along the beam axis. Selected events (full symbols) are required to have a reconstructed primary vertex with $|z|<10~\cm$. The right panel corresponds to the directions perpendicular to the beam axis: horizontally (i.e. $x$-direction, squares and full line) and vertically (i.e. $y$-direction, triangles and dashed line).

Invariant mass distributions of $\Kzs$, $\rmLambda$ and $\rmAlambda$, $\phi$ and the sum $\Xis$. The vertical arrows indicate the nominal mass values from PDG.

Armenteros-Podolanski distribution for V0 candidates showing a clear separation between $\Kzs$, $\rmLambda$ and $\rmAlambda$. The $\gamma$ converting to $e^{+}e^{-}$ with the detector material are located in the low $q_{T}$ region, where $q_{T}$ is the momentum component perpendicular to the parent momentum vector.

$\Kzs$, $\rmLambda$ and $\rmAlambda$ lifetime distributions obtained for the candidates selected by the invariant mass within a $\pm 3\sigma$ region around the nominal mass and corrected for detection efficiency. The distributions are scaled for visibility and fitted to an exponential distribution (straight lines). Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Left panel shows the distribution of the measured energy-deposit of charged particles versus their momentum in the TPC. The dashed lines delimit successively a $\pm 5\sigma$ then a $\pm 3\sigma$ selection of the kaon tracks using the ALEPH parameterization~\cite{ALEPH} of the Bethe-Bloch curve (solid line). Right panel shows the relative difference between TOF measured times and that corresponding to a kaon mass hypothesis. The dashed lines delimit a coarse fiducial region compatible with this kaon hypothesis.

Plot illustrating the ``bin-counting'' method used to extract the raw yields. It corresponds to the invariant mass distribution of $\Kzs$ for the $\pT$ bin $[0.4-0.5]~\gmom$. The hashed regions show where the background is sampled; they are chosen to be $6\sigma$ away from the signal approximated with a Gaussian distribution. The averaged or fitted background is subtracted from the signal region of $\pm 4\sigma$.

Background evaluation for the $\phi$ corresponding to the $\pT$ bin [1.0-1.5]~$\gmom$. The inset shows the $\phi$ signal after background subtraction. The vertical arrows indicate the nominal mass value from PDG.

Reconstructed (raw) yields of $\Kzs$ (open circles), $\rmLambda$ (open squares) and $\rmAlambda$ (open triangles) as a function of $\pT$. The change of bin size results in successive offsets of the raw counts at $\pT~=~[1.4, 1.6, 2.4] ~\gmom$ for $\Kzs$ and $\pT~=~[1.6, 2.4, 3.0] ~\gmom$ for $\rmLambda$ and $\rmAlambda$. Uncertainties correspond to the statistics and the systematics from the signal extraction. They are represented by the vertical error bars. The horizontal error bars give the bin width.

Reconstructed (raw) yields of $\phi$ (stars) and $\Xis$ (diamonds) as a function of $\pT$. With the current statistics, $4~\pT$ bins are used for the $\phi$ ([0.7-1.0], [0.7-1.5], [1.5-2.0] and [2.0-3.0]~$\gmom$) and $3~\pT$ bins for the $\Xis$ ([0.6-1.4], [1.4-2.0] and [2.0-3.0]~$\gmom$). Uncertainties correspond to the statistics (i.e. the number of reconstructed particles) and the systematics from the signal extraction. They are represented by the vertical error bars (the horizontal ones give the bin width).

Efficiency of $\Kzs$ (open circles), $\rmLambda$ (open squares) and $\rmAlambda$ (open triangles) as a function of $\pT$. The uncertainties correspond to the statistics in Monte Carlo samples used to compute the corrections. The efficiency is limited by the branching ratio represented by a solid arrow for $\Kzs$ (0.692) and by a dashed arrow for $\rmLambda$ and $\rmAlambda$ (0.639).

Efficiency of $\phi$ (stars) and $\Xis$ (diamonds) as a function of $\pT$. The uncertainties correspond to the statistics in the Monte Carlo sample used to compute the corrections. The efficiency is limited by the branching ratio represented by a solid arrow for $\Xis$ (0.636) and by a dashed arrow for $\phi$ (0.492).

Comparison between data (red circles) and Monte Carlo (black open triangles) for several topological variables used to select secondary vertices. The top panels correspond to the $\Kzs$ candidates selected in a $\pm 20~\mmass$ invariant mass window around the nominal mass. The distribution of the DCA between the positive daughter track and the primary vertex and the DCA distribution between the two daughters tracks are displayed in the left and the right top panels respectively. On the bottom panels, the same distributions are shown for the $\rmLambda$ candidates selected in a $\pm 8~\mmass$ invariant mass window around the nominal mass.

Comparison of the corrected yields as a function of $\pT$ for $\Kzs$ (circle) and charged kaons ($\mathrm{K^{+}}$) (open squares), identified via energy loss in the TPC and ITS, and via time of flight in the TOF. The points are plotted at the centre of the bins. The full vertical lines associated to the $\Kzs$ points, as well as the gray shaded areas associated to the $\mathrm{K^{+}}$ points, correspond to the statistical and systematic uncertainties summed in quadrature whereas the inner vertical lines contain only the statistical uncertainties (i.e. the number of reconstructed particles) and the systematics from the signal extraction.

Particle spectra (corrected yields) as a function of $\pT$ for $\Kzs$ (circles), $\rmLambda$ (squares), $\rmAlambda$ (triangles), $\phi$ (stars) and $\Xis$ (diamonds). The data points are scaled for visibility and plotted at the centre of the bins. Uncertainties corresponding to both statistics (i.e. the number of reconstructed particles) and systematics from the signal extraction are shown as vertical error bars. Statistical uncertainties and systematics (summarized in Table~\ref{tab:4}) added in quadrature are shown as brackets. The fits (dotted curves) using L\'{e}vy functional form [see Eq.~(\ref{eqn:funclevy})] are superimposed.

Comparison of the transverse momentum differential yield for the $\Kzs$ particles for INEL pp collisions with PHOJET and PYTHIA tunes 109, 306 and 320.

Comparison of the transverse momentum differential yield for the $\rmLambda$ particles for INEL pp collisions with PHOJET and PYTHIA tunes 109, 306 and 320.

Comparison of the transverse momentum differential yield for the $\phi$ particle for INEL pp collisions with PHOJET and PYTHIA tunes 109, 306 and 320.

Comparison of the transverse momentum differential yield for the $\Xis$ particle for INEL pp collisions with PHOJET and PYTHIA tunes 109, 306 and 320.

Ratios of integrated yields including $\pi^{(\pm)}$, K$^{(\pm)}$, p and $\pbar$ performed with the ALICE experiment~\cite{Alice:Pid,Aamodt:2010dx} and compared with STAR values for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$~=~0.2~$\tev$~\cite{Abelev:2006cs}. All ratios are feed-down corrected. For the ratio $\rmXi / \rmLambda$ of ALICE, the $\dNdy|_{y=0}$ for $\Xis$ is divided by 2. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are added in quadrature.

$\meanpT$ vs. particle mass for the measurements performed with the ALICE experiment and compared with STAR values for pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$~=~0.2~$\tev$~\cite{Abelev:2006cs,Adams:2006yu} and the ISR parameterization~\cite{Bourquin:1976fe}. Both statistical (vertical error bars) and systematic (brackets) uncertainties are shown for ALICE data.

$(\rmLambda+\rmAlambda)/2\Kzs$ as a function of $\pT$ for different collision energies in pp and $\ppbar$ minimum bias events. The STAR ratio is taken from~\cite{Abelev:2006cs} whereas the CDF and UA1 ratios are computed with the $(\rmLambda+\rmAlambda)$ and $\Kzs$ spectra published in~\cite{Acosta:2005pk} and~\cite{Bocquet:1995jq} respectively. The ALICE and STAR ratios are feed-down corrected. Because the $\Kzs$ and $(\rmLambda+\rmAlambda)$ spectra from UA1 have incompatible binning, the $\Kzs$ differential yield has been calculated for each $(\rmLambda+\rmAlambda)$ $\pT$ data point using the fit function published by UA1. Such a choice is motivated by the fact that the $\chi^{2}$ value for the $\Kzs$ spectrum fit is better than that for the $(\rmLambda+\rmAlambda)$ spectrum.