Cover not available
Part of
Relationships in Organized Helping: Analyzing interaction in psychotherapy, medical encounters, coaching and in social media
Edited by Claudio Scarvaglieri, Eva-Maria Graf and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 331] 2022
► pp. 51–78

Doing We – Working alliance in psychotherapeutic relationships

A recursive model

| IPU Berlin
Larger chunks from psychotherapeutic cooperations are presented. Cooperation is studied in empirical psychotherapeutic process research as “working alliance” of which conceptual conflicts are outlined.
I follow a proposal by Ginzburg and Poesio (2016) to micro-analyze hesitation markers as conversational equivalents to embodied pointing gestures. Several stories by patients are told in order to “point” to comparisons between the stories. The concept of “tacit comparisons” is, thus, introduced. Then, a recursive model of common ground is proposed with reference to cognitive-linguistic theory of metaphor (Cienki und Müller 2010; Lakoff 1987). The conversation creates in describable steps new metaphors indicating important change.
Keywords: psychotherapy, conversation analysis, larger chunks, meaning making in therapeutic relationships, interactional metaphors, tacit comparison, common ground, psychoanalysis
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Early psychoanalytic efforts and empirical research
  • 3.First example: A “failed” we-construction
  • 4.“My-mind-is-with-you” (MMWY): A silent dimension
  • 5.From sequentiality to larger chunks: Tacit comparisons
    • Hesitation markers as pointing to tacit comparisons
  • 6.From pointing to metaphor: A recursive model
  • 7.We-Constellation: To overcome emotional deafness
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 7 September 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.331.03buc
References (79)
References
Albert, Saul und J. P. de Ruiter. 2018. “Repair: The Interface Between Interaction and Cognition.” Topics in Cognitive Science 10 (2): 279–313. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Antaki, Charles. 2008. „Formulations in psychotherapy.“ In Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy, hrsg. von Anssi Peräkylä, Charles Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen und Ivan Leudar, 26–43. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aron, Lewis. 1996. A Meeting of Minds – Mutuality in Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, B. 2000. Understanding agency. Social theory and responsible action. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Birkner, Karin und Oliver Ehmer, Hrsg. 2013. Veranschaulichungsverfahren im Gespräch. Mannheim: Verl. für Gesprächsforschung.Google Scholar
Bögels, Sara, Lilla Magyari und Stephen C. Levinson. 2015. „Neural Signatures of Response Planning Occur Midway Through an Incoming Question in Conversation.” Scientific reports 5:12881. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Bordin, Edward S. 1979. “The Generalizability of the Psychoanalytic Concept of the Working Alliance.” Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training 16: 252–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brockmeier, Jens. 2017. „From Memory as Archive to Remembering as Conversation.“ In Handbook of Culture and Memory, hrsg. von Brady Wagoner, 39–72 1: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruner, Jerome S. 1995/2014. „From Joint Attention to the Meeting of Minds (1995).” In Moore, Dunham, and Dunham 1995/2014, 1–14.Google Scholar
Buchholz, Michael B. 2015. „Listening to Words, Seeing Images – Metaphors of emotional involvement and the movement of the metaphor.” Psychoanalytic Discourse 5 (1): 20–38.Google Scholar
Buchholz, Michael B. 2016. “Conversational Errors and Common Ground Activities in Psychotherapy – Insights from Conversation Analysis.” IJPS 8 (3): 134–53. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Buchholz, Michael B. 2019a. „Commentary I: Clinically rethinking CA studies to improve therapeutic conversation.” Communication and Medicine 16 (2): 184–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buchholz, Michael B. 2019b. „Re-Petition in (Therapeutic) Conversation: A Psychoanalyst’s Perspective Using Conversation Analysis.“ In Repetition, Recurrence, Returns: How Cultural Renewal Works, hrsg. von Joan R. Resina und Christoph Wulf, 85–108. Lanham, Boulder, New York, London: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
2019c. „Veränderung braucht Verbindung.“ In Pragmatik der Veränderung – Problem- und lösungsorientierte Kommunikation in helfenden Berufen, hrsg. von Eva-Maria Graf, Claudio Scarvaglieri und Thomas Spranz-Fogasy, 75–95. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
2020. “Seeing the Situational Gestalt – Movement in Therapeutic Spaces.” Gestalt Theory 42 (2): 1–31. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Buchholz, Michael B., Oliver Ehmer, Christopher Mahlstedt, Stefan Pfänder und Elke Schumann. 2021. „Speaking that silences. A single case multi-method analysis of a couple’s interview.“ In Silence and silencing in psychoanalysis. Cultural, clinical, and research aspects, hrsg. von Aleksandar Dimitrijević und Michael B. Buchholz, 333–97. Abingdon, Oxon, New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Buchholz, Michael B. und Horst Kächele. 2017. „From turn-by-turn to larger chunks of talk: An exploratory study in psychotherapeutic micro-processes using conversation analysis.” Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome 20:161–78. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Calbris, Genevieve. 2013. „Elements of meaning in gesture: The analogical links.“ In Body – Language – Communication. An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction, vol. 1, hrsg. von Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Ladewig, H. Silva und David McNeill, 658–77. Berlin [u.a.]: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallce. 1985. „Some Reasons for Hesitating.“ In Perspectives on Silence, hrsg. von Deborah Tannen und Muriel Saville-Troike, 77–89. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.Google Scholar
Clark, H. 2003. “Pointing and placing,” In Pointing: Where Language, Culture, and Cognition Meet, ed. by Sotaro Kita, 243–268, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cienki, Alan und Cornelia Müller, (Hrsg.). 2010. Metaphor and Gesture. Paperback. Gesture studies 3. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corballis, Michael C. 2011. The Recursive Mind: The Origins of Human Language, Thought, and Civilization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf. 2011. “The Study of Formulations as a Key to an Interactional Semantics.” Human Studies 34 (2): 115–28. DOI logo.Google Scholar
. 2015. „Agency in Erzählungen über Gewalterfahrungen in Kindheit und Jugend.“ In Narrative Bewältigung von Trauma und Verlust., hrsg. von Eduard C. Scheidt, Gabriele Lucius-Hoene, Anja Stukenbrock und Elisabeth Waller. 1. Aufl, 64–75. Stuttgart: Schattauer.Google Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf und H. Blühdorn. 2013. „Negation als Verfahren des Adressatenzuschnitts: Verstehenssteuerung durch Interpretationsrestriktionen.” Deutsche Sprache 13 (1): 6–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf und Axel Schmidt. 2016. “Partnerorientierung zwischen Realität und Imagination: Anmerkungen zu einem zentralen Konzept der Dialogtheorie.” Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 44 (3). DOI logo.Google Scholar
Edwards, Derek und David Middleton. 1987. “Conversation and Remembering: Bartlett Revisited.” Appl. Cognit. Psychol. 1 (2): 77–92. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Edwards, Derek und Jonathan Potter. 1992. “The Chancellor’s Memory: Rhetoric and Truth in Discursive Remembering.” Appl. Cognit. Psychol. 6 (3): 187–215. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Ehmer, Oliver. 2011. Imagination und Animation. Die Herstellung mentaler Räume durch animierte Rede. Linguae & litterae 7. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elliott, Robert, Arthur C. Bohart, Jeanne C. Watson und David Murphy. 2018. “Therapist Empathy and Client Outcome: An Updated Meta-Analysis.” Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.) 55 (4): 399–410. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Emirbayer, Mustafa und Ann Mische. 1998. “What is Agency?“. The American Journal of Sociology 103 (4): 962–1023. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N. J. 2013. Relationship thinking – Agency, enchrony, and human sociality. Foundations of Human Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, Nicholas J. und Paul Kockelman, Hrsg. 2017. Distributed Agency. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faimberg, Haydée. 1996. “‘Listening to Listening’.” Intern. J. Psychoanal. 77: 667–77.Google Scholar
Falkenström, Fredrik, Fredrik Granström und Rolf Holmqvist. 2014. “Working Alliance Predicts Psychotherapy Outcome Even While Controlling for Prior Symptom Improvement.” Psychotherapy Research 24 (2): 146–59. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Falkenström, Fredrik, Mary Kuria, Caleb Othieno und Manasi Kumar. 2019. “Working Alliance Predicts Symptomatic Improvement in Public Hospital-Delivered Psychotherapy in Nairobi, Kenya.” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 87 (1): 46–55. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Ginzburg, Jonathan und Massimo Poesio. 2016. „Grammar Is a System That Characterizes Talk in Interaction.” Front. Psychol. 7:1–22. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1983. “The Interaction Order.” Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48: 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 2015. „Narrative as Talk-in-Interaction.“ In the Handbook of Narrative Analysis, hrsg. von Anna de Fina und Alexandra Georgakopoulou, 197–218. Blackwell handbooks in linguistics. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018a. Co-Operative Action. Learning in doing. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2018b. „Seeing in Depth.“ In Co-Operative Action, hrsg. von Charles Goodwin, 275–306. Learning in doing. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hatcher, Robert L., Karin Lindqvist und Fredrik Falkenström. 2019. “Psychometric Evaluation of the Working Alliance Inventory-Therapist Version: Current and New Short Forms.” Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, 1–12. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Huber, Dorothea und Günther Klug. 2016. “Münchner Psychotherapiestudie.” Psychotherapeut, 1–6. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Kanninen, K., J. Salo und R. -L Punamäki. 2000. „Attachment Patterns and Working Alliance in Trauma Therapy for Victims of Political Violence.” Psychotherapy Research 10 (4): 435. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kidwell, Mardi und Don H. Zimmerman. 2007. „Joint attention as action.” Journal of Pragmatics 39: 592–611. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kirsch, Michael und Michael B. Buchholz. 2020. „On the Nature of the Mother-Infant Tie and Its Interaction With Freudian Drives.” Front. Psychol. 11:596. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Korner, Anthony. 2015. „Analogical Fit: dynamic relatedness in the psychotherapeutic setting with reference to language, autonomic response, and change in self-state.” Dissertation, Department of Linguistics, Macquarie University.
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gene H. 2013. „On the Place of Hesitating in Delicate Formulations: A Turn-Constructional Infrastructure for Collaborative Indiscretion.” In Hayashi, Raymond, and Sidnell 2013, 95–134.Google Scholar
Loewald, Hans W. 1971. “The Transference Neurosis: Comments on the Concept and the Phenomenon.” J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assoc. 19: 54–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1979. “Reflections on the Psychoanalytic Process and Its Therapeutic Potential.” Psychoanal. Study Child 34: 155–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahr, Johannes und Gergely Csibra. 2018. “Why Do We Remember? The Communicative Function of Episodic Memory.” The Behavioral and brain sciences 42 (1): 1–93. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Mergenthaler, Erhard. 2008. „Resonating Minds: A School-Independent Theoretical Conception and Its Empirical Application to Psychotherapeutic Processes.” Psychotherapy Research 18: 109–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller-Bottome, Madeleine und Jeremy D. Safran. 2018. „Ferenczi’s Contributions to Relational Psychoanalysis: The Pursuit of Mutuality.“ In Ferenczi’s Influence on Contemporary Psychoanalytic Traditions. Lines of Development---Evolution of Theory and Practice over the Decades, hrsg. von Aleksandar Dimitrijevic, Gabriele Cassullo und Jay Frankel, 227–31. Milton: Routledge.Google Scholar
Montangero, J. 2009. „Using dreams in cognitive behavioral therapy.” Dreaming 19: 239–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muntigl, Peter und Adam O. Horvath. 2014. „“I Can See Some Sadness in Your Eyes”: When Experiential Therapists Notice a Client’s Affectual Display.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 47 (2): 89–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muran, J. Christopher. 2019. „Confessions of a New York rupture researcher: An Insider’s guide and critique.” Psychotherapy Research 29 (1–2): 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi und Jörg R. Bergmann. 2020. “Practices of joint meaning creation. Dreams in psychoanalytic discussion.” The International journal of psycho-analysis, 1–28. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi, Pentti Henttonen, Liisa Voutilainen, Mikko Kahri, Melisa Stevanovic, M. Sams und Niklas Ravaja. 2015. “Sharing the Emotional Load. Recipient Affiliation Calms Down the Storyteller.” Social Psychology Quarterly 78 (4): 301–23. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Plessner, Hellmuth. 1928. Die Stufen des Organischen und der Mensch (3. Auflage 1975). Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey und Gail Jefferson. 1992/1995. Lectures on Conversation. Edited by Gail Jefferson, with an Introduction by Emanuel A. Schegloff. 2 Bände. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Safran, Jeremy D. und J. Christopher Muran. 2000. Negotiating the Therapeutic Alliance – a Relational Treatment Guide. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Scarvaglieri, Claudio. 2020. “Starting points for therapeutic change.” CAM 16 (2): 117–28. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2000. “Das Wiederauftauchen des Unterdrückten.” Psychother. Soz. 2 (1): 3–29.Google Scholar
2006. „Interaction: The Infrastructure for Social Institutions, the Natural Ecological Niche for Language, and the Arena in Which Culture Is Enacted.“ In Roots of Human Sociality. Culture, Cognition and Interaction, hrsg. von Stephen C. Levinson und Nicholas J. Enfield, 70–96. Oxford: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2013. „Ten operations in self-initiated, same-turn repair.” In Hayashi, Raymond, and Sidnell 2013, 41–70.Google Scholar
Selting, Margret, Peter Auer, Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Jörg R. Bergmann, Pia Bergmann, Karin Birkner, Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen et al.. 2011. “A system for transcribing talk-in-interaction: GAT 2 translated and adapted for English by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Dagmar Barth-Weingarten.” Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 12: 1–51. [URL].Google Scholar
Sinha, Chris und Cintia Rodriguez. 2008. „Language and signifying objects: From convention to imagination.“ In The Shared Mind. Perspectives on Intersubjectivity, hrsg. von Jordan Zlatev, Racine, Timothy, P., Chris Sinha und Esa Itkonen, 357–78. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sterba, Richard F. 1934. “Das Schicksal des Ich im therapeutischen Verfahren.” Intern. Zeitschrift für Psychoanalyse 20: 66–73.Google Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa und Anssi Peräkylä. 2014. “Three Orders in the Organization of Human Action: On the Interface Between Knowledge, Power, and Emotion in Interaction and Social Relations.” Language in Society 43 (02): 185–207. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Stiles, William B., Clara E. Hill und Robert Elliott. 2015. “Looking Both Ways.” Psychotherapy Research 25 (3): 282–93. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 1995/2014. „Joint Attention as Social Cognition.” In Moore, Dunham, and Dunham 1995/2014, 103–30.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael und Amrisha Vaish. 2013. “Origins of Human Cooperation and Morality.” Annu. Rev. Psychol. 64 (1): 231–55. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, Colwyn. 1979. „Communication and Cooperation in Early Infancy: A Description of Primary Intersubjectivity.“ In Before Speech: The Beginning of Interpersonal Communication, hrsg. von Margaret Bullowa, 321–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vosniadou, S. 1995. „Analogical Reasoning in Cognitive Development.” Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10: 297–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wagner Cook, Susan. 2014. „Gesture and working memory.“ In Body – Language – Communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, vol. 2, hrsg. von Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill und Jana Bressem, 1936–42. Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 38,2. Berlin [u.a.]: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Weiste, Elina und Anssi Peräkylä. 2013. “A Comparative Conversation Analytic Study of Formulations in Psychoanalysis and Cognitive Psychotherapy.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 46 (4): 299–321. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Wooffitt, Robin. 2005. „From Process to Practice: Language, Interaction and ‘Flashbulb’ Memories.“ In Conversation and Cognition, hrsg. von Hedwig t. Molder und Jonathan Potter, 203–25. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Kabatnik, Susanne
2024. “Because he was disgusting”: transforming relations through positioning in messenger-supported group psychotherapy. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.