ৱিকিপিডিয়া:ভাল ভাৱ ৰাখকৰ উৎস চাওক

{{ৱিকিপিডিয়া অনুবাদ}}

{{subcat guideline|behavioral guideline|Assume good faith|WP:AGF|WP:AFG|WP:FAITH|WP:GOODFAITH|WP:BONAFIDE}}
{{nutshell|
* Unless there is '''clear evidence''' to the contrary, assume that people who work on the project are trying to help it, not hurt it. 
* If criticism is needed, discuss editors' actions, but avoid accusing others of harmful motives without clear evidence.}}
{{Guideline list}}

'''Assuming good faith''' is a fundamental principle on [[Wikipedia]].  It is the assumption that editors' edits and comments are made in [[good faith]].  Most people try to help the project, not hurt it.  If this were false, a project like Wikipedia would be doomed from the beginning. This guideline does not require that editors continue to assume good faith in the presence of obvious evidence to the contrary ([[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]]). Assuming good faith does not prohibit discussion and criticism.  Rather, editors should not attribute the actions being criticized to malice unless there is specific evidence of malice.

When disagreement occurs, try to the best of your ability to explain and resolve the problem, not cause more conflict, and so give others the opportunity to reply in kind.  Consider whether a dispute stems from different perspectives, and look for ways to reach [[WP:CONSENSUS|consensus]]. 

When doubt is cast on good faith, continue to assume good faith yourself where you can.  Be [[Wikipedia:Civility|civil]] and follow [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution processes]], rather than [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|attacking]] editors or [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit warring]] with them.  If you wish to express doubts about the conduct of fellow [[Wikipedians]], please substantiate those doubts with specific [[WP:DIFF|diffs]] and other relevant evidence, so that people can understand the basis for your concerns.  Although bad conduct may seem to be due to bad faith, it is usually best to address the conduct without mentioning motives, which might exacerbate resentments all around.

Be careful about citing this principle too aggressively. Just as one can incorrectly judge that another is acting in bad faith, so too can one mistakenly conclude that bad faith is being assumed, and exhortations to "Assume Good Faith" can themselves [[Wikipedia:Assume the assumption of good faith|reflect negative assumptions about others]] if a perceived assumption of bad faith was not clear-cut.

==About good faith==

Everyone makes mistakes, both behavioral (like [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|personal attacks]]) and content-based (like adding [[WP:NOR|original research]]).   Most of the time,  we can correct such mistakes with simple reminders.   However, there will be disagreements on Wikipedia for which no policy or guideline has an easy answer. When disagreements happen,  ill intent may not be involved. Keep a [[Wikipedia:Staying cool when the editing gets hot|cool head]], and consider [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] if disagreements seem intractable; many of them are not.

Violation of policies, such as engaging in [[WP:SOCK|sock-puppetry]], violating [[WP:CONSENSUS|consensus]], and so on, may be perpetrated in either good or bad faith. There are processes for dealing with all of these, and [[WP:BLOCK|sanctions]] for repeated violation of policy apply regardless of whether bad faith was involved. 

===Good faith and newcomers===
{{main|Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers}}
It is important to be patient with newcomers, who will be unfamiliar with Wikipedia's culture and rules, but may nonetheless turn out to be valuable contributors.

A newcomer's behavior probably seems appropriate to him/her, and a problem in that regard usually indicates unawareness or misunderstanding of Wikipedian culture. It is not uncommon for a newcomer to believe that an unfamiliar policy should be changed to match their notion of how things should function, especially if they notice that there is already some level of disagreement over the policy in question.  Similarly, many newcomers want to have their contributions to articles accepted without question, especially those which pertain to subjects on which they have extensive knowledge.  Behaviors arising from these perspectives, while possibly misguided, are usually not malicious and should not be treated as such. Many new users who lack an intuitive grasp of Wikipedia customs are gradually brought around, once the logic behind these customs becomes clearer to them.

===Good faith and copyright===
{{main|Wikipedia:Copyright violations}}
{{Shortcut|WP:AGFC}}
When dealing with possible copyright violations, good faith means assuming that editors ''intend'' to comply with site policy and the law.  That is different from assuming they have actually complied with either.  Editors have a proactive obligation to document image uploads, etc. and material may be deleted if the documentation is incorrect or inadequate.  Good faith corrective action includes informing editors of problems and helping them improve their practices.

==Demonstrate good faith==
{{Shortcut|WP:DGF}}
In addition to assuming good faith, encourage others to assume good faith by demonstrating your own good faith. You can do this by articulating your [[Wikipedia:Honesty|honest]] motives and by making edits that show your willingness to compromise, interest in improving Wikipedia, adherence to policies and guidelines, belief in the veracity of your edits, avoidance of [[Wikipedia:Gaming the system|gaming the system]], and other good-faith behavior. Showing good faith is not required, but it aids smooth and successful interactions with editors.

==Dealing with bad faith==
Even if bad faith is evident, do not act [[Wikipedia:Civility|uncivilly]] yourself in return, [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|attack]] others, or [[Wikipedia:Wikistress|lose your cool]] over it. It is ultimately much easier for others to [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|resolve a dispute]] and see who is breaching policies, if one side is clearly acting appropriately throughout. 

Wikipedia [[Wikipedia:Administrators|administrators]] and other experienced editors involved in dispute resolution will usually be glad to help, and are very capable of identifying policy-breaching conduct if their attention is drawn to clear and specific evidence. 

===Accusing others of bad faith===
{{Shortcut|WP:AOBF}}
Although the assumption of good faith is dictated by Wikipedia policy, there is no corresponding policy requiring editors to ''act'' in good faith. Thus accusations of bad faith serve no purpose. They also can be [[Wikipedia:Edit war|inflammatory]] and hence can aggravate a dispute. It can be seen as a [[WP:NPA|personal attack]] if bad faith motives are alleged without clear evidence that the others' action is actually in bad faith and [[WP:Harassment|harassment]] if done repeatedly. The result is often accusations of bad faith on your part, which tends to create a nasty cycle.

==See also==
{{Wikipedia glossary}}
===[[Wikipedia:Guidelines|Guidelines]]===
* [[Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers]]

===[[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines#Essays|Essays]]===
* [[MeatBall:AssumeGoodFaith]]  (from [[MeatballWiki]])
* [[Wikipedia:Assume no clue]]
* [[Wikipedia:Assume clue]]
* [[Wikipedia:Assume the assumption of good faith]]
* [[User:Ben/Assume the presence of a belly-button|Wikipedia:Assume the presence of a belly-button]]
* [[Wikipedia:Be the glue]]
* [[Wikipedia:Competence is required]]
* [[Wikipedia:Conflict paradox]]
* [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing]]
* [[Wikipedia:Don't assume]]
* [[Wikipedia:Don't call a spade a spade]]
* [[Wikipedia:Give 'em enough rope]]
* [[Wikipedia:Honesty]]
* [[Wikipedia:IPs are human too]]
* [[Wikipedia:Honor system]]
* [[Wikipedia:Lurkers]]
* [[Wikipedia:No angry mastodons]]
* [[Wikipedia:No vested contributors]]
* [[Wikipedia:On assuming good faith]]
* [[m:WikipediAhimsa|Wikipedia policy should follow the spirit of ahimsa (from meta)]]
* [[Wikipedia:Wiki spirit]]
* [[Wikipedia:Wikispeak#AGF|Wikipedia:Wikispeak#Assume Good Faith]]
* [[mailarchive:foundation-l/2006-December/026164.html|YOU are pretty darn awesome]]
* [[Wikipedia:Newbies aren't always clueless]]

===Articles===
* [[Hanlon's razor]]
* [[Presumption of innocence]]
* [[Reciprocal altruism]]
* [[Suspension of judgment]]

{{Wikipedia policies and guidelines}}