-
The MUSE Beamline Calorimeter
Authors:
W. Lin,
T. Rostomyan,
R. Gilman,
S. Strauch,
C. Meier,
C. Nestler,
M. Ali,
H. Atac,
J. C. Bernauer,
W. J. Briscoe,
A. Christopher Ndukwe,
E. W. Cline,
K. Deiters,
S. Dogra,
E. J. Downie,
Z. Duan,
I. P. Fernando,
A. Flannery,
D. Ghosal,
A. Golossanov,
J. Guo,
N. S. Ifat,
Y. Ilieva,
M. Kohl,
I. Lavrukhin
, et al. (18 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The MUon Scattering Experiment (MUSE) was motivated by the proton radius puzzle arising from the discrepancy between muonic hydrogen spectroscopy and electron-proton measurements. The MUSE physics goals also include testing lepton universality, precisely measuring two-photon exchange contribution, and testing radiative corrections. MUSE addresses these physics goals through simultaneous measuremen…
▽ More
The MUon Scattering Experiment (MUSE) was motivated by the proton radius puzzle arising from the discrepancy between muonic hydrogen spectroscopy and electron-proton measurements. The MUSE physics goals also include testing lepton universality, precisely measuring two-photon exchange contribution, and testing radiative corrections. MUSE addresses these physics goals through simultaneous measurement of high precision cross sections for electron-proton and muon-proton scattering using a mixed-species beam. The experiment will run at both positive and negative beam polarities. Measuring precise cross sections requires understanding both the incident beam energy and the radiative corrections. For this purpose, a lead-glass calorimeter was installed at the end of the beam line in the MUSE detector system. In this article we discuss the detector specifications, calibration and performance. We demonstrate that the detector performance is well reproduced by simulation, and meets experimental requirements.
△ Less
Submitted 23 August, 2024;
originally announced August 2024.
-
Blinding for precision scattering experiments: The MUSE approach as a case study
Authors:
J. C. Bernauer,
E. W. Cline,
H. Atac,
W. J. Briscoe,
A. Christopher Ndukwe,
E. J. Downie,
I. P. Fernando,
T. Gautam,
R. Gilman,
R. Goldin,
M. Kohl,
I. Lavrukhin,
W. Lin,
W. Lorenzon,
P. Mohanmurthy,
S. J. Nazeer,
M. Nicol,
T. Patel,
A. Prosnyakov,
R. D. Ransome,
R. Ratvasky,
H. Reid,
P. E. Reimer,
G. Ron,
T. Rostomyan
, et al. (5 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Human bias is capable of changing the analysis of measured data sufficiently to alter the results of an experiment. It is incumbent upon modern experiments, especially those investigating quantities considered contentious in the broader community, to blind their analysis in an effort to minimize bias. The choice of a blinding model is experiment specific, but should also aim to prevent accidental…
▽ More
Human bias is capable of changing the analysis of measured data sufficiently to alter the results of an experiment. It is incumbent upon modern experiments, especially those investigating quantities considered contentious in the broader community, to blind their analysis in an effort to minimize bias. The choice of a blinding model is experiment specific, but should also aim to prevent accidental release of results before an analysis is finalized. In this paper, we discuss common threats to an unbiased analysis, as well as common quantities that can be blinded in different types of nuclear physics experiments. We use the Muon Scattering Experiment as an example, and detail the blinding scheme used therein.
△ Less
Submitted 16 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Extraction of the neutron F2 structure function from inclusive proton and deuteron deep-inelastic scattering data
Authors:
Shujie Li,
Alberto Accardi,
Matteo Cerutti,
Ishara. P. Fernando,
Cynthia E. Keppel,
Wally Melnitchouk,
Peter Monaghan,
Gabriel Niculescu,
Maria I. Niculescu,
Jeff. F. Owens
Abstract:
The available world deep-inelastic scattering data on proton and deuteron structure functions F2p, F2d, and their ratios, are leveraged to extract the free neutron F2n structure function, the F2n/F2p ratio, and associated uncertainties using the latest nuclear effect calculations in the deuteron. Special attention is devoted to the normalization of the proton and deuteron experimental datasets and…
▽ More
The available world deep-inelastic scattering data on proton and deuteron structure functions F2p, F2d, and their ratios, are leveraged to extract the free neutron F2n structure function, the F2n/F2p ratio, and associated uncertainties using the latest nuclear effect calculations in the deuteron. Special attention is devoted to the normalization of the proton and deuteron experimental datasets and to the treatment of correlated systematic errors, as well as the quantification of procedural and theoretical uncertainties. The extracted F2n dataset is utilized to evaluate the Q2 dependence of the Gottfried sum rule and the nonsinglet F2p - F2n moments. To facilitate replication of our study, as well as for general applications, a comprehensive DIS database including all recent JLab 6 GeV measurements, the extracted F2n, a modified CTEQ-JLab global PDF fit named CJ15nlo_mod, and grids with calculated proton, neutron and deuteron DIS structure functions at next-to-leading order, are discussed and made publicly available.
△ Less
Submitted 2 August, 2024; v1 submitted 28 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
Instrumental uncertainties in radiative corrections for the MUSE experiment
Authors:
L. Li,
S. Strauch,
J. C. Bernauer,
W. J. Briscoe,
A. Christopher Ndukwe,
E. Cline,
D. Cohen,
K. Deiters,
E. J. Downie,
I. P. Fernando,
A. Flannery,
R. Gilman,
Y. Ilieva,
M. Kohl,
I. Lavrukhin,
W. Lin,
W. Lorenzon,
S. Lunkenheimer,
P. Mohanmurthy,
J. Nazeer,
M. Nicol,
T. Patel,
A. Prosnyakov,
H. Reid,
P. E. Reimer
, et al. (5 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The MUSE experiment at the Paul Scherrer Institute is measuring elastic lepton-proton scattering cross sections in a four-momentum transfer range from $Q^2$ of approximately 0.002 to 0.08 GeV$^2$ using positively and negatively charged electrons and muons. The extraction of the Born cross sections from the experimental data requires radiative corrections. Estimates of the instrumental uncertaintie…
▽ More
The MUSE experiment at the Paul Scherrer Institute is measuring elastic lepton-proton scattering cross sections in a four-momentum transfer range from $Q^2$ of approximately 0.002 to 0.08 GeV$^2$ using positively and negatively charged electrons and muons. The extraction of the Born cross sections from the experimental data requires radiative corrections. Estimates of the instrumental uncertainties in those corrections have been made using the ESEPP event generator. The results depend in particular on the minimum lepton momentum that contributes to the experimental cross section and the fraction of events with hard initial-state radiation that is detected in the MUSE calorimeter and is excluded from the data. These results show that the angular-dependent instrumental uncertainties in radiative corrections to the electron cross section are better than 0.4 % and are negligible for the muon cross section.
△ Less
Submitted 8 January, 2024; v1 submitted 12 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Strong Interaction Physics at the Luminosity Frontier with 22 GeV Electrons at Jefferson Lab
Authors:
A. Accardi,
P. Achenbach,
D. Adhikari,
A. Afanasev,
C. S. Akondi,
N. Akopov,
M. Albaladejo,
H. Albataineh,
M. Albrecht,
B. Almeida-Zamora,
M. Amaryan,
D. Androić,
W. Armstrong,
D. S. Armstrong,
M. Arratia,
J. Arrington,
A. Asaturyan,
A. Austregesilo,
H. Avagyan,
T. Averett,
C. Ayerbe Gayoso,
A. Bacchetta,
A. B. Balantekin,
N. Baltzell,
L. Barion
, et al. (419 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This document presents the initial scientific case for upgrading the Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility (CEBAF) at Jefferson Lab (JLab) to 22 GeV. It is the result of a community effort, incorporating insights from a series of workshops conducted between March 2022 and April 2023. With a track record of over 25 years in delivering the world's most intense and precise multi-GeV electron…
▽ More
This document presents the initial scientific case for upgrading the Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility (CEBAF) at Jefferson Lab (JLab) to 22 GeV. It is the result of a community effort, incorporating insights from a series of workshops conducted between March 2022 and April 2023. With a track record of over 25 years in delivering the world's most intense and precise multi-GeV electron beams, CEBAF's potential for a higher energy upgrade presents a unique opportunity for an innovative nuclear physics program, which seamlessly integrates a rich historical background with a promising future. The proposed physics program encompass a diverse range of investigations centered around the nonperturbative dynamics inherent in hadron structure and the exploration of strongly interacting systems. It builds upon the exceptional capabilities of CEBAF in high-luminosity operations, the availability of existing or planned Hall equipment, and recent advancements in accelerator technology. The proposed program cover various scientific topics, including Hadron Spectroscopy, Partonic Structure and Spin, Hadronization and Transverse Momentum, Spatial Structure, Mechanical Properties, Form Factors and Emergent Hadron Mass, Hadron-Quark Transition, and Nuclear Dynamics at Extreme Conditions, as well as QCD Confinement and Fundamental Symmetries. Each topic highlights the key measurements achievable at a 22 GeV CEBAF accelerator. Furthermore, this document outlines the significant physics outcomes and unique aspects of these programs that distinguish them from other existing or planned facilities. In summary, this document provides an exciting rationale for the energy upgrade of CEBAF to 22 GeV, outlining the transformative scientific potential that lies within reach, and the remarkable opportunities it offers for advancing our understanding of hadron physics and related fundamental phenomena.
△ Less
Submitted 24 August, 2023; v1 submitted 13 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
The Present and Future of QCD
Authors:
P. Achenbach,
D. Adhikari,
A. Afanasev,
F. Afzal,
C. A. Aidala,
A. Al-bataineh,
D. K. Almaalol,
M. Amaryan,
D. Androić,
W. R. Armstrong,
M. Arratia,
J. Arrington,
A. Asaturyan,
E. C. Aschenauer,
H. Atac,
H. Avakian,
T. Averett,
C. Ayerbe Gayoso,
X. Bai,
K. N. Barish,
N. Barnea,
G. Basar,
M. Battaglieri,
A. A. Baty,
I. Bautista
, et al. (378 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This White Paper presents the community inputs and scientific conclusions from the Hot and Cold QCD Town Meeting that took place September 23-25, 2022 at MIT, as part of the Nuclear Science Advisory Committee (NSAC) 2023 Long Range Planning process. A total of 424 physicists registered for the meeting. The meeting highlighted progress in Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) nuclear physics since the 2015…
▽ More
This White Paper presents the community inputs and scientific conclusions from the Hot and Cold QCD Town Meeting that took place September 23-25, 2022 at MIT, as part of the Nuclear Science Advisory Committee (NSAC) 2023 Long Range Planning process. A total of 424 physicists registered for the meeting. The meeting highlighted progress in Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) nuclear physics since the 2015 LRP (LRP15) and identified key questions and plausible paths to obtaining answers to those questions, defining priorities for our research over the coming decade. In defining the priority of outstanding physics opportunities for the future, both prospects for the short (~ 5 years) and longer term (5-10 years and beyond) are identified together with the facilities, personnel and other resources needed to maximize the discovery potential and maintain United States leadership in QCD physics worldwide. This White Paper is organized as follows: In the Executive Summary, we detail the Recommendations and Initiatives that were presented and discussed at the Town Meeting, and their supporting rationales. Section 2 highlights major progress and accomplishments of the past seven years. It is followed, in Section 3, by an overview of the physics opportunities for the immediate future, and in relation with the next QCD frontier: the EIC. Section 4 provides an overview of the physics motivations and goals associated with the EIC. Section 5 is devoted to the workforce development and support of diversity, equity and inclusion. This is followed by a dedicated section on computing in Section 6. Section 7 describes the national need for nuclear data science and the relevance to QCD research.
△ Less
Submitted 4 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Characterization of Muon and Electron Beams in the Paul Scherrer Institute PiM1 Channel for the MUSE Experiment
Authors:
E. Cline,
W. Lin,
P. Roy,
P. E. Reimer,
K. E. Mesick,
A. Akmal,
A. Alie,
H. Atac,
A. Atencio,
C. Ayerbe Gayoso,
N. Benmouna,
F. Benmokhtar,
J. C. Bernauer,
W. J. Briscoe,
J. Campbell,
D. Cohen,
E. O. Cohen,
C. Collicott,
K. Deiters,
S. Dogra,
E. Downie,
I. P. Fernando,
A. Flannery,
T. Gautam,
D. Ghosal
, et al. (35 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The MUon Scattering Experiment, MUSE, at the Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland, investigates the proton charge radius puzzle, lepton universality, and two-photon exchange, via simultaneous measurements of elastic muon-proton and electron-proton scattering. The experiment uses the PiM1 secondary beam channel, which was designed for high precision pion scattering measurements. We review the prope…
▽ More
The MUon Scattering Experiment, MUSE, at the Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland, investigates the proton charge radius puzzle, lepton universality, and two-photon exchange, via simultaneous measurements of elastic muon-proton and electron-proton scattering. The experiment uses the PiM1 secondary beam channel, which was designed for high precision pion scattering measurements. We review the properties of the beam line established for pions. We discuss the production processes that generate the electron and muon beams, and the simulations of these processes. Simulations of the $π$/$μ$/$e$ beams through the channel using TURTLE and G4beamline are compared. The G4beamline simulation is then compared to several experimental measurements of the channel, including the momentum dispersion at the IFP and target, the shape of the beam spot at the target, and timing measurements that allow the beam momenta to be determined. We conclude that the PiM1 channel can be used for high precision $π$, $μ$, and $e$ scattering.
△ Less
Submitted 15 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
-
Beam charge asymmetries for deeply virtual Compton scattering off the proton
Authors:
V. Burkert,
L. Elouadrhiri,
F. -X. Girod,
S. Niccolai,
E. Voutier,
A. Afanasev,
L. Barion,
M. Battaglieri,
J. C. Bernauer,
A. Bianconi,
R. Capobianco,
M. Caudron,
L. Causse,
P. Chatagnon,
T. Chetry,
G. Ciullo,
P. L. Cole,
M. Contalbrigo,
G. Costantini,
M. Defurne,
A. ~Deur,
S. Diehl,
R. Dupré,
M. Ehrhart,
I. P. Fernando
, et al. (35 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The unpolarized and polarized Beam Char\-ge Asymmetries (BCAs) of the $\vv{e}^{\pm}p \to e^{\pm}p γ$ process off unpolarized hydrogen are discussed. The measurement of BCAs with the CLAS12 spectrometer at the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, using polarized positron and electron beams at 10.6 GeV is investigated. This experimental configuration allows to measure azimuthal and $t$-de…
▽ More
The unpolarized and polarized Beam Char\-ge Asymmetries (BCAs) of the $\vv{e}^{\pm}p \to e^{\pm}p γ$ process off unpolarized hydrogen are discussed. The measurement of BCAs with the CLAS12 spectrometer at the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, using polarized positron and electron beams at 10.6 GeV is investigated. This experimental configuration allows to measure azimuthal and $t$-dependences of the unpolarized and polarized BCAs over a large $(x_B,Q^2)$ phase space, providing a direct access to the real part of the Compton Form Factor (CFF) ${\mathcal H}$. Additionally, these measurements confront the Bethe-Heitler dominance hypothesis and eventual effects beyond leading twist. The impact of potential positron beam data on the determination of CFFs is also investigated within a local fitting approach of experimental observables. Positron data are shown to strongly reduce correlations between CFFs and consequently improve significantly the determination of $\Re {\rm e} [\mathcal{H}]$.
△ Less
Submitted 23 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
An experimental program with high duty-cycle polarized and unpolarized positron beams at Jefferson Lab
Authors:
A. Accardi,
A. Afanasev,
I. Albayrak,
S. F. Ali,
M. Amaryan,
J. R. M. Annand,
J. Arrington,
A. Asaturyan,
H. Atac,
H. Avakian,
T. Averett,
C. Ayerbe Gayoso,
X. Bai,
L. Barion,
M. Battaglieri,
V. Bellini,
R. Beminiwattha,
F. Benmokhtar,
V. V. Berdnikov,
J. C. Bernauer,
V. Bertone,
A. Bianconi,
A. Biselli,
P. Bisio,
P. Blunden
, et al. (205 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Positron beams, both polarized and unpolarized, are identified as essential ingredients for the experimental programs at the next generation of lepton accelerators. In the context of the hadronic physics program at Jefferson Lab (JLab), positron beams are complementary, even essential, tools for a precise understanding of the electromagnetic structure of nucleons and nuclei, in both the elastic an…
▽ More
Positron beams, both polarized and unpolarized, are identified as essential ingredients for the experimental programs at the next generation of lepton accelerators. In the context of the hadronic physics program at Jefferson Lab (JLab), positron beams are complementary, even essential, tools for a precise understanding of the electromagnetic structure of nucleons and nuclei, in both the elastic and deep-inelastic regimes. For instance, elastic scattering of polarized and unpolarized electrons and positrons from the nucleon enables a model independent determination of its electromagnetic form factors. Also, the deeply-virtual scattering of polarized and unpolarized electrons and positrons allows unambiguous separation of the different contributions to the cross section of the lepto-production of photons and of lepton-pairs, enabling an accurate determination of the nucleons and nuclei generalized parton distributions, and providing an access to the gravitational form factors. Furthermore, positron beams offer the possibility of alternative tests of the Standard Model of particle physics through the search of a dark photon, the precise measurement of electroweak couplings, and the investigation of charged lepton flavor violation. This document discusses the perspectives of an experimental program with high duty-cycle positron beams at JLab.
△ Less
Submitted 21 May, 2021; v1 submitted 29 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
Timing Detectors with SiPM read-out for the MUSE Experiment at PSI
Authors:
Tigran Rostomyan,
Ethan Cline,
Ievgen Lavrukhin,
Hamza Atac,
Ariella Atencio,
Jan C. Bernauer,
William J. Briscoe,
Dan Cohen,
Erez O. Cohen,
Cristina Collicott,
Konrad Deiters,
Shraddha Dogra,
Evangeline Downie,
Werner Erni,
Ishara P. Fernando,
Anne Flannery,
Thir Gautam,
Debdeep Ghosal,
Ronald Gilman,
Alexander Golossanov,
Jack Hirschman,
Minjung Kim,
Michael Kohl,
Bernd Krusche,
Lin Li
, et al. (18 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Muon Scattering Experiment at the Paul Scherrer Institut uses a mixed beam of electrons, muons, and pions, necessitating precise timing to identify the beam particles and reactions they cause. We describe the design and performance of three timing detectors using plastic scintillator read out with silicon photomultipliers that have been built for the experiment. The Beam Hodoscope, upstream of…
▽ More
The Muon Scattering Experiment at the Paul Scherrer Institut uses a mixed beam of electrons, muons, and pions, necessitating precise timing to identify the beam particles and reactions they cause. We describe the design and performance of three timing detectors using plastic scintillator read out with silicon photomultipliers that have been built for the experiment. The Beam Hodoscope, upstream of the scattering target, counts the beam flux and precisely times beam particles both to identify species and provide a starting time for time-of-flight measurements. The Beam Monitor, downstream of the scattering target, counts the unscattered beam flux, helps identify background in scattering events, and precisely times beam particles for time-of-flight measurements. The Beam Focus Monitor, mounted on the target ladder under the liquid hydrogen target inside the target vacuum chamber, is used in dedicated runs to sample the beam spot at three points near the target center, where the beam should be focused.
△ Less
Submitted 15 October, 2020; v1 submitted 23 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
Workshop on Physics with Neutral Kaon Beam at JLab (KL2016) Mini-Proceedings
Authors:
M. Albrow,
M. Amaryan,
E. Chudakov,
P. Degtyarenko,
A. Feijoo,
C. Fernandez-Ramirez,
I. P. Fernando,
A. Filippi,
J. L. Goity,
H. Haberzettl,
B. C. Jackson,
H. Kamano,
C. Keith,
M. Kohl,
I. Larin,
Wei-Hong Liang,
V. K. Magas,
M. Mai,
D. M. Manley,
V. Mathieu,
F. Myhrer,
K. Nakayama,
H. Noumi,
Y. Oh,
H. Ohnishi
, et al. (12 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The KL2016 Workshop is following the Letter of Intent LoI12-15-001 "Physics Opportunities with Secondary KL beam at JLab" submitted to PAC43 with the main focus on the physics of excited hyperons produced by the Kaon beam on unpolarized and polarized targets with GlueX setup in Hall D. Such studies will broaden a physics program of hadron spectroscopy extending it to the strange sector. The Worksh…
▽ More
The KL2016 Workshop is following the Letter of Intent LoI12-15-001 "Physics Opportunities with Secondary KL beam at JLab" submitted to PAC43 with the main focus on the physics of excited hyperons produced by the Kaon beam on unpolarized and polarized targets with GlueX setup in Hall D. Such studies will broaden a physics program of hadron spectroscopy extending it to the strange sector. The Workshop was organized to get a feedback from the community to strengthen physics motivation of the LoI and prepare a full proposal.
Further details about the Workshop can be found on the web page of the conference: http://www.jlab.org/conferences/kl2016/index.html .
△ Less
Submitted 6 April, 2016;
originally announced April 2016.