-
The origin and evolution of the normal Type Ia SN 2018aoz with infant-phase reddening and excess emission
Authors:
Yuan Qi Ni,
Dae-Sik Moon,
Maria R. Drout,
Abigail Polin,
David J. Sand,
Santiago GonzÁlez-GaitÁn,
Sang Chul Kim,
Youngdae Lee,
Hong Soo Park,
D. Andrew Howell,
Peter E. Nugent,
Anthony L. Piro,
Peter J. Brown,
LluÍs Galbany,
Jamison Burke,
Daichi Hiramatsu,
Griffin Hosseinzadeh,
Stefano Valenti,
Niloufar Afsariardchi,
Jennifer E. Andrews,
John Antoniadis,
Rachael L. Beaton,
K. Azalee Bostroem,
Raymond G. Carlberg,
S. Bradley Cenko
, et al. (18 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
SN~2018aoz is a Type Ia SN with a $B$-band plateau and excess emission in the infant-phase light curves $\lesssim$ 1 day after first light, evidencing an over-density of surface iron-peak elements as shown in our previous study. Here, we advance the constraints on the nature and origin of SN~2018aoz based on its evolution until the nebular phase. Near-peak spectroscopic features show the SN is int…
▽ More
SN~2018aoz is a Type Ia SN with a $B$-band plateau and excess emission in the infant-phase light curves $\lesssim$ 1 day after first light, evidencing an over-density of surface iron-peak elements as shown in our previous study. Here, we advance the constraints on the nature and origin of SN~2018aoz based on its evolution until the nebular phase. Near-peak spectroscopic features show the SN is intermediate between two subtypes of normal Type Ia: Core-Normal and Broad-Line. The excess emission could have contributions from the radioactive decay of surface iron-peak elements as well as ejecta interaction with either the binary companion or a small torus of circumstellar material. Nebular-phase limits on H$α$ and He~I favour a white dwarf companion, consistent with the small companion size constrained by the low early SN luminosity, while the absence of [O~I] and He~I disfavours a violent merger of the progenitor. Of the two main explosion mechanisms proposed to explain the distribution of surface iron-peak elements in SN~2018aoz, the asymmetric Chandrasekhar-mass explosion is less consistent with the progenitor constraints and the observed blueshifts of nebular-phase [Fe~II] and [Ni~II]. The helium-shell double-detonation explosion is compatible with the observed lack of C spectral features, but current 1-D models are incompatible with the infant-phase excess emission, $B_{\rm max}-V_{\rm max}$ color, and absence of nebular-phase [Ca~II]. Although the explosion processes of SN~2018aoz still need to be more precisely understood, the same processes could produce a significant fraction of Type Ia SNe that appear normal after $\sim$ 1 day.
△ Less
Submitted 24 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
DES16C3cje: A low-luminosity, long-lived supernova
Authors:
C. P. Gutiérrez,
M. Sullivan,
L. Martinez,
M. C. Bersten,
C. Inserra,
M. Smith,
J. P. Anderson,
Y. -C. Pan,
A. Pastorello,
L. Galbany,
P. Nugent,
C. R. Angus,
C. Barbarino,
T. -W. Chen,
T. M. Davis,
M. Della Valle,
R. J. Foley,
M. Fraser,
C. Frohmaier,
S. González-Gaitán,
G. F. Lewis,
M. Gromadzki,
E. Kankare,
R. Kokotanekova,
J. Kollmeier
, et al. (67 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present DES16C3cje, a low-luminosity, long-lived type II supernova (SN II) at redshift 0.0618, detected by the Dark Energy Survey (DES). DES16C3cje is a unique SN. The spectra are characterized by extremely narrow photospheric lines corresponding to very low expansion velocities of $\lesssim1500$ km s$^{-1}$, and the light curve shows an initial peak that fades after 50 days before slowly rebri…
▽ More
We present DES16C3cje, a low-luminosity, long-lived type II supernova (SN II) at redshift 0.0618, detected by the Dark Energy Survey (DES). DES16C3cje is a unique SN. The spectra are characterized by extremely narrow photospheric lines corresponding to very low expansion velocities of $\lesssim1500$ km s$^{-1}$, and the light curve shows an initial peak that fades after 50 days before slowly rebrightening over a further 100 days to reach an absolute brightness of M$_r\sim -15.5$ mag. The decline rate of the late-time light curve is then slower than that expected from the powering by radioactive decay of $^{56}$Co but is comparable to that expected from accretion power. Comparing the bolometric light curve with hydrodynamical models, we find that DES16C3cje can be explained by either i) a low explosion energy (0.11 foe) and relatively large $^{56}$Ni production of 0.075 M$_{\odot}$ from a $\sim15$ M$_{\odot}$ red supergiant progenitor typical of other SNe II, or ii) a relatively compact $\sim40$ M$_{\odot}$ star, explosion energy of 1 foe, and 0.08 M$_{\odot}$ of $^{56}$Ni. Both scenarios require additional energy input to explain the late-time light curve, which is consistent with fallback accretion at a rate of $\sim0.5\times{10^{-8}}$ M$_{\odot}$ s$^{-1}$.
△ Less
Submitted 29 May, 2020; v1 submitted 30 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
-
ASCR/HEP Exascale Requirements Review Report
Authors:
Salman Habib,
Robert Roser,
Richard Gerber,
Katie Antypas,
Katherine Riley,
Tim Williams,
Jack Wells,
Tjerk Straatsma,
A. Almgren,
J. Amundson,
S. Bailey,
D. Bard,
K. Bloom,
B. Bockelman,
A. Borgland,
J. Borrill,
R. Boughezal,
R. Brower,
B. Cowan,
H. Finkel,
N. Frontiere,
S. Fuess,
L. Ge,
N. Gnedin,
S. Gottlieb
, et al. (29 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This draft report summarizes and details the findings, results, and recommendations derived from the ASCR/HEP Exascale Requirements Review meeting held in June, 2015. The main conclusions are as follows. 1) Larger, more capable computing and data facilities are needed to support HEP science goals in all three frontiers: Energy, Intensity, and Cosmic. The expected scale of the demand at the 2025 ti…
▽ More
This draft report summarizes and details the findings, results, and recommendations derived from the ASCR/HEP Exascale Requirements Review meeting held in June, 2015. The main conclusions are as follows. 1) Larger, more capable computing and data facilities are needed to support HEP science goals in all three frontiers: Energy, Intensity, and Cosmic. The expected scale of the demand at the 2025 timescale is at least two orders of magnitude -- and in some cases greater -- than that available currently. 2) The growth rate of data produced by simulations is overwhelming the current ability, of both facilities and researchers, to store and analyze it. Additional resources and new techniques for data analysis are urgently needed. 3) Data rates and volumes from HEP experimental facilities are also straining the ability to store and analyze large and complex data volumes. Appropriately configured leadership-class facilities can play a transformational role in enabling scientific discovery from these datasets. 4) A close integration of HPC simulation and data analysis will aid greatly in interpreting results from HEP experiments. Such an integration will minimize data movement and facilitate interdependent workflows. 5) Long-range planning between HEP and ASCR will be required to meet HEP's research needs. To best use ASCR HPC resources the experimental HEP program needs a) an established long-term plan for access to ASCR computational and data resources, b) an ability to map workflows onto HPC resources, c) the ability for ASCR facilities to accommodate workflows run by collaborations that can have thousands of individual members, d) to transition codes to the next-generation HPC platforms that will be available at ASCR facilities, e) to build up and train a workforce capable of developing and using simulations and analysis to support HEP scientific research on next-generation systems.
△ Less
Submitted 31 March, 2016; v1 submitted 30 March, 2016;
originally announced March 2016.
-
Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae
Authors:
S. Perlmutter,
G. Aldering,
G. Goldhaber,
R. A. Knop,
P. Nugent,
P. G. Castro,
S. Deustua,
S. Fabbro,
A. Goobar,
D. E. Groom,
I. M. Hook,
A. G. Kim,
M. Y. Kim,
J. C. Lee,
N. J. Nunes,
R. Pain,
C. R. Pennypacker,
R. Quimby,
C. Lidman,
R. S. Ellis,
M. Irwin,
R. G. McMahon,
P. Ruiz-Lapuente,
N. Walton,
B. Schaefer
, et al. (7 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We report measurements of the mass density, Omega_M, and cosmological-constant energy density, Omega_Lambda, of the universe based on the analysis of 42 Type Ia supernovae discovered by the Supernova Cosmology Project. The magnitude-redshift data for these SNe, at redshifts between 0.18 and 0.83, are fit jointly with a set of SNe from the Calan/Tololo Supernova Survey, at redshifts below 0.1, to…
▽ More
We report measurements of the mass density, Omega_M, and cosmological-constant energy density, Omega_Lambda, of the universe based on the analysis of 42 Type Ia supernovae discovered by the Supernova Cosmology Project. The magnitude-redshift data for these SNe, at redshifts between 0.18 and 0.83, are fit jointly with a set of SNe from the Calan/Tololo Supernova Survey, at redshifts below 0.1, to yield values for the cosmological parameters. All SN peak magnitudes are standardized using a SN Ia lightcurve width-luminosity relation. The measurement yields a joint probability distribution of the cosmological parameters that is approximated by the relation 0.8 Omega_M - 0.6 Omega_Lambda ~= -0.2 +/- 0.1 in the region of interest (Omega_M <~ 1.5). For a flat (Omega_M + Omega_Lambda = 1) cosmology we find Omega_M = 0.28{+0.09,-0.08} (1 sigma statistical) {+0.05,-0.04} (identified systematics). The data are strongly inconsistent with a Lambda = 0 flat cosmology, the simplest inflationary universe model. An open, Lambda = 0 cosmology also does not fit the data well: the data indicate that the cosmological constant is non-zero and positive, with a confidence of P(Lambda > 0) = 99%, including the identified systematic uncertainties. The best-fit age of the universe relative to the Hubble time is t_0 = 14.9{+1.4,-1.1} (0.63/h) Gyr for a flat cosmology. The size of our sample allows us to perform a variety of statistical tests to check for possible systematic errors and biases. We find no significant differences in either the host reddening distribution or Malmquist bias between the low-redshift Calan/Tololo sample and our high-redshift sample. The conclusions are robust whether or not a width-luminosity relation is used to standardize the SN peak magnitudes.
△ Less
Submitted 7 December, 1998;
originally announced December 1998.
