-
Beam Delivery and Beamstrahlung Considerations for Ultra-High Energy Linear Colliders
Authors:
Tim Barklow,
Spencer Gessner,
Mark Hogan,
Cho-Kuen Ng,
Michael Peskin,
Tor Raubenheimer,
Glen White,
Erik Adli,
Gevy Jiawei Cao,
Carl A. Lindstrom,
Kyrre Sjobak,
Sam Barber,
Cameron Geddes,
Arianna Formenti,
Remi Lehe,
Carl Schroeder,
Davide Terzani,
Jeroen van Tilborg,
Jean-Luc Vay,
Edoardo Zoni,
Chris Doss,
Michael Litos,
Ihar Lobach,
John Power,
Maximilian Swiatlowski
, et al. (5 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
As part of the Snowmass'21 community planning excercise, the Advanced Accelerator Concepts (AAC) community proposed future linear colliders with center-of-mass energies up to 15 TeV and luminosities up to 50$\times10^{34}$ cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$ in a compact footprint. In addition to being compact, these machines must also be energy efficient. We identify two challenges that must be addressed in the de…
▽ More
As part of the Snowmass'21 community planning excercise, the Advanced Accelerator Concepts (AAC) community proposed future linear colliders with center-of-mass energies up to 15 TeV and luminosities up to 50$\times10^{34}$ cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$ in a compact footprint. In addition to being compact, these machines must also be energy efficient. We identify two challenges that must be addressed in the design of these machines. First, the Beam Delivery System (BDS) must not add significant length to the accelerator complex. Second, beam parameters must be chosen to mitigate beamstrahlung effects and maximize the luminosity-per-power of the machine. In this paper, we review advances in plasma lens technology that will help to reduce the length of the BDS system and we detail new Particle-in-Cell simulation studies that will provide insight into beamstrahlung mitigation techniques. We apply our analysis to both $e^+e^-$ and $γγ$ colliders.
△ Less
Submitted 31 May, 2023; v1 submitted 30 April, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
Accelerator and Beam Physics: Grand Challenges and Research Opportunities
Authors:
S. Nagaitsev,
V. Shiltsev,
A. Valishev,
T. Zolkin,
J. -L. Vay,
M. Bai,
Y. Cai,
M. J. Hogan,
Z. Huang,
J. Seeman,
B. Dunham,
X. Huang,
T. Roser,
M. Minty,
J. Rosenzweig,
P. Piot,
J. Power,
J. M. Byrd,
A. Seryi,
S. Lund,
J. R. Patterson
Abstract:
Accelerator and beam physics (ABP) is the science of the motion, generation, acceleration, manipulation, prediction, observation and use of charged particle beams. It focuses on fundamental long-term accelerator and beam physics research and development. Accelerator and beam physics research has resulted in important advances in accelerator science, yet support for this research is declining. NSF…
▽ More
Accelerator and beam physics (ABP) is the science of the motion, generation, acceleration, manipulation, prediction, observation and use of charged particle beams. It focuses on fundamental long-term accelerator and beam physics research and development. Accelerator and beam physics research has resulted in important advances in accelerator science, yet support for this research is declining. NSF has terminated its program in accelerator Science and funding by DOE through GARD and Accelerator Stewardship has been steady or declining. The declining support for accelerator research will slow advances and threaten student training and work-force development in accelerator science. We propose a robust and scientifically challenging program in accelerator and beam physics, which will position the field of US High Energy Physics to be productive and competitive for decades to come.
△ Less
Submitted 13 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Collective Effects and Intense Beam-Plasma Interactions in Ion-Beam-Driven High Energy Density Matter and Inertial Fusion Energy
Authors:
Igor D. Kaganovich,
Edward A. Startsev,
Hong Qin,
Erik Gilson,
Thomas Schenkel,
Jean-Luc Vay,
Ed P. Lee,
William Waldron,
Roger Bangerter,
Arun Persaud,
Peter Seidl,
Qing Ji,
Alex Friedman,
Dave P. Grote,
John Barnard
Abstract:
For the successful generation of ion-beam-driven high energy density matter and heavy ion fusion energy, intense ion beams must be transported and focused onto a target with small spot size. One of the successful approaches to achieve this goal is to accelerate and transport intense ion charge bunches in an accelerator and then focus the charge bunches ballistically in a section of the accelerator…
▽ More
For the successful generation of ion-beam-driven high energy density matter and heavy ion fusion energy, intense ion beams must be transported and focused onto a target with small spot size. One of the successful approaches to achieve this goal is to accelerate and transport intense ion charge bunches in an accelerator and then focus the charge bunches ballistically in a section of the accelerator that contains a neutralizing background plasma. This requires the ability to control space-charge effects during un-neutralized (non-neutral) beam transport in the accelerator and transport sections, and the ability to effectively neutralize the space charge and current by propagating the beam through background plasma. As the beam intensity and energy are increased in future heavy ion fusion (HIF) drivers and Fast Ignition (FI) approaches, it is expected that nonlinear processes and collective effects will become much more pronounced than in previous experiments. Making use of 3D electromagnetic particle-in-cell simulation (PIC) codes (BEST, WARP-X, and LTP-PIC, etc.), the theory and modelling studies will be validated by comparing with experimental data on the 100kV Princeton Advanced Test Stand, and future experiments at the FAIR facility. The theoretical predictions that are developed will be scaled to the beam and plasma parameters relevant to heavy ion fusion drivers and Fast Ignition scenarios. Therefore, the theoretical results will also contribute significantly toward the long-term goal of fusion energy production by ion-beam-driven inertial confinement fusion.
△ Less
Submitted 31 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
ASCR/HEP Exascale Requirements Review Report
Authors:
Salman Habib,
Robert Roser,
Richard Gerber,
Katie Antypas,
Katherine Riley,
Tim Williams,
Jack Wells,
Tjerk Straatsma,
A. Almgren,
J. Amundson,
S. Bailey,
D. Bard,
K. Bloom,
B. Bockelman,
A. Borgland,
J. Borrill,
R. Boughezal,
R. Brower,
B. Cowan,
H. Finkel,
N. Frontiere,
S. Fuess,
L. Ge,
N. Gnedin,
S. Gottlieb
, et al. (29 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This draft report summarizes and details the findings, results, and recommendations derived from the ASCR/HEP Exascale Requirements Review meeting held in June, 2015. The main conclusions are as follows. 1) Larger, more capable computing and data facilities are needed to support HEP science goals in all three frontiers: Energy, Intensity, and Cosmic. The expected scale of the demand at the 2025 ti…
▽ More
This draft report summarizes and details the findings, results, and recommendations derived from the ASCR/HEP Exascale Requirements Review meeting held in June, 2015. The main conclusions are as follows. 1) Larger, more capable computing and data facilities are needed to support HEP science goals in all three frontiers: Energy, Intensity, and Cosmic. The expected scale of the demand at the 2025 timescale is at least two orders of magnitude -- and in some cases greater -- than that available currently. 2) The growth rate of data produced by simulations is overwhelming the current ability, of both facilities and researchers, to store and analyze it. Additional resources and new techniques for data analysis are urgently needed. 3) Data rates and volumes from HEP experimental facilities are also straining the ability to store and analyze large and complex data volumes. Appropriately configured leadership-class facilities can play a transformational role in enabling scientific discovery from these datasets. 4) A close integration of HPC simulation and data analysis will aid greatly in interpreting results from HEP experiments. Such an integration will minimize data movement and facilitate interdependent workflows. 5) Long-range planning between HEP and ASCR will be required to meet HEP's research needs. To best use ASCR HPC resources the experimental HEP program needs a) an established long-term plan for access to ASCR computational and data resources, b) an ability to map workflows onto HPC resources, c) the ability for ASCR facilities to accommodate workflows run by collaborations that can have thousands of individual members, d) to transition codes to the next-generation HPC platforms that will be available at ASCR facilities, e) to build up and train a workforce capable of developing and using simulations and analysis to support HEP scientific research on next-generation systems.
△ Less
Submitted 31 March, 2016; v1 submitted 30 March, 2016;
originally announced March 2016.
-
High Energy Physics Forum for Computational Excellence: Working Group Reports (I. Applications Software II. Software Libraries and Tools III. Systems)
Authors:
Salman Habib,
Robert Roser,
Tom LeCompte,
Zach Marshall,
Anders Borgland,
Brett Viren,
Peter Nugent,
Makoto Asai,
Lothar Bauerdick,
Hal Finkel,
Steve Gottlieb,
Stefan Hoeche,
Paul Sheldon,
Jean-Luc Vay,
Peter Elmer,
Michael Kirby,
Simon Patton,
Maxim Potekhin,
Brian Yanny,
Paolo Calafiura,
Eli Dart,
Oliver Gutsche,
Taku Izubuchi,
Adam Lyon,
Don Petravick
Abstract:
Computing plays an essential role in all aspects of high energy physics. As computational technology evolves rapidly in new directions, and data throughput and volume continue to follow a steep trend-line, it is important for the HEP community to develop an effective response to a series of expected challenges. In order to help shape the desired response, the HEP Forum for Computational Excellence…
▽ More
Computing plays an essential role in all aspects of high energy physics. As computational technology evolves rapidly in new directions, and data throughput and volume continue to follow a steep trend-line, it is important for the HEP community to develop an effective response to a series of expected challenges. In order to help shape the desired response, the HEP Forum for Computational Excellence (HEP-FCE) initiated a roadmap planning activity with two key overlapping drivers -- 1) software effectiveness, and 2) infrastructure and expertise advancement. The HEP-FCE formed three working groups, 1) Applications Software, 2) Software Libraries and Tools, and 3) Systems (including systems software), to provide an overview of the current status of HEP computing and to present findings and opportunities for the desired HEP computational roadmap. The final versions of the reports are combined in this document, and are presented along with introductory material.
△ Less
Submitted 28 October, 2015;
originally announced October 2015.
