-
Comparing recent PTA results on the nanohertz stochastic gravitational wave background
Authors:
The International Pulsar Timing Array Collaboration,
G. Agazie,
J. Antoniadis,
A. Anumarlapudi,
A. M. Archibald,
P. Arumugam,
S. Arumugam,
Z. Arzoumanian,
J. Askew,
S. Babak,
M. Bagchi,
M. Bailes,
A. -S. Bak Nielsen,
P. T. Baker,
C. G. Bassa,
A. Bathula,
B. Bécsy,
A. Berthereau,
N. D. R. Bhat,
L. Blecha,
M. Bonetti,
E. Bortolas,
A. Brazier,
P. R. Brook,
M. Burgay
, et al. (220 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Australian, Chinese, European, Indian, and North American pulsar timing array (PTA) collaborations recently reported, at varying levels, evidence for the presence of a nanohertz gravitational wave background (GWB). Given that each PTA made different choices in modeling their data, we perform a comparison of the GWB and individual pulsar noise parameters across the results reported from the PTA…
▽ More
The Australian, Chinese, European, Indian, and North American pulsar timing array (PTA) collaborations recently reported, at varying levels, evidence for the presence of a nanohertz gravitational wave background (GWB). Given that each PTA made different choices in modeling their data, we perform a comparison of the GWB and individual pulsar noise parameters across the results reported from the PTAs that constitute the International Pulsar Timing Array (IPTA). We show that despite making different modeling choices, there is no significant difference in the GWB parameters that are measured by the different PTAs, agreeing within $1σ$. The pulsar noise parameters are also consistent between different PTAs for the majority of the pulsars included in these analyses. We bridge the differences in modeling choices by adopting a standardized noise model for all pulsars and PTAs, finding that under this model there is a reduction in the tension in the pulsar noise parameters. As part of this reanalysis, we "extended" each PTA's data set by adding extra pulsars that were not timed by that PTA. Under these extensions, we find better constraints on the GWB amplitude and a higher signal-to-noise ratio for the Hellings and Downs correlations. These extensions serve as a prelude to the benefits offered by a full combination of data across all pulsars in the IPTA, i.e., the IPTA's Data Release 3, which will involve not just adding in additional pulsars, but also including data from all three PTAs where any given pulsar is timed by more than as single PTA.
△ Less
Submitted 1 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
The Parkes Pulsar Timing Array Third Data Release
Authors:
Andrew Zic,
Daniel J. Reardon,
Agastya Kapur,
George Hobbs,
Rami Mandow,
Małgorzata Curyło,
Ryan M. Shannon,
Jacob Askew,
Matthew Bailes,
N. D. Ramesh Bhat,
Andrew Cameron,
Zu-Cheng Chen,
Shi Dai,
Valentina Di Marco,
Yi Feng,
Matthew Kerr,
Atharva Kulkarni,
Marcus E. Lower,
Rui Luo,
Richard N. Manchester,
Matthew T. Miles,
Rowina S. Nathan,
Stefan Osłowski,
Axl F. Rogers,
Christopher J. Russell
, et al. (9 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present the third data release from the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array (PPTA) project. The release contains observations of 32 pulsars obtained using the 64-m Parkes "Murriyang" radio telescope. The data span is up to 18 years with a typical cadence of 3 weeks. This data release is formed by combining an updated version of our second data release with $\sim 3$ years of more recent data primarily ob…
▽ More
We present the third data release from the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array (PPTA) project. The release contains observations of 32 pulsars obtained using the 64-m Parkes "Murriyang" radio telescope. The data span is up to 18 years with a typical cadence of 3 weeks. This data release is formed by combining an updated version of our second data release with $\sim 3$ years of more recent data primarily obtained using an ultra-wide-bandwidth receiver system that operates between 704 and 4032 MHz. We provide calibrated pulse profiles, flux-density dynamic spectra, pulse times of arrival, and initial pulsar timing models. We describe methods for processing such wide-bandwidth observations, and compare this data release with our previous release.
△ Less
Submitted 17 October, 2023; v1 submitted 28 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
On the evidence for a common-spectrum process in the search for the nanohertz gravitational-wave background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array
Authors:
Boris Goncharov,
R. M. Shannon,
D. J. Reardon,
G. Hobbs,
A. Zic,
M. Bailes,
M. Curylo,
S. Dai,
M. Kerr,
M. E. Lower,
R. N. Manchester,
R. Mandow,
H. Middleton,
M. T. Miles,
A. Parthasarathy,
E. Thrane,
N. Thyagarajan,
X. Xue,
X. J. Zhu,
A. D. Cameron,
Y. Feng,
R. Luo,
C. J. Russell,
J. Sarkissian,
R. Spiewak
, et al. (4 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
A nanohertz-frequency stochastic gravitational-wave background can potentially be detected through the precise timing of an array of millisecond pulsars. This background produces low-frequency noise in the pulse arrival times that would have a characteristic spectrum common to all pulsars and a well-defined spatial correlation. Recently the North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Wa…
▽ More
A nanohertz-frequency stochastic gravitational-wave background can potentially be detected through the precise timing of an array of millisecond pulsars. This background produces low-frequency noise in the pulse arrival times that would have a characteristic spectrum common to all pulsars and a well-defined spatial correlation. Recently the North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves collaboration (NANOGrav) found evidence for the common-spectrum component in their 12.5-year data set. Here we report on a search for the background using the second data release of the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array. If we are forced to choose between the two NANOGrav models $\unicode{x2014}$ one with a common-spectrum process and one without $\unicode{x2014}$ we find strong support for the common-spectrum process. However, in this paper, we consider the possibility that the analysis suffers from model misspecification. In particular, we present simulated data sets that contain noise with distinctive spectra but show strong evidence for a common-spectrum process under the standard assumptions. The Parkes data show no significant evidence for, or against, the spatially correlated Hellings-Downs signature of the gravitational-wave background. Assuming we did observe the process underlying the spatially uncorrelated component of the background, we infer its amplitude to be $A = 2.2^{+0.4}_{-0.3} \times 10^{-15}$ in units of gravitational-wave strain at a frequency of $1\, \text{yr}^{-1}$. Extensions and combinations of existing and new data sets will improve the prospects of identifying spatial correlations that are necessary to claim a detection of the gravitational-wave background.
△ Less
Submitted 11 August, 2021; v1 submitted 26 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
