-
The FRB 20121102A November rain in 2018 observed with the Arecibo Telescope
Authors:
J. N. Jahns,
L. G. Spitler,
K. Nimmo,
D. M. Hewitt,
M. P. Snelders,
A. Seymour,
J. W. T. Hessels,
K. Gourdji,
D. Michilli,
G. H. Hilmarsson
Abstract:
We present 849 new bursts from FRB 20121102A detected with the 305-m Arecibo Telescope. Observations were conducted as part of our regular campaign to monitor activity and evolution of burst properties. The 10 reported observations were carried out between 1150 and 1730 MHz and fall in the active period around November 2018. All bursts were dedispersed at the same dispersion measure and are consis…
▽ More
We present 849 new bursts from FRB 20121102A detected with the 305-m Arecibo Telescope. Observations were conducted as part of our regular campaign to monitor activity and evolution of burst properties. The 10 reported observations were carried out between 1150 and 1730 MHz and fall in the active period around November 2018. All bursts were dedispersed at the same dispersion measure and are consistent with a single value of 562.4(1) pc/cm$^3$. The rate varies between 0 bursts and 218(16) bursts per hour, the highest rate observed to date. The times between consecutive bursts show a bimodal distribution. We find that a Poisson process with varying rate best describes arrival times with separations >0.1 s. Clustering on timescales of 22 ms reflects a characteristic timescale of the source and possibly the emission mechanism. We analyse the spectro-temporal structure of the bursts by fitting 2D Gaussians with a temporal drift to each sub-burst in the dynamic spectra. We find a linear relationship between the sub-burst's drift and its duration. At the same time, the drifts are consistent with coming from the sad-trombone effect. This has not been predicted by current models. The energy distribution shows an excess of high energy bursts and is insufficiently modelled by a single power-law even within single observations. We find long-term changes in the energy distribution, the average spectrum, and the sad-trombone drift, compared to earlier and later published observations. Despite the large burst rate, we find no strict short-term periodicity.
△ Less
Submitted 6 January, 2023; v1 submitted 11 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
Arecibo observations of a burst storm from FRB 20121102A in 2016
Authors:
D. M. Hewitt,
M. P. Snelders,
J. W. T. Hessels,
K. Nimmo,
J. N. Jahns,
L. G. Spitler,
K. Gourdji,
G. H. Hilmarsson,
D. Michilli,
O. S. Ould-Boukattine,
P. Scholz,
A. D. Seymour
Abstract:
FRB 20121102A is the first known fast radio burst (FRB) from which repeat bursts were detected, and one of the best-studied FRB sources in the literature. Here we report on the analysis of 478 bursts (333 previously unreported) from FRB 20121102A using the 305-m Arecibo telescope - detected during approximately 59 hours of observations between December 2015 and October 2016. The majority of bursts…
▽ More
FRB 20121102A is the first known fast radio burst (FRB) from which repeat bursts were detected, and one of the best-studied FRB sources in the literature. Here we report on the analysis of 478 bursts (333 previously unreported) from FRB 20121102A using the 305-m Arecibo telescope - detected during approximately 59 hours of observations between December 2015 and October 2016. The majority of bursts are from a burst storm around September 2016. This is the earliest available sample of a large number of FRB 20121102A bursts, and it thus provides an anchor point for long-term studies of the source's evolving properties. We observe that the bursts separate into two groups in the width-bandwidth-energy parameter space, which we refer to as the low-energy bursts (LEBs) and high-energy bursts (HEBs). The LEBs are typically longer duration and narrower bandwidth than the HEBs, reminiscent of the spectro-temporal differences observed between the bursts of repeating and non-repeating FRBs. We fit the cumulative burst rate-energy distribution with a broken power-law and find that it flattens out toward higher energies. The sample shows a diverse zoo of burst morphologies. Notably, burst emission seems to be more common at the top than the bottom of our 1150 - 1730 MHz observing band. We also observe that bursts from the same day appear to be more similar to each other than to those of other days, but this observation requires confirmation. The wait times and burst rates that we measure are consistent with previous studies. We discuss these results, primarily in the context of magnetar models.
△ Less
Submitted 18 July, 2022; v1 submitted 22 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
Burst properties of the highly active FRB 20201124A using uGMRT
Authors:
V. R. Marthi,
S. Bethapudi,
R. A. Main,
H. -H. Lin,
L. G. Spitler,
R. S. Wharton,
D. Z. Li,
T. G. Gautam,
U. -L. Pen,
G. H. Hilmarsson
Abstract:
We report the observations of the highly active FRb20201124A with the upgraded Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope at 550-750~MHz. These observations in the incoherent array mode simultaneously provided an arcsecond localization of bursts from \rss, the discovery of persistent radio emission associated with the host galaxy, and the detection of 48 bursts. Using the brightest burst in the sample (…
▽ More
We report the observations of the highly active FRb20201124A with the upgraded Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope at 550-750~MHz. These observations in the incoherent array mode simultaneously provided an arcsecond localization of bursts from \rss, the discovery of persistent radio emission associated with the host galaxy, and the detection of 48 bursts. Using the brightest burst in the sample ($F= 108~{\rm Jy~ms}$) we find a structure-maximizing dispersion measure of $410.8 \pm 0.5~{\rm pc~cm}^{-3}$. We find that our observations are complete down to a fluence level of $10~{\rm Jy~ms}$, above which the cumulative burst rate scales as a power-law $R(>\!F) = 10~{\rm hr}^{-1} \left(F/10\mathrm{~Jy~ms}\right)^γ$ with $γ= -1.2 \pm 0.2$. We find that the bursts are on average wider than those reported for other repeating FRBs. We find that the waiting time between bursts is well approximated by an exponential distribution with a mean of $\sim 2.9$ min during our observations. We searched for periodicities using both a standard Fourier domain method and the Fast Folding Algorithm, but found no significant candidates. We measure bulk spectro-temporal drift rates between $-0.75$ and $-20~{\rm MHz~ms}^{-1}$. Finally, we use the brightest burst to set an upper limit to the scattering time of 11.1~ms at 550~MHz. The localization of FRB20201124A adds strength to the proof-of-concept method described in our earlier work and serves as a potential model for future localizations and follow-up of repeating FRBs with the uGMRT.
△ Less
Submitted 21 October, 2021; v1 submitted 2 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
-
Scintillation timescale measurement of the highly active FRB20201124A
Authors:
R. A. Main,
G. H. Hilmarsson,
V. R. Marthi,
L. G. Spitler,
R. S. Wharton,
S. Bethapudi,
D. Z. Li,
H. -H. Lin
Abstract:
Scintillation of compact radio sources results from the interference between images caused by multipath propagation, and probes the intervening scattering plasma and the velocities of the emitting source and scattering screen. In FRB20201124A, a repeating fast radio burst (FRB) which entered a period of extreme activity, we obtained many burst detections in observations at the upgraded Giant Metre…
▽ More
Scintillation of compact radio sources results from the interference between images caused by multipath propagation, and probes the intervening scattering plasma and the velocities of the emitting source and scattering screen. In FRB20201124A, a repeating fast radio burst (FRB) which entered a period of extreme activity, we obtained many burst detections in observations at the upgraded Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope (uGMRT) and the Effelsberg 100\,m Radio Telescope. Bursts nearby in time show similar scintillation patterns, and we measure a scintillation timescale of $14.3\pm1.2$\,min and $7\pm2$\,min at Effelsberg (1370\,MHz) and uGMRT (650\,MHz), respectively, by correlating burst pair spectra. The scintillation bandwidth scaled to 1\,GHz is $0.5\pm0.1$\,MHz, and the inferred scintillation velocity at Effelsberg is $V_{\mathrm{ISS}}\approx (59\pm7) \sqrt{d_{l}/2\,\rm{kpc}}~{\rm km~s}^{-1}$, higher than Earth's velocity for any screen beyond a lens distance of $d_{l} \gtrsim 400\,$pc. From the measured scintillation bandwidth, FRB20201124A has comparatively lower scattering than nearby pulsars, and is underscattered by a factor of $\sim 30$ or $\sim 1200$ compared to the NE2001 and YMW16 model predictions respectively. This underscattering, together with the measured scintillation velocity are consistent with a scattering screen more nearby the Earth at $d_{l} \sim 400\,$pc, rather than at the 2\,kpc spiral arm which NE2001 predicts to be the dominant source of scattering. With future measurements, the distance, geometry, and velocity of the scattering screen could be obtained through modelling of the annual variation in $V_{\rm ISS}$, or through inter-station time delays or interferometric observations. Scintillation/scattering measurements of FRBs could help improve Galactic electron density models, particularly in the Galactic halo or at high Galactic latitudes.
△ Less
Submitted 22 November, 2021; v1 submitted 30 July, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
-
Polarization properties of FRB 20201124A from detections with the 100-m Effelsberg Radio Telescope
Authors:
G. H. Hilmarsson,
L. G. Spitler,
R. A. Main,
D. Z. Li
Abstract:
The repeating FRB source, FRB 20201124A, was found to be highly active in March and April 2021. We observed the source with the Effelsberg 100-m radio telescope at 1.36 GHz on 9 April 2021 and detected 20 bursts. A downward drift in frequency over time is clearly seen from the majority of bursts in our sample. A structure-maximizing dispersion measure (DM) search on the multi-component bursts in o…
▽ More
The repeating FRB source, FRB 20201124A, was found to be highly active in March and April 2021. We observed the source with the Effelsberg 100-m radio telescope at 1.36 GHz on 9 April 2021 and detected 20 bursts. A downward drift in frequency over time is clearly seen from the majority of bursts in our sample. A structure-maximizing dispersion measure (DM) search on the multi-component bursts in our sample yields a DM of 411.6$\pm$0.6 pc/cm$^3$. We find that the rotation measure (RM) of the bursts varies around their mean value of -605 rad/m$^2$ with a standard deviation of 11.1 rad/m$^2$. This RM magnitude is 10 times larger than the expected Galactic contribution along this line of sight (LoS). We estimate a LoS magnetic field strength of 4--6 $μ$G, assuming that the entire host galaxy DM contributes to the RM. Further polarization measurements will help determine FRB 20201124A's RM stability. The bursts are highly linearly polarized, with some showing signs of circular polarization, the first for a repeating FRB. Their polarization position angles (PAs) are flat across the burst envelopes and vary between bursts. We argue that the varying polarization fractions and PAs of FRB 20201124A are similar to known magnetospheric emission from pulsars, while the observed circular polarization, combined with the RM variability, is hard to explain with Faraday conversion. The high linear polarization fractions, flat PAs, and downward drift from FRB 20201124A bursts are similar to previous repeating sources, while the observed circular polarization is a newly seen behaviour among repeaters.
△ Less
Submitted 29 October, 2021; v1 submitted 27 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
Observing superluminous supernovae and long gamma ray bursts as potential birthplaces of repeating fast radio bursts
Authors:
G. H. Hilmarsson,
L. G. Spitler,
E. F. Keane,
T. M. Athanasiadis,
E. Barr,
M. Cruces,
X. Deng,
S. Heyminck,
R. Karuppusamy,
M. Kramer,
S. P. Sathyanarayanan,
V. Ventakraman Krishnan,
G. Wieching,
J. Wu,
O. Wucknitz
Abstract:
Superluminous supernovae (SLSNe) and long gamma ray bursts (LGRBs) have been proposed as progenitors of repeating Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs). In this scenario, bursts originate from the interaction between a young magnetar and its surrounding supernova remnant (SNR). Such a model could explain the repeating, apparently non-Poissonian nature of FRB121102, which appears to display quiescent and active…
▽ More
Superluminous supernovae (SLSNe) and long gamma ray bursts (LGRBs) have been proposed as progenitors of repeating Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs). In this scenario, bursts originate from the interaction between a young magnetar and its surrounding supernova remnant (SNR). Such a model could explain the repeating, apparently non-Poissonian nature of FRB121102, which appears to display quiescent and active phases. This bursting behaviour is better explained with a Weibull distribution, which includes parametrisation for clustering. We observed 10 SLSNe/LGRBs for 63 hours, looking for repeating FRBs with the Effelsberg-100 m radio telescope, but have not detected any bursts. We scale the burst rate of FRB121102 to an FRB121102-like source inhabiting each of our observed targets, and compare this rate to our upper burst rate limit on a source by source basis. By adopting a fiducial beaming fraction of 0.6, we obtain 99.99\% and 83.4\% probabilities that at least one, and at least half of our observed sources are beamed towards us respectively. One of our SLSN targets, PTF10hgi, is coincident with a persistent radio source, making it a possible analogue to FRB121102. We performed further observations on this source using the Effelsberg-100~m and Parkes-64~m radio telescopes. Assuming that PTF10hgi contains an FRB121102-like source, the probabilities of not detecting any bursts from a Weibull distribution during our observations are 14\% and 16\% for Effelsberg and Parkes respectively. We conclude by showing that a survey of many short observations increases burst detection probability for a source with Weibull distributed bursting activity.
△ Less
Submitted 29 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
-
Rotation Measure Evolution of the Repeating Fast Radio Burst Source FRB 121102
Authors:
G. H. Hilmarsson,
D. Michilli,
L. G. Spitler,
R. S. Wharton,
P. Demorest,
G. Desvignes,
K. Gourdji,
S. Hackstein,
J. W. T. Hessels,
K. Nimmo,
A. D. Seymour,
M. Kramer,
R. McKinven
Abstract:
The repeating fast radio burst source FRB 121102 has been shown to have an exceptionally high and variable Faraday rotation measure (RM), which must be imparted within its host galaxy and likely by or within its local environment. In the redshifted ($z=0.193$) source reference frame, the RM decreased from $1.46\times10^5$~rad~m$^{-2}$ to $1.33\times10^5$~rad~m$^{-2}$ between January and August 201…
▽ More
The repeating fast radio burst source FRB 121102 has been shown to have an exceptionally high and variable Faraday rotation measure (RM), which must be imparted within its host galaxy and likely by or within its local environment. In the redshifted ($z=0.193$) source reference frame, the RM decreased from $1.46\times10^5$~rad~m$^{-2}$ to $1.33\times10^5$~rad~m$^{-2}$ between January and August 2017, showing day-timescale variations of $\sim200$~rad~m$^{-2}$. Here we present sixteen FRB 121102 RMs from burst detections with the Arecibo 305-m radio telescope, the Effelsberg 100-m, and the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array, providing a record of FRB 121102's RM over a 2.5-year timespan. Our observations show a decreasing trend in RM, although the trend is not linear, dropping by an average of 15\% year$^{-1}$ and is $\sim9.7\times10^4$~rad~m$^{-2}$ at the most recent epoch of August 2019. Erratic, short-term RM variations of $\sim10^3$~rad~m$^{-2}$ week$^{-1}$ were also observed between MJDs 58215--58247. A decades-old neutron star embedded within a still-compact supernova remnant or a neutron star near a massive black hole and its accretion torus have been proposed to explain the high RMs. We compare the observed RMs to theoretical models describing the RM evolution for FRBs originating within a supernova remnant. FRB 121102's age is unknown, and we find that the models agree for source ages of $\sim6-17$~years at the time of the first available RM measurements in 2017. We also draw comparisons to the decreasing RM of the Galactic center magnetar, PSR J1745--2900.
△ Less
Submitted 29 January, 2021; v1 submitted 25 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
-
Repeating behaviour of FRB 121102: periodicity, waiting times and energy distribution
Authors:
M. Cruces,
L. G. Spitler,
P. Scholz,
R. Lynch,
A. Seymour,
J. W. T. Hessels,
C. Gouiffès,
G. H. Hilmarsson,
M. Kramer,
S. Munjal
Abstract:
Detections from the repeating fast radio burst FRB 121102 are clustered in time, noticeable even in the earliest repeat bursts. Recently, it was argued that the source activity is periodic, suggesting that the clustering reflected a not-yet-identified periodicity. We performed an extensive multi-wavelength campaign with the Effelsberg telescope, the Green Bank telescope and the Arecibo Observatory…
▽ More
Detections from the repeating fast radio burst FRB 121102 are clustered in time, noticeable even in the earliest repeat bursts. Recently, it was argued that the source activity is periodic, suggesting that the clustering reflected a not-yet-identified periodicity. We performed an extensive multi-wavelength campaign with the Effelsberg telescope, the Green Bank telescope and the Arecibo Observatory to shadow the Gran Telescope Canaria (optical), NuSTAR (X-ray) and INTEGRAL (gamma-ray). We detected 36 bursts with Effelsberg, one with a pulse width of 39\,ms, the widest burst ever detected from FRB 121102. With one burst detected during simultaneous NuSTAR observations, we place a 5-$σ$ upper limit of $5\times10^{47}$ erg on the 3--79\,keV energy of an X-ray burst counterpart. We tested the periodicity hypothesis using 165-hr of Effelsberg observations and find a periodicity of 161$\pm$5 days. We predict the source to be active from 2020-07-09 to 2020-10-14 and subsequently from 2020-12-17 to 2021-03-24. We compare the wait times between consecutive bursts within a single observation to Weibull and Poisson distributions. We conclude that the strong clustering was indeed a consequence of a periodic activity and show that if the few events with millisecond separation are excluded, the arrival times are Poisson distributed. We model the bursts' cumulative energy distribution with energies from ${\sim}10^{38}$-$10^{39}$ erg and find that it is well described by a power-law with slope of $γ=-1.1\pm 0.2$. We propose that a single power-law might be a poor descriptor of the data over many orders of magnitude.
△ Less
Submitted 20 October, 2020; v1 submitted 8 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Simultaneous multi-telescope observations of FRB 121102
Authors:
M. Caleb,
B. W. Stappers,
T. D. Abbott,
E. D. Barr,
M. C. Bezuidenhout,
S. J. Buchner,
M. Burgay,
W. Chen,
I. Cognard,
L. N. Driessen,
R. Fender,
G. H. Hilmarsson,
J. Hoang,
D. M. Horn,
F. Jankowski,
M. Kramer,
D. R. Lorimer,
M. Malenta,
V. Morello,
M. Pilia,
E. Platts,
A. Possenti,
K. M. Rajwade,
A. Ridolfi,
L. Rhodes
, et al. (7 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present 11 detections of FRB 121102 in ~3 hours of observations during its 'active' period on the 10th of September 2019. The detections were made using the newly deployed MeerTRAP system and single pulse detection pipeline at the MeerKAT radio telescope in South Africa. Fortuitously, the Nancay radio telescope observations on this day overlapped with the last hour of MeerKAT observations and r…
▽ More
We present 11 detections of FRB 121102 in ~3 hours of observations during its 'active' period on the 10th of September 2019. The detections were made using the newly deployed MeerTRAP system and single pulse detection pipeline at the MeerKAT radio telescope in South Africa. Fortuitously, the Nancay radio telescope observations on this day overlapped with the last hour of MeerKAT observations and resulted in 4 simultaneous detections. The observations with MeerKAT's wide band receiver, which extends down to relatively low frequencies (900-1670 MHz usable L-band range), have allowed us to get a detailed look at the complex frequency structure, intensity variations and frequency-dependent sub-pulse drifting. The drift rates we measure for the full-band and sub-banded data are consistent with those published between 600-6500 MHz with a slope of -0.147 +/- 0.014 ms^-1. Two of the detected bursts exhibit fainter 'precursors' separated from the brighter main pulse by ~28 ms and ~34 ms. A follow-up multi-telescope campaign on the 6th and 8th October 2019 to better understand these frequency drifts and structures over a wide and continuous band was undertaken. No detections resulted, indicating that the source was 'inactive' over a broad frequency range during this time.
△ Less
Submitted 15 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
