Computer Science > Social and Information Networks
[Submitted on 5 Oct 2020 (v1), revised 21 Jan 2021 (this version, v2), latest version 1 Jun 2021 (v3)]
Title:Interdependent Diffusion: The social contagion of interacting beliefs
View PDFAbstract:Social contagion is the process in which people adopt a belief, idea, or practice from a neighbor and pass it along to someone else. For over 100 years, scholars of social contagion have almost exclusively made the same implicit assumption: that only one belief, idea, or practice spreads through the population at a time. It is a default assumption that we don't bother to state, let alone justify. The assumption is so ingrained that our literature doesn't even have a word for "whatever is to be diffused", because we have never needed to discuss more than one of them.
But this assumption is obviously false. Millions of beliefs, ideas, and practices (let's call them "diffusants") spread through social media every day. To assume that diffusants spread one at a time (or more generously, that they spread independently of one another) is to assume that interactions between diffusants have no influence on adoption patterns. This could be true, or it could be wildly off the mark. We've never stopped to find out.
This paper makes a direct comparison between the spread of independent and interdependent beliefs using simulations, observational data analysis, and a 2400-subject laboratory experiment. I find that in assuming independence between diffusants, scholars have overlooked social processes that fundamentally change the outcomes of social contagion. Interdependence between beliefs generates polarization, irrespective of social network structure, homophily, demographics, politics, or any other commonly cited cause. It also leads to the emergence of popular worldviews that are unconstrained by ground truth.
Submission history
From: James Houghton [view email][v1] Mon, 5 Oct 2020 17:45:22 UTC (2,474 KB)
[v2] Thu, 21 Jan 2021 16:54:48 UTC (1,699 KB)
[v3] Tue, 1 Jun 2021 14:35:12 UTC (5,197 KB)
Current browse context:
cs.SI
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.