Computer Science > Information Theory
[Submitted on 15 Nov 2017 (v1), last revised 25 Jan 2019 (this version, v2)]
Title:Sparse Combinatorial Group Testing
View PDFAbstract:In combinatorial group testing (CGT), the objective is to identify the set of at most $d$ defective items from a pool of $n$ items using as few tests as possible. The celebrated result for the CGT problem is that the number of tests $t$ can be made logarithmic in $n$ when $d=O(poly(\log n))$. However, state-of-the-art GT codes require the items to be tested $w=\Omega(d\log n)$ times and tests to include $\rho=\Omega(n/d)$ items (within log factors). In many applications, items can only participate in a limited number of tests and tests are constrained to include a limited number of items.
In this paper, we study the "sparse" regime for the group testing problem where we restrict the number of tests each item can participate in by $w_{\max}$ or the number of items each test can include by $\rho_{\max}$ in both noiseless and noisy settings. These constraints lead to an unexplored regime where $t$ is a fractional power of $n$. Our results characterize the number of tests $t$ as a function of $w_{\max} (\rho_{\max})$ and show, for example, that $t$ decreases drastically when $w_{\max}$ is increased beyond a bare minimum. In particular, if $w_{\max}\leq d$, then we must have $t=n$, i.e., individual testing is optimal. We show that if $w_{\max}=d+1$, this decreases suddenly to $t=\Theta(d\sqrt{n})$. The order-optimal construction is obtained via a modification of the Kautz-Singleton construction, which is known to be suboptimal for the classical GT problem. For more general case, when $w_{\max}=ld+1$ for $l>1$, the modified K-S construction requires $t=\Theta(d n^{\frac{1}{l+1}})$ tests, which we prove to be near order-optimal. We show that our constructions have a favorable encoding and decoding complexity. We finally discuss an application of our results to the construction of energy-limited random access schemes for IoT networks, which provided the initial motivation for our work.
Submission history
From: Huseyin Inan [view email][v1] Wed, 15 Nov 2017 04:35:25 UTC (167 KB)
[v2] Fri, 25 Jan 2019 23:51:27 UTC (196 KB)
Current browse context:
cs
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.