Computer Science > Systems and Control
[Submitted on 21 Apr 2016 (this version), latest version 21 Nov 2019 (v4)]
Title:Regret of Queueing Bandits
View PDFAbstract:This paper studies multi-armed bandit algorithms for queueing systems where system parameters, such as service rates, may be unknown. This is a fundamental issue in many queueing systems, including crowdsourcing systems and wireless networks. We consider a system with multiple queues and servers, where the servers have queue-dependent, but unknown, service rates. At each time, a matching must be chosen between queues and servers. We focus on the goal of keeping the queue sizes small, and in particular aim to design algorithms that minimize queue-regret: the (expected) difference between the queue-lengths obtained by the algorithm, and those obtained by a "genie"-aided matching algorithm that knows exact server statistics. A naive view of this problem would suggest that queue-regret should grow logarithmically: since a queue is an integrator of service rates, classical regret analysis implies there exist algorithms that ensure queue-regret increases no more than logarithmically in time.
Our paper shows surprisingly more complex behavior. In particular, the naive intuition is correct as long as the bandit algorithm's queues have relatively long regenerative cycles: in this case queue-regret is similar to cumulative regret, and scales (essentially) logarithmically. However, we show that this "early stage" of the queueing bandit eventually gives way to a "late stage", where the optimal queue-regret scaling is $O(1/t)$. We demonstrate an algorithm that (order-wise) achieves this asymptotic queue-regret, and also exhibits close to optimal switching time from the early stage to the late stage.
Submission history
From: Subhashini Krishnasamy [view email][v1] Thu, 21 Apr 2016 16:43:27 UTC (600 KB)
[v2] Mon, 13 Jun 2016 18:37:51 UTC (762 KB)
[v3] Mon, 8 Oct 2018 01:11:54 UTC (3,580 KB)
[v4] Thu, 21 Nov 2019 22:18:22 UTC (3,580 KB)
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.