Newsgroups: comp.robotics
Path: brunix!cat.cis.Brown.EDU!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!netcomsv!butch!NewsWatcher!user
From: farnham@lmsc.lockheed.com (Greg Farnham)
Subject: RE: Proposed 68HC11 board
Message-ID: <farnham-140894152859@129.197.52.35>
Followup-To: comp.robotics
Sender: news@butch.lmsc.lockheed.com
Organization: CIEM
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 1994 22:31:37 GMT
Lines: 14

Take the miniboard 2.0, add 32K battery backed up ram, and a high current
(1-3amps) dual motor driver.   Maybe a few connectors for servos.  Make it
compatible with the miniboard libraries (or update the libraries to work
with the new board).  Then you have a nice board to slap on an RC car to
build an autonomous mobile robot.  In otherwords, a board that fits between
the Miniboard and the 6.270 board in terms of capability and price.

_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
_/ Greg Farnham      InterNet: farnham@lmsc.lockheed.com  _/
_/  Of Course,  all comments are mine, not the company's  _/
_/                                                        _/
_/ IMPROVEMENT CANNOT TAKE PLACE WITHOUT CHANGE           _/
_/                                                        _/
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
