Newsgroups: comp.ai,comp.object.logic,sci.logic,sci.misc,sci.philosophy.tech,sci.physics,talk.philosophy.misc
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!news.mathworks.com!udel!rochester!galileo.cc.rochester.edu!prodigal.psych.rochester.edu!stevens
From: stevens@prodigal.psych.rochester.edu (Greg Stevens)
Subject: Re: Is time continuous?
Message-ID: <1995Mar3.224358.247@galileo.cc.rochester.edu>
Sender: news@galileo.cc.rochester.edu
Nntp-Posting-Host: prodigal.psych.rochester.edu
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York
References: <1995Feb20.144659.9334@vax.sbu.ac.uk> <3iikm3INN9j7@duncan.cs.utk.edu> <MXM.95Feb26034944@dcs.ed.ac.uk>,<3iumrp$m8n@btr0x1.hrz.uni-bayreuth.de> <D4u4JL.7EK@umassd.edu>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 95 22:43:58 GMT
Lines: 15
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu comp.ai:27910 comp.object.logic:378 sci.logic:9924 sci.misc:12302 sci.philosophy.tech:16973 sci.physics:112377

In <D4u4JL.7EK@umassd.edu> neverett@umassd.edu writes:

>Excuse me, but the answer to your questions has been dealt with in the 
>Critique of Pure Reason and the World as Will and Representation.  The
>difference here is the distinction between phenomena as perceived by
>the senses (representation) and the thing in itself (will).

Excuse me, but not everyone agrees with the Critique of Pure Reason.

I for one do not accept the notion of "thing in itself."

Greg Stevens

stevens@prodigal.psych.rochester.edu

