Newsgroups: comp.lang.smalltalk
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!udel!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!unify!decalpha.sac.unify.com!dlf
From: dlf@decalpha.sac.unify.com (Douglas Frink)
Subject: Re: Smalltalk V3.0 vs VisualAge
Message-ID: <D4u4yw.7vL@unify.com>
Lines: 16
Sender: usenet@unify.com
Nntp-Posting-Host: decalpha
Reply-To: dlf@decalpha.sac.unify.com (Douglas Frink)
Organization: Unify Corporation
X-Newsreader: mxrn 6.18-9
References:  <n1417963633.21803@smtpgwprod.ny.jpmorgan.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 1995 22:54:32 GMT


In article <n1417963633.21803@smtpgwprod.ny.jpmorgan.com>, "Alvarez, X." <alvarez_x@JPMORGAN.COM> writes:
|>Hi,
|>
|>Does anybody know the differences and/or advantages betwen the Smalltalk V3.0
|>of Digitalk and VisualAge (for Windows)? Are there any papers about this
|>subject?
|>
|>Thanks in advance.
|>

Check out the Feb 20 issue of Open System Today.  The article on page 34
compares Digitalk's Visual Smalltalk, IBM's VisualAge, and ParcPlace's
VisualWorks.

Doug
