Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp,comp.lang.scheme
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!fas-news.harvard.edu!newspump.wustl.edu!news.ecn.bgu.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!gatech!news-out.communique.net!mr.net!newsfeeds.sol.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.mathworks.com!howland.erols.net!ix.netcom.com!hbaker
From: hbaker@netcom.com (Henry Baker)
Subject: Re: Why lisp failed in the marketplace
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Message-ID: <hbaker-2002971046220001@10.0.2.1>
Sender: hbaker@netcom4.netcom.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: nil
X-Newsreader: Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.2.0
References: <5edfn1$83b@Masala.CC.UH.EDU> <m3pvxxylnf.fsf@laphroig.mch.sni.de> <5efl85$33h@fido.asd.sgi.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 1997 18:46:22 GMT
Lines: 31
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu comp.lang.lisp:25577 comp.lang.scheme:18772

In article <5efl85$33h@fido.asd.sgi.com>, mikemac@engr.sgi.com (Mike
McDonald) wrote:

>   I believe that the reason Lisp has failed to be widely accepted is that for
> most programmers, their first and only exposure to Lisp is in some rinky dink
> "Introduction to AI" class. At the end of which, if they're lucky, they might
> have written programs like Eliza and a checkers player. I can understand why
> they don't think Lisp is good for anything real.

Excellent point!  Such a class usually uses a really bad (slow) implementation
of Lisp, and no decent parenthesis matching editor.  Lisp has come a long way
from 1965, which is the kind of Lisp those courses teach.

>   As for Symbolics part in the downfall of Lisp, sure, they contributed to the
> problem in some respects.

> When the Sun3 was first
> introduced, both Symbolics and Sun were about the same size, in terms of
> revenue. Symbolics decided that they were not in the "workstation" market.
> They were in the AI market. One of the all time stupidest moves ever.

Symbolics was crucified on the cross of 'gross margin', just like Apple
recently was.  Some idiot investors who went to business school in the 1970's
got the hair-brained idea that you could charge a 'premium' price for a
'protected' market, and continue to get away with it.  Both Apple and Symbolics
learned the hard way that _there are no 'protected' markets in the computer
business._  The idiots who made these decisions were out of both stocks long
ago, leaving the hulks to rust on the dustbin of history.

I think it is curious that Autodesk cannot kill AutoLisp, even after years
of trying very hard.
