Newsgroups: comp.lang.scheme
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!udel!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!jussieu.fr!univ-lyon1.fr!swidir.switch.ch!scsing.switch.ch!news.dfn.de!news.dkrz.de!news.rrz.uni-hamburg.de!news.Hanse.DE!wavehh.hanse.de!cracauer
From: cracauer@wavehh.hanse.de (Martin Cracauer)
Subject: Re: Free scheme implementations for Solaris2 f
Message-ID: <1995Mar24.094931.23337@wavehh.hanse.de>
Organization: The Internet
References: <3k6011$3mhm@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <SERRANO.95Mar21075520@ardeche.IRO.UMontreal.CA> <D5vsK7.4K@celsiustech.se>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 95 09:49:31 GMT
Lines: 18

bkl@celsiustech.se (Bengt Kleberg) writes:

>: > In article 3mhm@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net, ltheran@ibm.net   (Louis Theran) writes:
>: > >Are there any free scheme implementations that have been ported for Solaris2.x,
>: > >as I don't see any in the Free Scheme Implementations section in the FAQ?
>: > I expect most of the schemes in the repository will build easily for Solaris 2.x.
>: > I use SCM and vscm.

>ELK works fine. Even the incremental loading, which must have been difficult.

I can add scheme48-0.36 to that list (using Solaris-2.4 SPARC and
gcc-2.6.3).

Martin
-- 
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Private email Martin.Cracauer@wavehh.hanse.de Fax +4940 522 8536. No NeXTMail!
"As far as I'm concerned, if something is so complicated that you can't ex-
 plain it in 10 seconds, then it's probably not worth knowing anyway" - Calvin
