Newsgroups: comp.lang.scheme
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!mwa
From: mwa@netcom.com (Mark Watson)
Subject: Q: is the "do" special form available on most scheme implementations?
Message-ID: <mwaD0AtC8.FIq@netcom.com>
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 1994 18:14:31 GMT
Lines: 15

I use MIT Scheme, which supports the "do" special form for iteration.
I wanted to write some utilities that could be used on all popular
Scheme implementations.  Is "do" fairly standard?  Years ago, for a
lark, I converted the OPS5 expert system tool to Scheme, and I used
only recursion for all forms of iteration; I would like to avoid doing
this with my new utilities.

Thanks in advance for any information!,
  Mark Watson

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Mark Watson  EMAIL: mwa@netcom.com

WWW home page: http://www.itl.saic.com/employee/mark_watson/index.html

PGP Public Encription Key (add to your local keyring:)

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: 2.6.1
 
mQBNAy6oSe0AAAECAM3qBqdZLnon5kGSo+jZXX+br2P6+NiVUZHG1qtK5mq/KaGq
PPdj5FegE36qEsaNizFk8MYHt/SbE+6j5QA2to0ABRG0H01hcmsgTC4gV2F0c29u
IDxtd2FAbmV0Y29tLmNvbT4=
=AmS8
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

--------------------------------------------------------------------
