Newsgroups: comp.lang.scheme,comp.lang.misc,gnu.misc.discuss
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!news.mathworks.com!udel!gatech!asuvax!chnews!ennews!enuxsa.eas.asu.edu!lambrech
From: lambrech@enuxsa.eas.asu.edu (Eric Lambrecht)
Subject: Re: GNU Extension Language -- Scheme compatible?
Message-ID: <CyE6HG.Ewu@ennews.eas.asu.edu>
Nntp-Posting-Host: enuxsa.eas.asu.edu
Sender: news@ennews.eas.asu.edu (USENET News System)
Organization: Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 1994 16:44:03 GMT
References: <9410190420.AA02904@mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu> <MIKEW.94Oct25140603@gopher.dosli.govt.nz> <LEWIKK.94Oct25093043@grasshopper.aud.alcatel.com> <LEEI.94Oct25102620@crazypete.ai.sri.com>
Lines: 13
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu comp.lang.scheme:10776 comp.lang.misc:18539 gnu.misc.discuss:19253

In article <LEEI.94Oct25102620@crazypete.ai.sri.com>,
Lee Iverson <leei@Crazypete.ai.sri.com> wrote:
>How about GLU, the ``GNU Language Utility'' (given that it is really
>intended to be a sort assembly language underneath a possible variety
>of faces) or the ``GNU Lisp Utility''.
>

That name is already being used by professors at my school who are
devloping 'Granular Lucid', which they call GLU. Please don't use
it... it would just cause confusion.

Eric...

