Newsgroups: comp.lang.scheme
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!MathWorks.Com!yeshua.marcam.com!charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu!olivea!uunet!sytex!smcl
From: smcl@sytex.com (Scott McLoughlin)
Subject: Re: The expense of call/cc (was R4RS)
Message-ID: <B2qqTc1w165w@sytex.com>
Sender: bbs@sytex.com
Organization: Sytex Access Ltd.
References: <36ut56$835@larry.rice.edu>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 1994 21:03:58 GMT
Lines: 12

drichter@owlnet.rice.edu (David Richter) writes:
> the same expense, but popping a frame always costs at least one
> instruction (decrement stack pointer) while garbage-collecting that
> frame (using a copying garbage collector) is (asymptotically) free.
                                               ----------------
Howdy,
        There's the rub.

=============================================
Scott McLoughlin
Conscious Computing
=============================================
