Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,comp.lang.tcl,comp.lang.scheme
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!MathWorks.Com!yeshua.marcam.com!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!twwells!bill
From: bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells)
Subject: Re: Why you should not use Tcl
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: None, Mt. Laurel, NJ
Message-ID: <Cwo56o.8tv@twwells.com>
References: <9409232314.AA29957@mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu> <19940924T224042Z.erik@naggum.no> <362ima$ofc@cmcl2.NYU.EDU> <19940925T031002Z.erik@naggum.no>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 1994 04:44:47 GMT
Lines: 17
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu gnu.misc.discuss:18218 comp.lang.tcl:19203 comp.lang.scheme:9848

In article <19940925T031002Z.erik@naggum.no>,
Erik Naggum  <erik@naggum.no> wrote:
: whatever one may think about RMS, his work or his motives, Tcl or anything
: else, it was T. William Wells' attitude that I was addressing.

Take your flaming elsewhere, Naggum. They, and your paranoid ravings, are not
appropriate to this newsgroup.

I will repeat what I told you in e-mail, which you promptly ignored: I do not
want further e-mail from you, and I have, as I told you, filed that unwanted
e-mail unread. *Do not send more e-mail*.

Folks, I've had run-ins with Naggum before. You all know the type, one who
flames and then obfuscates the issues until he "wins" because everyone gives
up in digust. Please spare us all and don't reply to his arguments. You
cannot win, not because he's right, but because he is impervious to anything
resembling logic.
