Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,comp.lang.tcl,comp.lang.scheme
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!MathWorks.Com!news.duke.edu!convex!cs.utexas.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!jussieu.fr!univ-lille1.fr!zaphod.crihan.fr!warwick!uknet!festival!edcogsci!jeff
From: jeff@aiai.ed.ac.uk (Jeff Dalton)
Subject: Re: Why you should not use Tcl
Message-ID: <Cwwp93.IsF@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Sender: usenet@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (C News Software)
Nntp-Posting-Host: bute.aiai.ed.ac.uk
Organization: AIAI, University of Edinburgh, Scotland
References: <36859k$il9@csnews.cs.Colorado.EDU> <19940927T122811Z.erik@naggum.no> <36959r$99m@erinews.ericsson.se>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 1994 19:39:02 GMT
Lines: 17
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu gnu.misc.discuss:18566 comp.lang.tcl:19658 comp.lang.scheme:10125

In article <36959r$99m@erinews.ericsson.se> etxmesa@eos.ericsson.se (Michael Salmon) writes:
>In article <19940927T122811Z.erik@naggum.no>
>Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no> writes:
>|> [Tom Christiansen]
>|> 
>|> |   He cares about truth and beauty and right and wrong in a pure,
>|> |   platonic, untarnished, and sadly, oftentimes unworkable in the real
>|> |   world we do live in.
>|> 
>|> you mean you don't care about truth and beauty and right and wrong because
>|> it is only in pure, platonic untarnished worlds that it is possible, right?
>
>Truth, beauty, right and wrong are all subjective terms. I care about
>all four but I don't see any reason to impose my definitions on the
>world.

Truth subjective?  Interesting...
