Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,comp.lang.tcl,comp.lang.scheme
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!MathWorks.Com!zombie.ncsc.mil!news.duke.edu!concert!decwrl!twwells!bill
From: bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells)
Subject: Re: Why you should not use Tcl
Organization: None, Mt. Laurel, NJ
Message-ID: <CwtHvI.Dsy@twwells.com>
References: <9409232314.AA29957@mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu> <367nsdINNa54@sbusol.rz.uni-sb.de> <CwsMDH.EDA@sunsrvr6.cci.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 1994 02:06:53 GMT
Lines: 8
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu gnu.misc.discuss:18434 comp.lang.tcl:19473 comp.lang.scheme:10028

In article <CwsMDH.EDA@sunsrvr6.cci.com>, Mike Perico <mjp@cci.com> wrote:
: You have to be kidding. Even the book written by John is hard to read.

I'm currently reviewing that book and, of the various language descriptions
I've read, it qualifies as one of the easiest reads. I don't know why you
think it difficult to read; however, if it's merely a matter of your personal
experience, I'd look to idiosyncratic reasons as opposed to the quality of
the book.
