Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!fas-news.harvard.edu!newspump.wustl.edu!news.ecn.bgu.edu!psuvax1!news.pop.psu.edu!news.cac.psu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uknet!festival!edcogsci!jeff
From: jeff@aiai.ed.ac.uk (Jeff Dalton)
Subject: Re: Modern Workstations -vs- Old Lisp Machines
Message-ID: <D5Dzoq.C0@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Sender: usenet@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (C News Software)
Nntp-Posting-Host: bute.aiai.ed.ac.uk
Organization: AIAI, University of Edinburgh, Scotland
References: <D50ADr.L8r@news2.new-york.net> <D581xq.6oL@rheged.dircon.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 1995 16:12:26 GMT
Lines: 17

In article <D581xq.6oL@rheged.dircon.co.uk> simon@rheged.dircon.co.uk (Simon Brooke) writes:
>In article <D50ADr.L8r@news2.new-york.net>,
>Michael J. Ferrador N2KRA <n2kra@starcomm.overleaf.com> wrote:
>>   How do Modern (300Mhz Alpha, and 100Mhz 601,R4X00,Pentium) machines
>>compare with Classic Lisp Workstations? Are there any modern 0.5 micron
>>100Mhz revamps of Lisp Processors?
>>
>>   What other Lisp Workstations were there, I'm only heard of Symbolics
>>and TI Explorer.
>
>Someone else has already mentioned LMI, so I won't repeat it...
>
>There was also the Xerox 1100 series [...]

You might also count the Perq/Accent/SPICE Lisp combination.

-- jd
