Newsgroups: alt.lang.design,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.lisp
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!news.mathworks.com!newshost.marcam.com!uunet!munnari.oz.au!cs.mu.OZ.AU!munta.cs.mu.OZ.AU!fjh
From: fjh@munta.cs.mu.OZ.AU (Fergus Henderson)
Subject: Re: Comparing productivity: LisP against C++ (was Re: Reference Counting)
Message-ID: <9435717.840@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>
Sender: news@cs.mu.OZ.AU
Organization: Computer Science, University of Melbourne, Australia
References: <19941203T221402Z.enag@naggum.no> <LGM.94Dec5075553@polaris.ih.att.com> <D0CLt9.6K3@research.att.com> <BUFF.94Dec15103904@pravda.world> <D0xAIp.3Dn@rheged.dircon.co.uk> <vrotneyD11MDv.Ks7@netcom.com> <D14LKq.4CJ@lcpd2.SanDiegoCA.NCR.COM> <vrotneyD15A7u.4IM@netcom.com> <D16Ho3.4BE@lcpd2.SanDiegoCA.NCR.COM> <nagleD16rtG.AH7@netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 1994 06:29:55 GMT
Lines: 9
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu comp.lang.c++:104639 comp.lang.lisp:16165

nagle@netcom.com (John Nagle) writes:

>      Is STL really going in?  It isn't in Plauger's book of the
>draft C++ Standard Library.  

Yes, it is.

-- 
Fergus Henderson - fjh@munta.cs.mu.oz.au
