CERN Accelerating science

Mass distributions for (left) $\D\kaon$ samples and (right) $\D\pi$ samples, with $\D \to \KS \pip \pim$ decays reconstructed with a (top) downstream \KS candidate and a (bottom) long \KS candidate. The projections of the fit results are overlaid. In the legend, particles in square brackets are not reconstructed.

Mass distributions for (left) $\D\kaon$ samples and (right) $\D\pi$ samples, with $\D \to \KS \pip \pim$ decays reconstructed with a (top) downstream \KS candidate and a (bottom) long \KS candidate. The projections of the fit results are overlaid. In the legend, particles in square brackets are not reconstructed.

Mass distributions for (left) $\D\kaon$ samples and (right) $\D\pi$ samples, with $\D \to \KS \pip \pim$ decays reconstructed with a (top) downstream \KS candidate and a (bottom) long \KS candidate. The projections of the fit results are overlaid. In the legend, particles in square brackets are not reconstructed.

Mass distributions for (left) $\D\kaon$ samples and (right) $\D\pi$ samples, with $\D \to \KS \pip \pim$ decays reconstructed with a (top) downstream \KS candidate and a (bottom) long \KS candidate. The projections of the fit results are overlaid. In the legend, particles in square brackets are not reconstructed.

Mass distributions for (left) $\D\kaon$ samples and (right) $\D\pi$ samples, with $\D \to \KS \pip \pim$ decays reconstructed with a (top) downstream \KS candidate and a (bottom) long \KS candidate. The projections of the fit results are overlaid. In the legend, particles in square brackets are not reconstructed.

Mass distributions for (left) $\D\kaon$ samples and (right) $\D\pi$ samples, with $\D \to \KS \pip \pim$ decays reconstructed with a (top) downstream \KS candidate and a (bottom) long \KS candidate. The projections of the fit results are overlaid. In the legend, particles in square brackets are not reconstructed.

Mass distributions for (left) $\D\kaon$ samples and (right) $\D\pi$ samples, with $\D \to \KS \pip \pim$ decays reconstructed with a (top) downstream \KS candidate and a (bottom) long \KS candidate. The projections of the fit results are overlaid. In the legend, particles in square brackets are not reconstructed.

Mass distributions for (left) $\D\kaon$ samples and (right) $\D\pi$ samples, with $\D \to \KS \pip \pim$ decays reconstructed with a (top) downstream \KS candidate and a (bottom) long \KS candidate. The projections of the fit results are overlaid. In the legend, particles in square brackets are not reconstructed.

Mass distributions for (left) $\D\kaon$ samples and (right) $\D\pi$ samples, with $\D \to \KS \Kp \Km$ decays reconstructed with a (top) downstream \KS candidate and a (bottom) long \KS candidate. The projections of the fit results are overlaid. In the legend, particles in square brackets are not reconstructed.

Mass distributions for (left) $\D\kaon$ samples and (right) $\D\pi$ samples, with $\D \to \KS \Kp \Km$ decays reconstructed with a (top) downstream \KS candidate and a (bottom) long \KS candidate. The projections of the fit results are overlaid. In the legend, particles in square brackets are not reconstructed.

Mass distributions for (left) $\D\kaon$ samples and (right) $\D\pi$ samples, with $\D \to \KS \Kp \Km$ decays reconstructed with a (top) downstream \KS candidate and a (bottom) long \KS candidate. The projections of the fit results are overlaid. In the legend, particles in square brackets are not reconstructed.

Mass distributions for (left) $\D\kaon$ samples and (right) $\D\pi$ samples, with $\D \to \KS \Kp \Km$ decays reconstructed with a (top) downstream \KS candidate and a (bottom) long \KS candidate. The projections of the fit results are overlaid. In the legend, particles in square brackets are not reconstructed.

Mass distributions for (left) $\D\kaon$ samples and (right) $\D\pi$ samples, with $\D \to \KS \Kp \Km$ decays reconstructed with a (top) downstream \KS candidate and a (bottom) long \KS candidate. The projections of the fit results are overlaid. In the legend, particles in square brackets are not reconstructed.

Mass distributions for (left) $\D\kaon$ samples and (right) $\D\pi$ samples, with $\D \to \KS \Kp \Km$ decays reconstructed with a (top) downstream \KS candidate and a (bottom) long \KS candidate. The projections of the fit results are overlaid. In the legend, particles in square brackets are not reconstructed.

Mass distributions for (left) $\D\kaon$ samples and (right) $\D\pi$ samples, with $\D \to \KS \Kp \Km$ decays reconstructed with a (top) downstream \KS candidate and a (bottom) long \KS candidate. The projections of the fit results are overlaid. In the legend, particles in square brackets are not reconstructed.

Mass distributions for (left) $\D\kaon$ samples and (right) $\D\pi$ samples, with $\D \to \KS \Kp \Km$ decays reconstructed with a (top) downstream \KS candidate and a (bottom) long \KS candidate. The projections of the fit results are overlaid. In the legend, particles in square brackets are not reconstructed.

Contours at 68.3\% and 95.5\% confidence levels indicated by the darker and lighter regions, respectively, for (left, red) $(x_{-}^{\Dstar \kaon}, y_{-}^{\Dstar \kaon})$ which is labelled $\Bm$ and (left, purple) $(x_{+}^{\Dstar \kaon}, y_{+}^{\Dstar \kaon})$ which is labelled $\Bp$, and (right) $(\Re(\xi^{\Dstar\pi}), \Im(\xi^{\Dstar \pi}))$, including only statistical uncertainty. The black points indicate the central values.

Contours at 68.3\% and 95.5\% confidence levels indicated by the darker and lighter regions, respectively, for (left, red) $(x_{-}^{\Dstar \kaon}, y_{-}^{\Dstar \kaon})$ which is labelled $\Bm$ and (left, purple) $(x_{+}^{\Dstar \kaon}, y_{+}^{\Dstar \kaon})$ which is labelled $\Bp$, and (right) $(\Re(\xi^{\Dstar\pi}), \Im(\xi^{\Dstar \pi}))$, including only statistical uncertainty. The black points indicate the central values.

Confidence intervals at 68.3\% and 95.5\% for the CKM angle \g.

Confidence intervals at 68.3\% and 95.5\% for the CKM angle \g.

Confidence regions at 68.3\% and 95.5\% indicated by the lighter and darker shades respectively, for (top, left) \g vs. $r_{B}^{\Dstar\kaon}$, (top, right) \g vs. $\delta_{B}^{\Dstar\kaon}$, (bottom left) \g vs. $r_{B}^{\Dstar\pi}$, and (bottom, right) \g vs. $\delta_{B}^{\Dstar\pi}$.

Confidence regions at 68.3\% and 95.5\% indicated by the lighter and darker shades respectively, for (top, left) \g vs. $r_{B}^{\Dstar\kaon}$, (top, right) \g vs. $\delta_{B}^{\Dstar\kaon}$, (bottom left) \g vs. $r_{B}^{\Dstar\pi}$, and (bottom, right) \g vs. $\delta_{B}^{\Dstar\pi}$.

Confidence regions at 68.3\% and 95.5\% indicated by the lighter and darker shades respectively, for (top, left) \g vs. $r_{B}^{\Dstar\kaon}$, (top, right) \g vs. $\delta_{B}^{\Dstar\kaon}$, (bottom left) \g vs. $r_{B}^{\Dstar\pi}$, and (bottom, right) \g vs. $\delta_{B}^{\Dstar\pi}$.

Confidence regions at 68.3\% and 95.5\% indicated by the lighter and darker shades respectively, for (top, left) \g vs. $r_{B}^{\Dstar\kaon}$, (top, right) \g vs. $\delta_{B}^{\Dstar\kaon}$, (bottom left) \g vs. $r_{B}^{\Dstar\pi}$, and (bottom, right) \g vs. $\delta_{B}^{\Dstar\pi}$.

Confidence regions at 68.3\% and 95.5\% indicated by the lighter and darker shades respectively, for (top, left) \g vs. $r_{B}^{\Dstar\kaon}$, (top, right) \g vs. $\delta_{B}^{\Dstar\kaon}$, (bottom left) \g vs. $r_{B}^{\Dstar\pi}$, and (bottom, right) \g vs. $\delta_{B}^{\Dstar\pi}$.

Confidence regions at 68.3\% and 95.5\% indicated by the lighter and darker shades respectively, for (top, left) \g vs. $r_{B}^{\Dstar\kaon}$, (top, right) \g vs. $\delta_{B}^{\Dstar\kaon}$, (bottom left) \g vs. $r_{B}^{\Dstar\pi}$, and (bottom, right) \g vs. $\delta_{B}^{\Dstar\pi}$.

Confidence regions at 68.3\% and 95.5\% indicated by the lighter and darker shades respectively, for (top, left) \g vs. $r_{B}^{\Dstar\kaon}$, (top, right) \g vs. $\delta_{B}^{\Dstar\kaon}$, (bottom left) \g vs. $r_{B}^{\Dstar\pi}$, and (bottom, right) \g vs. $\delta_{B}^{\Dstar\pi}$.

Confidence regions at 68.3\% and 95.5\% indicated by the lighter and darker shades respectively, for (top, left) \g vs. $r_{B}^{\Dstar\kaon}$, (top, right) \g vs. $\delta_{B}^{\Dstar\kaon}$, (bottom left) \g vs. $r_{B}^{\Dstar\pi}$, and (bottom, right) \g vs. $\delta_{B}^{\Dstar\pi}$.