Charged jet cross section and fragmentation in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV
- Acharya, Shreyasi et al
- arXiv:1809.03232CERN-EP-2018-235
 | Top panel: inclusive charged jet cross section compared to POWHEG + PYTHIA8 NLO pQCD calculations with and without MPI. In data and calculations, the Underlying Event contribution is subtracted. Bottom panel: ratio of POWHEG calculations to data. The shaded bands indicate systematic uncertainties on data and theory predictions. |
 | Left panel: Charged particle scaled \pt{} spectra $F^{z}(z^{\rm ch},p_{\rm T}^{\rm ch \; jet})$ for different bins in jet transverse momentum. Right panel: Ratio of MC distributions to data. The shaded band shows the systematic uncertainty on the data drawn at unity. Error bars represent the statistical uncertainties. |
 | Left panel: Charged particle scaled \pt{} spectra $F^{z}(z^{\rm ch},p_{\rm T}^{\rm ch \; jet})$ for different bins in jet transverse momentum. Right panel: Ratio of MC distributions to data. The shaded band shows the systematic uncertainty on the data drawn at unity. Error bars represent the statistical uncertainties. |
 | Top panel: inclusive charged jet cross section in pp collisions at $\rm{\sqrt{s}=7}$~TeV using the anti-$k_{\rm T}$ algorithm with $R$~=~0.4 compared to calculations from PYTHIA6 Perugia-2011 and PYTHIA8 tune Monash. Bottom panel: ratios of MC distributions to data. The shaded band shows the systematic uncertainty on the data drawn at unity, error bars represent the statistical uncertainties. Most uncertainties are smaller than the marker size. |