thanks for answering my questions: the second version of the paper looks good.
I have still few points:
-L 205-207 : single side fake J/Psi background. In the previous answer you say that this is the standards way in J/Psi fits. I understand that these "fake J/Psi" are indeed genuine J/Psi, but not related to a decay from a B-particle. My question is: what is the origin of these J/Psi: are they the decay product of other particles with a significant life time to generate a "single sided" distribution?
-L 253 and following: :construction of BDT to discriminate the fake muons: I am wondering that if the kinematic variables to build the BDT are correlated too much, the resulting discriminating power could be spoiled.
-L567-567-568: "For the b+c hadron estimation the systematic uncertainty ranges from below1% up to 9% depending on the kinematic region." But what is the overall Bc background systematic uncertainty to the cross section yield.
Dear authors,
thanks for answering my questions: the second version of the paper looks good.
I have still few points:
-L 205-207 : single side fake J/Psi background. In the previous answer you say that this is the standards way in J/Psi fits. I understand that these "fake J/Psi" are indeed genuine J/Psi, but not related to a decay from a B-particle. My question is: what is the origin of these J/Psi: are they the decay product of other particles with a significant life time to generate a "single sided" distribution?
-L 253 and following: :construction of BDT to discriminate the fake muons: I am wondering that if the kinematic variables to build the BDT are correlated too much, the resulting discriminating power could be spoiled.
-L567-567-568: "For the b+c hadron estimation the systematic uncertainty ranges from below1% up to 9% depending on the kinematic region." But what is the overall Bc background systematic uncertainty to the cross section yield.
Thanks, Vincenzo
Thanks, Vincenzo