001700212 001__ 1700212
001700212 003__ SzGeCERN
001700212 005__ 20210715025642.0
001700212 0248_ $$aoai:cds.cern.ch:1700212$$pcerncds:FULLTEXT$$pcerncds:CERN:FULLTEXT$$pcerncds:CERN
001700212 035__ $$9arXiv$$aoai:arXiv.org:1405.1617
001700212 035__ $$9Inspire$$a1294778
001700212 037__ $$9arXiv$$aarXiv:1405.1617$$chep-ph
001700212 041__ $$aeng
001700212 100__ $$aBrooijmans, G.$$uColumbia U.
001700212 245__ $$aLes Houches 2013: Physics at TeV Colliders: New Physics Working Group Report
001700212 269__ $$c07 May 2014
001700212 260__ $$c2014
001700212 300__ $$a201 p
001700212 500__ $$aComments: Proceedings of the New Physics Working Group of the 2013 Les Houches Workshop, Physics at TeV Colliders, Les Houches 3-21 June 2013. 201 pages
001700212 500__ $$9arXiv$$aProceedings of the New Physics Working Group of the 2013 Les Houches Workshop, Physics at TeV Colliders, Les Houches 3-21 June 2013. 201 pages
001700212 520__ $$aWe present the activities of the "New Physics" working group for the "Physics at TeV Colliders" workshop (Les Houches, France, 3--21 June, 2013). Our report includes new computational tool developments, studies of the implications of the Higgs boson discovery on new physics, important signatures for searches for natural new physics at the LHC, new studies of flavour aspects of new physics, and assessments of the interplay between direct dark matter searches and the LHC.
001700212 520__ $$9arXiv$$aWe present the activities of the "New Physics" working group for the "Physics at TeV Colliders" workshop (Les Houches, France, 3--21 June, 2013). Our report includes new computational tool developments, studies of the implications of the Higgs boson discovery on new physics, important signatures for searches for natural new physics at the LHC, new studies of flavour aspects of new physics, and assessments of the interplay between direct dark matter searches and the LHC.
001700212 540__ $$aarXiv nonexclusive-distrib. 1.0$$barXiv$$uhttp://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
001700212 595__ $$aLANL EDS
001700212 65017 $$2arXiv$$aParticle Physics - Phenomenology
001700212 690C_ $$aPREPRINT
001700212 690C_ $$aCERN
001700212 695__ $$9LANL EDS$$ahep-ph
001700212 700__ $$aContino, R.$$uCERN$$uITPP, Lausanne
001700212 700__ $$aFuks, B.$$uStrasbourg, IPHC$$uCERN
001700212 700__ $$aMoortgat, F.$$uCERN
001700212 700__ $$aRichardson, P.
001700212 700__ $$aSekmen, S.$$uCERN
001700212 700__ $$aWeiler, A.$$uCERN
001700212 700__ $$aAlloul, A.
001700212 700__ $$aArbey, A.$$uLyon, IPN$$uLyon, Ecole Normale Superieure$$uLyon U.$$uLyon Observ.$$uCERN
001700212 700__ $$aBaglio, J.$$uKIT, Karlsruhe, TP
001700212 700__ $$aBarducci, D.$$uSouthampton U.$$uRutherford
001700212 700__ $$aBarr, A.J.
001700212 700__ $$aBasso, L.$$uSouthampton U.$$uRutherford
001700212 700__ $$aBattaglia, M.$$uUC, Santa Cruz$$uCERN
001700212 700__ $$aBélanger, G.$$uCarleton U.
001700212 700__ $$aBelyaev, A.$$uSouthampton U.$$uRutherford
001700212 700__ $$aBernon, J.
001700212 700__ $$aBharucha, A.$$uHamburg U., Inst. Theor. Phys. II
001700212 700__ $$aBondu, O.$$uCERN
001700212 700__ $$aBoudjema, F.$$uSussex U.
001700212 700__ $$aBoos, E.$$uIPT, Kazakstan
001700212 700__ $$aBuchkremer, M.$$uLouvain U., CP3
001700212 700__ $$aBunichev, V.$$uMoscow State U.
001700212 700__ $$aCacciapaglia, G.$$uLyon, IPN$$uLyon U.
001700212 700__ $$aChalons, G.$$uKIT, Karlsruhe, TTP
001700212 700__ $$aConte, E.$$uStrasbourg, IPHC$$uLouis Pasteur U., Strasbourg I$$uHaute Alsace U.
001700212 700__ $$aDolan, M.J.
001700212 700__ $$aDeandrea, A.$$uLyon, IPN$$uLyon U.
001700212 700__ $$aDe Causmaecker, K.$$uCERN
001700212 700__ $$aDjouadi, A.$$uOrsay, LPT
001700212 700__ $$aDumont, B.$$uLPSC, Grenoble
001700212 700__ $$aEllis, J.$$uKing's Coll. London$$uCERN
001700212 700__ $$aEnglert, C.$$uGlasgow U.
001700212 700__ $$aFalkowski, A.$$uOrsay, LPT
001700212 700__ $$aFichet, S.$$uRio Grande do Norte U.$$uIIP, Brazil
001700212 700__ $$aFlacke, T.
001700212 700__ $$aGaz, A.$$uColorado U.
001700212 700__ $$aGhezzi, M.$$uRome U.$$uINFN, Rome
001700212 700__ $$aGodbole, R.$$uBangalore, Indian Inst. Sci.
001700212 700__ $$aGoudelis, A.$$uAnnecy, LAPTH
001700212 700__ $$aGouzevitch, M.$$uCERN
001700212 700__ $$aGreco, D.$$uITPP, Lausanne
001700212 700__ $$aGrober, R.$$uKIT, Karlsruhe
001700212 700__ $$aGrojean, C.$$uCERN
001700212 700__ $$aGuadagnoli, D.$$uAnnecy, LAPTH
001700212 700__ $$aGunion, J.F.
001700212 700__ $$aHerrmann, B.$$uAnnecy, LAPTH
001700212 700__ $$aKalinowski, J.$$uWarsaw U.
001700212 700__ $$aKim, J.H.
001700212 700__ $$aKraml, S.$$uLPSC, Grenoble
001700212 700__ $$aKrauss, M.E.
001700212 700__ $$aKulkarni, S.
001700212 700__ $$aLee, S.J.
001700212 700__ $$aLim, S.H.
001700212 700__ $$aLiu, D.$$uITPP, Lausanne$$uBeijing, Inst. Theor. Phys.
001700212 700__ $$aMahmoudi, F.$$uCERN$$uClermont-Ferrand U.
001700212 700__ $$aMaravin, Y.$$uKansas State U.
001700212 700__ $$aMassironi, A.
001700212 700__ $$aMitzka, L.
001700212 700__ $$aMohan, K.$$uBangalore, Indian Inst. Sci.
001700212 700__ $$aMoreau, G.$$uOrsay, LPT
001700212 700__ $$aMühlleitner, M.M.
001700212 700__ $$aNhung, D.T.
001700212 700__ $$aO'Leary, B.
001700212 700__ $$aOliveira, A.$$uUnlisted, PT
001700212 700__ $$aPanizzi, L.$$uRutherford$$uSouthampton U.
001700212 700__ $$aPappadopulo, D.$$uLBL, Berkeley$$uUC, Berkeley
001700212 700__ $$aPataraia, S.$$uWuppertal U.
001700212 700__ $$aPorod, W.$$uWurzburg U.
001700212 700__ $$aPukhov, A.$$uFachhochschule Dusseldorf$$uNizhnii Novgorod State U.
001700212 700__ $$aRiva, F.$$uITPP, Lausanne
001700212 700__ $$aRojo, J.$$uCERN
001700212 700__ $$aRosenfeld, R.$$uChicago U.$$uChicago U., EFI
001700212 700__ $$aRuiz-Álvarez, J.
001700212 700__ $$aRzehak, H.$$uFreiburg U.
001700212 700__ $$aSanz, V.$$uSussex U., Astron. Ctr.$$uYork U., Canada
001700212 700__ $$aSengupta, D.$$uTata Inst.
001700212 700__ $$aSpannowsky, M.$$uDurham U.$$uDurham U., IPPP
001700212 700__ $$aSpira, M.$$uPSI, Villigen
001700212 700__ $$aStreicher, J.$$uKIT, Karlsruhe, TP
001700212 700__ $$aStrobbe, N.$$uGent U.
001700212 700__ $$aThamm, A.$$uITPP, Lausanne
001700212 700__ $$aThomas, M.
001700212 700__ $$aTorre, R.
001700212 700__ $$aWaltenberger, W.$$uVienna, OAW
001700212 700__ $$aWalz, K.$$uKIT, Karlsruhe, TP
001700212 700__ $$aWilcock, A.
001700212 700__ $$aWulzer, A.$$uINFN, Padua$$uPadua U.$$uZurich, ETH
001700212 700__ $$aWürthwein, F.$$uUC, San Diego
001700212 700__ $$aWymant, C.$$uDurham U.
001700212 8564_ $$uhttp://arxiv.org/pdf/1405.1617.pdf$$yPreprint
001700212 8564_ $$81341392$$s11584$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vlq_Exclusion_Combined_NoOverflow_LesHouches.png$$y00056 The exclusion plots for partners of the $u,d,s,c$ and $b$ quark (curves from right to left) within sample Model I. Left: 95\% CL exclusion limits including the signal bins of Ref.~\cite{ATLAS-CONF-2013-072}. Right: Would-be 95\% CL exclusion limits when both signal and overflow bin data of Ref.~\cite{ATLAS-CONF-2013-072} is included in the analysis. The parameter region to the top-left region from the respective curve is excluded at 95\% CL. For reference, the gray region in each of the plots shows $\Gamma / M > 1/2$ and the coupling above which the narrow-width-approximation does not apply anymore. Ref.~\cite{Flacke:2013fya} did not search through this region.
001700212 8564_ $$81341393$$s9155$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/cpvmssm_Mh3_cmssm_bf.png$$y00081 Distributions of the $h_1$ (left), $h_2$ (center) and $h_3$ (right) Higgs masses for the CMSSM (top), and NUHM1 (bottom) in the best-fit benchmark scenarios \emph{before} applying the EDM constraints.
001700212 8564_ $$81341394$$s31990$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/hcouplings_hfit-CMS_Comp_CF_CV.png$$y00004 Left plot: Fit of $C_V$ and $C_F$. The dashed lines are the 68\% and 95.4\% CL contours as reported by the CMS collaboration in Fig.~6 of Ref.~\cite{CMS-PAS-HIG-13-005}, while the red, orange and yellow regions are the 68\%, 95.4\% and 99.7\% CL regions of our fit. Middle plot: Fit of $C_{WZ}$ while $C_Z$ and $C_F>0$ are profiled over with comparison to the CMS fit, Fig.~7 of Ref.~\cite{CMS-PAS-HIG-13-005}. Right plot: Fit of $C_{WZ}$ while $C_Z$ and $C_F$ are profiled over with comparison to the ATLAS fit, Fig.~11 of Ref.~\cite{Aad:2013wqa}.
001700212 8564_ $$81341395$$s17215$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/tth-lh-proc_final_Figs_tthplot-pp.png$$y00030 (Left panel) The invariant-mass distribution of the $\tth$ system, normalized to unity. (Right panel) The differential cross-section with respect to the invariant mass distribution of the $\tth$ system.
001700212 8564_ $$81341396$$s6732$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/cpvmssm_Mh1_cmssm_bf.png$$y00080 Distributions of the $h_1$ (left), $h_2$ (center) and $h_3$ (right) Higgs masses for the CMSSM (top), and NUHM1 (bottom) in the best-fit benchmark scenarios \emph{before} applying the EDM constraints.
001700212 8564_ $$81341397$$s34541$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vbsh_figures_wlwl_hist_theta_star_cut_0_9_WithM4Cut_1_5ab.png$$y00027 The $\cos(\theta^*)$ distribution for $pp\to jj Z Z \to e^+ e^- \mu^+ \mu^- j j$ process for 1.5 ab$^{-1}$ @LHC13TEV for four different sets of cuts: a) (top-left)$|\cos(\theta_V)|<0.9$; b) (top-right)$|\cos(\theta_V)|<0.5$; c)(bottom-left) $|\cos(\theta_V)|<0.9$ and $M_{4l}>500$~GeV d)(bottom-right) $|\cos(\theta_V)|<0.5$ and $M_{4l}>500$~GeV.$pp\to jj Z Z \to e^+ e^- \mu^+ \mu^- j j$
001700212 8564_ $$81341398$$s192572$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vbsh_figures_wlwl_WWZZ_cut.png$$y00016 Total $W^+ W^- \to ZZ$ without cuts (left plot) and with $|\cos(\theta_Z)|<0.9$ (right plot) as a function of center-of-mass energy $\sqrt{s}$ and anomalous coupling $c_V$.
001700212 8564_ $$81341399$$s203744$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vbsh_figures_wlwl_WWZZ_nocut.png$$y00015 Total $W^+ W^- \to ZZ$ without cuts (left plot) and with $|\cos(\theta_Z)|<0.9$ (right plot) as a function of center-of-mass energy $\sqrt{s}$ and anomalous coupling $c_V$.
001700212 8564_ $$81341400$$s108116$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/nsusy_nsusy-mstop_mlsp_allowed_combined.png$$y00060 Simplified Models results, obtained with {\sc SModelS}, for the scan with $m_{\tilde g}=2$~TeV described in Section~\ref{sec:nsusy-scan_parameters}. Excluded mass combinations are marked by a red star, while combinations that are not excluded for at least one combination of the scanned parameters are marked by a blue point. In the $\tilde\chi^0_1$ versus $\tilde t_1$ mass plane (left panel), the results are presented for 3 stop mixing angles, with a small offset introduced in the stop mass to make the points visible. For each ($\tilde t_1$,\,$\tilde\chi^0_1$) mass combination, the connected points thus represent, from left to right, a pure $\tilde t_L$, a mixed $\tilde t_{LR}$ and a pure $\tilde t_R$ ($\theta_{\tilde t} = 0, 45, 90$\,deg). The results in the $\tilde b_1$ versus $\tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane (right panel) depend less on the bottom mixing angle, thus $\theta_{\tilde b}$ is marginalized over.
001700212 8564_ $$81341401$$s8055$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vlq_CrossSection_pcomp_14TeV_1_PartnerPairProd_LesHouches.png$$y00051 Production cross section for a pair of vector-like quark partners in Model I as a function of the partners' mass $M$ for LHC at $8 \mathrm{ TeV}$ (left) and $14 \mathrm{ TeV}$ (right). The first two lines from the top correspond to the pair production cross section with $\kappa_H V^{4i}_R=v/M$ for partners of the up (red) and down (orange), while the third line (black) denotes the QCD pair production cross section. The non-QCD pair production cross sections for partners of the $s,c$ and $b$ quarks are PDF suppressed. Thus, the pair production cross section for these quark partners is to a good approximation given by the QCD pair production cross section.
001700212 8564_ $$81341402$$s34025$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/hcouplings_hfit-CWZ_updated.png$$y00009 1-dimensional fit of $C_{WZ}$ for three different choices of fermionic couplings; when free, $C_U$ and $C_D$ are profiled over.
001700212 8564_ $$81341403$$s101600$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/nsusy_nsusy-msbot_mlsp_045.png$$y00061 Simplified Models results, obtained with {\sc SModelS}, for the scan with $m_{\tilde g}=2$~TeV described in Section~\ref{sec:nsusy-scan_parameters}. Excluded mass combinations are marked by a red star, while combinations that are not excluded for at least one combination of the scanned parameters are marked by a blue point. In the $\tilde\chi^0_1$ versus $\tilde t_1$ mass plane (left panel), the results are presented for 3 stop mixing angles, with a small offset introduced in the stop mass to make the points visible. For each ($\tilde t_1$,\,$\tilde\chi^0_1$) mass combination, the connected points thus represent, from left to right, a pure $\tilde t_L$, a mixed $\tilde t_{LR}$ and a pure $\tilde t_R$ ($\theta_{\tilde t} = 0, 45, 90$\,deg). The results in the $\tilde b_1$ versus $\tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane (right panel) depend less on the bottom mixing angle, thus $\theta_{\tilde b}$ is marginalized over.
001700212 8564_ $$81341404$$s32659$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vlq_LesHouches.png$$y00046 \small \it Reconstructed $T$ mass for the signal sample.
001700212 8564_ $$81341405$$s34912$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/hcouplings_hfit-CZGamma.png$$y00014 Fit of ${\rm Re}(C_U)$, ${\rm Im}(C_U)$ and $C_V$ shown in the $\left(\Gamma_{ \gamma\gamma}/\Gamma_{\gamma\gamma}^{\rm SM}, \ \Gamma_{Z\gamma}/\Gamma_{Z\gamma}^{\rm SM} \right)$ plane. The red, orange and yellow regions are the 68\%, 95.4\% and 99.7\% CL regions, respectively. The yellow triangle marks the best fit point, while the white point is the SM expectation. Overlaid are for comparison the 68\% (dashed black), 95.4\% (dashed dark gray) and 99.7\% (dashed light gray) CL contours for the CP-conserving case with ${\rm Im}(C_U)=0$.
001700212 8564_ $$81341406$$s26853$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vlq_Nb.png$$y00041 Leading order kinematical distributions for the light jets multiplicity (top left), the light jets transverse momentum (bottom left), the $b$-jets multiplicity (top right) and the $b$-jets transverse momentum (bottom right), in the three- and four-lepton channels, for an integrated luminosity of 20 fb$^{-1}$\ at the LHC\ 14\ TeV. The total expected numbers of event is plotted for the $T$ singlet (red) and $(X,T)$ doublet (blue) signal models, versus the backgrounds (black), after imposing the standard cuts.
001700212 8564_ $$81341407$$s43280$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/nmssmcalc_nmssmcalc_fig1.png$$y00000 Left: Higgs boson masses $M_{H_2}$ (red/light grey) and $M_{H_3}$ (blue/dark grey) as function of $\mathrm{Im}(\kappa)$ at LO (dashed) and NLO (full). Right: The amount of CP-violation $r^i_{\mathrm{CP}}$ for $H_2$ (red/light grey) and $H_3$ (blue/dark grey) as function of $\mathrm{Im} (\kappa)$.
001700212 8564_ $$81341408$$s7729$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/lrmssm_lrmssm_fig_nuRmu.png$$y00070 Bounds on the cross section $\sigma (p p \to W_R \to \nu_R \ell \to jj \ell \ell)$ at $\sqrt{s}=8~$TeV for $m_{\nu_R} = \frac12 M_{W_R}$ considering $\sigma \cdot BR(j j\mu\mu)$ only (left) and for the case that all three right-handed neutrinos are degenerate in mass (right). Our curves have been obtained from the results given in Ref.~\cite{CMS-PAS-EXO-12-017}. The same two parameter points as in Fig.~\ref{lrmssm_fig_2bound}, but with adjusted masses for the right-handed neutrinos, are shown, and the vev $v_R$ has been varied from 3~TeV to 6~TeV. The black solid and dashed lines depict the calculated cross sections for the two parameter choices as in Fig.~\ref{lrmssm_fig_1bound}, and we note that for the parameter choice depicted by the solid black line, the two-body decay into a chargino and a slepton opens at $m_{\nu_R} \approx 1~$TeV.
001700212 8564_ $$81341409$$s26472$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/nmfvsusy_delta_ms2.png$$y00078 Caption not extracted
001700212 8564_ $$81341410$$s26464$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/nmfvsusy_delta_ms1.png$$y00074 Caption not extracted
001700212 8564_ $$81341411$$s10131$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vbfhh_CX_gluglu_VBF.png$$y00096 Production cross section of KK-graviton (in pb) as a function of its mass with at the LHC13 with $\tilde{\kappa} = 0.1$ for the GF (dashed green line) and VBF (solid red line) processes.
001700212 8564_ $$81341412$$s28687$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vlq_VLQ_fig_3l.png$$y00047 Plots for signal: (top-left) $W$-boson reconstruction: transverse mass of 1 lepton; (top-right) $Z$-boson reconstruction: invariant mass of pair of lepton closest in value to $M_Z$; (bottom-left) top reconstruction: transverse mass of $W$-boson and $b$-quark; (bottom-right) $T'$ reconstruction: transverse mass of $b-$quark and all 3 leptons.
001700212 8564_ $$81341413$$s44883$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vbfhh_RadMass_ct4.png$$y00101 Parton level distributions of reconstructed objects with no cuts applied. Distributions are shape normalized. {\bf Left:} Leading reconstructed Higgs. {\bf Right:} Reconstructed bulk KK-graviton. Those distributions are only for illustration.
001700212 8564_ $$81341414$$s10936$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/compressed_compressed_fig1.png$$y00058 Left: $W$-boson transverse mass distribution $m_T^W$, as defined in Eq.~\eqref{eq:compressed_mtw}, for surviving background contributions and the example signal scenario of Section~\ref{sec:compressed_simulation} after all selection criteria have been applied, excepted $m_T^W > 120 \GeV$. Right: LHC sensitivity to SUSY monotop signals in the $(m_{\tilde{t}_1},m_{\tilde{\chi}_1^0})$ plane with $m_{\tilde{t}_1}=m_{\tilde{g}}$. We superimpose a previous exclusion bound set by an ATLAS analysis searching for stops decaying into a charm quark and the lightest neutralino using monojet events.
001700212 8564_ $$81341415$$s8588$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/compressed_compressed_fig2.png$$y00059 Left: $W$-boson transverse mass distribution $m_T^W$, as defined in Eq.~\eqref{eq:compressed_mtw}, for surviving background contributions and the example signal scenario of Section~\ref{sec:compressed_simulation} after all selection criteria have been applied, excepted $m_T^W > 120 \GeV$. Right: LHC sensitivity to SUSY monotop signals in the $(m_{\tilde{t}_1},m_{\tilde{\chi}_1^0})$ plane with $m_{\tilde{t}_1}=m_{\tilde{g}}$. We superimpose a previous exclusion bound set by an ATLAS analysis searching for stops decaying into a charm quark and the lightest neutralino using monojet events.
001700212 8564_ $$81341416$$s10109$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vlq_CrossSection_pcomp_8TeV_1_PartnerSingleProd_LesHouches.png$$y00052 Production cross section for a single $T$ as a function of its mass $M$ for LHC at $8 \mathrm{TeV}$ (left) and $14 \mathrm{TeV}$ (right). Lines denote (from right to left): Single production cross section with $\kappa_H V^{4i}_R=v/M$ for partners of the $u,d,s,c,b$ quark.
001700212 8564_ $$81341417$$s41464$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/hcouplings_hfit-results_Grid_CUCDCWCZ_updated_3_4.png$$y00008 $C_W, C_Z$ fit assuming $C_U=C_D=1$ (left) and varying $C_U, C_D>0$ (right). The red, orange and yellow regions are respectively the 68\%, 95.4\%, and 99.7\% CL regions. The white point shows the SM expectation while the yellow triangle shows the best-fit point: ($C_W=0.980,\, C_Z=1.102$) (left) and ($C_W=1.061,\, C_Z=1.143$) (right).
001700212 8564_ $$81341418$$s34332$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vlq_PTj1.png$$y00042 Leading order kinematical distributions for the light jets multiplicity (top left), the light jets transverse momentum (bottom left), the $b$-jets multiplicity (top right) and the $b$-jets transverse momentum (bottom right), in the three- and four-lepton channels, for an integrated luminosity of 20 fb$^{-1}$\ at the LHC\ 14\ TeV. The total expected numbers of event is plotted for the $T$ singlet (red) and $(X,T)$ doublet (blue) signal models, versus the backgrounds (black), after imposing the standard cuts.
001700212 8564_ $$81341419$$s13681$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vbfhh_BulkGravitonBRcomp.png$$y00097 Branching ratios for bulk KK-graviton assuming no coupling with top quark. The solid lines represent analytical calculations and the dots are the numerical results from the model implementation.
001700212 8564_ $$81341420$$s6482$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/cpvmssm_Mh1_nuhm1_bf.png$$y00082 Distributions of the $h_1$ (left), $h_2$ (center) and $h_3$ (right) Higgs masses for the CMSSM (top), and NUHM1 (bottom) in the best-fit benchmark scenarios \emph{before} applying the EDM constraints.
001700212 8564_ $$81341421$$s8195983$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/arXiv:1405.1617.pdf
001700212 8564_ $$81341422$$s48458$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vbfhh_H1hist.png$$y00100 Parton level distributions of reconstructed objects with no cuts applied. Distributions are shape normalized. {\bf Left:} Leading reconstructed Higgs. {\bf Right:} Reconstructed bulk KK-graviton. Those distributions are only for illustration.
001700212 8564_ $$81341423$$s74977$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vlq_FeynmanDiagrams.png$$y00039 Representative $T\bar{T}$ and $X\bar{X}$\ pair-production channels to three-lepton (left, middle) and four-lepton (right) final states in non-exclusive mixing scenarios (e.g., with $R_{L}>0$ ).
001700212 8564_ $$81341424$$s16954$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/tth-lh-proc_final_Figs_tthplot-sig.png$$y00031 (Left panel) The invariant-mass distribution of the $\tth$ system, normalized to unity. (Right panel) The differential cross-section with respect to the invariant mass distribution of the $\tth$ system.
001700212 8564_ $$81341425$$s15266$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/tth-lh-proc_final_Figs_delphill_tt.png$$y00032 Difference in the azimuthal angles of the lepton momenta, with the $\ell^+$ momentum evaluated in the rest frame of the top quark and the $\ell^-$ momentum evaluated in the rest frame of the anti-top quark.
001700212 8564_ $$81341426$$s15110$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/hh_plot_pt_norm.png$$y00037 Comparison of the inclusive Higgs transverse momentum spectrum for different values of $\xi$, a total $K$ factor estimate is included~\cite{Baglio:2012np}. We also show a shape-comparison in the right panel. It demonstrates the standard lore of composite scenarios: there are large deviations when the characteristic new physics scale starts to get resolved.
001700212 8564_ $$81341427$$s20469$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/htheo_HiggsfitTH_CombMargND.png$$y00002 The $68.27\%$, $95.45\%$, $99.73\%$ confidence level (CL) (from marginalized frequentist likelihoods) and Bayesian credible (from posteriors) regions are shown respectively as colored regions and contour levels in the $(c_V,c_f)$ plane. The green point is the frequentist best-fit location. Left and right panels respectively correspond to the flat and Gaussian prior case. The SM prediction point is also displayed [in red].
001700212 8564_ $$81341428$$s18145$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/nsusy_nsusy-pTleadingbjet.png$$y00064 Distributions of the kinematic variable $M^W_{T2}$ and the $p_T$ of the leading $b$-tagged jet after preselection cuts of the analysis CMS-SUS-13-011. The solid lines correspond to the CMS results, given in Figure~2 of Ref.~\cite{Chatrchyan:2013xna}, while the dashed lines are obtained from our re-interpretation within {\sc MadAnalysis}\,5.
001700212 8564_ $$81341429$$s12952$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/dmeft_plotR1.png$$y00093 Constraints obtained for the $R_1$ (left panel) and $R_3$ (right panel) operators in the spin-independent scattering cross section vs.\ WIMP mass plane. The preliminary results for monojet searches at 8, 14 and 100~TeV are compared to the current LUX 90\% C.L. upper limits and the expected reach of the future LZ experiment. The constraint derived from relic dark matter density and the limit of validity of the EFT approach are also shown.
001700212 8564_ $$81341430$$s67702$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/hcouplings_hfit-results_Grid_LH_5CPV_05_updated_1_2.png$$y00013 68\% (red), 95.4\% (orange) and 99.7\% (yellow) CL best-fit regions in the $\big( {\rm Re}(C_U), \ {\rm Im}(C_U)\big)$ plane, on the left for fit ii) with $C_V\equiv C_W=C_Z$, on the right for fit iii) with free $C_W$ and $C_Z$. The white point shows the SM expectation while the yellow triangle shows the best-fit point.
001700212 8564_ $$81341431$$s6319$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/nsusy_nsusy-flowchart.png$$y00065 Schematic depiction of the programs used in the production chain.
001700212 8564_ $$81341432$$s78661$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vlq_THT.png$$y00045 \small \it LEFT: pseudorapidity $\eta$ of the associated light jet at parton level. RIGHT: total hadronic energy for backgrounds (stacked) and signal (overimposed).
001700212 8564_ $$81341433$$s23660$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/lrmssm_lrmssm_fig_nuRbrScatter.png$$y00068 Branching ratios of the right-handed neutrino as a function of the mass difference to the lightest charged Higgs state (left) and the corresponding cross section of the respective neutrino state produced by a $W_R$-resonance (right), using the PDF set {\sc CTEQ6L1} as in Ref.~\cite{CMS-PAS-EXO-12-017} and a $K$-factor of 1.3. Blue points depict cases where the right-handed neutrino $\nu_R$ decays to a $\ell H^\pm_1$ state, with the charged Higgs boson $H^\pm_1$ further decaying to a $tb$ final state, whereas green (red) points represent cases where it decays into a $\ell j j\, (tb)$ state mediated by an intermediate off-shell $W_R$-boson. The parameters have been varied within the ranges $3.8\leq v_R/\text{TeV}\leq 4.3,~-1 \leq \lambda_{s/L/R} \leq 1,~-0.1 \leq \lambda_{12} \leq 0.1,~200 \leq M_{2L/2R}/\text{GeV} \leq 900,~0 < M_1/\text{GeV} \leq 500,~4 \leq \tan \beta \leq 15$. The mass of the charged Higgs boson $H_1^\pm$ lies in the range of $180 < m_{H_1^\pm}/\mbox{GeV}<320$. Let us note that the branching fractions shown do not always add to 1 for some parameter points due to three-body decays into $\ell \tilde \chi^\pm \tilde \chi^0$ states that are kinematically accessible.
001700212 8564_ $$81341434$$s34042$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vbsh_figures_wlwl_hist_theta_star_cut_0_5_WithM4Cut_1_5ab.png$$y00028 The $\cos(\theta^*)$ distribution for $pp\to jj Z Z \to e^+ e^- \mu^+ \mu^- j j$ process for 1.5 ab$^{-1}$ @LHC13TEV for four different sets of cuts: a) (top-left)$|\cos(\theta_V)|<0.9$; b) (top-right)$|\cos(\theta_V)|<0.5$; c)(bottom-left) $|\cos(\theta_V)|<0.9$ and $M_{4l}>500$~GeV d)(bottom-right) $|\cos(\theta_V)|<0.5$ and $M_{4l}>500$~GeV.$pp\to jj Z Z \to e^+ e^- \mu^+ \mu^- j j$
001700212 8564_ $$81341435$$s8650$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vlq_CrossSection_pcomp_8TeV_1_HiggsPairProd_LesHouches.png$$y00054 Production cross section for two Higgses via $t$-channel exchange of a $T$ quark for LHC at $8 \mathrm{TeV}$ (left) and $14\mathrm{TeV}$ (right). Lines denote (from right to left): Cross section with $\kappa_H V^{4i}_R=v/M$ for the exchange of $u,d,s,c,b$ quark partners.
001700212 8564_ $$81341436$$s190370$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/nsusy_nsusy-mstop_msbot_combined.png$$y00062 Same as Figure~\ref{fig:nsusy-stop_sbot_lsp_combined} (left) but in the $\tilde t_1$ versus $\tilde b_1$ mass plane for fixed $\mu=200$~GeV. See text for details.
001700212 8564_ $$81341437$$s6337$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/cpvmssm_Mh1_nuhm1_bf_edms.png$$y00086 Distributions of the $h_1$ (left), $h_2$ (center) and $h_3$ (right) Higgs masses for the CMSSM (top) and NUHM1 (bottom) best-fit benchmark scenarios \emph{after} applying the EDM constraints.
001700212 8564_ $$81341438$$s16850$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vbsh_figures_wlwl_W+W+_W+W+_C.png$$y00017 $\cos\theta_V$ angular distributions for $VV\to VV$ process for $\sqrt{s}=1$~TeV with (black curves, $c_V=1$, SM case) and without Higgs boson (red curves, $c_V=0$).
001700212 8564_ $$81341439$$s11525$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vlq_Exclusion_Combined_WithOverflow_LesHouches.png$$y00057 The exclusion plots for partners of the $u,d,s,c$ and $b$ quark (curves from right to left) within sample Model I. Left: 95\% CL exclusion limits including the signal bins of Ref.~\cite{ATLAS-CONF-2013-072}. Right: Would-be 95\% CL exclusion limits when both signal and overflow bin data of Ref.~\cite{ATLAS-CONF-2013-072} is included in the analysis. The parameter region to the top-left region from the respective curve is excluded at 95\% CL. For reference, the gray region in each of the plots shows $\Gamma / M > 1/2$ and the coupling above which the narrow-width-approximation does not apply anymore. Ref.~\cite{Flacke:2013fya} did not search through this region.
001700212 8564_ $$81341440$$s34269$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vbsh_figures_wlwl_hist_theta_star_cut_0_5_NoM4Cut_1_5ab.png$$y00026 The $\cos(\theta^*)$ distribution for $pp\to jj Z Z \to e^+ e^- \mu^+ \mu^- j j$ process for 1.5 ab$^{-1}$ @LHC13TEV for four different sets of cuts: a) (top-left)$|\cos(\theta_V)|<0.9$; b) (top-right)$|\cos(\theta_V)|<0.5$; c)(bottom-left) $|\cos(\theta_V)|<0.9$ and $M_{4l}>500$~GeV d)(bottom-right) $|\cos(\theta_V)|<0.5$ and $M_{4l}>500$~GeV.$pp\to jj Z Z \to e^+ e^- \mu^+ \mu^- j j$
001700212 8564_ $$81341441$$s22466$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/hcouplings_hfit-CMS_CWZ_Comp.png$$y00005 Left plot: Fit of $C_V$ and $C_F$. The dashed lines are the 68\% and 95.4\% CL contours as reported by the CMS collaboration in Fig.~6 of Ref.~\cite{CMS-PAS-HIG-13-005}, while the red, orange and yellow regions are the 68\%, 95.4\% and 99.7\% CL regions of our fit. Middle plot: Fit of $C_{WZ}$ while $C_Z$ and $C_F>0$ are profiled over with comparison to the CMS fit, Fig.~7 of Ref.~\cite{CMS-PAS-HIG-13-005}. Right plot: Fit of $C_{WZ}$ while $C_Z$ and $C_F$ are profiled over with comparison to the ATLAS fit, Fig.~11 of Ref.~\cite{Aad:2013wqa}.
001700212 8564_ $$81341442$$s15675$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/dmeft_plotR3.png$$y00094 Constraints obtained for the $R_1$ (left panel) and $R_3$ (right panel) operators in the spin-independent scattering cross section vs.\ WIMP mass plane. The preliminary results for monojet searches at 8, 14 and 100~TeV are compared to the current LUX 90\% C.L. upper limits and the expected reach of the future LZ experiment. The constraint derived from relic dark matter density and the limit of validity of the EFT approach are also shown.
001700212 8564_ $$81341443$$s38419$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vbfhh_Deta.png$$y00098 Separation in pseudo rapidity between the two VBF jets $\Delta\eta (jj)$. No additional cuts applied, the different contributions have been normalized to the same area.
001700212 8564_ $$81341444$$s35540$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/hcouplings_hfit-results_Grid_SMCWCZ_updated_3_4.png$$y00007 $C_W, C_Z$ fit assuming $C_U=C_D=1$ (left) and varying $C_U, C_D>0$ (right). The red, orange and yellow regions are respectively the 68\%, 95.4\%, and 99.7\% CL regions. The white point shows the SM expectation while the yellow triangle shows the best-fit point: ($C_W=0.980,\, C_Z=1.102$) (left) and ($C_W=1.061,\, C_Z=1.143$) (right).
001700212 8564_ $$81341445$$s27623$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/lrmssm_lrmssm_fig_nuRxsScatter.png$$y00069 Branching ratios of the right-handed neutrino as a function of the mass difference to the lightest charged Higgs state (left) and the corresponding cross section of the respective neutrino state produced by a $W_R$-resonance (right), using the PDF set {\sc CTEQ6L1} as in Ref.~\cite{CMS-PAS-EXO-12-017} and a $K$-factor of 1.3. Blue points depict cases where the right-handed neutrino $\nu_R$ decays to a $\ell H^\pm_1$ state, with the charged Higgs boson $H^\pm_1$ further decaying to a $tb$ final state, whereas green (red) points represent cases where it decays into a $\ell j j\, (tb)$ state mediated by an intermediate off-shell $W_R$-boson. The parameters have been varied within the ranges $3.8\leq v_R/\text{TeV}\leq 4.3,~-1 \leq \lambda_{s/L/R} \leq 1,~-0.1 \leq \lambda_{12} \leq 0.1,~200 \leq M_{2L/2R}/\text{GeV} \leq 900,~0 < M_1/\text{GeV} \leq 500,~4 \leq \tan \beta \leq 15$. The mass of the charged Higgs boson $H_1^\pm$ lies in the range of $180 < m_{H_1^\pm}/\mbox{GeV}<320$. Let us note that the branching fractions shown do not always add to 1 for some parameter points due to three-body decays into $\ell \tilde \chi^\pm \tilde \chi^0$ states that are kinematically accessible.
001700212 8564_ $$81341446$$s35037$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/cpvmssm_cpvmssm_fig_DDpSI_MN1_bw.png$$y00090 Spin-independent dark matter scattering cross-section on a proton as a function of the lightest neutralino mass.
001700212 8564_ $$81341447$$s16923$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vbsh_figures_wlwl_W+W-_W+W-_C.png$$y00018 $\cos\theta_V$ angular distributions for $VV\to VV$ process for $\sqrt{s}=1$~TeV with (black curves, $c_V=1$, SM case) and without Higgs boson (red curves, $c_V=0$).
001700212 8564_ $$81341448$$s31640$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/hcouplings_hfit-results_Grid_ALL_3CPV_001_updated_2_3.png$$y00011 68\% (red), 95.4\% (orange) and 99.7\% (yellow) CL best-fit regions in the $\big(1-C_V^2, \ {\rm Im}(C_U) \big)$ plane, on the left for fit i), on the right for fit ii). In both cases, the best-fit point lies in the $1-C_V^2 < 0$ region.
001700212 8564_ $$81341449$$s7257$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/cpvmssm_ddpSI_cmssm_bf.png$$y00091 Distributions of the spin-independent dark matter scattering cross-section on the proton in the CMSSM (left) and NUHM1 (right) benchmark scenarios \emph{before} applying the EDM constraints.
001700212 8564_ $$81341450$$s24499$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vlq_VLQ_fig_tp_stacked.png$$y00048 $T'$ reconstruction: transverse mass of $b-$quark and all 3 leptons.
001700212 8564_ $$81341451$$s19632$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vbsh_figures_wlwl_hist_allinvmass_cut_0_5_NoM4Cut_1_5ab.png$$y00022 Four-lepton invariant mass distribution, $M_{4l}$ for 1.5 ab$^{-1}$ @LHC13TEV representing the invariant mass of the vector-boson scattering in $pp\to jj Z Z \to e^+ e^- \mu^+ \mu^- j j$ process: left (right) frames present the $M_{4l}$ distribution for $|\cos\theta_V|<0.9 (0.5)$ cuts respectively. The red histogram is for $c_V=0$, the blue one represents $c_V=0$ (SM) case.
001700212 8564_ $$81341452$$s15790$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/nsusy_nsusy-MT2W.png$$y00063 Distributions of the kinematic variable $M^W_{T2}$ and the $p_T$ of the leading $b$-tagged jet after preselection cuts of the analysis CMS-SUS-13-011. The solid lines correspond to the CMS results, given in Figure~2 of Ref.~\cite{Chatrchyan:2013xna}, while the dashed lines are obtained from our re-interpretation within {\sc MadAnalysis}\,5.
001700212 8564_ $$81341453$$s10909$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vlq_CrossSection_pcomp_14TeV_1_PartnerSingleProd_LesHouches.png$$y00053 Production cross section for a single $T$ as a function of its mass $M$ for LHC at $8 \mathrm{TeV}$ (left) and $14 \mathrm{TeV}$ (right). Lines denote (from right to left): Single production cross section with $\kappa_H V^{4i}_R=v/M$ for partners of the $u,d,s,c,b$ quark.
001700212 8564_ $$81341454$$s6609$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/cpvmssm_Mh1_cmssm_bf_edms.png$$y00084 Distributions of the $h_1$ (left), $h_2$ (center) and $h_3$ (right) Higgs masses for the CMSSM (top) and NUHM1 (bottom) best-fit benchmark scenarios \emph{after} applying the EDM constraints.
001700212 8564_ $$81341455$$s9734$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vlq_CrossSection_pcomp_14TeV_1_HiggsPairProd_LesHouches.png$$y00055 Production cross section for two Higgses via $t$-channel exchange of a $T$ quark for LHC at $8 \mathrm{TeV}$ (left) and $14\mathrm{TeV}$ (right). Lines denote (from right to left): Cross section with $\kappa_H V^{4i}_R=v/M$ for the exchange of $u,d,s,c,b$ quark partners.
001700212 8564_ $$81341456$$s36250$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vbfhh_fatcat.png$$y00099 Parton level number separation on number of mass drops after analysis flow.
001700212 8564_ $$81341457$$s22595$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/nmfvsusy_bbsmumu2.png$$y00076 Caption not extracted
001700212 8564_ $$81341458$$s23448$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/nmfvsusy_bbsmumu1.png$$y00072 Dependence of selected observables on the NMFV-parameters $\lambda_{L}$, $\lambda_{LR}$, and $\lambda_{R}$ around reference scenario I. The markers correspond to the scenario as defined in Table~\ref{tab:points}. The black horizontal lines indicate the experimental central value of Table~\ref{tab:PLMs}. The green, yellow, and orange bands correspond to the limits at $1\sigma$, $2\sigma$, and $3\sigma$ confidence level, respectively.
001700212 8564_ $$81341459$$s34324$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vbsh_figures_wlwl_hist_theta_star_cut_0_9_NoM4Cut_1_5ab.png$$y00025 The $\cos(\theta^*)$ distribution for $pp\to jj Z Z \to e^+ e^- \mu^+ \mu^- j j$ process for 1.5 ab$^{-1}$ @LHC13TEV for four different sets of cuts: a) (top-left)$|\cos(\theta_V)|<0.9$; b) (top-right)$|\cos(\theta_V)|<0.5$; c)(bottom-left) $|\cos(\theta_V)|<0.9$ and $M_{4l}>500$~GeV d)(bottom-right) $|\cos(\theta_V)|<0.5$ and $M_{4l}>500$~GeV.$pp\to jj Z Z \to e^+ e^- \mu^+ \mu^- j j$
001700212 8564_ $$81341460$$s15987$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vbsh_figures_wlwl_hist_theta_prime_cut_0_9_WithM4Cut_1_5ab.png$$y00024 The $\cos(\theta_V)$ distribution for 1.5 ab$^{-1}$ @LHC13TEV for $pp\to jj Z Z \to e^+ e^- \mu^+ \mu^- j j$ process. Left: no $M_{4l}$ cut applied, Right: the distributions after $M_{4l}>500$~GeV cut.
001700212 8564_ $$81341461$$s8834$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/hh_plot_sig_eff.png$$y00038 Double Higgs production cross section of MCHM4 in the full hadron-level analysis of $HH\to b\bar b \tau^+\tau^-$. For the two luminosities at each dashed line, see text.
001700212 8564_ $$81341462$$s7929$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vlq_CrossSection_pcomp_8TeV_1_PartnerPairProd_LesHouches.png$$y00050 Production cross section for a pair of vector-like quark partners in Model I as a function of the partners' mass $M$ for LHC at $8 \mathrm{ TeV}$ (left) and $14 \mathrm{ TeV}$ (right). The first two lines from the top correspond to the pair production cross section with $\kappa_H V^{4i}_R=v/M$ for partners of the up (red) and down (orange), while the third line (black) denotes the QCD pair production cross section. The non-QCD pair production cross sections for partners of the $s,c$ and $b$ quarks are PDF suppressed. Thus, the pair production cross section for these quark partners is to a good approximation given by the QCD pair production cross section.
001700212 8564_ $$81341463$$s19605$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/htheo_HiggsfitTH_CombMargGaussND.png$$y00003 The $68.27\%$, $95.45\%$, $99.73\%$ confidence level (CL) (from marginalized frequentist likelihoods) and Bayesian credible (from posteriors) regions are shown respectively as colored regions and contour levels in the $(c_V,c_f)$ plane. The green point is the frequentist best-fit location. Left and right panels respectively correspond to the flat and Gaussian prior case. The SM prediction point is also displayed [in red].
001700212 8564_ $$81341464$$s7731$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/lrmssm_lrmssm_fig_nuRall.png$$y00071 Bounds on the cross section $\sigma (p p \to W_R \to \nu_R \ell \to jj \ell \ell)$ at $\sqrt{s}=8~$TeV for $m_{\nu_R} = \frac12 M_{W_R}$ considering $\sigma \cdot BR(j j\mu\mu)$ only (left) and for the case that all three right-handed neutrinos are degenerate in mass (right). Our curves have been obtained from the results given in Ref.~\cite{CMS-PAS-EXO-12-017}. The same two parameter points as in Fig.~\ref{lrmssm_fig_2bound}, but with adjusted masses for the right-handed neutrinos, are shown, and the vev $v_R$ has been varied from 3~TeV to 6~TeV. The black solid and dashed lines depict the calculated cross sections for the two parameter choices as in Fig.~\ref{lrmssm_fig_1bound}, and we note that for the parameter choice depicted by the solid black line, the two-body decay into a chargino and a slepton opens at $m_{\nu_R} \approx 1~$TeV.
001700212 8564_ $$81341465$$s27304$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vlq_Nj.png$$y00040 Leading order kinematical distributions for the light jets multiplicity (top left), the light jets transverse momentum (bottom left), the $b$-jets multiplicity (top right) and the $b$-jets transverse momentum (bottom right), in the three- and four-lepton channels, for an integrated luminosity of 20 fb$^{-1}$\ at the LHC\ 14\ TeV. The total expected numbers of event is plotted for the $T$ singlet (red) and $(X,T)$ doublet (blue) signal models, versus the backgrounds (black), after imposing the standard cuts.
001700212 8564_ $$81341466$$s23165$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/cpvmssm_cpvmssm_fig_mugaga_mugg_bw.png$$y00089 The strength of the coupling of the lightest Higgs boson to two gluons as a function of the coupling strength to photon pairs (left), and the strength of the coupling to $b {\bar b}$ pairs as a function of the coupling strength to two vector bosons (right).
001700212 8564_ $$81341467$$s18032$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vbsh_figures_wlwl_hist_allinvmass_cut_0_9_NoM4Cut_1_5ab.png$$y00021 Four-lepton invariant mass distribution, $M_{4l}$ for 1.5 ab$^{-1}$ @LHC13TEV representing the invariant mass of the vector-boson scattering in $pp\to jj Z Z \to e^+ e^- \mu^+ \mu^- j j$ process: left (right) frames present the $M_{4l}$ distribution for $|\cos\theta_V|<0.9 (0.5)$ cuts respectively. The red histogram is for $c_V=0$, the blue one represents $c_V=0$ (SM) case.
001700212 8564_ $$81341468$$s77046$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vlq_Eta6thjet.png$$y00044 \small \it LEFT: pseudorapidity $\eta$ of the associated light jet at parton level. RIGHT: total hadronic energy for backgrounds (stacked) and signal (overimposed).
001700212 8564_ $$81341469$$s8113$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/cpvmssm_Mh3_cmssm_bf_edms.png$$y00085 Distributions of the $h_1$ (left), $h_2$ (center) and $h_3$ (right) Higgs masses for the CMSSM (top) and NUHM1 (bottom) best-fit benchmark scenarios \emph{after} applying the EDM constraints.
001700212 8564_ $$81341470$$s7840$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/cpvmssm_ddpSI_cmssm_bf_edms.png$$y00092 Distributions of the spin-independent dark matter scattering cross-section on the proton in the CMSSM (left) and NUHM1 (right) benchmark scenarios \emph{after} applying the EDM constraints.
001700212 8564_ $$81341471$$s99219$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/tth-lh-proc_final_Figs_CPFit2.png$$y00029 Two-dimensional fit to the Higgs-top couplings $a$ and $b$ in Eq.~(\ref{eqn:tth}) using Higgs decay and production rates from ATLAS and CMS data.
001700212 8564_ $$81341472$$s16778$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/tth-lh-proc_final_Figs_delphill.png$$y00033 (Left panel): Difference in the azimuthal angles of the lepton momenta, with both momenta evaluated in the rest frame of the Higgs boson. (Right panel): Azimuthal angle difference between the top and anti-top quarks in the lab frame.
001700212 8564_ $$81341473$$s19753$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/nmfvsusy_si_afb_bkmumu2.png$$y00079 Caption not extracted
001700212 8564_ $$81341474$$s22175$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/nmfvsusy_si_afb_bkmumu1.png$$y00075 Caption not extracted
001700212 8564_ $$81341475$$s58623$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/hcouplings_hfit-results_Grid_ALL_3CPV_001_updated_1_2.png$$y00012 68\% (red), 95.4\% (orange) and 99.7\% (yellow) CL best-fit regions in the $\big( {\rm Re}(C_U), \ {\rm Im}(C_U)\big)$ plane, on the left for fit ii) with $C_V\equiv C_W=C_Z$, on the right for fit iii) with free $C_W$ and $C_Z$. The white point shows the SM expectation while the yellow triangle shows the best-fit point.
001700212 8564_ $$81341476$$s40741$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/nmssmcalc_nmssmcalc_fig2.png$$y00001 Left: Higgs boson masses $M_{H_2}$ (red/light grey) and $M_{H_3}$ (blue/dark grey) as function of $\mathrm{Im}(\kappa)$ at LO (dashed) and NLO (full). Right: The amount of CP-violation $r^i_{\mathrm{CP}}$ for $H_2$ (red/light grey) and $H_3$ (blue/dark grey) as function of $\mathrm{Im} (\kappa)$.
001700212 8564_ $$81341477$$s43984$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/hcouplings_hfit-ATLAS_CWZ_Comp6.png$$y00006 Left plot: Fit of $C_V$ and $C_F$. The dashed lines are the 68\% and 95.4\% CL contours as reported by the CMS collaboration in Fig.~6 of Ref.~\cite{CMS-PAS-HIG-13-005}, while the red, orange and yellow regions are the 68\%, 95.4\% and 99.7\% CL regions of our fit. Middle plot: Fit of $C_{WZ}$ while $C_Z$ and $C_F>0$ are profiled over with comparison to the CMS fit, Fig.~7 of Ref.~\cite{CMS-PAS-HIG-13-005}. Right plot: Fit of $C_{WZ}$ while $C_Z$ and $C_F$ are profiled over with comparison to the ATLAS fit, Fig.~11 of Ref.~\cite{Aad:2013wqa}.
001700212 8564_ $$81341478$$s16951$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vbsh_figures_wlwl_W+Z_W+Z_C.png$$y00020 $\cos\theta_V$ angular distributions for $VV\to VV$ process for $\sqrt{s}=1$~TeV with (black curves, $c_V=1$, SM case) and without Higgs boson (red curves, $c_V=0$).
001700212 8564_ $$81341479$$s22388$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/nmfvsusy_si_bsg1.png$$y00073 Same as Fig.\ \ref{fig:point1} for variations of $\lambda_{L}$, $\lambda_{LR}$, and $\lambda_{R}$ around reference scenario II.
001700212 8564_ $$81341480$$s31177$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/hcouplings_hfit-results_Grid_CVCFttH1_tCPV_updated_2_3.png$$y00010 68\% (red), 95.4\% (orange) and 99.7\% (yellow) CL best-fit regions in the $\big(1-C_V^2, \ {\rm Im}(C_U) \big)$ plane, on the left for fit i), on the right for fit ii). In both cases, the best-fit point lies in the $1-C_V^2 < 0$ region.
001700212 8564_ $$81341481$$s22848$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/nmfvsusy_si_bsg2.png$$y00077 Caption not extracted
001700212 8564_ $$81341482$$s5486$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/nsusydm_figs_nsusydm_fd_1.png$$y00095 Representative diagrams for pair neutralino-chargino production in association with quark/gluon leading to mono-jet signature.
001700212 8564_ $$81341483$$s7672$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/cpvmssm_Mh3_nuhm1_bf_edms.png$$y00087 Distributions of the $h_1$ (left), $h_2$ (center) and $h_3$ (right) Higgs masses for the CMSSM (top) and NUHM1 (bottom) best-fit benchmark scenarios \emph{after} applying the EDM constraints.
001700212 8564_ $$81341484$$s8665$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/cpvmssm_Mh3_nuhm1_bf.png$$y00083 Distributions of the $h_1$ (left), $h_2$ (center) and $h_3$ (right) Higgs masses for the CMSSM (top), and NUHM1 (bottom) in the best-fit benchmark scenarios \emph{before} applying the EDM constraints.
001700212 8564_ $$81341485$$s14439$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/tth-lh-proc_final_Figs_delphitt.png$$y00034 (Left panel): Difference in the azimuthal angles of the lepton momenta, with both momenta evaluated in the rest frame of the Higgs boson. (Right panel): Azimuthal angle difference between the top and anti-top quarks in the lab frame.
001700212 8564_ $$81341486$$s50943$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/cpvmssm_cpvmssm_fig_mh1tanb_mh2_bw.png$$y00088 CPV-pMSSM model points satisfying the EDM constraints in the plane ($M_{h_1},\tan\beta$), in the case where either the $h_2$ (left) or the $h_3$ (right) is identified with the Higgs state discovered at the LHC.
001700212 8564_ $$81341487$$s14816$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vbsh_figures_wlwl_hist_theta_prime_cut_0_9_NoM4Cut_1_5ab.png$$y00023 The $\cos(\theta_V)$ distribution for 1.5 ab$^{-1}$ @LHC13TEV for $pp\to jj Z Z \to e^+ e^- \mu^+ \mu^- j j$ process. Left: no $M_{4l}$ cut applied, Right: the distributions after $M_{4l}>500$~GeV cut.
001700212 8564_ $$81341488$$s16028$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vbsh_figures_wlwl_W+W-_ZZ_C.png$$y00019 $\cos\theta_V$ angular distributions for $VV\to VV$ process for $\sqrt{s}=1$~TeV with (black curves, $c_V=1$, SM case) and without Higgs boson (red curves, $c_V=0$).
001700212 8564_ $$81341489$$s12846$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/lrmssm_lrmssm_fig_qq.png$$y00067 (Left) Bounds from $W_R$-boson searches in the $tb$ mode: the red line shows the CMS upper limit on the cross section $pp \to W_R \to tb \to \ell \nu b b$, where $\ell = e,\mu,\tau$. Red benchmark points present a valid spectrum but with $198 < m_{H^{\pm \pm}_1}/\mbox{GeV}<220$ or BR$(H^{\pm \pm}_1 \to \tau \tau) < 0.8$. Cyan points exhibit a more sensible doubly-charged Higgs boson ($m_{H^{\pm \pm}_1}>220~$GeV and BR$(H^{\pm \pm}_1 \to \tau \tau) > 0.8$). Black points are a subset of the former that is relevant for section~\ref{lrssm_subsect_RH}, \textit{i.e.} when $m_{H^\pm_1} < m_{\nu_{R,i}}$. The shown cross sections visualized by dots (squares) have been obtained using the PDF set {\sc CTEQ6L1} ({\sc CTEQ6M}), as explained in the text. The parameters have been varied within the ranges $3.8\leq v_R/\text{TeV}\leq 4.6,~-1 \leq \lambda_{s/L/R} \leq 1,~-0.1 \leq \lambda_{12} \leq 0.1,~200 \leq M_{2L/2R}/\text{GeV} \leq 900,~0 < M_1/\text{GeV} \leq 500,~4 \leq \tan \beta \leq 15$. We also show in white the cross sections of two specific parameter points with reduced branching ratios of the $W_R$-boson to SM particles, evaluated with {\sc CTEQ6L1}. The values have been set to $\lambda_s = 0.8$, $\lambda_L=\lambda_R = -1$, $\lambda_{12}=0.025$, $M_1=M_{2R}=250~$GeV, $M_{2L}=500$~GeV, $\tan \beta=30$ (solid line) and $\lambda_s = 0.3$, $\lambda_L=\lambda_R = -0.4$, $\lambda_{12}=0.04$, $M_1=200$~GeV, $M_{2R}=M_{2L}=550$~GeV, $\tan \beta=10$ (dashed line). \newline (Right) Bounds from $W_R$-boson searches in the dijet mode: shown is the cross section exclusion line from CMS (red) at 8~TeV center-of-mass energy and 19.6~fb$^{-1}$~\cite{CMS-PAS-EXO-12-059}. The black solid and dashed lines depict the calculated cross section for two parameter choices as in the left figure.
001700212 8564_ $$81341490$$s14663$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/hh_plot_pt.png$$y00036 Comparison of the inclusive Higgs transverse momentum spectrum for different values of $\xi$, a total $K$ factor estimate is included~\cite{Baglio:2012np}. We also show a shape-comparison in the right panel. It demonstrates the standard lore of composite scenarios: there are large deviations when the characteristic new physics scale starts to get resolved.
001700212 8564_ $$81341491$$s105621$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vlq_graphs.png$$y00049 Main channels leading to BSM Higgs final states from Model I and II. The label $p$ in the first diagram in (a) stands for any parton of the proton: $g$, $q$ and $\bar{q}$.
001700212 8564_ $$81341492$$s31356$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/lrmssm_lrmssm_fig_TBxsScatter.png$$y00066 (Left) Bounds from $W_R$-boson searches in the $tb$ mode: the red line shows the CMS upper limit on the cross section $pp \to W_R \to tb \to \ell \nu b b$, where $\ell = e,\mu,\tau$. Red benchmark points present a valid spectrum but with $198 < m_{H^{\pm \pm}_1}/\mbox{GeV}<220$ or BR$(H^{\pm \pm}_1 \to \tau \tau) < 0.8$. Cyan points exhibit a more sensible doubly-charged Higgs boson ($m_{H^{\pm \pm}_1}>220~$GeV and BR$(H^{\pm \pm}_1 \to \tau \tau) > 0.8$). Black points are a subset of the former that is relevant for section~\ref{lrssm_subsect_RH}, \textit{i.e.} when $m_{H^\pm_1} < m_{\nu_{R,i}}$. The shown cross sections visualized by dots (squares) have been obtained using the PDF set {\sc CTEQ6L1} ({\sc CTEQ6M}), as explained in the text. The parameters have been varied within the ranges $3.8\leq v_R/\text{TeV}\leq 4.6,~-1 \leq \lambda_{s/L/R} \leq 1,~-0.1 \leq \lambda_{12} \leq 0.1,~200 \leq M_{2L/2R}/\text{GeV} \leq 900,~0 < M_1/\text{GeV} \leq 500,~4 \leq \tan \beta \leq 15$. We also show in white the cross sections of two specific parameter points with reduced branching ratios of the $W_R$-boson to SM particles, evaluated with {\sc CTEQ6L1}. The values have been set to $\lambda_s = 0.8$, $\lambda_L=\lambda_R = -1$, $\lambda_{12}=0.025$, $M_1=M_{2R}=250~$GeV, $M_{2L}=500$~GeV, $\tan \beta=30$ (solid line) and $\lambda_s = 0.3$, $\lambda_L=\lambda_R = -0.4$, $\lambda_{12}=0.04$, $M_1=200$~GeV, $M_{2R}=M_{2L}=550$~GeV, $\tan \beta=10$ (dashed line). \newline (Right) Bounds from $W_R$-boson searches in the dijet mode: shown is the cross section exclusion line from CMS (red) at 8~TeV center-of-mass energy and 19.6~fb$^{-1}$~\cite{CMS-PAS-EXO-12-059}. The black solid and dashed lines depict the calculated cross section for two parameter choices as in the left figure.
001700212 8564_ $$81341493$$s2092$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/hh_hh_feyn.png$$y00035 Representative Feynman diagrams entering double Higgs production in MCHM4.
001700212 8564_ $$81341494$$s34777$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1700212/files/vlq_PTl1.png$$y00043 Leading order kinematical distributions for the light jets multiplicity (top left), the light jets transverse momentum (bottom left), the $b$-jets multiplicity (top right) and the $b$-jets transverse momentum (bottom right), in the three- and four-lepton channels, for an integrated luminosity of 20 fb$^{-1}$\ at the LHC\ 14\ TeV. The total expected numbers of event is plotted for the $T$ singlet (red) and $(X,T)$ doublet (blue) signal models, versus the backgrounds (black), after imposing the standard cuts.
001700212 916__ $$sn$$w201418
001700212 960__ $$a11
001700212 962__ $$bComments: Proceedings of the New Physics Working Group of the 2013 Les Houches Workshop, Physics at TeV Colliders, Les Houches 3-21 June 2013. 201 pages
001700212 980__ $$aPREPRINT
001700212 980__ $$aConferencePaper